| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Frank's TGirl World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from GCode:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words and feedback. I'm glad you found the review informative.
|
07-25-11 05:04pm
|
Reply
127
|
Freddie's World
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
I've got quite a few gay mates who enjoy straight porn, provided it's not with the "rent a cock" guys, when you don't see their bodies and faces. i must admit, some of it can turn me on too, especially gang bang scenes...
|
09-02-11 09:40am
|
Reply
128
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
Thanks for the info but I would take the warning with a pinch of salt. When I used to use Firefox it would pop up warnings about sites being bad yet those sites were ones I have used for years and trust. Kind of hard to believe warnings when you see so many false positives.
|
05-28-12 01:14am
|
Reply
129
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Sounds a little dodgy. I've had that sort of thing happen a few times in the past on a few sites. Sometimes it is the browser or anti spyware or anti virus kicking in - for instance in the past AVG warned of viruses for a time, when I tried to login to Pirate Bay. That appeared to be AVG acting as a censor, but I never know how seriously to take these sort of warnings. I'm always wary of sites offering special offers from live chat. I suppose I am cautious and don't blame you giving that particular site a miss.
|
05-25-12 07:34pm
|
Reply
130
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
At least become bisexual. As Woody Allen said, it doubles your chance for a date on a Saturday night!
|
10-05-12 09:14am
|
Reply
131
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
LOL, I can see it now new site on the market.
Gay BDSM, ManBoob Latino's ( LOL ) or POV lol
|
10-04-12 07:50am
|
Reply
132
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
hahaha,
sounds like a new forum topic if, you could open a porn site what would you call it LOL
|
10-04-12 07:46am
|
Reply
133
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Wait I am having a great idea, gay, Hispanic man boob site.
Could be a winner. LOL
|
10-04-12 07:43am
|
Reply
134
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
Come on, if they removed those categories how would anyone find any Mexicans with massive manboobs?
|
10-04-12 05:06am
|
Reply
135
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Cybertoad:
Thats one of my pet peeves is canned cloned sites.
Have some pride people, it call creativity :-)
|
10-03-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
136
|
Gay Video Base
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
This is funny stuff! Maybe the trend to implants has crossed over to gay porn!
|
10-03-12 01:55pm
|
Reply
137
|
Gay Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
It seems weird to have the guys run off after being caught. I agree with you that this seems almost anti-porn. It would be much better if the cameraman were to catch the action and then join in!
|
11-17-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
138
|
Gay Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
The site itself doesn't give a lot of info on their content so I'm left with what TBP wrote in their review. I think part of the reason for the score is that I gather that the viewer is meant to believe that what he is seeing is happening for real and that's where the being caught aspect comes in to add to the overall reality of the scene. I personally think that it's your run of the mill fake voyeurisiitc porn site with a slight twist.
I have to agree that the being caught on video would not add anything
worthwhile to the porn scene and I know that I'd never join an hetero site with simnilar content simply because this kind of porn is not my cup of tea.
|
11-14-12 06:40pm
|
Reply
139
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
This stype of stuff is actually quite old because Ed Power or Pierre Woodman was doing this years before this site existed and doing significantly better.
The fact that the girls are all amateurs isn't the problem. It's because the guy responsible for shooting the videos is an idiot. You'd think that a guy who has been doing this type of content for nearly 2 years would have gotten better but he isn't. At least he is not getting worse but that's not necessarily a compliment.
The first big mistake I can see is that they make sure that none of the shots include the face of the male performers. This limits the possible angles you can shoot from to the point where you might as well be doing POV or tripod only videos.
I didn't use the cost of the site in my review because I would still think the videos suck at 20$ but it would be easier to tell someone to give it a try if is wasn't 30$.
|
03-09-12 06:24pm
|
Reply
140
|
Grey Fox Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Amanda:
Closed the listing.
|
09-23-16 12:19pm
|
Reply
141
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Agreed outstanding first review !
|
09-15-11 03:20pm
|
Reply
142
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from mbaya:
I absolutely despise recycling and feel it is an insult to those who subscribe. For me this is a major negative.
|
09-25-16 10:53am
|
Reply
143
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Gazette Risque:
When this site popped up I would not have expected this to happen to it.
Considering it's such a niche market they're catering to, you would think they'd realize the consumers of this niche market would quickly be aware of this and cancel their subscription.
Thanks for the heads up!
|
09-20-16 08:52am
|
Reply
144
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Cybertoad:
Lets see not sure these are it but.
humiliationpov.com
cant find the one I am thinking off but its like this one.
|
03-07-13 06:28am
|
Reply
145
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
No masks, it was just done in a natural setting and the guest men, seemed to not be porn stars, or the production was made to appear like they actors were new. But not the starlets just the men were to appear that way. Be the mask series had guest men and was best I could compare to as far as format of the production. I'll see if I can find it.
|
03-07-13 06:20am
|
Reply
146
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
It was like 2 years ago, and hmmmmm. Something like humiliation, cant get it up or something that hinted. The quality looked good from what I recall. Was along the lines of be the mask and sites like that.
|
03-07-13 06:14am
|
Reply
147
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Cybertoad:
Great review, reminds me of a site, name escapes me. But they filmed guys who could not get it up with hot girls who would strip, stroke and suck and they would stay limb and embarrassed. Was more funny they sexy.
|
03-07-13 06:03am
|
Reply
148
|
Homo Punk
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from manholelover:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I suppose the regional pricing thing is down to personal opinion. I'm not too sure. With price in Sterling at least you know how much you're paying, but then again, if it stays in dollars, say, we could benefit from the exchange rate if it's favourable (as it is at the moment I believe).
|
08-06-11 02:18pm
|
Reply
149
|
Jason Strong Tickling
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from otoh:
I've seen a few straight tickling sites around too - to be honest, although quite amusing, it's lost on me a bit... but OTOH I'm glad there is room for such a relatively harmless and bizarre fetish :)
|
08-24-12 04:52am
|
Reply
150
|
Juicy Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Rockhardslc:
Good balanced review.
I was a short-time member of this site. Unfortunately, they have pre-checked default box checked for there other site (men.com) and they will charge you double. I wouldn't recommend them.
|
04-08-13 08:09pm
|
