| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
iFriends
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Robbi81:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
There was a charge of $1 made and then there was another charge of $9.47 made. Doing some looking around, that $9.47 is possibly for fan club status. Thing is.... I never signed up for any fan clubs. As for verifying my credit card and giving the money back, Its been just over a week now and I havent seen any money credited to my credit card.
Id also like to note that when I tried emailing their customer service to cancel, I got a automatic message saying that they dont have either my credit card OR login info on file and asked me to login as a new user.
|
06-07-10 09:19pm
|
Reply
52
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I hear ya Capn, did want anyone thinking I was high-jacking the previous review being so close together. But I get your point perhaps even if duplicating the review may address downfalls.
|
03-09-12 09:39am
|
Reply
53
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from mbaya:
Can you compare this site with others featuring old men with teens? Just curious as you don't mention any other sites of this type.
|
05-09-10 09:00am
|
Reply
54
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
This is really important when you dare to give a site the coveted 100% score. Many of the statements are in regards to the reviewers feelings and not cold hard facts.
I'll pass on this one unless I see a lot more info.
|
06-03-12 10:43am
|
Reply
55
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from Monahan:
In my opinion, a site that whacks you $40 with no preview option is an automatic ripoff. ("You pays your money and you takes your chances.") If these guys charged $10 less ($29.99) they would probably get 3 or 4 times the signups and make a whole lot more money...and you know they know that.
However they must also know their site is crap and that it won't attract renewals (that's where the big money is) so they do a hit and run, cash in for a few months, then they'll go away.
Shame, because they could be good if they raelly wanted to.
|
07-27-07 11:36am
|
Reply
56
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from Jay G:
Let me be the second to completely agree. Those who have been exploring many web-sites for awhile will soon realize that expensive sites are often very lacking in quantity and quality. Networks are most often the best "bang for the buck," unless you find one web-site that just is perfect and unique.
|
06-19-07 01:23pm
|
Reply
57
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from nygiants03:
Always been a fan of Tawnee Stone and Jordan Capri, but its to expensive so I still have not joined yet. The sites are small to, so its not worth it I guess also.
|
06-19-07 11:39am
|
Reply
58
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I also heard about him selling the site but I think it was many years ago and that was after the network was already no longer updating with new content.
I used to keep track of their updates because it was one of those sites that was borderline in my book. I liked their choice of girls but the content frightened me a little because I was never sure that there would be enough stuff that I like vs stuff that is too mysoginistic
|
06-05-12 09:58am
|
Reply
59
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
The main person responsible for the bulk of their content was a guy called Khan Tusion and the rumor is that he wasn't all that nice to the girls and that he may have had a hard time getting them to work for him as word got out about him.
I think some of the sites kept on adding new content after most had stopped but unless I'm very wrong then there really hasn't been anything new added in over 2 years.
|
06-05-12 09:10am
|
Reply
60
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Oh yeah, the chat is still monitored pretty closely. I prefer it that way, to be honest. The models don't have a very good grasp of English for the most part, and double entendres are generally wasted on them. Besides, you can get access to the chats with a trial account and a lot of people attending have a drink or two in them. There's only one chat going on at one time and there are a LOT of people attending some of them. If they didn't keep a lid on the chats, they'd be a zoo.
|
06-08-10 06:01pm
|
Reply
61
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Wraith0711:
So downloads are available again? The last time I joined this site they had just dropped the downloads a couple days before so I got burned on it. Just to make sure: basic membership does include downloading? What is this $10 VIP upgrade that a lot have mentioned and what does it include? Thanks for the very detailed review!
|
11-16-16 06:28am
|
Reply
62
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Yep, it was crappy, GR. I was shocked because I had never been banned before. If I were a potential subscriber I would look at the site owners and steer away from any other sites they own because I have the feeling they are on their way out.
One sister site I subscribed to in the past, "Old Pussy Exam" was small enough to start out with but has in the meantime been split in two. This is purely subjective but I think they are breathing their last breath and are trying to make as much money as they can while they wait for the inevitable.
|
05-27-12 10:10am
|
Reply
63
|
Mother Daughter Fuck
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from DpornGuy:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
fair enough. maybe in a month or two i'll check it out.
|
06-04-07 04:56pm
|
Reply
64
|
Mother Daughter Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from DpornGuy:
but do they actually fullfill the requests? i ask because although you can request.. do they actually listen and get the models?
|
06-04-07 02:09pm
|
Reply
65
|
Mother Daughter Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from roseman:
The scene requesting thing that you mentioned is surely good but I don't think that this is the only site that provides such '' services ''.
Nice review, thanks for the info.
|
06-03-07 10:05am
|
Reply
66
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Thanks for the reply GR
To be honest the download limit shouldn't be a big issue here as its not the largest of sites and still possible to download everything you want in a month. I downloaded about 90% of the photo sets here which came to less than 50 GB and the higher percentage of videos here don't have the HD option.
|
05-27-12 06:26am
|
Reply
67
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from SnowDude:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Hey mag Dude!
I'm sure you can come up with things I missed or didn't bring up, but regardless I think it's good to have as many reviews as possible. I know that I like to write something different, so I can understand why you'd say that, but please do a review! I'll be interested at the very least and I'm sure others will as well.
-SD
|
06-05-07 04:12pm
|
Reply
68
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MiztaBlu:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
No...Live shows are no longer part of NA, but you cant really blame them. While alot of people liked the Live shows, there wasnt quite enough interest and thus incoming revenue to keep it going. The cost to do those Live shows isnt cheap so they had to cut their losses.
I personally dont care for Live shows, but I know alot of people like them. Doubt they come back to NA though.
|
03-25-12 08:47am
|
Reply
69
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from bjorn7:
Hey Magman,
What sites are included in tier 2. I checked out
their site and see no mention of a tier 2 option.
I've been a member a few times with Naughty America
and I really enjoy the exclusive content. If there's
more that I'm missing I'd like to join again. Thanks
|
06-04-07 06:41am
|
Reply
70
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I'm not a computer guy so I can't tell you the cost but don't forget that these guys own a few more sites with the same design so it would require them to make the chan4ages on all of their sites and that's likely to make it a lot more expensive.
|
05-22-12 06:20am
|
Reply
71
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I suspect that if the porn industry was in a better position then they might be willing to improve their site(s) because they would already have a decent number of active members to help cover the cost but the industry is not in a good place and investing huge amounts of money on the chance that your content will not wind up on tube or torrent sites is almost impossible to justify.
|
05-14-12 11:11am
|
Reply
72
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
It's hard to know why they don't revamp the site but seeing the way the porn industry is at the moment then maybe they don't want to waste their profits improving a site that is already not making huge amounts of money.
They still manage to produce more content and in my opinion better content than 21sextury's Grandpas fuck teens, Old farts young tarts, Old Perverts and Beauty and the Senior. I think the last three sites don't even update on a regular basis if at all.
|
05-07-12 11:05am
|
Reply
73
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BabyGetReal:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!
|
05-26-10 05:54pm
|
Reply
74
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Cybertoad:
Yes a nice review for sure, but I too agree kinda a freaky website.
Keep up the great work.
|
03-08-12 07:44pm
|
Reply
75
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Great review, I would have maybe given it a slightly lower score just because I find it a bit too freaky but otherwise you are spot on. Thumbs up.
|
03-04-12 12:44pm
|
