| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Teen Charms
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Denner:
Fine review there, WWW....
And I got to agree with all of your cons. - except mayby "softcore" - I dig that!
But this site is - as you mention - close to death - concerning updates.
Well, this is a US-based site for east-euro stuff and how: on license-basis.
BTW - the Drooler is abolutely right about the main content: photosets.
That's not my main ballgame and the times I've been at this Teen Charms, my joy has been quite limited....
But then again: It's good to get updated on these sites, thanks!
|
05-17-08 07:50am
|
Reply
177
|
Teen Charms
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
If you haven't already, check out the reviews of My Precious Virgins. Some of the photo content from TeenCharms got migrated there, but there's a lot more as well.
Since I reviewed My Precious Virgins they've added some hardcore and some videos. They update slowly and erratically, too. But since you're a pic lover (as I am), I think you might like the site for the content that's already there.
But read the reviews here first, of course. ;)
|
05-17-08 02:45am
|
Reply
178
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from lk2fireone:
"Ethel and Martine: practically worth the money (to join) just for these two beauties."
You totally missed the point.
In no particular order:
Isabella, Maria, Nicole, and Rebecca are the real reasons to join Teen Stars Magazine.
Although I must say there are other great-looking models on the site as well.
|
01-15-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
179
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ksauz:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hi again...
Pic size is 1280 x 834
|
04-23-08 04:19pm
|
Reply
180
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
It was a lot worse in the old days.
|
01-06-08 08:56pm
|
Reply
181
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
"lab rat" - yes, that is a much more concise description than I came up with and really signifies just how alien the style seems to me.
You are also right about their softcore work - it is pretty universally top notch stuff - often a little too softcore for my tastes, but undoubtedly artistic and impressive. Unfortunately the photography on Teens From Tokyo is quite limited.
|
12-26-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
182
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from littlejoe:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
cool thx for the feedback. i went looking through a bunch of the panty sites and there does seem to be some duplicates,and i think i already have a lot of them!
|
12-03-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
183
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from littlejoe:
well my biggest fetish is women tasting themselves so this looks like a great site for me. there was only one preview movie so id like to know for sure; are most of the girls european? thats a big annoyance of mine, cause they sound so silly trying to talk dirty in english
|
12-01-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
184
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hey, WeeWillie,
Thanks for the clarification. I love groups of beautiful nude females, but hate DRM. Appreciate the info!
|
01-08-08 07:26am
|
Reply
185
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Jay G:
Thanks for the warning.
The tempting pictures on the homepage of groups of very pretty & very naked females is tempting, but DRM means "Downloading Really Messed-up" (Just joking, "Digital Rights Management" simply means that the videos play remarkably poorly, then disappear after a short period of time).
I've never belonged to a DRM site without lots of problems. Now I just stay away.
|
01-07-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
186
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
No need to apologize, www. Peoples' tastes differ and while you like "on all four shots" taken from behind they leave me cold, especially when only the butt is showing and there are a LOT of those. If it were a whole body shot, showing the model's face, I would find it exciting as well. I am glad you agree with most of the rest of my assessment. And I forgot about the picture naming, that too drove me crazy, why not give each set of a model her name and if she has more than one set add a 2 or 3 to the name. It could be so simple.
|
01-23-09 07:37am
|
Reply
187
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
After reading your replies I tend to agree with you, www. A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models would indeed be something to drool over. I hate to see that LVP are switching style because I prefer full size, full back to skimpy any time. Thanks for bringing up the subject of zip when it comes to LVP, if they don't zip then I will make a move to subscribe to True Amateur Models first, especially since you mentioned some mature women in the mix! :-) Thanks, I will check with the webmaster of LVP re. zip.
|
01-16-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
188
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hi www, I just took another look at the site and can see, just from the previews, how it would be very appealing. I love the naturalness of the models, so much so that I might forget about my vow never to join a site that doesn't zip!! Especially if most pics are in landscape!
But first things first for a panty lover, I decided, even though my dollar continues to drop, to subscribe to another site you recommended, LV Panties, very soon, possibly as early as next week.
But after that one this site is definitely on my "must subscribe to" list now. It's just too tempting and I trust your taste!
|
01-16-09 08:15am
|
Reply
189
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
You're welcome, WWW! Just keep in mind my subjectivity when it comes to good pictures. Not everyone is on my wave length.
|
04-14-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
190
|
Upskirt Collection
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from mr smut:
All in all a questionable site? I do wonder too and of course the children's faces - at least this has to be done - need to be blurred. Shouldn't it be common sense to do so?
|
12-03-09 01:29pm
|
Reply
191
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Great review, www. Just disagree with you about the: "Panties tend to be mostly those big, sheer things that you can see right through" as a negative. Those and the more substantial nylon panties made the sites perfect for me and earned them an 82, which I thought was a pretty respectable score for a small network of sites.
Cotton? Preferred?!!! How could you? :-)
|
06-06-11 02:41pm
|
Reply
192
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from lk2fireone:
Very thorough review with a nice personal flavor. Agree that cheesy music can be annoying. I like if a model gets off, as long as it looks real or believable. The fake moans and groans are a turn-off.
|
06-04-11 05:15am
|
Reply
193
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from otoh:
WWW, great review, thanks - as a panty and nylon enthusiast, this group of sites has been on my list for a while, and has now been bumped up a few places. I also share your disdain for insipid music, so it's good to see a site that avoids it; my main disagreement is that I love anything sheer :)
|
06-04-11 12:37am
|
Reply
194
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Capn:
I think it is a good theme for a site but very poorly executed.
It really hasn't progressed from mid 1990 standard websites.
|
09-12-09 08:00am
|
Reply
195
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
One thing I forgot to mention, www, that I am just as appalled that there's no way to download their big sets of pictures in zip. I, too, would not have the patience to do it one by one. I've subscribed to a couple of sites like that and will never go back until they discover zip! :-) I think Albert's indifferent attitude to customer requests (expressed in his e-mail letter to me) is not conducive to his ever running a first class site.
|
11-13-08 07:24am
|
Reply
196
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from messmer:
A timely review, www. I was tempted to subscribe. I had even sent an email to the webmaster to see what the present standard size of their pictures was because the free samples on their home page were very small. Got a bit of an ambiguous reply, "some are bigger, some are smaller depending on the source," with no effort on the part of the webmaster to be courteous. Your review just saved me a bundle because it confirms my suspicions about the site.
|
11-12-08 02:21pm
|
Reply
197
|
Voyeur 4 You
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from littlejoe:
some of the stuff on that page looks staged, and the claims of high school content is probably untrue. but the locker room/bathroom/ hidden stuff is real. its put up on newsgroups all the time, and is real hidden videos
|
12-08-07 10:39am
|
Reply
198
|
Voyeur 4 You
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from jd1961:
The 18 U.S.C. 2257 Statement on the front page proves that that the claim is not true.
|
12-07-07 02:09am
|
Reply
199
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I'd say they're definitely staged - I've seen too many eye contacts with the camera in the locker room and beach cabin sections to think otherwise. It's just a fantasy thing.
|
01-20-10 01:27pm
|
Reply
200
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Well, that's certainly easy enough to fix.
If you just go to recast your vote (as if you were going to change from yes to no) then the trust interface will open allowing you to reset the vote to yes or no (as you really want) AND to change the status of the "vote anonymously" check-box.
|
07-29-08 06:24pm
|
