| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(sullivan's Reply)
No, there's not been a definitive discussion but the issue has been touched upon a number of times since the Trust Ratings were initially added.
You can find some of the discussions at ...
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3170
Reply #9
https://www.pornusers.com/announcements.html
Trust Ratings Added to PornUsers
February 20th, 2007
If memory serves, it's also come up in a number of poll questions.
Now, to try and address your specific comments ...
Looking at the clip you took from the FAQ ... "In essence, the Trust Rating is simply a way ..." When you continue, you see we took a step to define the "trustworthy" with the next sentence ... "In other words, can the reviewer's remarks be trusted to be accurate to what others will find if they visit a site." (emphasis added)
Now, your comment speculates that "accurate" is to be read as, "factually correct" yet I'd offer that in this context, "accurate" would be more along the lines of "matching" or "similar" ... thus continuing the emphasis on Trust Ratings not being a personal judgement of someone's character but rather, how well their reviews give the reader the info they need to make an informed decision.. Since so many of the items found in a good review are subjective, "factually correct" would apply only to a small percentage of what's covered and therefore, would have limited applicability in this context.
As I was explaining to someone this morning ...
Trust Ratings are meant to be a judgement on how well your review will reflect what the user (who is casting the vote) will see if they visit the site you reviewed. In other words, it's like making the statement, "I trust that the review I'm reading here (yours) will be pretty close to what I'll notice when I visit." Obviously, a NO Trust Rating reflects the opposite.
But again, this is how they were *designed* to be used and how I encourage Users to apply them. How they're actually applied is a personal decision of each User.
|
06-28-07 07:43pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(sullivan's Reply)
LOL ...
Well, I can tell you how Trust Ratings were *designed* to be used and I can tell you how I've encouraged folks to use them; however, as you've mentioned, different people assign the ratings using their own criteria.
|
06-28-07 03:21pm
|
Reply
3
|
Alexandra Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from jonesyboy:
Agreed, the vid content is pathetic, especially in today's age with all the advancements in video technology. Someone tell the owners to stop cheating their customers and invest in decent equipment.
Also, and maybe this has changed recently, most of the sites (with the exception of DivineBreasts)is ROUTINELY late with updates. I've joined Alexandra Moore, Alica Loren, and a couple others where it was weeks in between posts.
Do you think I got a reply when I complained through mail? Nope.
|
07-01-07 03:47am
|
Reply
4
|
BBW Superstars
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from Pornjackker:
Thanks for doing this review. BBW Superstars has been at the near
top of my list to join for sometime:)
|
07-16-07 11:40am
|
Reply
5
|
Big Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from nygiants03:
I don't notice this problem. Realitykings tend to use very good equipment and produce great videos. The video quality has changed significantly over the past few years. The first few videos started fuzzy, and now they look really good.
|
12-01-07 08:11am
|
Reply
6
|
Big Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from roseman:
Nice comment, thanks for the info
|
06-25-07 12:59am
|
Reply
7
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from King:
The one thing they need to improve is size/quality ratio.
Even with 2Mbit MPEGs videos are not clear and size of the files is so huge. Good DivX compression could take it down by a half with the same quality
|
06-23-07 04:10pm
|
Reply
8
|
Boob Camp
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from boredsurfer:
Have to agree. The technical quality is a bit lacking, but you are right on in saying they have more content than Busty Britain, for example. And, again, you are right on in saying there is rare material here that is hard to find elsewhere, if at all.
So, while I may rate the site just a bit lower than you did, overall I'm in agreement: This is a site worth checking out for the boob fan.
|
08-28-12 12:44am
|
Reply
9
|
Boobs Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from roseman:
lol, I think that Polish Busty and BoobsGarden as related somehow ... maybe I am wrong.
It would be funny if the webmasters of those two sites where fighting for Bea's giant boobs LOL
Bea is looking awesome by the way.
|
06-22-07 09:44am
|
Reply
10
|
Busty Kelly Kay
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from roseman:
Kelly is very sexy. I was a member few months ago and really liked her site though it's content is not huge and videos are not many.
|
06-25-07 01:06am
|
Reply
11
|
Busty Kerry Marie
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from boredsurfer:
ESPECIALLY since her "own" site, officiallykerrymarie.com, has DMRs AND no hardcore of any kind AND promises more videos than they actually have posted AND misleads you into thinking that the videos are freely downloadable UNTIL AFTER you get into the site.
And while I do like her, on her private site she has got really fat.
(Good for the boobs, not so good for the belly).
|
03-09-08 01:50am
|
Reply
12
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from King:
Why wouldn't you download to Mac? You can play WMV in some other media players, not only Windows Media Player.
|
07-02-07 01:54pm
|
Reply
13
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from Monahan:
Just checked the site and there is no mention of any videos, just image sets.
TBP says there are 550+ 10 minute clips. Does each and every model have a video clip?
|
09-20-07 06:41pm
|
Reply
14
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from roseman:
(sullivan's Reply)
LOL, okay!
|
06-22-07 09:19am
|
Reply
15
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(sullivan's Reply)
I think that bangbros.com network doesn't give you access to BustyAdventures.com
(You can get access to it by joining Big Ass Pass).
|
06-22-07 05:44am
|
Reply
16
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from roseman:
Thanks for the info.
DDF Busty is on my top priority sites list ;)
* p.s. Jessica Moore is GREAT
|
06-22-07 04:02am
|
Reply
17
|
Nadine Jansen
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from Marianna:
actually i found no more than 100+ videos available for download. most of em as too short :/
also she adds about 1 video per month and after her pregnancy updates seem to come slowly.
|
06-20-07 09:52am
|
Reply
18
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from SnowDude:
(sullivan's Reply)
An interesting idea to be sure; maybe some sort of parallel system? When I become drunk with power and the cash is flowing, that'll be the first thing I do...well, maybe second. ;)
Thanks dude!
|
07-17-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
19
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SnowDude:
(sullivan's Reply)
Thanks for the comment Sullivan dude! I agree that rating the individual sites as well as the entire network is a bit odd. I asked about it very early on and it was suggested to me to do it the way I have, so I have kept it that way. I always try to rate the entire network a little higher than highest rated site. It's not perfect, but it seems to work for the most part. A suggestion for a different method would always be welcome!
|
07-16-07 05:22pm
|
Reply
20
|
Polish Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
from Roy Stone:
Agree mostly, however I would never re-subscribe to Polish Busty. It seems the site has run out of steam, and probably money. There has been no good new material for ages - not even topless - only fully-clothed Ewa Sonnet, streatched out over three "new" issues. Ahhh - very sad! Maybe she and Maria Swan will show up doing hardcore on another site (one with money!). Many have said they will never do hardcore, but end up doing it. Maybe the money is too good!
|
11-02-10 11:58am
|
Reply
21
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Comment
from boredsurfer:
I have to say no, I've cancelled twice from them and had no trouble.
Did you use a card, or some other method? I used a credit card, no trouble.
|
01-15-08 11:52pm
|
Reply
22
|
Teenage Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from freesbee:
(sullivan's Reply)
Thanks, that's good advise. I will do that if necessary.
The help page is running again, but the cancel-form not. But I found a way on the help page to send a message. So now I'm waiting for a reply.
|
07-13-07 02:59am
|
Reply
23
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from roseman:
(sullivan's Reply)
It was my mistake not to mention that it was a special and day limited discount offer, my apologies and thanks for bringing it up!
If you have any more questions please feel free to ask.
|
06-22-07 05:39am
|
Reply
24
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(sullivan's Reply)
At May's end I got an e-mail from Scoreland (I was a previous member of Scorevideos) saying that they celebrate something (If I remember correct some years since they started their company) and they offered special monthly subscription prices discounts.For example you could get access to ScoreLand for 15 USD than 30.Then I tryed XLgirls and noticed that there were a free 7 days trial (special offer as well). These offers where available only for 20 days ( 1 - 20 June , as was written at the e-mail ). Hope that helps.
|
06-21-07 10:55pm
|
