| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(tetros's Reply)
I have no clue for you because I never look at that kind of data. I simply click on the file and wait until it's downloaded so CPU usage is not something that I track.
|
12-03-12 04:25am
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Comment from tetros:
Ok, the main problem is the data loading process for the video, this takes additional 30-40% CPU-usage, when the video data is fully loaded, the video playing just takes 30% CPU-Usage. But other streaming sites don't have this problem.
|
12-03-12 02:38am
|
Reply
3
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know but I suspect that video resolution has a lot to do with that. Afterall the videos on You Tube are not in HD and they are for the most part of average quality.
|
12-02-12 10:22am
|
Reply
4
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BadMrFrosty:
(tetros's Reply)
Your call, your money my friend :)
|
09-20-12 02:07am
|
Reply
5
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(tetros's Reply)
Its when a site charges different prices based on where you live. This lot charge people in the US 30 USD but they want to charge me 30 EUR, which is closer to 40 USD, because I live in Europe. Same service, same product but more expensive.
This thread has a lot of debate about the issue https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=3000
|
09-19-12 12:11am
|
Reply
6
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(tetros's Reply)
I can see why a website would moderate comments, but I think reactive moderation would be better where the webmaster is notified of new comments published and can remove them if they're objectionable.
The strange thing is that looking at the reviews here, Evil Angel looks like a great website, so I can't believe they get much in the way of negative comments anyway.
|
11-07-12 11:21pm
|
Reply
7
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Comment
from Marcus:
One PU member said in their review if you don't write anything generic and flattering they won't approve it, while another has said they have written comments but none have appeared. I suspect they have comment moderation on (sensible...) but don't ever check the comments left (...not so good!)
|
11-07-12 11:49am
|
Reply
8
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(tetros's Reply)
I think you and I agree that the content of the site is very good but that is a different thing than the site being good. It would be good if it wasn't 30$ because that's too much money for a dead site with non-exlusif content.
|
11-04-12 10:58am
|
Reply
9
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(tetros's Reply)
I'm sorry if I seem harsh but you gave your review a high score but very little positive info to justify that score. If a review as a high score but very little info to justify that score than I tend to consider that it's a fake review meant to increase traffic to a dying site(s). The other reason is usually fans that can't be objective and therefore their review is also to be taken with a huge grain of salt. I don't know which one you are and I don't care. I'll know more if you do another review and I see about the same thing yopu did with this one.
Let me address so me of your comments.
-I'm sorry but "because of 10$" is a ludricous statement. We aren't talking about pennies but half the cost of most porn sites. You can join 21sextury for 20$ and they probably have scenes with most of the performers that appeared on tamed teens.
-Regional pricing is a huge problem which is compounded when the site is so expensive.
-The site being dead for 3 years should have been in the cons as it is a very important piece of information that a person doing a casual look over of your revbiew might not catch in the bottom line section.
-You mentioned the high quality photosets but did not give enough info except to give the number of pics per set and to say that some are good. I simply informed you that your statement was unfounded based on what you wrote.
-You mention 155 movies but you meant to say videos since you are talking about individual scenes. Evil Angel has 240 Raul Cristian scenes so that's nearly 100 more than this site and again it is a lot cheaper. Not to mention that you get a lot more for your money.
-I visted the site and it's clearly written in the top part of the screen "Fresh Updates in 2012: A new movie 3x a week". Now you and I both know that is bullshit.
**If this site had been 15$ or even maybe 20$ than I might have been forgiving but a dead site cannot charge 30$US or GOd forbid 30€ for 3 to 6 years old content. They especially can't claim new stuff as the reason why they are charging so much money.
|
11-03-12 06:32am
|
Reply
10
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Review
from pat362:
I can't understand why you gave this site such a high score. I also don't understand why there aren't more negative comments in the con section. You only mention that that the site is inactive but you fail to mention that it has been for 3 years. This is your first review and that is always the hardest one to do but doing one like this for a dead site smells of a advertising.
Here's my list of cons:
The site is 30$ when it should be at least 10$ cheaper.
The site has been dead for 3 years.
All these movies can now be found on other sites like Evil Angel and for a lot less than what you will pay on this site.
There is regional pricing.
I'm sorry but anyone interested in phototsets would laugh at 20 to 50 pic sets.
Now Raul may have started the live gonzo site but the entire appeal of a live shoot is that it's live so a director makes very little sense unless he's directing all the action and if you have read what most people think od directors who talk during the shoot then you know most people really dislike that.
I'm not going to give you a negative score based on one review but I would hope that you will pay attention to how other people do their review and try to emulate them. I know that's what I did and still do.
|
10-31-12 06:15pm
|
