| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Loki:
I love LeLu Love myself, and am glad I'm not the only fanboy of hers out there.
|
12-15-17 05:06pm
|
Reply
127
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from mbaya:
The cheapest join price, the "regular" is now $55 per month. There is also a vip and a platinum price.
|
12-05-17 12:49am
|
Reply
128
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks for the advice. I'm glad I missed the deal...
|
12-02-17 09:07am
|
Reply
129
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
This is a site that has been on my list to join for a long time. Last weekend there was a discount offered for a short time and I missed it. I had planned to join using the discount since it would be a low-risk way to join the site. After reading your review I'm kind of glad that I missed the discount and missed joining the site. I probably would have been disappointed.
|
12-02-17 06:21am
|
Reply
130
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
To begin with Thank You for the review. I like Pascal as a performer and many of the women who appear on his site are good looking. Sadly that's about the only positive I can say about his site.
1-The content is too extreme for my taste and that's why I will never join.
2-Many of the models are British performers but one of the problem with a lot of British performers is that they tend to sport a lot of ink and by default many of the models on the site have a significant amount of tattoos.
3-They don't try to make the models look as good as they could but I don't know if it's by choice or lack of interest.
|
12-01-17 06:54pm
|
Reply
131
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from gaypornolover:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Oh on the contrary I think it's great you did, I appreciated it very much. You rock!
|
10-30-17 12:11pm
|
Reply
132
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from gaypornolover:
Superb review, and I really appreciate that you took the time to write it when you're a straight guy. That's going above and beyond!
Hope you win the raffle with it, you deserve it!
|
10-16-17 03:05pm
|
Reply
133
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
It isn't often that those of us who join straight sites would get an opportunity to review a gay site. I think it is a great idea that you did this since we only have a few gay/bi members here so adding gay site reviews is a good thing.
On a semi-related note, I've been a regular Kink subscriber off and on pretty much since they started. They have some of the best BDSM-themed porn available on the internet. I'm really happy that they turned their membership into a 'network' rather than subscribing to single sites. But my take (and I've read similar opinions here and elsewhere) is that Kink has lost some of its edge and may be slipping from its place at the top of the heap. What are your thoughts on that?
This will fall into the category of TMI but I've never, ever had the courage to open any of the gay Kink sites even now that there is full network access. I'd have no trouble at all reviewing a 'mainstream' gay site but as someone afflicted with really, really sensitive testicles there is no way I could watch any scene with cock and ball torture without passing out! :-)
|
10-09-17 10:38am
|
Reply
134
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from merc77:
As a gay man, this is a very good review. I'm not into this type of site, but it does deliver the good for those who are.
I might try a review of a straight site if I get a membership to it through one of those big site groups.
|
10-08-17 04:09pm
|
Reply
135
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from lk2fireone:
WOW!
IMPRESSIVE REVIEW.
EASILY READABLE, COMPREHENSIVE.
|
10-08-17 02:51pm
|
Reply
136
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from tangub:
I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly so please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the conclusion I've reached from reading this is that you've not even subscribed to Bound Men Wanked and that this review is based on having access to 6 bonus or promotional videos within Kink network and is in effect pure speculation based on those 6 videos and what you can see in the site tour at Bound Men Wanked.
|
09-13-17 11:29am
|
Reply
137
|
Strapon Squad
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from MargulisAZ:
Straponsquad had some hot scenes but it doesn't update anymore, Kink may slowly release all the videos form the original site which has 60 vids I think. The Kaycee Dean shoots, which there are 2, are legendary. God damn that girl is tiny and hot and takes some massive toys and mean fisting from the girls.
|
08-13-17 02:59am
|
Reply
138
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from PinkPanther:
Lots of good bonus content on the Kink network, though when I was a member most recently it was all stream-only. There was another site that was related to Wasteland at one time, I believe, called Funny BDSM. I would love to see that material appear again. They had a lot of bizarre scenarios that were hot mainly due to the really sexy Euro-babes that they used in their vids, such as Sharka Blue.
|
07-30-17 09:01am
|
Reply
139
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I'm less surprised that they had to stop doing those kind of scenes than that they were able to do them for that long. The rule that a sub isn't supposed to be tied down during the fucking portion of a BSDM scene goes back to the beginning of porn so technically speaking Kink should never have been able to shoot even one video or if they did then they would have to take them down and as far as I know they are all still on the site.
|
07-06-17 10:32am
|
Reply
140
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
Not sure if you are aware but the reason why it is dead is because Kink had no choice. Their main CC processor threatened that if they didn`t change their format then they would no longer work with them.
At the heart of the problem is something that is kind of quirky about BSDM porn. You can be tied down and for lack of a more appropriate term tortured but you can`t be tied down and fucked. That doesn`t mean that you don`t get the odd scene with both and somehow this is overlooked in a lesbian BSDM scene but ultimately a performer cannot be tied up and fucked at the same time. Kink might have gotten away with it but too many of the bound gangbangs had a sort of rapy flavor and that`s bound (sorry for the pun) to raise major red flags with credit card companies.
Who would want to be associated with a website that promotes rape even the fake exaggerated kind. In the end Kink decided to change the format and remove the physical restrains like rope and simply get the men to hold the performers down. Even that last part is getting rare now.
|
06-30-17 06:53pm
|
Reply
141
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Jay G:
I belong to the Kink network but don't have access to Chanta's bitches with it. Lucky you.
It is an old site I belonged to a few times over the years, but it hasn't filmed new material since 2009. Chanta retired. She was one of the best.
|
06-05-17 07:56am
|
Reply
142
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I think your review is excellent and quite detailed. I respect your reasons for giving the site the score you did but there is no way that any of the current Kink sites deserve a perfect score because by your own admission they aren't perfect. The fact that their search engine sucks, the fact that you are basically relegated to scrolling from page to page to find a specific scene, the fact that most of their scenarios are not well thought out or well executed mean that they are more a distraction than an advantage. That said you did your homework and bothered to explain why you gave the site 100. I may not agree with your score but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
|
04-20-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
143
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from lk2fireone:
EXCELLENT REVIEW.
BUT I'M ALSO IMPRESSED BY YOUR WILLINGNESS TO GIVE THE SITE A 100 SCORE.
I GAVE METART A SCORE OF 99 ONCE, AND EARLIER GAVE IT A SCORE OF 95.
BUT I NEVER HAD THE COURAGE TO GIVE IT A SCORE OF 100.
EVEN WHEN I STATED THAT I SAID IT WAS THE BEST SOFTCORE PHOTO SITE ON THE INTERNET.
BRAVO FOR YOUR CONVICTION.
|
04-20-17 03:54pm
|
Reply
144
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from jook:
Excellent review and thanks.
Personally, I appreciate that you stuck to your convictions and had the wherewithal to give it a controversial rating.
I don't overly disagree except for a little nitpicking. You mentioned several cons. The one I would take them to task with is the first one you mentioned, organization. I would have taken off 5 points for that. But like I said, that's getting nitpicky.
I'll also mention that I was a member about a year ago. It's not my cup of tea but, as I mentioned elsewhere, personal bias should not be reflected in a review. For that reason, I don't have a big problem with giving it 100.
|
04-20-17 03:26pm
|
Reply
145
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! Thanks for adding it. Kink always seems to be the Gold Standard for any BDSM niche and this site is no different. I'm really glad that they now offer one price for all-site access.
And others may not agree, but I appreciate you adding "anal in almost every scene" as a pro!
|
03-25-17 06:04pm
|
Reply
146
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
I didn't notice that you had posted a review of Water Bondage until just now. I had a membership there many years ago and really liked what they offered. I occasionally check in to see if they've started updating but obviously they haven't. I'm not aware of any other site quite like this.
And I'm with you - the new 'network' access that Kink is offering is a great value. This is still among the best BDSM networks available.
|
01-23-17 03:25pm
|
Reply
147
|
Men On Edge
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from gaypornolover:
Wow great to see a straight guy reviewing a gay site, that truly is above and beyond the call of duty for your porn buddies!
Much appreciated, thank you. You are very cool!
|
01-10-17 09:37pm
|
Reply
148
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from calissa:
I love your enthusiasm, Marc, but this sounds more like P.R. at times than a review. She should hire you. :-) Clearly you're smitten with Lelu. From looking over her site, she wouldn't seem to be everyone's cup of tea, but then, who is? It's nice that you're so satisfied with your membership and eager to spread the gospel. One question: you mention she won Best Female Fetish Performer. What specifically establishes her as a fetish model? Thanks!
|
01-08-17 02:58pm
|
Reply
149
|
Jeny Smith.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks Marcdc1, yeah she is Russian and I would of loved more talking but I do have a great fondness for Russian women as lots are so beautiful so will give it a whirl, I do prefer subtitles though to none at all though I have to say.
Thanks about the warning about payment process, I'll only join if its a trusted company.
|
01-08-17 01:25am
|
Reply
150
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from EllenFrank:
The group of sites was great in the past. I joined again about a year ago, however, and was very disappointed. It appears as though they are riding in fear of some obscure or brand new censorship law(s) as the money shots were all practically gone/not shown. I don't know how they are still around if that was not simply a very temporary deal. I joined for a month, and looked all over, no, no, no.
|
12-28-16 04:18pm
|
