Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Kink Men (0)

Newbie 95* marcdc1 (0) 10-08-17  02:39pm                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: ***** Note I'm a straight man trying to give an objective review to a site included with the kink.com network. I did not reduce their score just because it's a gay porn site.******* - Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus. (8 gay sites) - Over 1,500 videos - Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. - Great production value. Lighting/sound/talent is all top notch. - Exclusive content. - Robust community. Pretty much every shoot has a lengthy set of comments. You can really get a good sense of the content from the comment sheet. - Updates at least once a week (average is 2-3). - .zip files of screenshots available - Kink is known for shooting with top-notch female talent. I'm not as versed in the gay porn side - I'm assuming the same is true here. I do recognize some of the names as shooting straight porn and have wasn't disappointed. Cons: - The organization is horrible. You can filter by the amount of circumcised or uncircumcised hair - but can't filter searches. - Rather pricey - but this may be one of those times that you get what you pay for. I guess what I'm saying is: yes this is more than most sites, but most sites (maybe no other site?) has this high of quality and this many shoots. - Little model diversity. Most are straight out of central casting. - With a top-notch site like kink, there really aren't too many downsides. - This site is the catch-all for all their gay porn (see comments below) Bottom Line: This site does not post content under its own. Instead this is a collection of all the gay porn on kink.com. It may help with the organization, but it's not the same as having a dedicated site (to be fair; Kink.com does NOT try to pad their network by claiming this as a separate site). Again I'm doing this from the perspective of a straight man. I didn't watch many videos just dipped in and out so I could give a fair review. I've reviewed almost the entire network at kink.com so I feel I can give an accurate assessment of this site as well; even though I'm not the target audience. Kink has high standards for production so there's never a bad scene An all-around great site for kink/BDSM material. Much of the material is too extreme for some so check out the previews before you buy. Files are available in multiple quality levels so you can strike the right balance between size and quality. While they may be pricey you can't beat the production value. talent, catalog, depth. They do what they do very well. You get 5 previews a day. That gives you enough to explore and see if this is for you Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (6) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 lk2fireone (0) WOW! IMPRESSIVE REVIEW. EASILY READABLE, COMPREHENSIVE. 10-08-17  02:51pm Reply To Message 2 merc77 (Disabled) As a gay man, this is a very good review. I'm not into this type of site, but it does deliver the good for those who are. I might try a review of a straight site if I get a membership to it through one of those big site groups. 10-08-17  04:09pm Reply To Message 3 rearadmiral (0) It isn't often that those of us who join straight sites would get an opportunity to review a gay site. I think it is a great idea that you did this since we only have a few gay/bi members here so adding gay site reviews is a good thing. On a semi-related note, I've been a regular Kink subscriber off and on pretty much since they started. They have some of the best BDSM-themed porn available on the internet. I'm really happy that they turned their membership into a 'network' rather than subscribing to single sites. But my take (and I've read similar opinions here and elsewhere) is that Kink has lost some of its edge and may be slipping from its place at the top of the heap. What are your thoughts on that? This will fall into the category of TMI but I've never, ever had the courage to open any of the gay Kink sites even now that there is full network access. I'd have no trouble at all reviewing a 'mainstream' gay site but as someone afflicted with really, really sensitive testicles there is no way I could watch any scene with cock and ball torture without passing out! :-) 10-09-17  10:38am Reply To Message 4 gaypornolover (0) Superb review, and I really appreciate that you took the time to write it when you're a straight guy. That's going above and beyond! Hope you win the raffle with it, you deserve it! 10-16-17  03:05pm Reply To Message 5 marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #4 - gaypornolover : Thank you very much for the kind words. I was relucted to write reviews for gay sites feeling like I was on someone else's turf. Thank you for making me feel welcome 10-19-17  02:09pm Reply To Message 6 gaypornolover (0) REPLY TO #5 - marcdc1 : Oh on the contrary I think it's great you did, I appreciated it very much. You rock! 10-30-17  12:11pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.