| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
A full access trial membership is rare so even if you don't find as many great videos as I did then you are still getting plenty for your money.
|
05-16-13 06:37pm
|
Reply
177
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tree Rodent:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks Marc. Yes they could do themselves a favour and give a better preview section, especially as they are so low profile. They could find some new subscribers and lengthen their life, but all the signs are thay're on life support.
|
05-16-13 06:13am
|
Reply
178
|
Tampa Housewives
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Capn:
Well, if they stopped updating in 2008, & haven't re-started updates, I would certainly give i a miss on that score alone!
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-12-13 03:02pm
|
Reply
179
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RustyJ:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks. I'd almost recommend this as the first site from this network if you just want to get a little bit of everything.
|
05-09-13 11:38pm
|
Reply
180
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review from marcdc1:
Those of you looking through the comments of this site you will see after my review I learned that there is in fact NOT new content still uploaded to this site.
Those of you paying extra close attention will see that I also lowered my score of this site from 60 to 55 to reflect the lack of new content and the attempt to trick their consumers.
Thank you again Pat362 for pointing out what they were doing.
|
04-28-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
181
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
You would think that but you'd be wrong. This is one of the ways scam sites use to make money from unsuspecting people. They upload older content and pretend that it is new. One look can usually tell you that it can't be since the quality of the pic is so bad that it looks awfull in low resolution. These guys could never use larger pics because the image would be so blurry that you couldn't see what is happening in the pic.
|
04-28-13 09:42am
|
Reply
182
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from pat362:
Actually I believe the below poster is right and the site is dead. Their claim of new updates is pure B.S on their part. If you look at the preview section where they show their most recent updates then these are all old content that is promoted as new stuff. Not too mention that the same scenes are used to update more than one day.
|
04-27-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
183
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Don't worry about it. In my opinion. The site doesn't deserve a score above 50 but a score of 60 is not much better and you gave some good info to help people know why the site is so bad. I might have a different opinion about this site and the others associated with it if they were upfront about the quality of their content but they know that if that info gets out then no one will ever join again.
|
04-23-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
184
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
You are way more generous than I would be. I got screwed by this site but couldn't find a match on TBP so I didn't review it but it's a giant pile of poo.
|
04-22-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
185
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from gaypornolover:
Shame the site isn't up to standard - I admire the lady for still being active in her sixties!
|
04-22-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
186
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from graymane:
You got my attention...... No Candy for this guy.
|
04-21-13 01:24am
|
Reply
187
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
This is another site where I wish the webmaster would chime in to defend their content. But I guess we all know better - 300 x 200 pictures? Last I checked, this isn't 1985.
Isn't it funny how the crappiest sites are the hardest to review?
|
04-20-13 07:39am
|
Reply
188
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from RagingBuddhist:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I think it's just a matter of being resistant to change and being sold on CCBill and Epoch. Besides never having had an issue with them, they've actually refunded my money for sites that were blatant ripoffs. I guess I just stay with what I know works.
|
04-05-13 04:47pm
|
Reply
189
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from LeluLove Co:
Thanks Marc and yep the new spy cams are SO much better than the old ones and some people stay on them ALL the time which is great!! :)
|
04-05-13 09:39am
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Might be a little deep to be called philosophy, but thanks for putting it in that category.
|
04-03-13 05:12am
|
Reply
191
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from RagingBuddhist:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks for the quick response.
Believe me - if I joined, there would definitely be a review. Unfortunately, there are two problems I can see.
1) Money for porn isn't so easy right now and
2) I won't join a site through Zombaio.
That's a shame because I've been looking for something new and, with amateurs being my thing, I'd probably like what I'd see here.
|
04-01-13 02:31pm
|
Reply
192
|
Cuckold My Husband
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from gaypornolover:
A pity... I guess you get what you pay for!
|
04-01-13 12:22pm
|
Reply
193
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
One detail that concerns a pet peeve of mine. TBP says the watermark is medium sized. I've seen sites where "medium" looks like large and distracting to me. What's the logo here look like? Is it bright or subdued in color? Is it stuck in a corner where (I think) they all should be? An overbearing watermark can really kill an otherwise good video. ARE YOU LISTENING SCORE HD?
|
04-01-13 10:57am
|
Reply
194
|
Cuckold My Husband
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Cybertoad:
Does not sound like an impressive site, I really dislike sites that do not zip photos, it is so easy and helps the consumer greatly
|
04-01-13 08:15am
|
Reply
195
|
VNA Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from martinlongbow:
is there anal content?
|
03-29-13 07:26pm
|
Reply
196
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from pat362:
I don't agree with their method and it's bad business practices in my book but is it really any different then all those 1$ trials that so many sites like to employ?
Both lure you in using a small amount as bait and both hope to cath a sucker in the process. I assume that enough people fall for it and that's why you still see sites do that. If a site thinks it's content is only worth a dollar then why would anyone think it's worth more than a buck?
|
03-29-13 10:30am
|
Reply
197
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from tangub:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I've no doubt Bangbros have plenty of great porn if you like that sort of thing, I just wouldn't trust them with my credit card number.
|
03-29-13 09:20am
|
Reply
198
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I saw the age verification thing when visiting from your link there but not when visiting from the PU link. When clicking on the age verification thing it just takes you to a sign up page for the site where you have the option to sign up to the 2 day $1 trial recurring at $39.95 or taking a standard membership for $29.95 not to mention the sneaky pre-checked cross sales in small print at the bottom.
The age verification thing looks like nothing more than a sneaky underhand attempt at selling a subscription. The thing that most surprised me about your comment was seeing the words "Bangbros" and "reputable" in the same sentence.
|
03-29-13 07:58am
|
Reply
199
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Clicking through from the main homepage, I can see thumbnails of the videos, but like you, when I click on them I get a 'you must verify your age for $1' message.
Cynically, I guess that once you have to paid $1 to verify your age, it will probably automatically upgrade you to full membership a day later or something 'for your convenience' - to me it looks like a limited trial by stealth, and I would be surprised if it didn't try and trick you into full membership.
$1 to verify my age is hassle and not something I'd ever do. And if the website is trying to trick people into a recurring membership, then it's not a site I'd ever give my money to.
|
03-29-13 07:39am
|
Reply
200
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from tangub:
I didn't have any problem browsing the tour and playing preview videos, I wasn't asked for any kind of age verification.
|
03-29-13 05:10am
|
