| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Homegirl:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Fake girl moans are distracting. Real girl moans are a big turn on.
|
05-23-20 05:29am
|
Reply
2
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
from badandy400:
Thanks for this post. It answered a few of the exact questions I was wondering!
|
03-17-08 11:39pm
|
Reply
3
|
Girls Got Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from PRIMECHUCK:
i just bought it im going to cancel today because its fake anal creampies i want to see a real anal creampie its looks so phony every time the seen begins you see the same blue couch in the corner the girls are nice looking but its just fake
|
11-27-07 05:45am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from williamj:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Thank you...I love wet pussy too many dry pussy in these sites...My question is not why lube the pussy?
|
11-13-07 09:52pm
|
Reply
5
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from williamj:
I couldn't have wrote any different of a review. AbbyWinters is on my list for a re-visit this winter, LOL winter...Winters, whatever. I just wish they would say it for once, that room is filled with hot cunny aroma during the photo shoots and the videos. Natural girl next door models that are having total fun being naughty. The site is worth a visit if you want to see Real girls exploring their sexuality. 89 rating...yes I agree. On the mark review.
|
10-02-07 02:45am
|
Reply
6
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gene2112:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Yes, but the problem still remains that the 35-40 cd's that I downloaded from 99BB a couple years back remain unviewable due to the DRM licensing. Do you know if the site offers previous members the opportunity to remove the DRM restrictions from downloaded material?
I vowed never to pay for that site again, but could be swayed by a gesture on their part to ease the pain and suffering from the members they've screwed over in the past.
|
08-27-07 09:21am
|
Reply
7
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for this newer update/review from Schnitzel.
It looks like things are the same as it was 3 month ago.
Their updates are too rare and the quality ain't getting any better - even the models/scenes seem more boring than before. They placed a few very attractives ones some time ago.
Don't think I'll go back again
|
08-19-07 08:08am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Pinche Kankun:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BY THE POWER OF STIFLER, ASS, BABY, FEEL THAT ASS!!!!!!!
|
08-12-07 05:47pm
|
Reply
9
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Hey Schnitzel, thanks, I actually join the site for my wife. She loves very softcore, highly erotic photography, but really isn't into anything much more. I find myself looking for more pictures! I'm digging through a zip file saying, "Where are the rest!" I really can appreciate their quality though, and similar to how I will reply to Pink Panther just below this one, I am a lover of curvy women, so those real skinny ones aren't going to do much for me. I'm also more into the at least trimmed pubic hair models, not really into shaven slick either, but the full bush isn't my type either. I'm open-minded enough though to know there are guys who are opposite of me in those regards. Thanks for the comment.
|
07-29-07 12:58am
|
Reply
10
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
from Monahan:
I just joined OxPass based on meember comments on this site and am still getting used to it. It's got a messy navigation process that takes a while to understand.
But one thing seems to me to be apparent and that is the more recent videos are far sharper and better than the older ones on all of the network sites.
The best part so far is that every video I've run has been original material and almost all have made my woody come to attention. Better yet they have fun and don't take their profession too seriously. And that's a good thing.
|
07-27-07 11:42am
|
Reply
11
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from jd1961:
About the videos---I was a member last year, and then again about a month ago. They used to have a ton of videos, but they were low res. I'm assuming they are redoing their video section. Now they are high res, but they are very large. Too large for such short vids IMO. But, I mainly collect photos, and their archive is endless.
|
07-23-07 12:00am
|
Reply
12
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from PinkPanther:
This site frustrates me. There are a lot of updates and there are hot models, but there is something really un-exciting about too much of their photography and video. The photographers just don't seem to get much oomph out of their models. I had a membership that I'm going to lapse again in a couple of days.
I have been checking out Karups PC and I'm much more excited by Karups' material. It's definitely in the same terrain as this site, but I find it much more erotic, in the main.
|
07-17-07 09:07pm
|
Reply
13
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
I hope you went with Met Art - it's an extraordinary site if you like hot models and high quality photography.
|
07-17-07 08:55pm
|
Reply
14
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from SnowDude:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Thanks Schnitzel dude! Good point about the camcorders! I mean, when you start making more money off memberships, I think you should upgrade the equiptment too, right? Seems like the least they could do...and I do mean least!
Thanks again for the comments. Keep on keeping on dude! ;)
|
07-17-07 08:14pm
|
Reply
15
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I've been a member of Met Art for approx 1 year now. I really love the site, mainly for the variety of the photography and the quality of the photography and the models.
The vids are an aspect of the site that I pretty much ignore for months at a time. They're just not exciting to me. They are very soft vids of their models cavorting in the surf or on rocks or something like that. They are pretty vids with nice music - the sound is sumptuous.
Having said all of that, I downloaded one of their recent vids in the DIVX version - their highest quality download, according to the site. The file was about 350MB for a 15 minute vid. The video quality, watching it on the newest version Windows Media Player full-screen, is pretty damned fantastic - pretty much DVD quality. The sound is truly outstanding. The content is not terribly exciting to me, though.
I'm there for the pics and, every once in a while, the cam shows.
|
07-16-07 08:22pm
|
Reply
16
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from iporn:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Yes, I actually modified my bookmark to point to the new beta site. It's fully functional.
As for the improvements, you can now download the front and back cover of the DVD, there is a "my Videobox" tab, thumbnails are larger, you can download the movie scene directly from the DVD page, there are different pages for pornstars, studios and movie series, all in a modern look and better nav system.
|
07-15-07 11:27pm
|
Reply
17
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
Apart from a much cleaner home page, the new Beta site adds a fflash player so you can check out a scene quickly without having to D/L. The flash quality is very acceptible. All members can opt in to use the Beta version.
The Beta also catalogues your d/l's and your flash plays so you can quickly find a scene you recently watched but did not save.
It also has an AI (artificial intelligence) feature that takes your interests and will suggest videos/scenes you haven't checked out yet.
I like the new version a lot even though I wonder how much data they have on me that I may not want them to have.
|
07-15-07 02:20pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
You say ... "The reasons should also be moderated."
Unless I'm misunderstanding, doesn't that open the door for admin to decide what is and isn't a good reason to cast a no vote?
|
07-14-07 06:30am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(Schnitzel's Reply)
I wouldn't knock a CRT too much. If I had room for it, my 21" CRT wouldn't be in the attic. We're all sacrificing color and picture quality by going flat panel!
|
07-13-07 08:07pm
|
Reply
20
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
from exotics4me:
Which download manager do you use? I usually use the freebie Free Download Manager, it works fine for maybe 6 or 7 clips, but if I load 50 in it and leave the room, the site refreshes, even with my username and password in the manager. Thanks ahead of time.
|
07-10-07 11:47pm
|
