| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Still can't get into anal, ol' buddy .
But could try -- if I hav'ta, ...... to part the oceans if it were the only course of action at getting at your reviews.
|
05-13-14 08:20pm
|
Reply
627
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jook:
thank you once again for an incredibly informative review.
Normally after reading one of your reviews i can immediately decide whether to join. However, I'm on the ropes on this one. I've got plenty of petit/gorgeous Russian/eastern European doing anal in my collection. I ask, do I really need another one?
This will help make up my mind - how are the "bonus" sites? I know you said one sucked, not in so many words though ;). And how is the billing? After some bad experiences, I now factor this in.
Thanks again for your contribution.
|
05-13-14 04:10am
|
Reply
628
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tribex:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the reply I got them to cancel my subscription,the site is not great they have some hot girls but the guys filming are kinda annoying.
|
05-11-14 10:39am
|
Reply
629
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Glad for the warning, and also glad that you are able to take this so calmly.
I would be screaming my lungs out that I had been tricked.
Which would not be that good for me, at my age. Lol.
Thanks again for the warning.
This was a new one, for me.
Except that I was charged twice on my cell phone, for ring-tones, that I never ordered or agreed to buy.
My cell phone carrier representative told me I had probably opened a text message from some company, and that automatically gave the company the right to charge me for a service.
The reason I was charged twice (about $15 for each time), was that as soon as I noticed the charge on my monthly bill, I called my cell phone carrier to complain, they placed a block on the account, but somehow, I was still charged a second time by the *(^%$ ring-tone company.
I called the ring-tone company that charged me, they said they would give me a refund: it took about 4 months for me to get a refund, of $15 (they had charged me $15 twice, for a total of $30).
I gave up trying to get the rest of my money back.
But scams, thieves, whatever, are alive and well out there.
Even big-name corporations like to play games.
Sometimes they even get caught, and are forced to pay a fine.
But in the past, any fine they paid was small compared to the money they probably made from cheating their customers.
|
05-10-14 10:10am
|
Reply
630
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from tribex:
I'm having similar issues with cancelling my membership could you please tell me who to email.
|
05-08-14 10:35am
|
Reply
631
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from uscue:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Do they still actively update at all?
|
05-06-14 05:06pm
|
Reply
632
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from bibo:
Sorry, but that reply by NS is a load of nonsense. Looks like they're trying to talk their way out of this dodgy behaviour.
1. The quote I posted in my original comment is a copy/paste. They DID say 2 GB and 12 hour lockout.
2. People, who are using those horrible download managers to download more than 6GB content from sites are now considered "abusers", who are hurting the "legit" members (hurting them in what way exactly)? Welcome to the internet, welcome to 2014! I wonder how sites like Brazzers or RK are handling those abusers, considering the fact that some of their files are larger than 5GB. If the NS membership would be 12$, I wouldn't say a word, but NS comes at the usual full price range of 29$. That's quite a lot compared to similar sites, who are a LOT cheaper, have more content to offer and don't have a download limit.
3. There was no mentioning of the download limit, neither here on TBP, nor on the site (although I'm sure NS will point us to the crucial sentence, hidden somewhere behind a wall of text.)
Bottom line for me is:
If sites want to "protect" their content, it's their choice and that's fine. But this is a market. And being a customer, I want to be informed about what I get and what I don't get BEFORE I join, clearly and fairly. There are too many sites out there resorting to those little tricks or downright rip offs (see my pornxn comment).
|
05-05-14 09:15pm
|
Reply
633
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from Khan:
Please see rearadmiral's recent comment that gives updated info in the download limit.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=88844
|
05-05-14 06:25pm
|
Reply
634
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from badandy400:
Thanks for the great information. Will add them to the list of sites to not join.
|
05-04-14 01:44pm
|
Reply
635
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from bibo:
Thanks for the confirmation!
This site is on my "avoid" list from now on. Time for TBP to add this to the site review and maybe adjust the score.
|
05-04-14 10:54am
|
Reply
636
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
^^ Yep I'm with what graymane says. I'm not here much now, but the least I can do is drop by to congratulaute you on yet another very high quality informative review.
This is one that I almost went with over a year ago, but what put me off is the low quality resolutions, and if you get used to that high spec material, you do notice the difference.
|
04-29-14 11:44am
|
Reply
637
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
I'm passing on some very important info to the right people upstairs, RA, about lookin' into providing you with a much deserved reciprocal Company retirement package.
Yep! you heard me right!
The unstoppable flow of your numerous, comprehensively reviewed sites, courted by an unmatched editorial quality born of each review, that would be the envy of any noted, local news pundit serving on any paper within the U-S-of-A ......
I figure your notoriously proven power of sway, guiding judgment, and directing fellow members in the right direction, not to mention the blood-sweat-an-tears that went into each effort on your part.... all of which, adding up to awarding you at least equal monetary allotment.... with and among which the whole being shared by our PU founders, their loyal, time-honored and presently entrenched staff.
|
04-29-14 02:41am
|
Reply
638
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It's not exactly artcore or glamcore. Imagine the format that you're used to for g/g content on ALS, then make it b/g. No condoms, last time I checked!
By the way, I should amend my review in one way. Their latest photosets have increased in resolution to 5000x3000. They have always been the first to adopt the highest resolution formats, and they are making good on that tradition.
|
04-23-14 05:56pm
|
Reply
639
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
C'mon, RA ..... lighten up. I'm running out of superlatives with which to cap the anointing praise consistent with your unending display of journalistic talents.
My God, man! ......get some sleep.
|
04-20-14 07:36am
|
Reply
640
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Marcus:
Thanks for such a great review, and for addressing the elephant in the room (ie, the upsells). Honestly, as amazing as the site is, and even bearing in mind your recommendations, it's still not worth the risk for me. All it would take for me to think again would be for a 'you will be billed extra for this - are you sure' popup to appear.
|
04-19-14 10:15am
|
Reply
641
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jook:
Thanks as always for a thorough review.
Maybe I need an internet lesson. My experience has been horrible (I'm in my 1st week and basically gave up). First, I was double charged. I was taken to epoch where my card was rejected in a microsecond. I was then brought to a secondary processor where I had no problem. That is, except that I got charged by epoch also. I thought I was joining the site Latina rampage. At least that's what I clicked. . After joining, I saw no reference to this site. My only option was bangbros, which I hate. Tattooed warriors, not my style. I couldn't get any other site without being asked for another $29. I have to think I'm doing something wrong but have no idea what. And I'd rather forego the dough rather than spend hours emailing and trying to figure it out. Does Latina rampage even exist?
|
04-18-14 12:46pm
|
Reply
642
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment from rearadmiral:
I should add, in the interest of fairness, that my email received a response that was quick and effective. My advice to anyone joining an add-on here is to keep you joining email for any information you may need to cancel. I did, and though that didn't work I suspect that having all that information to provide in an email helped out.
|
04-17-14 04:35pm
|
Reply
643
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Monahan:
Agree with the Squirrel, RA. Another great review.
My only addition is that I use Firefox as my browser and had frequent problems signing on. The unstated limits seemed to arrive even on the first or second D/L. When I had Firefox access issues I could access with IE immediately but couldn't download anything. I also don't like having to switch browsers.
RK's support provided no he;p fixing the issue so I just decided to quit trying. There are plenty of other great sites so fighting to access what I've paid for just ain't worth the frustration.
|
04-10-14 11:29pm
|
Reply
644
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another great review admiral, and good investigation into the very cloudy download limit situation. Most if us hate download limits, but they're even worse when you're unclear what the download limit is.
|
04-10-14 08:53am
|
Reply
645
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Loki:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.
It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.
|
04-09-14 11:04pm
|
Reply
646
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The first time I went to the tour site using the PU link the price was $29.95. I logged out and did something else. I went back a few minutes later, spent more time checking out the talent, then decided to move on. As I was exiting the tour site a pop up offered me was $23.95, 20% off the $23.95. I visited the tour site twice...so maybe they felt I was close to signing up and needed an extra nudge.
Whatever, I decided not to join the site.
|
04-06-14 11:59am
|
Reply
647
|
Industry Invaders
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Divinx:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Those that rip off whole sites, know well how to get the movies, no matter what the site owner may try against it. So they are not going to chase away pirates, but are chasing away potential paying customers.
|
04-04-14 04:32am
|
Reply
648
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I agree - I'm never going to join Bangbrothers because of their shady practices, and I don't see why tricking those who do is a good business plan because they're hardly encouraging loyalty.
|
04-01-14 11:34pm
|
Reply
649
|
Hard X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from EverNight:
Thanks for the review
|
03-31-14 10:42am
|
Reply
650
|
Hard X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another excellent review. I wasn't aware of this one until I saw your forum post. Question is - will it grow? If they update it looks to be a great site, with professionally shot material, and one that appeals to my taste. Nice find admiral.
|
03-30-14 05:19pm
|
