| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(elephant's Reply)
I'll look to see if there's a way I can move it. If not, no biggie. Just thought it'd mean more if it was with the site's listing.
Followup - thread moved
|
04-17-12 08:06am
|
Reply
402
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(elephant's Reply)
Guys, you may want to continue this discussion on the SexArt listing page https://www.pornusers.com/review/sexart/
... rather than keeping it under MetArt
|
04-17-12 07:36am
|
Reply
403
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Abel Semen:
It seems pretty good so far but is a little short on content right now, which is to be expected I guess.
It's especially short on boy-girl hardcore - two photo sets out of 32 (one of which couldn't really be called "hardcore"), one non-series film out of 19, and nothing in either of the "original series", as far as I can see. I'm hoping this changes in a hurry.
The mean quality of what's there is VERY high (the fact that most of it isn't B/G hardcore notwithstanding), but right now, if your tastes run in a Met-Art type direction but more hardcore, you're better off at, say, X-Art or PassionHD. (Or orgasms.xxx if you also prefer your women a little older, I suppose.) Much more stuff plus law of averages equals more stuff you'll like despite the average level being maybe a little lower. In time, this will change and sexart is going to be really awesome sooner or later, I predict.
|
04-15-12 06:58pm
|
Reply
404
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from slutty:
Sounds interesting, although I would hope they can manage to do it a little more erotic than MetArt is, at it has a tendency to be a bit overly 'arty' at times.
|
04-08-12 10:56pm
|
Reply
405
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from Monahan:
Good review (because it reflects, accurately, a lot of my thoughts).
The site is huge so it is impossible for anyone who has a life to check out each end every model. The boredom factor hit me as well because many (most?) sets were so similar that I got the feeling I'd seen the set before.
But the part I really appreciate about the site is elephant's observation that the site treats its models with total respect. That's a rare characteristic that shows up in very few sites.
As for me, I'm a video guy so I can't be a continuing member on a site whose videos are, mostly, recordings of photo shoots.
My other problem is that the models are identified only by first name and a number so if I really like someone and want to see if she appears on other sites, I cannot do that.
Last point. If you are into the harder side of soft core (insertions, pussy play, etc.) this site is not for you.
|
02-23-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
406
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from badandy400:
I would absolutely love to see the girls getting more frisky with each other. That is one of the things I liked about FTV Girls and MC-Nudes, very similar sites, but more girl on girls action going on!
|
12-06-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
407
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Wittyguy:
OMG, if they did a Met-Art hardcore site I would be in heaven, especially if they used the same high quality production and quality at the flagship site. However, I am also of the opinion that I don't really see a h/c site fitting into their marketing scheme. At best it would be a small site since most of the models their probably wouldn't do hc and why ruin a great thing they already have going.
|
12-06-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
408
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Drooler:
I have no hopes of MetArt doing any kind of hardcore material. Nor any wishes.
Monahan is right about their branding and their stature. If I were them, how would I see a need to diversify into the already soaked and saturated hardcore market?
They've come a long, long way from their beginnings of having 1 part of one shoot per day (the other parts sometimes being months away!). It had to have been a lot of work and a lot of smarts to gain their current reputation among softcore lovers.
But some of their models are hardcore babes on other sites. I was checking out Katie at TeenSexMania and I know that I've seen her at MetArt. And there are others.
Some girls just have that kind of range.
|
12-06-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
409
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
I did some googling, but so far I haven't come up with anything.
|
12-06-08 11:00am
|
Reply
410
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Monahan:
I doubt that they'll go hardcore. MetArt is at the top of the softcore game and have a huge subscriber base staying soft.
Now that's not to say they may start a hardcore site but I doubt they'll do any kind of tie-in with MetArt. They will want to protect their brand.
[Now that I've said that, watch 'em do exactly that. ;-) ]
|
12-06-08 10:54am
|
Reply
411
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
"Hardcore" means Male/Female doesn't it?
With the prissy Met-Art models ?!
|
12-06-08 10:53am
|
Reply
412
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
FYI - I added the Evil Angel channel at Videobox and there isn't a lot of overlap between the three sites. That good because it makes them all valuable, but bad because you have to get three site memberships (four if you count Videobox) to get all the Evil Angel material on the internet. You can see everything on offer without joining so if you're a big Evil Angel fan I'd recommend checking it out.
|
12-11-11 05:18pm
|
Reply
413
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I'll be adding Evil Angel to my Videobox membership soon so it I find that the content is completely different I'll be sure to let you know. Certainly the TBP discount membership to both stand-alone Evil Angel sites is still likely the best value. Those prices are hard to beat.
|
12-11-11 08:08am
|
Reply
414
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
There isn't a lot of overlap with the other Evil Angel site so it is definitely worth looking at both. What I don't have an answer to is whether both Evil Angel sites have a lot of overlap with the Evil Angel 'channel' at Videobox. I have a regular membership at VB now and plan to add the Evil Angel channel soon so I might have an answer to that too.
|
12-06-11 05:52pm
|
Reply
415
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from mcb80295:
Thankfully I read these reviews, no way in hell I would join a streaming only site!
|
10-21-16 09:39am
|
Reply
416
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I'm a member - got this as an add-on to my Brazzers.com membership. Perhaps there are different types of memberships. That seems to be a "thing" these days. I have the ability to download every scene except the not-yet-released scenes, though they are encouraging people to buy a VIP membership that would also give members access to those scenes.
|
09-16-16 02:26pm
|
Reply
417
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
I think Mofo started to see a significant reduction in new members while seeing more and more members not remaining longer and they saw an opportunity to keep those existing members all the while still attracting the unsuspecting new ones or even those aware that new members can only stream the content. I guess it must work because they have been doing this for a while now and haven't changed their policy.
Mind you they are owned by Mindgeek who makes most of their money through the streaming of stolen content broadcasted on their various tube sites. maybe they don't care if one of their sites makes little if any money.
|
09-14-16 06:11pm
|
Reply
418
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from pat362:
Take the following with a grain of salt. If you go to TBP's review of Mofo and scroll to the bottom of the page. You will see that X3Guide has a September 2016 review that claims that you can upgrade your membership to VIP status in the members section which would allow downloads. Of course that now means that your 20$ membership will go up to 30$. You have to decide if it's worth it. The other thing to consider is that existing members have the download option available to them but do they have to pay 30$ or did they negotiate their price prior to quitting the site.
|
09-11-16 10:16am
|
Reply
419
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(elephant's Reply)
Great, thanks, Elephant. I must go check again.
|
11-20-11 10:18am
|
Reply
420
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
I thought they might not be exclusif when I first saw them but that quick research I did makes me think that they are. I'm sure I have seen similar content elsewhere but not those videos.
|
06-16-12 11:14am
|
Reply
421
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from slutty:
I as well poked around, and couldn't find any of it on DVD, I have some movies with a similar theme with many of the same ladies, but they aren't the same scenes.
|
06-12-12 01:04am
|
Reply
422
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from pat362:
If it's available then it's must be on other sites because I checked the IAFD pages of a couple of the performers and they don't have any dvd's of these scenes.
|
06-10-12 12:39pm
|
Reply
423
|
Money Talks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(elephant's Reply)
The one thing about the DL limit, I'm not having any problems with it. What I have been doing is downloading 2 full scenes from each site, each day, equals about 8 GB per day, and I have yet to be cut off. My understanding is that they get you when you download a lot from one site in one day, like if you downloaded 8 full scenes in 1 day from Money Talks.
Agree about the daring men parts, some of it is just sickening. Some of it comes off as very staged too. The one scene where the women are washing cars. The guy's girlfriend who they get to flash later in the movie, is in about 4 other videos on their other sites. I guess they could always say she had never been in porn until that dare, but some of it just seems a little fake.
|
10-21-07 11:08pm
|
Reply
424
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(elephant's Reply)
We're both wrong I think---she's Ira! These models should stick with one name!
|
01-19-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
425
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
At FemJoy, Anya is "Fibby." As a visitor, click models and then type in a search on that name. 3 photosets, no videos.
At JustTeenSite, she's "Ira." Their models list also has a search, but just find that name in the popup list. Then you'll find her along with the other 6 Ira's. I think they have about 4 photosets of her, but no vids.
I found Vikka as Vikka at eurobabesindex. They list about 15 sites that she's been on. No hardcore, though.
|
01-06-08 03:25am
|
