| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from exotics4me:
I believe if I remember correctly all photo sets after mid-2008 are zipped, but they didn't go back and zip the sets that were already up. Video quality was 640 high end from what I remember. Though if you're interested in this site, I would recommend joining through Pacino's Adventures, not Pacino's World or La Zona Modelos. If you join through Pacino's Adventures you get La Zona Modelos as a bonus site and Pacino's Adventures has quite a collection of HD quality videos all exclusive.
|
05-18-10 03:19am
|
Reply
27
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from exotics4me:
I don't think any of their sites are updating any longer. I had talked with a site rep or webmaster who said their costs were too much to keep filming new content at the high technical quality that they were filming in. I don't know if that's true or not, but as a side note, can't guarantee this either, but when I was last a member it was when they had stopped updating. When I went to cancel after 2 weeks as a member, it gave me the option to transfer my remaining 2 weeks to any of their other sites. Kind of making it like a network except you had to go through the switching sites part.
|
05-18-10 03:16am
|
Reply
28
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Look for Exotics' reviews. He has reviewed related sites, I believe, and given details on this site.
|
05-17-10 07:51pm
|
Reply
29
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from anyonebutme:
I thought the guy who ran the site, Raul Cristian, just didn't want to continue with the sites. I think he went and worked in L.A. for awhile. Or I don't know.
|
05-17-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
30
|
Full Screen Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from yote78:
Oh yes, sorry, williamj. I forgot to mention that the trailer runs for only about 10 seconds and then crashes. I didn't think it was really worth mentioning in my review and, frankly, I'd forgotten about it.
But don't let that sway your judgment too much about the site. Once you enter the site there are no such problems and everything streams and downloads just fine. Aside from the "Cons" I listed in my review, it's a pretty damn good site.
As far as them listing "exclusive" models that actually have been seen many other places, all I can say is they are certainly not the only adult site that does that. And can you really tell me that you would pass up the chance to watch such a beauty as Blue Angel get very nasty with herself just because of a relatively small lapse in truth in advertising? Yes, she has her own site now, over at 21st Century/Porn Pass For All and she's even more smokin' hot there. But that doesn't mean I don't love to see her anywhere I can. MOST (not all) of the models on Full Screen Teen I've seen on many other sites and I'm happy to be entertained by their lovely charms no matter where I encounter them.
|
04-29-10 06:18am
|
Reply
31
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
I agree, williamj. I'm amazed by many things at this site, the models as well as the high-end, luxurious sets. There's sometimes so much ornament, color, and detail that it's like Ridley Scott decided to direct some soft porn for a change of pace.
And I can't say too much about the silence factor: no music, ZERO blather from the cameraman, and precious little from the model.
Oh, and they seem to be holding the camera much steadier than a few years ago!
|
02-09-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
32
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from WeeWillyWinky:
(williamj's Reply)
I don't have a Comcast connection, I have a cable connection. I never heard of Comcast before this thread.
|
02-09-10 12:29pm
|
Reply
33
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from WeeWillyWinky:
(williamj's Reply)
You mean, I presume, that the DL came in at 2,200kb a second? Holy crap, that's more than three times as fast as my optimal speed, which is around 700k a sec. I thought I had a reasonably fast connection. Yikes.
Oh, and by the way, the downloads have been okay for me recently, ranging from 300 to 700k.
|
01-27-10 08:39pm
|
Reply
34
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(williamj's Reply)
as i told so in my review ;)
|
12-09-09 08:16am
|
Reply
35
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wetandpuffy:
(williamj's Reply)
Hi there, We havnt yet updated our preview pages and there is alot more inside the members area. What is it you would like to see more of if you dont mind me asking.
Regards
|
12-08-09 01:48pm
|
Reply
36
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from abbywinters:
Hi Williamj,
The balance of explicitness in our GG shoots is unlikely to change from what you have already seen, so we may not be the site for you.
Thanks for the feedback, tho, it helps us keep focus!
|
11-24-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
37
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(williamj's Reply)
Yeah - agreed - I got bored when they started having too much photo-shopping in the pics, but it's a really good site - very consistent with hot women posing, stripping and masturbating - sounds good to me!
|
11-23-09 07:55pm
|
Reply
38
|
Machine Sex Slaves
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Pornbro:
(williamj's Reply)
hope so too, I am really excited if the next site fuckslut-license-test.com (15th. september) will have more scenes at the start (12 @ tame that bitch launch).
|
09-09-09 12:32am
|
Reply
39
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
you still get access to their other sites like huge strapon lesbians when you join. it's worth joining if you never have before.
|
08-25-09 11:14pm
|
Reply
40
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(williamj's Reply)
This decrease in updates wouldn't be as bad if a) they stopped advertising 2 updates per day, b) they added an extra update when one of their "Jokes" sets was the set posted, or c) they added an extra update when they posted an ALS Scan set posted - I've got to give props once again to ALS Scan - when they post a set from 1 By Day, it's an extra - it's not a replacement to the ALS Scan material that would be posted that day. In my view if a site is going to a flag-ship site - as ALS Scan is - as One By Day is - and if they're going to charge premium prices - you have to join One-By-Day for a full year to bring the monthly price below $20/month - then they ought to be held to quite a high standard of performance.
If they've got one main guy as they photographer, and he's stretched doing work on their other sites, they ought to do what Suze Randall did and cultivate a group of contributing photographers - have those others fill out the updates on the site to give more value to the members.
|
04-17-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
41
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Balibalo:
(williamj's Reply)
Precisely I'm not a newbie and what you say doesn't explain the issue.
|
04-16-09 06:51am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from james4096:
(williamj's Reply)
I do love going back an looking at stuff I haven't seen in years. I love those trips down memory lane.
|
04-14-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
43
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(williamj's Reply)
The webmaster replied about the missing videos that they are on a sister site hugestraponlesbians.com that is included in the membership.
|
04-10-09 02:48pm
|
Reply
44
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(williamj's Reply)
You ask a question that seems to have a disturbing answer-NO. I checked out the members pages quite thoroughly and compared them to the preview. The lesbian videos do NOT appear on the site. Specifically the tour page shows videos for Kream and Hellizabeth dated 3/2/9, Cassidy and Anya dated 2/23/9, Jaelynn and Chelsea dated 2/16/9, Barbara and Suzanne dated 2/9/9 and Natalie and Cameron dated 2/2/9. NONE OF THESE VIDEOS ARE ON THE SITE. I did find a total of 4 lesbian videos, but the most recent is on May 13, 2008.
|
04-10-09 02:23pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(williamj's Reply)
Agree with both - so it's just a waste of time - and besides, the main issue for this user: lack of security.
|
03-27-09 07:32am
|
Reply
46
|
Pacino's Adventures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Flimo:
(williamj's Reply)
Thank you for the info.
|
02-22-09 06:20am
|
Reply
47
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(williamj's Reply)
Thanks, williamj, that's just what I needed to hear. That makes watermarks a non-issue for me as well!
|
01-29-09 01:12pm
|
Reply
48
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Toadsith:
(williamj's Reply)
Glad to hear it got sorted out :-)
|
01-28-09 03:44pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(williamj's Reply)
Considering how much computers have changed in the 30 years since 1979 (remember the TRS 80? The "PC clones?" the IBM 360 and 370?, DOS 2.1, 4.0 and 6;12? remember WordStar and Multimate? remember when the Internet really only became available to the general public in the early 1990's?) and considering that high quality porn on the web is a whole lot less than 10 years old, my answer to your question is, NO. I really can't imagine what will be happening with porn in 10 years, much less 30 years. (Perhaps someone will invent VC (virtual copulation) in the next decade. ;)
|
01-19-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from pat362:
(williamj's Reply)
I don't think so, because they would be sticking their unshaved, sweat soaked armpits right under his nose.
|
01-15-09 07:15pm
|
