| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from badandy400:
I must say that it is not true anyway. I did not do my homework on this site before joining, though this site by the way. I was charged extra for joining this site, and that was this past Sunday night. The site is very large and runs very fast and easy, but I do agree with avoiding it based on principal. The do rip people off, and it is fraud. The only reason I download from the site was to at least make them pay for the bandwidth usage, I am sure that 150 GB in 6 hours is not cheap to maintain. I felt a need to rip them off just as they did to me and many others now. It is too bad this site could not be bought out by an honest porn lover, instead it is run by people as evil as the oil executives who rape us every time we drive to work.
They need to clean up their act. There are good things to say about this site, but I do not want to say them without saying "DONT JOIN!"
|
03-21-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
102
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from asmith12:
I think I've missed something :-). Could somebody tell what's all this whole story is about?
|
03-21-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
103
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Rick:
(williamj's Reply)
Cool. Your welcome man. Here's my reply to that...
Regarding our sister site (at this time only being TheBestPorn.com), it uses the same outgoing links as PornUsers, so anything we do on either site will apply for both. I can't speak for other review sites and have no control over their links.
The fact that we did something about this, should say how we disapprove of that billing method. In my last reply I spelled out clearly how I thought it was misleading as well. If we did approve of this type of practice, we would do nothing about it. We post warnings when we see something that's unusual or shady all the time also.
I could go on about what we warn people about, especially the details we try to provide with trial information (which no other site has tackled yet). We have a lot of plans to expand on thse warnings in our site facts also, but it's down the road a bit (one thing at time, forum is next).
You say you want us to boycott the site, but you also say "you're not looking for some police on what adult sites to join". I'm not in the business to structure boycotts and blacklists, that would be a nightmare and probably result in disaster. If there's proof of something going down, we'll expose the facts. You guys decide who to boycott and who not to. Our job is to provide you with the means to do so.
|
03-20-08 08:01pm
|
Reply
104
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from jd1961:
It is much better for TBP and PU to leave this site up in the listings. because I can tell you , after reading the warnings and comments here, that there is no way i would ever join this site. And it's because it is listed. If it weren't listed, how would I know? When I consider joining a site, I look at all the input here. And I'm not the only one looking---the webmaster is also. let him see all the warnings.
|
03-20-08 07:37pm
|
Reply
105
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Rick:
(williamj's Reply)
Hey William,
Thought I would add another point of view from the staff here at Pornusers.
Our entire goal behind TheBestPorn and PornUsers is to expose everything, good and bad. Consider us as the fact checkers. We absolutely work with both sides here... the consumers and the vendors. Our goal is to bring good consumers together with good products/services. Sometimes it's not always easy to do.
When I saw the join page from an e-mail we initially had received, I went straight to Ken (who's job is to work with webmasters on getting special deals, assist on issues such as this, etc.) to help resolve this. The cross-sells to me were extremely misleading. We hate seeing tactics like that and our consumers NEED to be aware of them at the very least. Be very clear, we DO NOT endorse this practice. We went to them and straight up told them how we felt. We were getting ready to add warning messages on our pages like we normally would, but it was surprising that they actually resolved this for our consumers as quickly as they did (we honestly didn't expect they would) and removed such cross-sells from the join page.
The point of my post is to illustrate our position and where we stand and what to expect from us. Expect us to have your back, but not always in the way you want. Either way, we still have your back. You might think we should remove the Incredible Pass sites completely. It sure would be a lot easier for us, but we have always believed in giving the users all the information (warnings) and letting them choose. Users can then decide whether it's worth the risk to continue or not. Who are we to say they shouldn't be given the choice.
These type of things do come up quite a bit and we have to make the decision we think is best for that situation. In this situation, the fact that our links now provide no crosss-sells and still maintain a discounted price, means we've done a damn good job with this one. If yer looking for us to be the porn police, unfortunately that's just not the business we want to be in.
|
03-20-08 06:19pm
|
Reply
106
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(williamj's Reply)
Okay - I guess it was easy enough to have missed Ken's explanation. But there are still more diplomatic ways to get a point across without screaming accusations about criminal activity and leaving the forum.
Maybe I have to say that I take this somewhat personally because I am a member of this site and, by your original post, I felt like I was being told I was also guilty by association. I think the people at PornUsers do a great service to it's members and will defend it when I feel the need to.
And thank you for your response. : - )
|
03-20-08 05:20pm
|
Reply
107
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Wow.
Drama time.
williamj -
At first, I wasn't too happy about what Ken's announcement appeared to say either. But, if you'd bother to read what he had to say to Denner in his comment about this issue, there would be no need for all this yelling, and kicking. He said:
"I was not trying to present this as an "offer". I think that my excitement cam thru the wrong way in my previous post. For that I appologize."
No one is forcing you to associate yourself with PornUsers. If it really meant all you said it did, that it was enough to make you think that PornUser's is run by people who condone criminal activity, why bother posting a separate comment on something that was already addressed? You are certainly free to leave us if you so choose. But do it with a little grace - not by screaming about respect, disgrace and criminals...
|
03-20-08 04:32pm
|
Reply
108
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Denner:
Apart from my earlier answer to both williamj and Vegas Ken on this matter, just this:
I totally agree with williamj: BOYCUTT ALL SITES FROM THIS COMPANY!
Just see the troubles and problems these people have caused other PUs......It could have been you!
But bottom line, Vegas Ken of TBP admitted the input about the socalled improvement from the pass-site was a slip.
I still have confidence in TBP and PU.
|
03-20-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
109
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(williamj's Reply)
Hey williamj...
Please see my answer to Vegas Ken - AND also his answer.
I still believe in this PU and TBP. Even if I had the same worries you have...
Our friends at TBP is doing a hell of a job here - not only for our blue eyes, of course. But still: the coordination of fellow PUs and the TBP putting up this PU-thing is maybe the best way for us pornsite consumers to get good tips and good warnings. And this kind of slip, I have not seen before. I regard it as a mistake.
Let's all move on from here....and enjoy fine tips and good warnings from both TBP and fellow users at PU.
Swell reply, thanks, williamj
|
03-20-08 02:28pm
|
Reply
110
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(williamj's Reply)
Thanks for your interest in my review. I'm a newbie but, the way I see it, the rating of "Excellent - Site is near perfect, best in its class. Highly recommended" is perfectly justifiable in this case.
The key is "best in its class". I've been member to several other American professional Individual Models sites (Porn Stars and published Glamour models alike) and few come close to deliver half as this. You may not like Jaime Hammer's looks or personality (probably not worth joining, then) or expect every adult site to be a gynecology textbook (this site is clearly not one) but the quality of the product and the high degree of involvement of the model with her site is undeniable and way higher than most other similar Individual Models sites.
The cons are not that big. After all, seeing nobody but the website model in an official website is what you join for not to just get "girlfriend" updates of models you are not interested in. Images and videos are currently big enough to fill most screens. HD quality is cool but I don't look for it so I listed them as cons for those who do. Maybe a bit too few images in the galleries but more could become repetitive in a softcore model.
On the other hand, the site is currently clearly misscategorized at PU: it should by no means be in the Porn Stars category but Softcore or Glamour. If you look at it as a Porn Stars site, you will be very disappointed.
Also, the TBP official review is 2 years outdated although I'm in awe that they updated the site facts after my review. For completeness, let me state again that half the galleries (the most recent ones) are available as zip files and that the content is not amateur in any sense.
|
04-20-08 03:46am
|
Reply
111
|
Jay's POV
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from mr smut:
The previews are working for me. I didn't have any problems to view them.
|
11-27-08 10:36pm
|
Reply
112
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Mitch74:
This site is not bad just a little pricey for what you get most sets are not in zip file format though...If you are really into latinas and have plenty of time to click through the pics its worth it at least a 2 month subscription. These girls are really the hottest latinas on the net. I just don't have that kind of time no days.
|
01-03-12 11:20pm
|
Reply
113
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from exotics4me:
I believe if I remember correctly all photo sets after mid-2008 are zipped, but they didn't go back and zip the sets that were already up. Video quality was 640 high end from what I remember. Though if you're interested in this site, I would recommend joining through Pacino's Adventures, not Pacino's World or La Zona Modelos. If you join through Pacino's Adventures you get La Zona Modelos as a bonus site and Pacino's Adventures has quite a collection of HD quality videos all exclusive.
|
05-18-10 03:19am
|
Reply
114
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Look for Exotics' reviews. He has reviewed related sites, I believe, and given details on this site.
|
05-17-10 07:51pm
|
Reply
115
|
Lesbian Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Bacchus:
(williamj's Reply)
It is probably one of the worst websites I've ever perused...
|
10-30-07 07:06pm
|
Reply
116
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(williamj's Reply)
Thanks, they do have a model index now, well, it isn't really a model index but you click on "See all of Sal's girls" and it brings up this page of thumbnailed pictures of each model. That helps a little, but the navigation is still very clunky. I didn't even realize I was looking at movie clips to download because of the wording. I thought those were some kind of preview clips since it didn't say, "movies". I really liked the models though, even though I usually just go for the glamour models.
Thanks for the reply.
|
10-04-07 08:01pm
|
Reply
117
|
Machine Sex Slaves
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Pornbro:
(williamj's Reply)
hope so too, I am really excited if the next site fuckslut-license-test.com (15th. september) will have more scenes at the start (12 @ tame that bitch launch).
|
09-09-09 12:32am
|
Reply
118
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from jd1961:
Thanks, his site needs a review here. Look forward to seeing it.
|
10-11-07 06:57pm
|
Reply
119
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tom Veller:
(williamj's Reply)
Hallo WilliamJ,
please review our new movie samples page :-)
Martin
|
10-14-07 08:52am
|
Reply
120
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tom Veller:
(williamj's Reply)
Hallo WilliamJ,
thanks to quick reply and another suggestions. We will make changes on sample movie ASAP!
Have a nice day,
Martin
|
10-14-07 03:27am
|
Reply
121
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Tom Veller:
Another news - Free Gallery with 21 photos in mid-res (1024px) was added. See our title page.
Thanks
Martin
|
10-12-07 09:01am
|
Reply
122
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Tom Veller:
Hallo,
thanks for comment. Please review improved title page of EvelynsGlamour; we add new features, thumbnails not linked to JOIN page only, now and there is a new item on right column - List of Models.
I hope this changes reflects your suggestions!
|
10-12-07 04:48am
|
Reply
123
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(williamj's Reply)
OK, I've gone through "Browse All," and there are seven videos in total. I thought that browsing the subsections, "My Exclusves," "My Photos," "My Exclusive Girls," and "Czech Girls" would show the videos, but nooooo.
They really ought to have a link just for the videos.
There aren't nearly as many of Evelyn as at her former site. Where'd it all go?
|
10-07-07 06:15am
|
Reply
124
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(williamj's Reply)
Glad you reminded me of this. I've just gone and amended the review and raised the score. Webmaster had responded and promised to replace the watermark, and by golly they did on all the sets! That's very positive.
The new watermark takes up mostly horizontal space at the bottom. It could be smaller yet, but it's still much easier on the eyes than the garishly ugly thing they'd had before.
But about videos, I've just scoured all over the site and I can't find any. I wonder what's up with that? Makes me glad I'd joined Evelyn's first site and grabbed some. I'm not that into softcore videos, but Evelyn was very sensual in her solo stuff. She really got to me!
|
10-07-07 04:57am
|
Reply
125
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(williamj's Reply)
It's true, I think every site should have a few nice sample photos. I took a chance on this site due to exotic's review, and wasn't disappointed.
|
10-07-07 03:39am
|
