Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from asmith12:
(TheViking's Reply)
> But think it would be great if you submited yours too, you might have a better angle on it with "the WORST" processor.
Submitted, let's see if it comes out.
|
11-26-07 12:09pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Khan:
(TheViking's Reply)
As an aside regarding your poll submission ...
We're going to accept it with a little tweaking. However, for the record (and so they don't think we're dissing them) we'll note that both Denner and roseman submitted similar questions (that were not approved at the time) over the last few months.
|
11-26-07 10:51am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(TheViking's Reply)
> That would be an interesting topic for next poll.
You're right; will you submit it yourself or want me to do it? (to fit it into current poll system, I'll probably make it something like "Which CC processor do you think is the WORST?")
> Myself, I allways see it as a big plus if a site is ccbill caus i never had any problems with them
Ditto.
|
11-26-07 04:12am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(TheViking's Reply)
I'll tell you that that being American, I don't appreciate at all what some of these companies are doing, especially since they gear all their sites toward the American consumer (such as naming Olga "Betty"), and I am not patronizing the sites that are doing this.
|
11-26-07 01:29am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Denner:
(TheViking's Reply)
That not the entire story about the dollar-payment.
Quite a few of the most popular sites are charged i euros.
|
11-25-07 08:22pm
|