Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
I think its been totally unfair to judge you just cause you like another network over another. I was pleased you posted the link as I did like the theme so much and theres nowt wrong with helping out other users find sites or directing them to knowledge that theres other sites available.
Everyones entitled to an opinion, and me I like both companies videos lesbian sex scenes of what I've seen. I've only been a member of lezcuties but loved their choice of models and the sex is hot, quality of the movies I found could certainly be improved or give at least a higher quality option. With DDF vids I've seen I really like the lighting and camerwork on what I've seen of the new material. Sure the 2005 material is lower quality stuff and the lighting maybe isn't as good as the stuff around now.
I think its healthy to have little debates and people like different things and different styles of porn turn them on. Lesbian porn is my favourite too, I think both networks have a great love of European sexy models who are great at sex scenes and both have something to offer me. Not going to please everyone which is totally fair enough stuff.
Just my little take on it, Davit welcome to Porn Users, I think its an awesome place here and I don't work for the forum or any porn company, lol, love to though someday, dream job. No I must say this site is a great addition to thebestporn and its so well done they way its been evolved and had the problems of people posting fake reviews of their site, the way its dealt with. I certainly love visiting it here to see what site is hot or discover peoples opinions.
God I do ramble, I shut up now
|
01-02-08 03:32pm
|
Reply
127
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(Davit's Reply)
Not a problem. Just wanted to keep the record straight.
|
01-02-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
128
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
I don't mean to be overly cautious, but the old timers here will agree that we worked hard to keep this site untainted. I myself was once "bribed" by a webmaster to change my comments at one time. Bela is a great webmaster BTW, extremely helpful. I think your very low score hurt his feelings!
|
01-02-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
129
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Khan:
(Davit's Reply)
Davit said:
>> "But I was kind of disappointed to realise that this whole review site must be biased if the webmaster is affiliated with DDF."
That is a mistake on your part.
The owner/operators of TBP/PornUsers.com are NOT directly associated with DDF.
The webmaster of that site (Bela) speaks for themself just as you speak for yourself. Neither of you speaks for PornUsers.com Please try to keep the difference straight in your mind.
|
01-02-08 11:39am
|
Reply
130
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Well, it seemed to me like enough coincidence that it might arouse suspicions, but when that happens, sometimes the suspicions turn out to be wrong. I decided to hint at it and go no further.
There was a time when PU was having a real problem with shills (not to say it can't happen again). I even joined a site, a very disppointing one, on a shill's recommendation. Overall, it was getting tiresome and frustrating. Then I suspected one new member of being a shill -- he wrote a glowing review (of a site I knew) that seemed really over the top -- and I treated him to a nasty dose of ridicule. Whoops!
Anway, it's good to have your comments about the angles and camera steadiness. I agree with you on that aspect of the 21st Sextury stuff I've seen over the years. I think of Victoria Swinger getting it from behind in a standing position. So very nice! But overall I'm not big on videos, so I really can't make a lot of comparisons.
Anyway, all the best and I look forward to the negative reviews you have planned. ;)
|
01-02-08 11:38am
|
Reply
131
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from jd1961:
I am very suspicious of this review, referencing another network complete with hotlink is not what we are looking for here.
|
01-02-08 09:25am
|
Reply
132
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
Hi Denner and Davit
Yeah Theres a little something for everyone here I guess, its massive so keeps you busy, yeah theres a few things to moan a little bit about like there is really all sites. no site is perfect. Some of the older material before 2005 is on the poorer quality scale but love the new options of all the download qualities, certainly pleases all now.
Lulu and Cindy vid Denner was 2007-05-07 incase you wanted to find it straight away. I've seen a few more vids soon and yeah agree that some weird camera angles but actually found it a bit refreshing to be honest. On a few of the vids theres some awesome shots of pussy licking in views I've never seen before and in awesome quality, almost like your there lol
Maybe I'll join clubsandy.com later on in the year Looks a great clip though Davit, they all look very cute and I'm a massive fan of Sophie Moon.
More Ice Cream pussies please, very sexy to see.
Up to now I'm enjoying 1by-day, well the fresh less done up makeup wise girls and very impressive lesbian scenes that are up there with great Saphhic Erotica, which a lot of people say has gone down hill which yeah theres a lot of scenes going through the motions but in general theres mainly hot stuff still in my eyes. The lesbian stuff I'm finding here are surprisingly hot so look forward to going through the archives more. Would love a scene withe Belicia and Priscilla, my dream scene maybe a threesome with Nella would be nice, incase your reading webmaster. try your best for us, lol
|
01-02-08 09:17am
|
Reply
133
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Bela:
You're entitled to your opinion, but I very much doubt that most members of Pornusers will agree with you.
I also find it "interesting" that the sites you have reviewed so far (ClubSandy-95, Lezbo-Honey-90 and Dirty101-90) all happen to be owned by the same company - surely it must be co-incidence. And surely 1by-day's score of 75 must be a typo.
1by-day has been around ten years, has a huge following and lots of loyal members and you're going to have a hard time convincing them that our models' "talents are wasted here" and that our content has "bad lighting, shaky camera work, inability to get decent angles or close-ups, bad editing." Perhaps you've been downloading videos from 2002? :)
So, you're entitled to your opinion and we'll see what other Pornusers make of it, but my personal opinion is that your review it total bull and you shouldn't be using Pornusers as a place to plug sites which you are no doubt affiliated with (interesting that all the links you have "helpfully" posted include Nats affiliate codes.....).
Pornusers should be a place for porn lovers to get together and voice their unbiased, helpful opinions and views on the various sites they have been members of in the interests of aiding others who are perhaps thinking of joining those sites - last time I looked, it wasn't a place to advertise your own sites, certainly not at the expense of others.
Happy New Year!
Bela
DDF Productions
|
01-02-08 06:50am
|
Reply
134
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Jay G:
I really appreciate your comment about the distracting talk that ruins way too many sex scenes. The language of sex should be wonderful moans, groans, and screams of passion, not dirty chit-chat.
Sex scene producers, please listen!
|
01-01-08 02:22pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
