Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
I'M ONE OF THEM!!
WELL. I have two kids, but I hardly get enough so that makes me damn near a virgin!!! :D
|
01-13-08 08:03pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from s1vus1:
(Davit's Reply)
can i just say i almost wet myself after reading that last post lmao
|
01-13-08 05:09pm
|
Reply
103
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Robare:
From your profile:
"I would like to see more negative reviews (not just here - I mean anywhere), as these are just as important as the positive reviews, to warn us when certain sites do not deliver what they promise (and there are LOTS of them). It would be great to have a kind of 'Hall Of Shame' that objectively lists the sites that, for example, have very low-quality movies, or a tiny amount of content, or just don't do what the tour pages promise. I think that would be highly appreciated by potential users."
It seems that in your eagerness to be credited with a negative review, you've managed to post a review that is not to your credit. You failed to meet the criteria you established for a negative review. You preferred to use terms like "lots" rather than quantify. It seems accommodating your sense of irritation and/or lassitude is more important to you than conveying reality.
I disagree with your assessment of the importance of being negative. Positive and negative in this context are terms resulting from subjective evaluations. As such, they are largely irrelevant. Positive and negative reviews are not needed. Truthful reviews are needed. And, it seems the truth about this site suffers a little at your hands. As examples:
1. You cited European girls but failed to cite American girls. Perhaps you failed to discern that American girls appear on the site, or perhaps you failed to perceive any of the American girls as being nice, but you left the reader with the impression that only Europeans appear on the site.
2. It's true that Alex interacts with models from an off-camera standpoint. In photoshoot videos, he's the photographer and it's quite normal for a photographer to give directions to the model. In behind-the-scenes videos, he and the others tend to interact casually and jovially, as one might expect. But, Alex understands that when a model is, or the models are, having sex, his interaction is a distraction and I've yet to see an instance of his speaking during the immediate build-up to, and achievement of, orgasm. It's usual for him to speak with the model during an introduction of a solo sex video and perhaps after the model has finished.
3. You seem to decry falsehood in your porn, yet you gave Sapphic Erotica an 89 and that site has conveyed far more falsities than ALSScan. Witness the preponderance of the seemingly mandatory breathing pattern, the play-acting of passion, and the paucity of wetness.
4. I've seen only one video on the site where the copious amount of fluid produced by the model during sex that might have been peeing. Your description failed to quantify and I suspect there's a good reason for that.
Playing loosely with the facts doesn't make for a good review, positive or negative...
|
01-13-08 10:20am
|
Reply
104
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Drooler:
I don't care for videos of photoshoots, nor for photoshoots published piecemeal. ("Let's see. This is Sophie Second Shoot Scene 3 Set 2. Did I ever get any of the other sets? Oh, and then part of it is in the promo zip, too. And THEN there's the stuff that came from the Director's Blog.")
All they have to do is just publish everything from one scene, three or four days in a row, and be done with it. It would still be piecemealing, but it wouldn't remind me so much of gathering things together for tax season. And it would just make, y'know, sense. Hey, it might even make it less complicated for them!
It's like what I feel like saying to Digital Desire, another site that is a notorious piecemealer: Congratulations, you've made something simple and straightforward into a royal pain in the ass!
And I just 86 the shots of the fisting, the peeing, the speculum/candles/"Rocket"/fresh produce insertions, or the pull-down-pussy-lips clamp. So yes, I've joined before because after a while, they have some pretty nice, high quality shots of some hot girls. But all of that weird other stuff is just crap as far as I'm concerned.
|
01-12-08 08:09pm
|
Reply
105
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PinkPanther:
Just a point or two for accuracy:
1) Alex isn't gay. He's married, has a couple of kids. I got the same impression that you had from his voice originally, but this is the story. He doen't think his voice is all that good either, but talks to get the most out of the models and the best shoots. For my tastes, he achieves that.
2) Their vid releases are clearly labeled as to whether they are photoshoots or not. The ones that are not only have Alex talking for a few seconds at the beginning at most - maybe he'll say "Hi" to the model and get her to tell us what she's going to do in the vid. Many of them, if the model is confident enough to talk to the camera, especially, he won't even do that. Looking at the last 10 vid releases, 60% have been non-photo shoot vids, so the amount of talking that Alex would have been doing in those would have been slim or none.
Alex's stated view is that he does the photoshoot vids more so that people can see what goes on in a real photoshoot than as stroke material. He's into that "educational" role of the site. One of my very favorite bonuses in the past year was a huge vid package showing a shoot in Czech from the time the crew woke up in the morning until they went back to their hotel at night. Given that the crew included Nella and Amber Rayne, both of whom were hotter than the models in the shoots, I was thoroughly entertained.
|
01-12-08 08:23am
|
Reply
106
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Denner:
Quite agree
I may rate this site a bit higher - but not much.
Two things:
The fisting-thing are WAY overdone - if this is NOT your favorite thing. Why don't the call it ALS Fisting - that may cover it better.
The videos are mainly based on photo-shoots - certainly not my favorite either...
BTH - I like Davits review - no beating around the bush..
|
01-12-08 08:09am
|
Reply
107
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review from Davit:
Well, I said I'd had enough of this topic but felt I had to comment as once again, we see laughably bad filming from 1 By Day.
I'm gonna carry on bringing this to the attention of potential customers until the webmaster acknowledges it and agrees to look into it. I'll be specific so it is clear I am not giving it BS.
The latest Julie Silver-Vanessa one. What the hell is going on? The cameraman has multiple opportunities to get some decent oral shots - and misses every one (except for the odd few seconds, literally)! There are times when the brunette is licking the blonde from behind, and the cameraman (shaky as ever) is filming from above her head, so you can see the top and side of her head OK, but that's not what we want to see in porn!
Then the blonde climbs on top in a 69. Just as the cameraman seems to get a potentially good angle - he moves away, and zooms out!!! What the fuck! And this goes on - he finds a reasonable angle for all of 3 seconds, then moves away! See how jerky the movements are? See how unnatural the editing is?
And this is NOT subjective. This is NOT personal taste. This is objectively pointing out the obvious! 1 By Day may have some decent cameramen - but they clearly have some absolutely useless ones too, and this movie is just one more example.
And when the blonde is facing the brunette on the bed and rubbing the blue dildo along the brunette's pussy - I would swear the cameraman is having a wank the way that camera jerks and shakes! Just watch - around 8min25. The instant the dildo makes contact, the cameraman has an epileptic fit! Eventually he zooms in again, and holds it - for about TWO SECONDS! Then there's another edit.
It seems to improve shortly after, with some good dildo ass-fucking - but not for long. Our friend with the camera can't keep still for more than a few seconds again. by this time, I'm so pissed off with how this guy ever got this work, I can't be bothered with the rest of the movie, and turn to something on my hard drive with a more professional look.
It's a shame - these girls are HOT and really sexy together. But wasted on any porn supplier that uses this cameraman.
|
01-06-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
108
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from OneMan:
(Davit's Reply)
Yes I agree with you to a degree...if the filming takes place at their home country.
I just get the feeling - though I'm not 100% sure of course - that they are probably filming in the west and possibly being taken advantage of.
But of course that could happen to anyone...
|
01-06-08 11:51am
|
Reply
109
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#44
from Toadsith:
(Davit's Reply)
Ah - indeed you did say that, I'm sorry I had forgotten that some how. That is cool - I just wanted to make sure. Hey - 1 By Day may not be for you, no worries - I'm glad you tried to get your money's worth none the less. I just was worried that you might have given up on the site to soon, because in the past - I've nearly done the that error myself on other sites I learned later to love. But sometimes a site just doesn't click with ya - such is life.
Cheers!
|
01-05-08 10:32am
|
Reply
110
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(Davit's Reply)
It is kinda crazy how many sites get beat up by the accelerator, I almost never use it these days. I actually have to remember to turn acceleration back on when I download from big servers to get a game demo (or a patch from Microsoft - damn their servers are fast!). I suppose not all porn sites can run on huge super servers, ah but one can dream... lol
Cheers!
|
01-05-08 10:22am
|
Reply
111
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from OneMan:
Totally agree with your commments on bad direction and technical work. This is made even worse when these "professionals" start playing with Hi Definition. HD is notoriously difficult to use well. They should really be sent on a course...what a waste some of these sites are...they have cash and willing girls but can't produce a decent movie to save their lives.
HiDef shoud not be held held unless absolutely necessary. This type of fil making could easily be 80% tripod based...but no...and the exposure/lighting is all to pot as well. Some of these guys may as well use a cellular phone...it would be cheaper and give just the same results.
The eastern European ones are the worst culprits. They really need a wake-up call !
Rant over.......Happy New Year !
|
01-05-08 08:06am
|
Reply
112
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from elephant:
Just have to chip in again.
Its great that both parties are both respectively giving their opinions to each other and not hurling abuse. I can see where both of you are coming from. Davit I have to be honest do find a score of 70 for a few shaky camera work in half a dozen vids slightly harsh. I had a look at that vid with Nancy Bell and Black Angelica and yeah there is moments of moving it about too much when its focused nice on the action. Having said that, I have also viewed loads of really well filmed vids that in my opinion were really fresh views for porn and had me thinking great camera work. I know opinions to what is great camera work differs between tastes but the site judging it along side other sites with 70 as a score which in general is saying its not too great and needs lots of improvement. Sure this site isn't perfect, its certainly got a following and respected. I do think its moving in the right direction. I think there maybe lots of good stuff you perhaps missed.
Bringing the score of its ranking down so much does seem unfair, look I know you are entitled to your opinions and all that but shouldn't base a full score on just seeing a small about of vids. I'd have a look more at some other stuff, maybe the solo stuff and hardcore. I'll leave it at that. I do think scores will be a bit personal cause we like what we like and that is always going to have some impact in us liking and reviewing but also have to look at it as a whole. Of what it offers others and the size and quality.
Anyway its good to have a debate and has been a great read this review and all peoples views on scores and 1by-day.
|
01-04-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
113
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#38
from Toadsith:
(Davit's Reply)
I know you've gotten attacked on every front and I'm not trying to pile it on. This is just a recommendation I wanted to send over your way. I've been subscribing to porn sites regularly for about 5 years (I only really started paying attention to Porn Users.com pretty recently - my bad.) and while your comment might have been off-hand, it did grab my attention. You said you watched "about half a dozen" videos. Six videos. I can tell you that I have had a number of sites that I've subscribed to and was at first disappointed by their content because my first few batches of videos I download weren't in tune with my tastes at the time - with sites as large as DDF's - I would recommend a lot more time spent hunting through. Hell - the site has over 900 models!
Granted your opinion might not change, but hell - you dropped at least $30 on the site - you owe it to yourself to put their servers to work. The current sites I'm currently exploring, I've pulled near 10 Gigs from them in a matter of days - as fast as my connection is, I still watch videos faster than they download, so I find downloading them en masse is important.
Now I generally think of DDF as a photo production company - back when I was a member of Hands On Hardcore their strength was definitely in the photos - though I still would download the videos as they were super-high res and it was mainly for more content of the models I liked - I haven't been a member for a while though and perhaps the focus on video has increased - certainly in general on the web porn sites are emphasizing video - but I do think you'll also want to take into account that the first thing 1By-Day advertises is "we have 282182 photos" - I think it is only fair to review a site on what they believe is their strong-point. If they are wrong, then feel free to tell them.
So - long story short, try to get your money's worth anytime you subscribe to a site - sometimes you'll get a lemon - but for me, some patience has paid off many times. Frankly I had to apply some patience to the 21 Sextury network you so love - a few sites I was really psyched about really didn't turn out the way I wanted - but I found some other sites I really like. So just take your time, explore thoroughly and THEN review the site.
Cheers.
|
01-04-08 02:43pm
|
Reply
114
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#35
from Bela:
(Davit's Reply)
So your review was based on the latest Black-Angelica-Nancy Bell movie, not on the site as a whole? Dear me :)
You're right, I'll have to cut back on the sarcasm I think - although I very much hope that I've been civil so far, as have you :)
I still don't feel we deserve a score of 70 "just" because you feel some of our videos are a little "shaky" in your opinion, and the question isn't whether I agree or not or whether you're correct or not and entitled to your opinion, but rather if that opinion is enough cause to rate a whole huge site with such a tiny score which differs so hugely from the general opinion of practically everyone else here.
It also seems to me that you have a liking for lesbian sets (quite right too, so do I), and that you've based your opinion and comparison on just our lesbian content (you mentioned Lezbi machines, Lesbomat etc - you didn't mention that 1by-day also has a lot of the archives/content of SandysFantasies, OnlyBlowjob, HandsonHardcore, DDFBusty, CherryJul, 1girl-a-day and a host of other, smaller sites), so your score seems to be based on about 1/10th of our content not on the whole site. Am I wrong?
Anyway it's too late now, the harm's been done.
I don't want to argue with you (in fact I'm starting to enjoy this discussion!). I'm glad you're bringing a little life to PornUsers and I hope my reaction to your review hasn't taken away any of your initial spirit and drive (hopefully it's had the opposite effect), but I would urge you to be a little more lenient, to check out the whole site and what it has to offer and to not allow your personal views on certain aspects (such as in this case the video production/direction) to so affect the scores that you decide to give.
I'd also point out that the average visitor to Pornusers would view your list of reviews as a list in order of quality, a list of sites, best to worst, and not primarily as a list of your personal likes and dislikes. Those shouldn't affect the score so much and should perhaps be aired as comments rather than as a (too personal) key element of a review - IMHO.
You're right though, tastes differ and we can't make everyone happy. We will of course try to take your views and recommendations seriously and make any changes if needed. Perhaps it's a certain director/cameraman (we have 5 in Budapest and 3 in Prague) who isn't working to your liking, I'll look into it - perhaps you have been looking at some of our "reloaded" videos which are re-compressed, re-edited versions of some of our older material, republished in better quality by request from our members - but it certainly isn't true for all of our archives, all of our directors and all of our sets as your review would suggest...
Keep up the good work and input (no sarcasm here this once, really) and I wish you many good reviews and happy hours spent here at Pornusers. I also sincerely hope that your opinion of 1by-day and our other sites improves with age and use :)
Best Regards,
Bela
|
01-04-08 01:35pm
|
Reply
115
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#33
from Bela:
(Davit's Reply)
I would also suggest taking a little peek at a site's history - the fact that 1by-day is up there at no. 3 as one of the favourite sites of Pornuser members is no accident....
Oh dear, I see that you've single-handedly managed to reduce our average score from 92.5 to 89.5 and have us drop 17 places on the list which has accumulated over the past 2-3 years...well, that's quite an accomplishment - not to mention that you obviously think that the guys who gave us 90-95% before your wonderful review must all be dumb - not to mention a large number of the best review sites out theres, including TBP, where we are currently ranked no 4 among all the sites in the world. - I mean sure, they quite obviously don't know what they're doing and you're 100% correct in everything you've stated, definitely. Perhaps what I'm trying to put forward here is that I sense a certain amount of selfishness and thoughtlessness here (two of my pet hates I'm afraid) - a certain amount of "I don't care what affects my actions might have, this is fun, I'll do whatever I want" which I find quite distasteful.
I maintain that a review needs to be unbiased - yours aren't. You should either make them so, or keep to the forums/comments, or possibly start up your own review site, why not.
The point here is, the review is not about your personal (subjective) preferences. It's about facts: how much content, how many videos, how many picture, what size archives, what models, how many updates, quality, value for money etc. If after that you feel the need to deduct a few points because you think the production isn't the best, fine, but not 20-30 points?!
I challenge any Pornuser member to take a look at your list of reviews (https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3313), see that 1by-day is at the bottom of your list, overtaken by such prestigious great sites as Lez Love and We Live Together, which we all know and love and are definitely in the "highly recommended" category, unlike 1by-day, which we all know is a really really bad site, and not think that there is something seriously wrong here... I would put forward that you are new here and have possible misunderstood something or got hold of the wrong end of the stick.
Anyway, I'm obviously having a bad day again, so please accept my profuse excuses once more, and I do agree with a couple of the other posters on this thread that you have spiced life up a bit over here and this is a good thing. You've made me post my first ever comment or reply that wasn't designed to help or provide useful information.
Best Regards,
Bela
|
01-04-08 11:32am
|
Reply
116
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#32
from Bela:
(Davit's Reply)
Ah, so you're replying to Khan's messages too now? ;)
I maintain my apology, because you're correct, I have no proof that you are affiliated with other sites (apart from that affiliate code in your Sandy link perhaps, but I'll overlook that obvious flaw) and so I should not have accused you as such.
Similarly of course, you have no proof that you're not, so I'll keep my suspicions (to myself in the future though).
I still think that your review of 1by.day is incredibly biased and I'm sure that the vast majority of Pornuser members will agree that it deserves a lot more than 70 - of course you can maybe tell them that they're all biased. The site has a huge following, not least precisely because of the usually skilled photography and glamour style. We're not all perfect of course, I'm sure there are better and worse videos on the site.
However, as I mentioned previously, I believe you shouldn't be using a review to compare with other sites and purely voice your personal feelings - and should certainly not be actively promoting/recommending other sites. You should be doing that in the forum and by making comments. Your whole review and it's style sticks out like a sore thumb, and if I am incorrect in my suspicions that this is no accident, then as I say, I apologize and I would suggest that you take note - the fact that I immediately jumped to a possibly false conclusion (and that some Pornuser members have agreed) is also no accident and would point to the fact that you should perhaps provide a fuller picture of the sites in your reviews. The fact that you personally do not like the style of the videos on 1by-day is no reason to mark it down so drastically - there is still an awful lot of content up there, huge archives, great pictures.
We have members with 56k modems who only download the video clips - other prefer the pictures and zip files, others still are after their favourite models on the site - will your review really give them an unbiased view of the site and the information they are after, i.e. "is it good site, is it worth the money, is it worth joining?"? I would suggest that it doesn't and as such is not a good and unbiased review - you should be voicing your opinions in the forums and not letting your personal peeves, likes or dislikes affect the outcome of a review to this extent. In my view.
I did state that this was my personal opinion, as for my quality (or lack of) as a Customer Support person, I think that should be judged on how (quickly and well) I help out members in need and not on the basis of my personal opinion on the integrity (or lack of integrity) of your review.
Again, I'm sorry if I jumped to any wrong conclusions, but I'd recommend differentiating between a review, which has various consequences and reverberations and can affect potential members' view of a site, and the comments section, where you can voice your opinion freely - no matter how negative that happens to be.
t.b.c.
|
01-04-08 11:04am
|
Reply
117
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review from Davit:
Just checked out the movie of Black Angelica and Nancy Bell (uploaded to the site in the last few days).
To emphasise my main point, there's a bit where one of the girls is getting fucked with a dildo from behind, and you can see the other girl's spit coming from her pussy, very sexy. She's loving it. Lovely! But does the camera find a nice shot and hold it? No! The camera shakes and wobbles (maybe the cameraman was having a wank, I don't know) and it zooms this way and that in a really jerky fashion and can't keep still for 5 seconds. THAT'S what I'm talking about folks! See what I mean? It's THAT style that I personally hate. Reminds me of NYPD Blue.
|
01-04-08 10:51am
|
Reply
118
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Bela:
Hi everyone,
Woah, I wasn't expecting this issue to spiral out of control - and I'm glad to see it hasn't.
Thank you for your support and kind words re my Customer Support - I'm actually the "support guy" over here, not so much a webmaster.
(Oh yes, to clear one misunderstanding up I am a guy, Bela as in Bela Bartok, Bela Lugosi etc.).
All in all you're absolutely right, I do owe Davit and apology and I hereby apologize. I'm sure I was having a bad day and possibly jumped to conclusions.
As jd1961 rightly pointed out, a review of 75 for a site like 1by-day does ring alarm bells. If you take a look at the 16 reviews that have been posted by Pornusers so far, you'll see that the lowest was 80 (and that was immediately dubbed as untrustworthy), otherwise all other reviews start at 85 or so.
Next I took a look at what other posts and reviews you had made, and saw that you happened to have reviewed three sites all owned by the same company: Club Sandy (the majority of the content of which we shot here at DDF by the way), Dirty 101 and Lezbo Honeys, all of which received very high scores (90's).
You also posted a link to a specific movie in Club Sandy, complete with Nats affiliate code (gets you commission on possible joins)...oh yes, you also mentioned that you'll have to join the site to actually see the video that you posted the link to...
Anyway, right or wrong conclusion, this was immediately enough information to make me 99.9% sure that your review of 1by-day was not above board. I cannot conceivably understand how you think that Dirty 101 or Lesbo Honeys is even comparable to 1by-day, let alone give it 20 more marks on your review.
You do of course have a right to your opinion and what better place to voice it than here on Pornusers. However, this is Pornusers and not "Davit's Favourites" nor a video quality discussion page and although I agree with some of your comments, I feel that they should have remained just comments.
I think that when you post a review it should be absolutely unbiased and I also think that you shouldn't forget that a review can have a positive or negative affect on the opinions of others visiting the site who are looking for the answer to the question "which is the better site?" or "which site should I join?" and inserting plugs to other sites and negative comments in a review may well leave readers with the impression that 1by-day is a really bad site whereas Dirty 101 is of course the coolest site on the planet. i.e. they aren't necessarily looking for the answer to the question "which is Davit's favourite site?" and I think you should be posting the kind of comparative comments you have made in the forum for discussion and NOT in a review. A good or bad review can seriously affect sales and other people's view of our site and I think that over and above the urge to voice your opinion you also need to feel a certain amount of responsibility towards the site involved and take into account all aspects.
Bela
|
01-04-08 09:23am
|
Reply
119
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Davit's Reply)
Yeah, it gets worse and worse. Everytime I take a look at that site, they chop off more from the beginning of the life of the site so they can just tack it on at the end as "new" content. They don't even have the honesty to show that it's a dead site - the people who run that site are disgustingly dishonest.
|
01-03-08 09:36pm
|
Reply
120
|
Lez Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from SnowDude:
Thanks for the great review and I'm glad to have you here at PU!
|
01-03-08 08:53pm
|
Reply
121
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from SnowDude:
I thought the original review was very well written and there was nothing that sugested to me that Davit was biased other than honestly liking one network over another. I think the webmaster overreracted a bit here, especially since 75 is hardly a terrible score. When I think a site (or a network) has interesting content that I think could be improved, the score is likely to be somewhere around 75. I recently reviewed GeekGirlsOnline with a similar score and if you read my review you'll see that I actually liked the site very much.
In the end, Davit is entitled to his opinion and I actually think he's owed an apology here. I encourage webmasters to engage reviewers to see how improvements can be made, but I was truly dismayed to see him accused of impropriety so quickly. If he doesn't like your site, he has every right to say as much and if people don't feel able to speak frankly about their likes and dislikes then what are we doing here?
Just my $0.02.
|
01-03-08 08:48pm
|
Reply
122
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from matyko:
(Davit's Reply)
Hello Hello!
If you open the site, at each one of the updates there is a streamed trailer with a big play icon, and on the right side, there are transparent icons. Which icon of these is highlighted, that is true for the set. From up to the way down you can see the following:
- HD Shot
- Video
- Foto [maybe it should be Photo]
- 360 [rotateable, looks very good!]
Maybe you mean if you click on "Gallery" than you see a list of thumbs - it works like an update log - and here its true that you can not see from outside what kind of content it will be. I report this to the site development team ASAP!
Thanks for your comments and opinion!
Best Regards,
Matyko
|
01-03-08 10:39am
|
Reply
123
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from Denner:
The site is part of the US-based Taboo Service who has Only 3X as main site.
They handle their costumers ok, apart from a former billing-situation with Verotel. I do not know if it is Taboo or Verotel that made the shitty thing about luring people into more expensive terms - but it's worth to keep an eye on these sites.
I've look into The Dorothy Black-site, but I have the feeling that this is just some other part of Only 3X...
If I'm wrong, please inform me.
Denner
|
01-03-08 08:21am
|
Reply
124
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from matyko:
Hello!
On the full lenght videos you can not here nothing but the nice kinky moaning of the actresses and actors ;)
Thanks for your opinion, we fires the audio cutter crew! ... just joking, but will warn them to you better music or nothing at all.
Best Regards,
Matyko
|
01-03-08 05:14am
|
Reply
125
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
Hi Davit
Yeah I certainly don't like American woman over Europeans, I just love them both, find it sexy sometimes to hear more dirty chat sometimes. I just love vareity in my lesbian, love when somethings different. Also love the softercore lightspeed network lesbian scenes as its very girly and cute and has the lovely Jordan and Dana (Belicia).
With the newer material, I think its very hit and miss stuff. theres some really good orgy scenes which I adore and its what I go there for but a lot I think is generic. Just in my view would be better and I'm seeing more and more in their very new scenes filming in different settings like outsides, I get bored of the bed and couch scenes and constant fake moaning with dildo use. that bugs me with some sapphic vids. I long for Cindy to return
|
01-02-08 03:53pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
