Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
NO WAY, MAN!!
It waw bad enough that Adam took a bite of the apple after Eve, but if Steve was present... I'M KICKIN' SATAN'S ASS!!! :)
I am already admitting that the only dick that I like to see is when it is sliding in and out of some hot tight pretty little pussy... CUZ I PRETEND THAT IS MY DICK IN DAT PUSSY!!! Therefore, no offense to anyone, but there is no gay "PINCHE KANKUN!" Sorry guys!! HA HA HA
So...
If the pornstar is super fucking hot, I am in luck!!! HA HA HA :D
|
02-12-08 11:15pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
Oh NO!! You got it all wrong, man!!
If it is a video that consist of coitus, then I am searching for scene where you DON'T see too much of the dude, PHUCK DAT!! I am not gay!! But I do relish seeing how a woman's pussy can work a dick!!! :)
If it is a video where there is women doing solo posing and teasing... HELL YEAH!!! Where there is absolute women and no men... GOOD SHIT!! I don't really like lesbian videos, especially since most of them involve toys and dildos!!! For that matter, she can sit on MY dick instead of shoving her twat with unliving matter!! :)
|
02-11-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from ace of aces:
(Davit's Reply)
help me man what is std? but i think we are both thinking of the same :)
|
02-11-08 05:05am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
THAT'S WHY I ALWAYS COMPLAIN ABOUT SOME THE SHIT THEY DO!!
They are too busy directing porn instead of let 2 consenting adults fornicate their asses off!!!
|
02-08-08 12:15am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
OH SHIT... THOSE PORNSTARS GOT STD's?!!!! NEVER MIND EVERYTHING I SAID!! I thought those people were getting checked somehow!!
Shit, let me direct porn films, this will happen:
- I need to see proof of doctor visits!
- The only drugs you can utilitize is WEED and/or Sexual Enhancers!
- The women will get $1000 off the back, period!! If they make the guy come early, they will get another $500!
- The guys will get paid based on how hard they nut: Massive - $700, Mediocre - $350, Drip Drop - $100!! If pussy can't make you nut, you don't get a penny!! The guys have to last at least 30 minutes!! The scenes will go no longer than 45 minutes!! So beware and be warned!!
- Each Scene will consist of the following:
a)Introduction and Camera Tease - The girl will stand up and pose naked for the camera at least five minutes (I need to relish her figure and assets... WOMEN ARE SO BEAUTIFUL!! :) )
b)Blowjob and Pussy Licking
c)Intercourse (As many positions as possible before the guy blows his lid)
d)Nutshot - And in most cases, it will be a really massive nutshot all over her body and on her face because the guys want to get paid full amount and cure themselves of "Blue Balls" at the same time, they will really shoot that hard
e)Girl takes a naked shower and teases the camera some more with her sexy soapy body, just trying to wash all that nut off!! :)
f)The guys will help the girl wipe the nut off with a towel, then give her a kiss to show her that us men appreciate women!! :)
f)Each DVD will have some Photo Galleries, Behind the Scenes, Previews, Websitie Information
NOW TOP THAT MUTHAPHUCKAS!! :D
|
02-08-08 12:08am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
THAT'S WHY YOU ARE THE MAN, DAVIT!!! Well put, well said!! :D
I guess it because the producers want us to think we are going to get what we want, and when we don't get it, our addiction will cause us to look for it some more!! Monopoly at its best!!
Just as I said, Political Porn, man. It's all about the money, not about what we want... Phucked up, isn't it?!! >:(
|
02-05-08 11:39pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
Keep it hidden, ey? My friend Davit... This has never happened to me, but I guess there have been incidents where a man is sooo drunk, he goes home a chick whose face is damn near close to King Kong, sleeps with her... and you know what happens the next morning....
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! >:O
|
01-31-08 10:43pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
THANK YOU FUCKING DAVIT... YOU ARE THE MAN!!!!! THAT'S RIGHT... SAY SOMETHING TO SOMEONE... PLLLEEEEEAAAAASSSSEEEE!!!!!
Porn is now almost smothered in blowjobs, man!!! "SUCK MY COCK AND FUCKING LIKE IT!!!!"
Oh for the love of mankind, if the rest of the 21th Century will consist of nothing but fucking blowjobs, well that leaves me to say this... The only thing that can give me head is the 21th Century!! Yeah, the 21th century can SUCK MY DICK!!! :D Skip the 21th Century and go right into the 22nd!! :-D
|
01-22-08 11:10pm
|
Reply
84
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PinkPanther:
I thought Pix & Video and Club Sandy were the flagship 21st Sextury sites and that Dirty 101 and all the network sites were the sites where they recycle the material.
Can anybody else confirm this or correct me?
|
01-21-08 11:44am
|
Reply
85
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PinkPanther:
FYI -this is a dead site - no new updates. They just keep taking material from the earliest days of the site and putting it up as new.
If you want to confirm that, check out "freeones.com" for Mya Diamond. You can find dated pic sets there that were then posted as new 18 months later.
|
01-21-08 11:39am
|
Reply
86
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Robare:
Thank-you, sir, for your responses, time, and consideration.
|
01-20-08 12:42pm
|
Reply
87
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Denner:
Great review.
And you're right about the (non) exclusive.
It's not only Sandy, but also some other sites from 21.Sextury.com. and the GE-company.
(BTW the bed-video with Christina Bella in Mya Diamond is awesome.)
Hope they'll get better - again - at Mya Diamond and Eve Angel.
A pity, though: A wish is that they'd get more high resolution videos. We're in 2008.
|
01-20-08 11:53am
|
Reply
88
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Robare:
So, are you able to give us the resolution and bitrate figures? If they're MPG or WMV, then that information may be available in Windows Media Player.
Also, from looking at the site's promotional pages, there appear to be, at present, 172 video and photo sets available and they appear to have been updating once a week for at least a year. There are no sample videos or photos (beyond what "right-click, save image as" provides) available. And, I got the impression from reading your review that there were usually two files per update, one where model A is a recipient and one where model B is a recipient, and that each of these files is 6-7 minutes in duration. Can you confirm?
And, of the movies you've seen, are these models actually having orgasms and by anal stimulation alone?
|
01-20-08 11:14am
|
Reply
89
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Robare:
(Davit's Reply)
I guess I had a slightly different appreciation of the Sapphic Erotica content. I understand and agree that there is a significant difference between raunchy and erotic. I found I also became disappointed with Sapphic Erotica's content because I was seeing too much of what appeared to be faked passion.
It seemed that certain standards had been developed and impressed on the models that they should perform in specific manners rather than simply enjoying the moment. One of the standards could be appreciated as the following: Thou shalt emit a vocalization of "Ouuuu" or "Awwww", then suck in air through your teeth. These shall be repeated throughout your performance regardless of the amount of physical stimulation applied to you by the model(s) with whom you are performing. It is permissible to randomly alternate between the "Ouuuu" and the "Awwww". However, the intensity and pattern with which these sounds are made shall not vary throughout the performance.
Some of their older videos, such as those from the time when Jackie (Nella), Rene, and Peaches were still working for the site, were much more enjoyable as there was an authenticity to their behavior in the videos. One of the reasons why I enjoy the videos of FTVGirls and ALSScan is that the models appear to actually be enjoying themselves, rather than attempting to perform as though they are enjoying themselves. Their enjoyment becomes my enjoyment and, conversely, their labors become my labors and I dislike paying for an opportunity to labor...
|
01-20-08 10:09am
|
Reply
90
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Fine. To each their own.
|
01-20-08 04:14am
|
Reply
91
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
There's your silver lining: free access for months!
After I'd reviewed it, thanks to a tip from exotics4me (think it was him), I e-mailed the webmaster and he gave me an extra month of access since it hadn't updated on schedule. Nice chap, he was.
Well, all good (and sometimes not-so-good) things must come to an end, I suppose, Eve's site being the best, and for awhile a really stellar individual model site compared to most.
|
01-20-08 03:57am
|
Reply
92
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
All of the sites, even Eve Angel's, seem to be in at least a partial breakdown mode. Lora Craft's I simply gave up on after a couple of joins. What a shame! Mya Diamond's, too. And Eve's has yet to post a single update for this month, and what's today?
Maybe the quality of the vid from ClubSandy is better than the original? (Looking for a shred of silver lining here.)
|
01-20-08 03:27am
|
Reply
93
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(Davit's Reply)
Davit: I can't argue you there. Traci, Jackie and Marcie have some great movies in the low-res era of SE.
|
01-19-08 05:56pm
|
Reply
94
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(Davit's Reply)
Hi, Davit, yes, it's true, it would probably be more apropriate to say that Sandy "does not get involved in boy/girl action anymore". You are right that some girl/girl action can be harder and nastier than a soft boy/girl shag. However, it's quite usual to identify hard-core with b/g and softcore with "solo" or g/g action, and that's the meaning I was looking for.
Thanks for the correction, and I also liked your reviews.
Cheers,
Nadie
|
01-19-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
95
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PosterDude:
Divit you sound like crying baby that got milk taken away. 65 score is very bad so you are just mad – not above average review like you say. You want alscan with above average review then change number to 85-90. Alsscan is one of best sites on internet and maybe best which should be 90-100 review. I have been member of over 150 sites what about you? Alscans has more content and better quality pictures and video than anybody I see. I count more than 75 percent of video are masturbation or girlgirl video. Below 25 percent is photoshoot video that is labeled. You do not like Alex voice then do not download photoshoot video. I like photoshoot video to and it show real girl. Still more video on site than 95% of other internet sites. Alsscan do not release photos in piece. Scenes have 2 or 3 theames. Some glamore with little and no insertion. Some explicit with lot of insertion and different toy and sometime fist. Each photo release completes set in order. I do not talk good English, I just no good porn.
Your review just seen as angry baby review. Nobody believe 65 score review.
|
01-19-08 07:11am
|
Reply
96
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PosterDude:
(Davit's Reply)
I do wish for Boy-Girl on site. Then it would be 100 score. It is best site for content and quality. I have big monitor to see all quality and compare. alscan is best of all in video and photo.
|
01-19-08 07:08am
|
Reply
97
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Robare:
(Davit's Reply)
Ahhh...really...?
If there were any lingering doubts readers might have had concerning the care you take in formulating your opinions, it seems you've eliminated them. You're assistance in confirming your disregard is appreciated. It provides a valuable context for evaluating the qualities of your remarks concerning this site.
You state I sound angry. Regarding the voice you seem to be hearing: you might ask yourself about the qualities of that voice. Is it the voice of a soprano, alto, tenor, or bass? Could it possibly be a gay voice? Whatever the qualities are, I'm pretty sure it is not my voice you are hearing...
|
01-18-08 06:52am
|
Reply
98
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Robare:
(Davit's Reply)
Hmmm...above average score...really...and you determined this by reckoning... That almost seems quaint...
I'd say that, based upon the information you've provided, your score is well below average. It's unfortunate you attempted to justify your decision based upon an undefined, unquantified list of sites which you state demonstrate some admittedly undesirable characteristics. However, as ALSScan has demonstrated none of those characteristics, I'd have to say they are irrelevant to the evaluation and using them as a basis for justification is unjustified.
Certainly, if we take a look at the well-defined, well-quantified list of sites which appear in the niche categories assigned by the TBP and PU staff, we'd have to admit your score is well below normal. And, you've more than once commented on how distasteful you find the male voice in the videos. Thus far, there is no reason to disbelieve your scoring of this site was largely motivated by an urge to slam the site and, in particular, the photographer/videographer/owner.
As to your supposed final point, I'm sure there are several readers who can appreciate the contributions of a self-renowned expert in the areas of human female physiology, physiological responses, and fluid production. I know I certainly do... But, I'll suggest that, unless you are in a position to evaluate those fluids with all five of your senses (rather than just the two that can be used with video), you're not well-poised to evaluate the authenticity, although I will admit that faking urination would be rather difficult and pointless...
|
01-17-08 08:30am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
PHUCKED UP, ISN'T IT?! :D
|
01-14-08 04:40pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
I SURE THE PHUCK DON'T!!! :D
They exaggerate waaaaaay too much shit in porn... Especially That!!! :D
Let me put some icing on the cherry cake... WHY DO SOME WOMEN YELL TOO DAMN MUCH?! :D Most guy's dicks aren't that dick!!! :D
|
01-13-08 08:13pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
