| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from MargulisAZ:
(Davit's Reply)
What's with this comment Davit? I was responding to indybt30 commenting on the idea of them trying to make money off the trials. Why don't you leave your sarcasm at the door and add something to the discussion instead?
|
08-10-08 11:30am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from mr smut:
(Davit's Reply)
:o) the other hand is most impressive. Masturbation is healthy none of us doubts that!
Behold ... I'm getting blind ...
|
06-07-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from asmith12:
(Davit's Reply)
> This is because (and this is FACT) 83.6% of such analyses are not
> accurate. That's with a margin of error of 4.
Sure. But my analysis doesn't fall within these 83.6%. Undoubtedly. :-)
|
05-16-08 05:01am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Some things are going to be kept secret .. we'll never know for sure. Remember, we're the ones who have to reveal all, in order to pass the qualifying interviews and the numerous other "tests."
|
04-15-08 09:22pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
A bowl of Frosties! I wonder if I can get my mitts on a big box of Frosties here on the other side of the pond. Thanks for the tip!
|
04-15-08 05:01pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from badandy400:
(Davit's Reply)
I would have to say that quality is very important. I know that was not the pole question, but it is out of the bag now so we might as well consider it because it is a valid point. For $30 a month on a new site there better be some great looking stuff. After all they did not have a update deadlines to meet before the site would launch so they should have plenty of time to plan the scenes and get the quality that is becoming standard. A new site should not even consider doing anything that is not shot in HD.
|
03-19-08 09:02pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
I agree, it does seem degrading, unless it's spontaneous with the girl doing it. But doing it for shock value alone seems forced. Of course, nowadays these girls will do anything for money.
|
03-13-08 04:31am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#39
from messmer:
(Davit's Reply)
Apologies, I meant to answer days ago but didn't get around to it until now. Thanks for the tip. Sapphic Erotica sounds great. Does it have any solo photo/video sets or does it stick strictly to its niche. I like a mixture of both. I suppose I could have gone to the site to find out for myself but am really rushed these days. F/F and F/solo, all of it as natural as possible, without the exaggerated yelps and screams of "Oh YESSS!" "Oh God!!" of imitation orgasms, that's my ideal site. AND without enhanced breasts, please. Should have added that to tattoos and piercings as a big turn-off. I could kill the first guy who told his girlfriend, wife that she would look good with inflated breasts. Who wants to play with bags of silicone? :-)
|
03-11-08 11:55am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(Davit's Reply)
Sure you don't mean 1958? : - )
|
03-08-08 11:58am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#34
from Toadsith:
(Davit's Reply)
It is so much better than the term "Whore Brand", which just seems mean to me. I only recently ran across the term "Tramp Stamp" myself (maybe a year ago at most); indeed it does have a bit of a British charm to it and as some of my writing I'm sure reflects, I'm quite fond of British colloquialisms. I'm currently working through the latest iteration of Top Gear (40GB worth of it) and have run across a boat-load of new phrases and terms that I hadn't heard before. That is such a fun show - I can't wait till Season 11 comes out - though I still have a backlog of 7 seasons to finish watching first...
|
03-07-08 05:19pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from messmer:
(Davit's Reply)
I agree with your sentiments! I never did like tattoos or piercings. And I also like that natural, homey, nice girl look that will prove to be a deception later on as she reveals her true self ... to paraphrase your words! :-) Do you know any sites like that?
|
03-07-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
Or maybe the pages were stuck together!!
|
03-06-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from MargulisAZ:
(Davit's Reply)
Lol, I can relate to this. I was in a 3 year relationship where the girl I was with couldn't stand porn, but she was way into fisting. Kind of odd, but there you go. She was only 17 at the time too (I was 19). The point is that she didn't know about me looking at porn either, but eventually I told her and she was not happy to say the LEAST! Ultimately she acquiesced to me viewing it "on occasion", which was a big relief to me because I'm not sure I would have the willingness to stop viewing either.
|
03-05-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from pat362:
(Davit's Reply)
The only instances that I can remember where I've enjoyed any kind of talking by the cameran/director, is in the Ben Dover movies. Now I don't know if you'd classify this as talking, but during a certain moment in a scene he'll ask the girl if she'd like to try something new. The he pretty much shuts up except to ask if the girl is all right(depending on what she was asked to do). That's what I meant about talking. You are right that most of what passes for comments in todays movies is at best an annoyance and at worst a big turn off.
Man I miss porn scenes/novies with actual passion in them.
|
03-04-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Yeah, it reminds me of the issue of whether to have the lights on. The guy's more likely to want to see things (I just love the view), but the girl's happy enough just feeling things and might be embarrassed by her own body and/or turned off by the sight of the guy with his weird looking pecker, his tufts of back and shoulder hair, and his pimply ass.
And it's surprising how bad some women can feel about their looks, and I mean really attractive ones!
In a standup act, Chris Rock says that he wants a girl that weighs 360 pounds, because that way he knows she's completely happy with herself and doesn't care what other people think about her looks. (Sure, it's an exaggeration, even a distortion, but it's to make the point.)
|
03-04-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHA!!!
:D :D :D
|
03-03-08 11:09pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
Suze Randall was good at talking to her models, but she's a professional photographer. In fact, it's interesting to watch her work in her photoshoots. but these cement heads, with their constant "show me your tits" commands make me pound my head into my keyboard!
|
03-02-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
I'm not a robot, so I don't like watching porn with fucking machines. ;)
|
02-29-08 05:06am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Khan:
(Davit's Reply)
You may believe what you will. I can tell you that there are indeed 4 people and two of them are female. You, of course, are free not to believe me.
|
02-28-08 06:50pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Starting with 30 and going from there is raising the bar in the consumer's favor, for sure.
I'm seeing "10" to start with is not exactly popular. I can't imagine why.;) At least that's poll data, too, so the webmasters will see that 10 don't cut it, at least for 30 smackaroonies per moon, daily updates though there'd be.
40 don't seem to cut it, either, for that matter. Some folks just don't ask for too much (30) and others want all they can get (50)!
But if I were on the providing end, starting with 50 might seem a bit like saying, "Here ya go. Just raid the shit out this site and then quit on us." I wonder what the experienced people say, particularly about the ledgers. Khan, are you there?
|
02-28-08 07:25am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#32
from exotics4me:
(Davit's Reply)
I had a similar situation with the 21st Sextury sites, had joined and didn't realize a day had passed. A few things came up that caused me to be out of town. I came home to download, what was probably going to be all night, canceled my subscription, went to sign in and the membership had already rebilled. So, I stuff as many downloads in as possible thinking I only had 1 day left. Got charged for another month, but didn't even go back to the site after that day because I thought canceled on time. From what I can tell, ccbill is on Pacific Standard Time, or -700, which is the same time zone I am in, but Epoch Paycom, I think is based in Europe, so I really have to watch those sites for the time zone difference.
|
02-23-08 09:21am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
Just as long as their fish hole has the right temperature, I don't think you'll have any problems!! :)
|
02-20-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#29
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
Ok, so that means if I live in the North Pole, I need to wait until Summer when the sun is higher and hotter in order to subscribe or I'll end up having erection difficulties from extremely cold climate? Reasoning behind this response is because I seriously doubt any man would want to acquire an erection in that part of the world!1 What if you walked into something and and your dick has already turned into a popsicle?!!! Um... :D
Ey, is it warmer near the equator? :D
I don't know, man!! I guess I am trying to use geography as a motive to subscribe to porn, but I can't figure out which geographic location I need to navigate to and on which day of the week in order to better subscribe to porn!! I mean the word Sunday involves the Sun so that means that day of the week is warmer to join a porn site, however your geographic location does have an affect on your decision making, cost, type of website, and the penis temperature!! :D
|
02-18-08 11:51pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA...
AW SHIT, I CAN'T BREATHE... HA HA HA HA HA HA...
I AM IN TEARS OVER HERE BUSTIN' UP... HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
:D :D :D
|
02-18-08 11:33pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Sounds like porn put into a cap and trade commodity market. After all, it does contaminate one's inner being!
Ha-ha. It's too late for me. Never much cared much for those "single theory to explain everything" maniacs anyway.
|
02-18-08 04:03pm
|
