Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
I think its been totally unfair to judge you just cause you like another network over another. I was pleased you posted the link as I did like the theme so much and theres nowt wrong with helping out other users find sites or directing them to knowledge that theres other sites available.
Everyones entitled to an opinion, and me I like both companies videos lesbian sex scenes of what I've seen. I've only been a member of lezcuties but loved their choice of models and the sex is hot, quality of the movies I found could certainly be improved or give at least a higher quality option. With DDF vids I've seen I really like the lighting and camerwork on what I've seen of the new material. Sure the 2005 material is lower quality stuff and the lighting maybe isn't as good as the stuff around now.
I think its healthy to have little debates and people like different things and different styles of porn turn them on. Lesbian porn is my favourite too, I think both networks have a great love of European sexy models who are great at sex scenes and both have something to offer me. Not going to please everyone which is totally fair enough stuff.
Just my little take on it, Davit welcome to Porn Users, I think its an awesome place here and I don't work for the forum or any porn company, lol, love to though someday, dream job. No I must say this site is a great addition to thebestporn and its so well done they way its been evolved and had the problems of people posting fake reviews of their site, the way its dealt with. I certainly love visiting it here to see what site is hot or discover peoples opinions.
God I do ramble, I shut up now
|
01-02-08 03:32pm
|
Reply
52
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(Davit's Reply)
Not a problem. Just wanted to keep the record straight.
|
01-02-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
53
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
I don't mean to be overly cautious, but the old timers here will agree that we worked hard to keep this site untainted. I myself was once "bribed" by a webmaster to change my comments at one time. Bela is a great webmaster BTW, extremely helpful. I think your very low score hurt his feelings!
|
01-02-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
54
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Khan:
(Davit's Reply)
Davit said:
>> "But I was kind of disappointed to realise that this whole review site must be biased if the webmaster is affiliated with DDF."
That is a mistake on your part.
The owner/operators of TBP/PornUsers.com are NOT directly associated with DDF.
The webmaster of that site (Bela) speaks for themself just as you speak for yourself. Neither of you speaks for PornUsers.com Please try to keep the difference straight in your mind.
|
01-02-08 11:39am
|
Reply
55
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Well, it seemed to me like enough coincidence that it might arouse suspicions, but when that happens, sometimes the suspicions turn out to be wrong. I decided to hint at it and go no further.
There was a time when PU was having a real problem with shills (not to say it can't happen again). I even joined a site, a very disppointing one, on a shill's recommendation. Overall, it was getting tiresome and frustrating. Then I suspected one new member of being a shill -- he wrote a glowing review (of a site I knew) that seemed really over the top -- and I treated him to a nasty dose of ridicule. Whoops!
Anway, it's good to have your comments about the angles and camera steadiness. I agree with you on that aspect of the 21st Sextury stuff I've seen over the years. I think of Victoria Swinger getting it from behind in a standing position. So very nice! But overall I'm not big on videos, so I really can't make a lot of comparisons.
Anyway, all the best and I look forward to the negative reviews you have planned. ;)
|
01-02-08 11:38am
|
Reply
56
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from jd1961:
I am very suspicious of this review, referencing another network complete with hotlink is not what we are looking for here.
|
01-02-08 09:25am
|
Reply
57
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
Hi Denner and Davit
Yeah Theres a little something for everyone here I guess, its massive so keeps you busy, yeah theres a few things to moan a little bit about like there is really all sites. no site is perfect. Some of the older material before 2005 is on the poorer quality scale but love the new options of all the download qualities, certainly pleases all now.
Lulu and Cindy vid Denner was 2007-05-07 incase you wanted to find it straight away. I've seen a few more vids soon and yeah agree that some weird camera angles but actually found it a bit refreshing to be honest. On a few of the vids theres some awesome shots of pussy licking in views I've never seen before and in awesome quality, almost like your there lol
Maybe I'll join clubsandy.com later on in the year Looks a great clip though Davit, they all look very cute and I'm a massive fan of Sophie Moon.
More Ice Cream pussies please, very sexy to see.
Up to now I'm enjoying 1by-day, well the fresh less done up makeup wise girls and very impressive lesbian scenes that are up there with great Saphhic Erotica, which a lot of people say has gone down hill which yeah theres a lot of scenes going through the motions but in general theres mainly hot stuff still in my eyes. The lesbian stuff I'm finding here are surprisingly hot so look forward to going through the archives more. Would love a scene withe Belicia and Priscilla, my dream scene maybe a threesome with Nella would be nice, incase your reading webmaster. try your best for us, lol
|
01-02-08 09:17am
|
Reply
58
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Bela:
You're entitled to your opinion, but I very much doubt that most members of Pornusers will agree with you.
I also find it "interesting" that the sites you have reviewed so far (ClubSandy-95, Lezbo-Honey-90 and Dirty101-90) all happen to be owned by the same company - surely it must be co-incidence. And surely 1by-day's score of 75 must be a typo.
1by-day has been around ten years, has a huge following and lots of loyal members and you're going to have a hard time convincing them that our models' "talents are wasted here" and that our content has "bad lighting, shaky camera work, inability to get decent angles or close-ups, bad editing." Perhaps you've been downloading videos from 2002? :)
So, you're entitled to your opinion and we'll see what other Pornusers make of it, but my personal opinion is that your review it total bull and you shouldn't be using Pornusers as a place to plug sites which you are no doubt affiliated with (interesting that all the links you have "helpfully" posted include Nats affiliate codes.....).
Pornusers should be a place for porn lovers to get together and voice their unbiased, helpful opinions and views on the various sites they have been members of in the interests of aiding others who are perhaps thinking of joining those sites - last time I looked, it wasn't a place to advertise your own sites, certainly not at the expense of others.
Happy New Year!
Bela
DDF Productions
|
01-02-08 06:50am
|
Reply
59
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hondaclf:
(Davit's Reply)
The site is basically soft-core but there are a few that are a little more intense. Some good girl-girl, beautiful girls.
|
02-29-08 04:40pm
|
Reply
60
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(Davit's Reply)
The overall portfloio of XXX material is massive and the well worth a peek. I've see that their now getting into strap-on play. If they just did more oral? If your into teen cunt being very hardcore you'll enjoy the site overall.
|
03-01-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
61
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from daveboy:
(Davit's Reply)
Hi Davit
Never really noticed the navigation so it was not a big minus. but this was before they started adding all the videos. so time to get over there.
As for the voices, depends who it is. Love Ben Dover and Buttman, this guys not in their league but it's not to bad. these guys making these sites have a nightmare keeping us happy. I did not like Nubiles, others love it. Bagalaz thinks 900 videos over 3 months is not enough and I think it's too much.
Tough job. LOL
|
02-17-08 12:33pm
|
Reply
62
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from daveboy:
(Davit's Reply)
You see I never got put off by him talking, kind of made me feel like I could be there holding the lights.
As for the design, who gives a F*#k about the design? LOL Never really struck me that it was that bad.
|
02-16-08 06:29am
|
Reply
63
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PosterDude:
Divit you sound like crying baby that got milk taken away. 65 score is very bad so you are just mad – not above average review like you say. You want alscan with above average review then change number to 85-90. Alsscan is one of best sites on internet and maybe best which should be 90-100 review. I have been member of over 150 sites what about you? Alscans has more content and better quality pictures and video than anybody I see. I count more than 75 percent of video are masturbation or girlgirl video. Below 25 percent is photoshoot video that is labeled. You do not like Alex voice then do not download photoshoot video. I like photoshoot video to and it show real girl. Still more video on site than 95% of other internet sites. Alsscan do not release photos in piece. Scenes have 2 or 3 theames. Some glamore with little and no insertion. Some explicit with lot of insertion and different toy and sometime fist. Each photo release completes set in order. I do not talk good English, I just no good porn.
Your review just seen as angry baby review. Nobody believe 65 score review.
|
01-19-08 07:11am
|
Reply
64
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PosterDude:
(Davit's Reply)
I do wish for Boy-Girl on site. Then it would be 100 score. It is best site for content and quality. I have big monitor to see all quality and compare. alscan is best of all in video and photo.
|
01-19-08 07:08am
|
Reply
65
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Robare:
(Davit's Reply)
Ahhh...really...?
If there were any lingering doubts readers might have had concerning the care you take in formulating your opinions, it seems you've eliminated them. You're assistance in confirming your disregard is appreciated. It provides a valuable context for evaluating the qualities of your remarks concerning this site.
You state I sound angry. Regarding the voice you seem to be hearing: you might ask yourself about the qualities of that voice. Is it the voice of a soprano, alto, tenor, or bass? Could it possibly be a gay voice? Whatever the qualities are, I'm pretty sure it is not my voice you are hearing...
|
01-18-08 06:52am
|
Reply
66
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Robare:
(Davit's Reply)
Hmmm...above average score...really...and you determined this by reckoning... That almost seems quaint...
I'd say that, based upon the information you've provided, your score is well below average. It's unfortunate you attempted to justify your decision based upon an undefined, unquantified list of sites which you state demonstrate some admittedly undesirable characteristics. However, as ALSScan has demonstrated none of those characteristics, I'd have to say they are irrelevant to the evaluation and using them as a basis for justification is unjustified.
Certainly, if we take a look at the well-defined, well-quantified list of sites which appear in the niche categories assigned by the TBP and PU staff, we'd have to admit your score is well below normal. And, you've more than once commented on how distasteful you find the male voice in the videos. Thus far, there is no reason to disbelieve your scoring of this site was largely motivated by an urge to slam the site and, in particular, the photographer/videographer/owner.
As to your supposed final point, I'm sure there are several readers who can appreciate the contributions of a self-renowned expert in the areas of human female physiology, physiological responses, and fluid production. I know I certainly do... But, I'll suggest that, unless you are in a position to evaluate those fluids with all five of your senses (rather than just the two that can be used with video), you're not well-poised to evaluate the authenticity, although I will admit that faking urination would be rather difficult and pointless...
|
01-17-08 08:30am
|
Reply
67
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Robare:
From your profile:
"I would like to see more negative reviews (not just here - I mean anywhere), as these are just as important as the positive reviews, to warn us when certain sites do not deliver what they promise (and there are LOTS of them). It would be great to have a kind of 'Hall Of Shame' that objectively lists the sites that, for example, have very low-quality movies, or a tiny amount of content, or just don't do what the tour pages promise. I think that would be highly appreciated by potential users."
It seems that in your eagerness to be credited with a negative review, you've managed to post a review that is not to your credit. You failed to meet the criteria you established for a negative review. You preferred to use terms like "lots" rather than quantify. It seems accommodating your sense of irritation and/or lassitude is more important to you than conveying reality.
I disagree with your assessment of the importance of being negative. Positive and negative in this context are terms resulting from subjective evaluations. As such, they are largely irrelevant. Positive and negative reviews are not needed. Truthful reviews are needed. And, it seems the truth about this site suffers a little at your hands. As examples:
1. You cited European girls but failed to cite American girls. Perhaps you failed to discern that American girls appear on the site, or perhaps you failed to perceive any of the American girls as being nice, but you left the reader with the impression that only Europeans appear on the site.
2. It's true that Alex interacts with models from an off-camera standpoint. In photoshoot videos, he's the photographer and it's quite normal for a photographer to give directions to the model. In behind-the-scenes videos, he and the others tend to interact casually and jovially, as one might expect. But, Alex understands that when a model is, or the models are, having sex, his interaction is a distraction and I've yet to see an instance of his speaking during the immediate build-up to, and achievement of, orgasm. It's usual for him to speak with the model during an introduction of a solo sex video and perhaps after the model has finished.
3. You seem to decry falsehood in your porn, yet you gave Sapphic Erotica an 89 and that site has conveyed far more falsities than ALSScan. Witness the preponderance of the seemingly mandatory breathing pattern, the play-acting of passion, and the paucity of wetness.
4. I've seen only one video on the site where the copious amount of fluid produced by the model during sex that might have been peeing. Your description failed to quantify and I suspect there's a good reason for that.
Playing loosely with the facts doesn't make for a good review, positive or negative...
|
01-13-08 10:20am
|
Reply
68
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Drooler:
I don't care for videos of photoshoots, nor for photoshoots published piecemeal. ("Let's see. This is Sophie Second Shoot Scene 3 Set 2. Did I ever get any of the other sets? Oh, and then part of it is in the promo zip, too. And THEN there's the stuff that came from the Director's Blog.")
All they have to do is just publish everything from one scene, three or four days in a row, and be done with it. It would still be piecemealing, but it wouldn't remind me so much of gathering things together for tax season. And it would just make, y'know, sense. Hey, it might even make it less complicated for them!
It's like what I feel like saying to Digital Desire, another site that is a notorious piecemealer: Congratulations, you've made something simple and straightforward into a royal pain in the ass!
And I just 86 the shots of the fisting, the peeing, the speculum/candles/"Rocket"/fresh produce insertions, or the pull-down-pussy-lips clamp. So yes, I've joined before because after a while, they have some pretty nice, high quality shots of some hot girls. But all of that weird other stuff is just crap as far as I'm concerned.
|
01-12-08 08:09pm
|
Reply
69
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from PinkPanther:
Just a point or two for accuracy:
1) Alex isn't gay. He's married, has a couple of kids. I got the same impression that you had from his voice originally, but this is the story. He doen't think his voice is all that good either, but talks to get the most out of the models and the best shoots. For my tastes, he achieves that.
2) Their vid releases are clearly labeled as to whether they are photoshoots or not. The ones that are not only have Alex talking for a few seconds at the beginning at most - maybe he'll say "Hi" to the model and get her to tell us what she's going to do in the vid. Many of them, if the model is confident enough to talk to the camera, especially, he won't even do that. Looking at the last 10 vid releases, 60% have been non-photo shoot vids, so the amount of talking that Alex would have been doing in those would have been slim or none.
Alex's stated view is that he does the photoshoot vids more so that people can see what goes on in a real photoshoot than as stroke material. He's into that "educational" role of the site. One of my very favorite bonuses in the past year was a huge vid package showing a shoot in Czech from the time the crew woke up in the morning until they went back to their hotel at night. Given that the crew included Nella and Amber Rayne, both of whom were hotter than the models in the shoots, I was thoroughly entertained.
|
01-12-08 08:23am
|
Reply
70
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Denner:
Quite agree
I may rate this site a bit higher - but not much.
Two things:
The fisting-thing are WAY overdone - if this is NOT your favorite thing. Why don't the call it ALS Fisting - that may cover it better.
The videos are mainly based on photo-shoots - certainly not my favorite either...
BTH - I like Davits review - no beating around the bush..
|
01-12-08 08:09am
|
Reply
71
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment from Davit:
Well, my search has brought me to In The Crack, which seems to offer all that Anal Toy Girls offers - but without the male hands, and with less toys too! See my comment for that site.
|
02-29-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
72
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from littlejoe:
i agree. id probably join this site if it were either female hands or no hands at all
|
02-28-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
73
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from Monahan:
I agree about natural sounds being audible. If there are no natural sounds, I'm fine with a bird chirping in the background or something like that just to make sure my speakers are operative.
I like music where the girl is dancing in the video but the music must be part of the content and not just dubbed in. Out of synch music is totally not good.
|
04-03-08 11:36am
|
Reply
74
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from Nick C:
Thanks Davit, thanks for taking the time to leave some comments! I can confirm that all of our new videos do not have any music added - just the sound of the babe getting off !!
Thanks again
Nick
Webmaster
|
02-20-08 08:27am
|
Reply
75
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
from Goldfish:
Say it! I haven't been a member of this site yet but I agree with your sentiment. It is a distraction to say the least.
|
02-19-08 08:31pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
