| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from Capn:
Thanks for the heads up on that!
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-03-10 04:18pm
|
Reply
27
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Goldfish's Reply)
"I personally didn't have any problem finding plenty of content I haven't seen before."
That's the appeal of sites like Brazzers and Reality Kings, but at a higher price. Huge volume plus some exclusive stuff makes this site look like a real find. Thanks.
|
03-16-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
28
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Monahan:
BTW, I went to the TBP review where Spencer says there is a lot of exclusive stuff, so my request above is for confirmation.
So far this site looks like it's a horndog's dream come true. Brain Pass looks like a great companion to Video Box. Joining both should keep you busy enough to not need any other porn sites.
|
03-16-09 11:34am
|
Reply
29
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Monahan:
Based on this review I checked out the preview site. It looks like it's a huge buffet room with endless offerings that should keep a horndog quite busy for a long time. And at $90 per year ($7.50 per month) it definitely looks like a good deal.
The preview site suggests, however, that a lot of the content (if not all) is not exclusive. Can you confirm that?
|
03-16-09 11:12am
|
Reply
30
|
Club Sapphic
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from messmer:
LOL. And you recommended this site to me? I could happily live with the older/younger theme .. but an abundance of tattoos and botched boob jobs? Never shall my money end up in their hands! :-)
|
02-04-11 07:09pm
|
Reply
31
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ipg386:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I didn't bother asking them for the money back, they are pornographers, not exactly the most upstanding members of the business world.
|
07-10-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
32
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Hey Goldfish,
The newest sets I saw were (m/d/y):
HDteensvideo: 8/8/09
Exclusiveteenporn: 4/9/10 (appears to still be updating, or perhaps just recycling content - only 2 video sets per month)
Bestfuckedteens - says 4/22/10, but I really doubt this is accurate as it appears to just display todays date no matter what
teensamateurvideo - says 4/22/10, once again I doubt it
fucking-young - newest video is 6/25/09
pearlteens - says 4/22/10, but I doubt it
magic-porn.biz - newest video is 11/15/08
In general, I would say that few if any of these sites are still updating, or updating very infrequently.
These are dates listed on the site, and I couldn't really tell if they were doing any recycling as I have never been a member here before.
Hope that helps.
|
04-22-10 02:36pm
|
Reply
33
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
It's a shame because they could have started each scenes with the girls walking with jeans on. They could have filmed from different angles, which would have allowed us to see the amazing backside that some of these girls have. No instead they use the jeans as a way to distinguish their sites from other anal themed sites.
The amount of time the girls spend in jeans is ridiculous. This is almost pure gonzo. The girls appear and voila they are now nude and
within a very short amount of time they are screwing.
|
05-22-10 01:57pm
|
Reply
34
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cryton:
(Goldfish's Reply)
There are a number of resolutions considered to be HD (obviously all are higher resolution than SD) including 720p, but to differentiate, the consumer electronics industry has deemed the phrase "full HD" should only relate to 1080×1920.
So you're quite right in saying that 720p is HD, but "full HD" should only be used to describe 1080×1920.
There's more at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080p
|
02-08-11 07:39pm
|
Reply
35
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from Cryton:
FWIW, "full HD" refers to 1920×1080, but 1280×720 is a valid HD resolution.
|
01-20-11 11:47pm
|
Reply
36
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from GCode:
These models are quite stunning! I like Misti on the preview page...woo she is hot. Interesting review and a site I'll add to my favorites for consideration later on :) Thanks for the heads up. Take care.
|
03-14-10 07:44pm
|
Reply
37
|
Full Screen Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from yote78:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Agreed.
In fact, the trailer runs only about 10 seconds and then locks up. But, as I told an earlier replier, don't judge the site just by the trailer.
I wouldn't call it a great site by any stretch but if you're into solo female masturbation this site is worth at least a short peek. I enjoyed it very much for the month I was a member, despite the shortcomings I listed in my review.
|
05-07-10 07:45pm
|
Reply
38
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for getting back to me on this. Yeah - that watermark was way over the top. Good to see it's gone.
|
04-10-10 04:52pm
|
Reply
39
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
It's good to see someone who's been here recently. This is one of the sites that I seem to go back to every once in a while.
I'm curious you've happened to notice if they've leveled out on the bitrates. A few months ago, they were all over the place. The other thing I'm curious about is the watermark. Are all the newer videos marred by that overly large square monstrosity they'd been starting to use?
|
04-09-10 05:26pm
|
Reply
40
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Months ago - not years
A classic case of wanting more than 10 minutes to edit a reply : - )
|
02-07-08 02:33am
|
Reply
41
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I'd actually joined this site twice, the last time being a couple of years ago. I just went to the home page and it looks like things haven't changed much as far as layout and content, other than updates of course.
Along with Her Sweet Hand, you also get access to seven other sites in their network - including another hand job site. The older videos were crappy resolution with scenes chopped into pieces but the later ones are great hi-def and available in full-length. It could just be I'm getting senile early, but I seem to recall that updates were kind of slow in coming, but with the amount of material that's already up, there's plenty to look at for your money
|
02-06-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
42
|
Hypno Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Yes, apparently hypnofetish is not very common, that's why there are so few sites around :)
It can also be because hypnosis and mind control belong more to erotica than to porn itself... Just check the Erotic Mind Control Story Archive: thousands of stories devoted to this same topic!!!
|
03-15-09 11:23am
|
Reply
43
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
The good thing for me is that many of the girls appearing on this site have done movies for Girlfriend Films and with those movies I get the full package: a storyline, clothes, tease, dialogue, kissing and sex. This is what I'd like to see on this site. I know there is a vast market for it. Hopefully somebody with money will do it.
|
08-01-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
44
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from pat362:
My biggest issue with this site is that it's only kissing. I think we don't see it often enough in porn today but I still want the rest that usually follows. I would never join this site even if they offer full length scenes in HD. I'll always feel that it's more tease than anything else. The day that they add actual sex between the player is the day I join ths site.
|
08-01-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
45
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I wish. Unfortunately that's $10.95 each clip, but it requires no site membership. I didn't spring for them, as I found the quality of the more recent clips available to members pretty decent.
|
07-10-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
46
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RagingBuddhist:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I emailed the webmaster almost immediately, asking for a refund because of script issues. I even waited all weekend before downloading anything, hoping that would make refunding my money easier to accept. All I finally got was a reply, directing me to their TOS, saying that no refund was possible and asking me what script problems I was having.
As it turns out, there's a setting that's easily changed in Firefox that lengthens the time it takes for a script to timeout. So now, instead of having to click a popup on every page change to allow the script to finish, all I have to do is wait the usual 10-20 seconds. It's ANNOYING AS HELL!
I haven't emailed them back about this yet, but I *am* going to send them a link to this comment as soon as I post this.
|
08-23-10 06:28pm
|
Reply
47
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Sadly for me it's too late. My membership ended on the 13th. To add insult to injury. I tried to log in on the 12th, but kept on getting refused. I noticed that they put up a note saying that someone was downloading excessivelly and that was the reason for the slowdown. I might be willing to believe that if it was for just a couple of times but I had problems for 3 weeks. I hope it's just technical but if it isn't then they aren't going to be able to keep getting new mebers
|
10-17-09 06:55am
|
Reply
48
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from roseman:
I read at your cons section that downloading speeds are slow.
What kind of internet connection do you own and what's the maximum download speed that this site gave you ?
|
09-07-08 04:18am
|
Reply
49
|
Mature Toilet Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(Goldfish's Reply)
> doesn't it make more sense to give us your experiences with five or ten > sites you've actually joined?
My understanding this is a completely different thing. The question as I read it was about sites out there, not about sites one cares to join (which means pre-selection process, especially for PU users). I think poll results confirm my interpretation too (I don't think that somebody was mistreated by 75% of the sites he joined).
> if there is disclosure of elements in the site that you may not like > in the free area or the terms and conditions, isn't that ethical
> business practice? I think it is.
Yes, and you should note that there were several sites I've considered "probably ethical but definitely not worth to join", so it's not about liking or disliking free area, but an estimate of chances of them lying in free area (if garbage site doesn't promise anything, it's ok, but if it says they have daily updates, it's suspicious). About terms and conditions, I didn't say these guys are necessarily unethical, but outrageous terms and conditions make me quite suspicious, so I wrote "unethical: unclear" for them. Sure this whole exercise is all about personal interpretation, but I hope mine isn't too far out :-).
|
05-16-08 04:44am
|
Reply
50
|
Minxxx Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from troglodite:
(Goldfish's Reply)
No music on vids that shouldn't have music. There's a few with music like the ones on Dream Taylor's site where she's dancing, but that makes sense :)
|
04-20-08 02:00pm
|
