| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(Goldfish's Reply)
When I had dialup service, my download speeds were about 3-4 KB/s, but sometimes slower.
With DSL, I am getting a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.
As far as structuring the poll questions, I did not know precisely how to split the speed options. I know that dialup is much slower than 100 KB/s for max download speed. But since the poll is a multiple choice format, I wanted to provide simple choices.
If the poll, instead of multiple choice, offered a way to write in each individual's actual maximum download speed, we would get a more precise idea of what PU members are using.
But I think this poll gives a nice approximate answer to what PU members are getting for download speeds.
This reply was somewhat directed at badandy400's reply #8. And for the sake of simplicity, it's better to use Kilobytes, instead of mixing Kilobytes and Kilobits for the answers.
|
05-30-10 12:12am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Goldfish, I admire you for that! Like someone on the show "Hoarders," I keep way too much stuff and don't purge anywhere near enough.
|
05-19-10 05:48am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Goldfish, as replied to RB - I'll try to go for that 4:3-deal - Thanks!!! And guess your're right about the old days and "full screen" - I'll remember that...
|
05-09-10 09:33am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from GCode:
(Goldfish's Reply)
When I made this poll, I wanted to target asia as in eastern asia (china, japan, taiwan, korea, vietnam, etc) and not lump india and russia in to it. So I figured if you wanted to visit either of these you can add that to the other category. Plus, when you make these polls, you get limited amount of choices for answers to the polls so there was not enough choices for me to add Middle East, India, Russia, Australia in a seperate category :(
|
04-07-09 09:50am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Lol. Yeah, I am not exactly sure why they are singled out, but there are probably a few offended members.
I would love to visit Australia; warm weather and lots to see, plus being a dumb monolingual American I would not have to learn another language, though I am sure I would stick out like a sore thumb regardless. Maybe I should join Abbywinters a few times and learn about their women?
After Australia I would visit the Scandinavian countries just to see the natural beauty of the land. They seem to be one of the last places on Earth where humans are not coexisting with the land simply by destroying it.
|
04-06-09 08:08pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Ah - indeed I've run into that trouble before - myself. No matter, that's what these lovely reply sections are designed to mend :-)
|
02-25-08 06:20pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I hope I didn't sound like I was equating watching porn with becoming a sexual predator. I don't think that watching porn leads to violence or sexual abuse of women and children. I believe that main stream media be it TV, radio, or magazines is far guiltier than porn can ever be on that subject. Afterall is there anyone in America who hasn't seen or read about Britney Spears V...a??? or heard about her pregnant 16 yrs old sister. That said, I still don't think that porn will ever be accepted. Anymore than I think prostituion is ever going to be accepted. I don't equate the two, but they are both based on sex. I wish that society could have a healthier view of porn, but porn isn't making it easy. We are talking about an industry riddled with drug abuse, std's of all kind, suicides. I don't know about you, but that makes it a little harder to show the good sides.
|
02-12-08 07:22pm
|
Reply
8
|
18 First Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from Denner:
ANOTHER site from the Cyprus-based:
S&S Royal Limited ( just love that name, ho, ho).
(And to those europeans who claim that US-people do not know much about geography (Wikileaks) - Cyprus is a Greek/Turkish island in the Mediterranean.
Still the S&S does a lot of good, but again this new "deal" is simply just another site with the same content as most of the others...
Still, like lk2 states about the quality, I will submit: It certainly varies a lot at the network Teen Mega World - some sites have just very fine vids - some less - like this new 18 First Sex....to join that site only is a bummer - go for the network.
And maybe that part should have been made clear in the TBP "What's Hot".
|
12-02-10 05:48am
|
Reply
9
|
18 First Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.
Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.
But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.
So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?
Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.
|
12-02-10 04:19am
|
Reply
10
|
18 First Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.
Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.
But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.
So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?
Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.
|
12-02-10 04:19am
|
Reply
11
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from elephant:
$42.54 if you are from the UK so even more pricier.
It used to be around $19.99 I think when I last joined a while back. I'd never join at the $40+ mark now, so they probably don't care but they've lost me at that price.
Nice review though.
|
11-13-15 03:26am
|
Reply
12
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I thought they brought it down to $29.99 cause I got all excited it had been reduced, not so long ago I think it was, but I could be wrong with that and maybe it was another site.
|
09-16-12 07:39am
|
Reply
13
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I'm not so sure, I have joined the last two times as a network so wouldn't be interested in paying $29.99 for one site and have to join all the others for $29.99 each.
|
09-16-12 07:02am
|
Reply
14
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for the note. I did realize that there was a name change. I have seen a number of videos from the YoungPorn/YoungLegalPorn site, and thought the models were very attractive and the videos were very clear and nice quality. But I never got around to joining the site/network, because I am mainly into softcore photosets. But I am dabbling with video sites more now.
|
07-18-10 09:53am
|
Reply
15
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from sitsat:
(Goldfish's Reply)
LOL - I've joined this site *twice* now and have been very disappointed and baffled by the reviews. Saying that, I have a niggling urge to join a third time (it's been about 3 years since I last joined) because I'm sure there must be something I've missed in the past for it to score so highly. Maybe I missed 95% of the site due to the poor navigation - I only got about 3 pages any time I searched for anything, if I remember correctly.
|
12-04-08 10:47pm
|
Reply
16
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for the comment Goldfish. You’ve reviewed more sites than I have so you’ll also know that there can be no better compliment than for someone to say they’ll take or avoid a membership based on your review. As I said above, I’m not a fan of this kind of site either but ALS Scan has all petite women which I like, and the scenes are not repetitive as with other sites. The Caribbean stuff and the public nudity is icing on the cake. It really is an excellent site.
When I joined a few weeks ago there was a special offer of $9.95 USD to join ALS Angels. While this site has a lot of similarities with ALS Scan it also has some differences. I’m thinking that since it is a stand-alone site I may do a review of it even though it is the same company – but it isn’t part of a network. If the special offer is still available I’d recommend it. It is excellent value at $9.95.
|
05-06-10 03:40am
|
Reply
17
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I am using Internet Download Manager. I have had this happen at a few different places so far, but it has never presented itself as a big deal. But, it can be a little scary at first because I figure that sometime I will run into a really nice site that I can not use the download manager on. It is not a big deal here because it corrected itself. Internet Download Manager does pretty much the same thing, but the part that stuck me as funny was that the zip folders worked with no issues and I downloaded them first?
|
03-21-08 09:14pm
|
Reply
18
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from marcdc1:
Great review Goldfish. I still love the production value, for what looks like a one man show he really pulls out all the stops in the quality department (both in terms of getting hot girls and kickass video production), and while the body mic are sometimes distracting, I'll take that over not being able to hear.
|
09-19-12 09:59am
|
Reply
19
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from nygiants03:
Use to love the girls on this site, alot of new faces. Do they still chop up the videos though? I remember when I use to be a member they would chop the scenes and put the logo in between. One second there would be a blowjob going on the next they are already having sex.
|
09-16-12 10:04am
|
Reply
20
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks goldfish. I always find that facility useful. They have not only a list of what you have viewed or downloaded, but a still from each clip. Makes it easy to see what you have viewed. It's handy if you want to find a clip you have viewed, or the dvd where it's from, but can't remember the name, or can't find it.
|
04-24-10 07:30am
|
Reply
21
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Reg Berkeley:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Look, I'm not one to start a flame war. If you don't like our site, then by all means. Frankly, "bland" isn't the first word that comes to mind involving AmericanVice. Crass, vulgar, distasteful, profane...that's my cup of tea :)
But all this talk of video quality made me want to jump in. We are a DVD download site. Our content comes from DVDs. All non-BluRay DVDs are MPEG2, which utilizes 720 x 480 (640 x 480 on PC...see another thread on square pixels versus round pixels).
We also maintain the proper aspect ratios on letterboxed DVDs and have gotten big kudos because of this. We even letterbox our screen caps to prevent distortion.
So unless you're trying to compare our DVD content to a HD site...then I can't apologize for the quality. We're bound by the nature of the source material.
All our videos are encoded at 2000K, which is the point of diminishing returns on encoding MPEG2 content. These files are about 400MB on average per scene. I'm not exactly sure what else we could do to address your comments about the quality.
|
06-22-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
22
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Cybertoad:
With such a low rating I expected to see more cons, but was a good review.
|
06-22-09 09:00am
|
Reply
23
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Goldfish's Reply)
When I click on the image (hot link) for amourangels at PU and/or TBP, a new page in my browser (firefox) comes up:
http://www.amourangels.com/trial/
That page does not load the images that it is supposed to show. Instead, I get a page that is mainly white-space. The titles and brief descriptions of many photosets are listed on the page, but there are no images loaded that are supposed to be a thumbnail for each photoset.
Clicking on one or more hot links for each photoset listing brings up a new browser page, that is supposed to be a larger image of that particular photoset. But again, there is no image of the photoset that is supposed to be shown on the new page.
Do you, or any member of PU (including staff), get any images when you visit the Intro page (http://www.amourangels.com/trial/) at amourangels?
Can you load or view the image for any of the photosets from the trial page?
Maybe my problem is that I need to clean out my cache, or do something else to bring up the images. Or maybe there is a problem at the amourangels site. That is what I am trying to find out. Is the problem of viewing the images due to my computer, or is it a site (server) problem?
|
03-31-09 07:06am
|
Reply
24
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Goldfish's Reply)
OK Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-04-10 01:58am
|
Reply
25
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Capn:
Is there much in the way of photo stuff?
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-03-10 04:21pm
|
