| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
If you do this right, they can't be removed. You place a watermark that is unique to each user, and it consists of very subtle color alterations of the pixels comprising the watermark, which can be off to the corner somewhere. You would never be able to see the effect of this.
If the webmaster wants to identify the downloader of a given image, all they have to do is subtract the pixels of their un-watermarked master copy from the watermarked image.
This cannot be decoded or removed without the master file, so there would be no way to defeat it.
Again, I would be fine with this. I once saw it implemented really badly though, with a semi-translucent alphanumeric code watermark right in the middle of the field of view. Ugh!
|
01-31-15 02:19pm
|
Reply
52
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Divinx:
Twistys is a PITA. Or should I say a pity? Considering the content is good, but trying to find you way around it is an unbearable task.
|
01-20-15 05:48pm
|
Reply
53
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from elephant:
Nice review Wittyguy and fair score.
I've been a recent member of this site, had to say I was left slightly disappointed, not so much with the site cause its not exclusive material and now available on a number of other sites. More with the current day quality of porn from whoever provides the material. I much preferred it a few years ago when the time Benta the girl they use on the thumbnail for the site above was around. Much hotter scenes in my opinion. This new style really doesn't cut it for me, there is the odd nice one cause some of the girls are beautiful still but the sex is too monotonous for my liking and the girls look like they are just going through the motions and not enjoying it.
Still this site still has loads of great old videos which is kind of how I got to compare, going through the old stuff when the site began and thinking most of this stuff is far hotter in my opinion than the new stuff.
|
01-11-15 02:09am
|
Reply
54
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'll check it out the next time I'm at Twistys. Someone once told me their older peeing shoots were amazing, so my curiosity is piqued. Also, I think all of Twistys' peeing shoots were pre-2007, including Justine Joli and Amber Michaels.
|
01-10-15 06:08pm
|
Reply
55
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from graymane:
Well WG ....
You got my attention.
great review ....but then I wouldn't expect less from you.
glad to see you steppin' out of hibernation for a change.
|
01-09-15 09:34pm
|
Reply
56
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from EverNight:
I had been a member of this site recently and I think your review is very accurate. One additional comment I'd add is that all of the high quality videos are in WMV only (no MP4 option) which can be a downside to some.
|
01-09-15 06:14pm
|
Reply
57
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from LPee23:
"You need to upgrade to see all the older / oldest content they have." (Wittyguy)
Can you give more details on this please? I recently joined Twistys for two reasons - Justine Joli and Amber Michaels peeing. I found what I was looking for. I also heard that Twistys had more peeing content than this in the past, but I could not find it. Support blew off my request for help.
|
01-09-15 03:44pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Annoying. Like wittyguy, it's even more annnoying for me when the good stuff is only in the video.
|
12-12-14 03:20pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Jay G:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I think the correlation between average score and IQ makes a lot of sense. I wish I had been smart enough to think of that!
|
10-18-14 02:52pm
|
Reply
60
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from DDFNetwork:
Hi Wittyguy,
Thank you for notifying us about the outdated info on these sites, but it's true, our free trial is no more unlimited, and this applies to the whole network.
Sadly too many free members were taking advantage of the numberless payment processors and opened countless free trial accounts - again and again - using our site for generally free. So we remained with two options:
1. Increase our prices, so actual pay members will pay for all the jerks-offs of these cheap-asses, or
2. Limit our trials, as of 8 full HD videos should be fair enough for anyone to decide if they like our exclusive content enough to stay and pay for quality, or to cancel and leave.
We decided to go with option 2, and have to say it's a big success. We are sorry that the information on PU/TBP is not up to date and may have misled you to join, but we'll try to get that info changed quick, however it's not under our control. We hope that the 8 total videos you can download will convince you to convert to a full access member and enjoy our content for long.
Kind regards,
Kris
DDF Network representative
|
07-30-14 08:47am
|
Reply
61
|
Just Teens Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Twotails:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'm now having a close look into TeenMegaWorld. Of course, I found some of the same models there (some are in many sites), but not one set is on both. So my supposition of exclusiveness is confirmed.
About quality I've written a comment in the TMW page. JustTeensPorn delivers the same video quality (throughout HD720) but ways better photo quality.
|
07-28-14 02:45am
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
The usual disk externals are best removed unless being used. The new solid state externals, however, are built with the intention of very long connection times.
The best test...if your external is hot after being plugged in for a period, best to remove it and let it cool down.
|
06-15-14 04:41pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I think that "more X than average" is a enough common idiom. It basically means "more than the (statistical) norm," based, of course, not on stats but on intuition coming out of one's own global knowledge base.
But as we've seen with other polls, some users are pickier than average about how things are worded. I wouldn't be surprised if we had a poll about tits and they'd be saying, "Depends on what you mean by 'tits'" and "Define 'tits'."
Maybe a little too much of life has been spent at Lake Wobegon, ironically enough.
|
03-23-14 06:53pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
When you get that check, let me know and we can start our own hook-up website. With your money and my brains we can do a great job. Well....maybe a good job. Then again...
Oh well.
|
12-19-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
65
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good comprehensive review Wittyguy. Place looks good apart from the tats, trickery and fake breasts. I've never been a member but might be tempted if they did away with the cross sales.
|
11-28-13 08:07am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Thedebilman666:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I think the lack of replies is peoples way of showing me they don't like me around here. Like I give a damn. If that's the case they can consider me the itching, burning, painful hemorrhoid that never goes away no matter how many surgeries they have or tubes of preparation H they smear on it.
The only reason I came up with this poll is because my two closest friends think I'm weird for faking a few orgasms in my life. The reasons are, once I was doing a fatty and couldn't maintain a hardon, so I faked to save face. The other reason is it was the 4th or 5th go around that night and my dick hurt, it didn't feel good anymore and I wanted a ham sammich.
|
10-22-13 03:08pm
|
Reply
67
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
I agree with the comments which are more thorough than most reviews. It is a vid rather than pic site, but the material is very professional. The price of my principals is $5 or £5, as I took up another offer from this network, this time for Devils Film. They have regional discrimination as well as pre checked cross selling but I took them up on their offer to steal material at a steal price.
I cancelled the next day because I know how tricky they can be. I received no confirmation either when I cancelled or when I followed up with two email queries. I had to go to live support who weren't there the first couple of times but when I finally got through they said I hadn't received a confirmation because I hadn't cancelled.
If anyone joins this site I would suggest you go straight to live support if you don't receive a cancellation confirmation email, because this is the second time I have joined a site for the $5 offer, cancelled and never received confirmation. Live support on both occasions sent me a notification within minutes.
|
10-20-13 07:49am
|
Reply
68
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
No zips? Sheesh. Sounds like a real Join 'n Boin.
|
10-17-13 04:03pm
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
LOL! Black it is then! :-)
|
09-20-13 09:50pm
|
Reply
70
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SelenaMetArt:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I just wanted to clarify that the site is not recycling old content.
I do agree that the VivThomas approach is more traditional hardcore than what is found on SexArt. :)
Otherwise, it's a matter of taste, and I love seeing users give feedback and assistance to other users!
|
07-31-13 12:42pm
|
Reply
71
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes, it did help and thanks! I'll put this site on the bottom of my sign up list for now.
|
07-31-13 12:19pm
|
Reply
72
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from hodayathink:
The sad part about all of this is that New Sensations actually does still shoot good content nowadays (if you get the chance, check out their newest DVDs), but they website is just so out of date that it's ridiculous.
|
07-23-13 07:34pm
|
Reply
73
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for the review. I was a member a couple of times, once way long ago in the days of runty pics and pixelly vids, and once more "recently" (like 3 years ago?). Some of the problems you mentioned I'd experienced during my second subscription (lack of search, cloned content, and vids at one standard but quickly self-deprecating def).
|
07-17-13 01:40pm
|
Reply
74
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from graymane:
How does one find enough superlatives to justify the merits of a review such as this one?
I had a webmaster once (I suppose because I pulled no punches with Cons and my score) cut us all down as being ill-qualified to do reviews.
I only wish he could read this one.
|
07-16-13 08:41pm
|
Reply
75
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Nice review. I quite like the place but agree with your judgement. It has some good mainstream porn, but the quality is not great by today's standards. I have been thinking about joining again, but have held off, mainly due to the cons mentioned. Surely they can do some sort of passable HD?
|
07-16-13 07:13pm
|
