| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from troglodite:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks for the comments - odd how we both managed to review this network in the same time when it hadn't had any before! I did check out your review before I made mine to try and eliminate much crossover. I didn't check out much of the other sites because the models didn't appeal to me near as much. Not sure where this network is based, but it must not be the Miami/LA scene because I've not seen any of the girls before. I'm guessing it must be Canadian.
|
01-03-09 09:05am
|
Reply
352
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I have yet to find a vid that is not akin to something that someone would post randomly to You Tube as opposed to anything that was intended to be sexy.
If there are any sexy vids on this site, I have yet to see them. The pics are hot though.
|
02-13-09 10:09pm
|
Reply
353
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Thaeral:
I've only been a member for a month or two. The sets that I've saved range from the highest pixel measurements from 1000 to 1200. 1200 are the most recent sets.
I have found no zip options of the sets. I believe they expect you to "collect" them in your favorites. And since the yearly membership is so cheap, I can see why they would feel that way. I'm old fashioned and like to archive them to my hard drive. I've resorted to viewing the sets in the HTML Gallery rather than the Flash Gallery so I can right click and save. The sets can have 60+ pics in them, so this does get monotonous.
The Flash Gallery is slick and it makes the imagines fit your screen. My screen is 1680x1050, so whatever scaling they're doing to fit my screen doesn't show any artifacts but the original images are very close to my resolution.
I really didn't like tattoos or piercings when I came into this site. It was so cheap to subscribe I had to try it. And now I'm a fan. There are a lot of gorgeous models (period) on this site. Technically they are "alt" models, but many of them are just so naturally beautiful that they stand up to whatever mainstream models are out there.
For the money, you really should give it a try. It'll either click with you or it won't. And if it doesn't, it's very little skin off your back.
|
02-12-09 08:59pm
|
Reply
354
|
Suze Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Fine tip and fine review.
The review speaks for itself, but the tip about this new Suze-site is great - I tend to some of the classics more and more - and when you get the hole Suze-deal for less than $ 10 - it sure seems worth it.
BTW: Yes, Raquel Darian - still hunting for her stuff..she was just top.
|
01-24-09 07:57am
|
Reply
355
|
Suze Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from PinkPanther:
If you join Suze's site for the shortest possible amount of time and then leave, you will get multiple offers a week to rejoin at a really low price - and to join Holly's site at a really low price too. So that's a bargain-hunter's tip for you, Witty
|
07-09-09 07:51pm
|
Reply
356
|
Suze Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
I've joined Holly Randall's fairly new site. All of the pics go up to 1600. It's a good attempt at site that mixes it up with softcore, hardcore, lez, and fetishy stuff. However, I'm not all that crazy about it, partly because it mixes it up with softcore, hardcore, lez, and fetishy stuff.
|
07-09-09 03:23pm
|
Reply
357
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Capn:
Nice to have you contributing again, W.
You have been missed.
Comprehensive review there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-13 11:31pm
|
Reply
358
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from KET924aab:
Excellent review! I wonder if Suze will follow Holly's lead, and let Met-Art take over management of the site. Check a little down in the comments for the link about Met-Art managing Holly's site.
|
01-31-13 08:29pm
|
Reply
359
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Maybe you're old enough to remember those Benson & Hedges TV ads. To the tune of "La Bamba": "A couple hundred pixels larger."
|
01-23-09 03:16am
|
Reply
360
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey thanks for doing the stats update. It's all clean and neatly organized; makes it look a lot easier than I'm sure it was.
Too bad that the Suze sites still haven't broken the 1280 pixel barrier on pic sizes, though improve they have over the last year or two.
|
01-22-09 03:32pm
|
Reply
361
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Divinx:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Just click "Join now", and there it is: $7.77 for 7 days, full access, including both photo and videos (suzevideo.com).
|
05-09-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
362
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Maggie:
Hi Wittyguy!
My apologies for the inaccuracies in my review. I was going by some old and outdated info about the site. It appears that just about a third of the content on Swank Pass is actually exclusive so I've edited my score and review to reflect that info. Thanks for pointing it out to us!
Maggie
|
01-23-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
363
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from swankd:
Dear Wittyguy,
We really appreciate you taking the time to review our member’s area, www.swankpass.com. You are correct about seeing the same content from DDF, but I wanted to inform you that DDF used to shoot content exclusively for us, however he could also use the material on his site. So as you can see he built a great website. However, DDF isn’t the only content producer that we worked with. If you notice we have content that dates back over 8 years and most of our content is either exclusive or semi-exclusive, particularly the photo sets. When you consider all of our niche sites, such as Girl Next Door, Tranny Kings, Plumpersandbw, LegAction, and Dcup you’ll see that we really don’t have that much content from DDF. In addition, you can’t find all of our content on Videobox too. Yes, you may see some content on Videobox don’t get me wrong. However, the difference between them and us is that we also have tons of hi-rez and classic photos that you will not be able to find on Videobox.
We understand, that they’re could be some confusion of what is consider ‘Exclusive’ especially in today’s times. The days of where a company would have their full staff shoot content for the company is long dead. If you remember back in the days, Clive McLean would only shoot for Hustler and not resell his content to any other companies. In today’s time, what is happening is that content producers will hire a girl give her three different outfits, put her in 3 different sets and then shoot the content. They will then sell those three sets to different companies and will offer a particular set to be either exclusive or semi-exclusive. So most likely when you join other sites and you see the same model and the same “style” of the photographer/video the set which is probably exclusive or semi-exclusive, but it may appear to the consumer that the content isn’t exclusive. I hope this make sense, I just wanted to explain to you a little more about how today’s trends in the industry.
On a different, note although we haven’t published it on the site yet..any customer that has been a member for over 3 months we will give them a complimentary 3 month magazine subscription to any of our magazines or a free video. We just ask our member’s to contact us if they’re interested and we’ll handle all of the rest. J
Again, I would like to thank you again for reviewing our site and giving us an opportunity to explain to PornUser’s surfers a little bit about SwankPass.
Sincerely,
Laurel H.
|
01-21-10 05:56pm
|
Reply
364
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
"Ughhhh, what a pic farm! Just thumbs to little galleries of 500 px pics of mostly non-exclusive stuff with no coherent organization, no searching, nothing. There's DDF and Hicks and whatever else loads this toilet boil of deceit. Possibly the worst ripoff I've had in 3 years!"
Well, that's part of my "note to self" I wrote 4 years ago after having joined Gent Online, which was the avenue through which I got into this network.
Things CAN change, of course, so I should bear that in mind. What I can glean from your comments about the site is that it still hasn't changed that much for the better. And from the new review at the TBP, well, it's just another overrated site.
They'll never deserve the $25 bucks I shelled out in 2005. Why give them any more?
|
01-21-10 02:46pm
|
Reply
365
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from pat362:
I agree with you and I hope it's just a glitch because this is the second review that receives an above 80 score which It doesn't deserve. I made a similar comment in December when Venessa awarded "it's your porn" 84.5 for what appears to be some old non-exclusive material.
|
01-20-10 06:22pm
|
Reply
366
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from El Nino:
I agree, not too impressed with this website.
|
02-02-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
367
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Good review, Wittyguy...
Well, got somewhat of the same question as exotics4me: It'd be nice - for a change - to sign up on the cheap trial - just could not find it...
|
09-20-08 08:01am
|
Reply
368
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from exotics4me:
Which site did you join through? I have been a member two times, joining through tasty pass, not any of the individual sites, and I have larger resolution videos. The tasty pass sign up page doesn't even give a trial option. I'm wondering if they are using lower quality videos for the trial? I have around 42 videos from the Tasty Tara site and all are at least 740 high end, some are even approaching 900 high end. The videos I have from Tasty Julie are a minimum 640 high end. I'm mainly asking if it is possible that they aren't letting trial members have the full size videos. My main interest in the site is Tasty Tara, and I found the quality of content on her site to be well above average.
|
09-19-08 11:00pm
|
Reply
369
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
FWIW, as well as clearing cache, you generally need to delete any cookies associated with the site. Then visit from one of our links.
If that doesn't help, not sure the problem.
Sorry I couldn't help more.
|
04-29-15 12:02pm
|
Reply
370
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from marvin:
Hey! TeamSkeet here - thank you for reviewing us! We welcome all feedback/suggestions and critiques. Couple of quick things:
A. Not sure where you got the $18 price point (unless cookies) but TBP does have a $9.87 link for the remainder of April. Goes to $17.887 after this month.
B. Just fyi -we do update 7 new girls per week - 31 per month in TeamSkeet - @ 9.87$ i think that makes us a great network; at least IMO.
Thank you!
-A
|
04-29-15 09:23am
|
Reply
371
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Khan:
FWIW, I just checked and am seeing the prices we have listed. As suggested by lk2fireone, it could have been a cache or a cookie issue.
|
04-29-15 09:02am
|
Reply
372
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from lk2fireone:
PS: I miss the annual PU forum awards. They were amusing.
|
04-29-15 08:42am
|
Reply
373
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from lk2fireone:
When I click on the PU link to TeamSkeet, the join page shows:
$4.99/month for 12 month membership
$9.87/month for 1 month membership
But you have to uncheck the pre-checked offer to join VideoZ, wich is billed at $39.97/month after 2-day trial for $1.00 ends.
I also get the same prices when I click the TBP link to TeamSkeet.
For a while, back in 2013, they dropped the pre-checked offer on signup. But it's now back again. Which could be very expensive if you forget to uncheck the offer and go into the very high monthly fee after 2 days for the cross-sell.
I'm not sure why you saw $18/month. Maybe you need to clear your cache. Or maybe it's something else. Computers can be a mystery.
Both signup pages links to TeamSkeet (PU and TBP) are billed thru Epoch.
|
04-29-15 08:24am
|
Reply
374
|
Tear My Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from badandy400:
Limited trial...hum! Thanks for the warning. The site might have changed that option since the site was reviewed last.
|
03-24-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
375
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hi Wittyguy. I'll do an individual review for some of the sites available on the network. All the site seem to suffer from the same problems:
1-Although they have pretty decent resolution on their pics. You can't download them in one file. You have to download each pic one by one (in my book that means no pics).
2-Some of the action is good but suffers from Max Hardcore envy. Way too much drooling, gagging in the blowjob. It's mostly gonzo with little interaction between the performers.
3-Some of the girls are really, really beautiful but that beauty gets lost because the set-up, makeup and general attitude detract from that beauty.
Little Hell cat is unusual for them because it's just one performer.
It's not bad but it's also very new. There are only 14 scenes at the moment. Be advvised that the pic situation is the same for this site as other in the network.
|
07-29-09 06:50pm
|
