| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from freaksoul666:
I wonder if you could tell me whom you sent an email for canceling your membership. I have been unable to cancel my membership and therefore have been billed for months. Thanks.
|
09-10-12 11:19am
|
Reply
177
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from alexmedia:
Thank you for review.
The site looks quite good.
|
09-21-10 09:41am
|
Reply
178
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Capn:
A very detailed review, thanks.
I will put that on the 'possibles' list.
I'll give it the once over! ;0)
|
09-19-10 03:31pm
|
Reply
179
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dracken:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Don't worry, the cancel policy of my membership also gave my money back so nothing lost, a lot of knowledge gained :)
|
08-12-09 07:19am
|
Reply
180
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from atrapat:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks for your encouragement. You're right that it's hard to find solo model sites that keep up. IMHO, the "recipe" for a solo model site is quite simple: offer at least one new photoset and one video a week and as much "interaction" with the model as possible (active in the message board, candid pictures, regularly updated diary, 3-4 webcam shows a month, reachable by email, schedule).
I am not saying it's an easy job to do it month after month but, if you offer decent quality content and make it reasonably priced, fans should be coming by the hundreds and let their memberships renew month after month.
It seems that very few well-known models realise the potential of their sites. Most don't even do the content part right and the interaction is just a promise on the website tour. I'm not interested in amateur/unpublished/web-only models but I feel they usually have a better understanding on how things work and their sites probably get a much higher percentage of rebills.
In Crystal Klein's case, it's a pity because, as far as I could see, the site used to be a perfect example on how to things properly for maybe 1-2 years but, for reasons beyond my understanding (the model hasn't retired), has settled down for no interaction and providing fewer and fewer updates every month. I remember reading in the message boards that people who had been there for 1-2 years were leaving because the model no longer was hosting webcam shows or posting in the boards.
|
06-06-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
181
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Look forward to your review - and what I've seen: trailer, ect - it looks really like a great site...
|
03-05-10 07:06am
|
Reply
182
|
Dads and Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from dracken:
I'd add that anyone with an interest in porn should stay away. This site and the whole network is very very pathetic. I have not found one single image or video worth downloading. Stay clear.
|
08-16-09 05:39am
|
Reply
183
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from atrapat:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
The vast majority of Brazzer's Pass current sites cater for the "white porn star with big fake boobs fucked by big cock" niche. It looks like most criticism to Brazzer's Pass for creating Mofos Network has been for the couple sites that overlap with typical Brazzer's Pass content. Day With A Pornstar is perhaps the best example but Can She Take It also has the same problem.
Mofos Network minus this couple sites becomes a different network geared towards other niches like real legal teens (College Bash or Teens At Work) and interracial (Mofos Worldwide or Milfs Like It Black).
Looking at the stars that have the most scenes at Mofos Network it also looks like they are looking for something different: most girls are much younger and have natural tits. There's also a higher percentage of asian or black stars.
So, my wild guess is they want to focus Brazzer's Pass on what they are best known for and try to make something different at Mofos Network.
|
04-04-09 03:50am
|
Reply
184
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks for that information.
I too was only seeing 9 sites, but stumbled across another area that shows 13 instead. As crazy as this will sound it's how I just now found it again.
Sign in. The page should be recent updates and there should be an ad at the top for DDF Cams. Here comes the crazy part. Click on "updates" up at the top beside the home icon. It knocks the ad off. There's a box that says "Choose a Website" near the top. The box has light-colored text in it that says, "Type Website Name". When you click on it to put your cursor in the box a drop-down menu pops up and has 13 sites listed in it including the older archive sites.
|
12-21-15 11:58pm
|
Reply
185
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Hello Wittyguy,
Thanks for posting this! Yes we now have a standard 2 Day Free Trial for all of our sites, renewing into monthly membership. Good way to get in their and see all the great content before purchasing a membership. Fresh new Site Redesign is right around the corner, nice time to get in on the action :)
|
05-06-13 05:25am
|
Reply
186
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks, it looks like it is going to be permanent. I'm guessing the 21st Sextury new network with all of their major sites included is breeding some good competition!
|
12-31-09 02:42am
|
Reply
187
|
Denude Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy,
Forgot to add (until just a sec ago) that the pic thumbs are very small. 100 x 66px. And I'm at 1024x768. If your rez is finer than that, you'll be reaching for a magnifying glass.
|
04-06-09 05:36pm
|
Reply
188
|
Denude Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Funny how I always wind up missing something in the details.
No toys. And that's important. So I've added to the review on that point.
A smidge of Lez Lite. Just three photosets. One of Verunka and Tammy/Carmen (not necessarily their names at DeNudeArt), one of Gina and Bridget (both blonds), and one of two girls I'm not familiar with.
|
04-06-09 05:10pm
|
Reply
189
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from navycolt:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I did.
|
07-10-09 08:41pm
|
Reply
190
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from navycolt:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I should have mentioned that another of the company's sites, Meetawife (and probably all of their sites), is also a total rip off. Avoid this site like the plague too--total fraudulent garbage.
|
07-09-09 06:40pm
|
Reply
191
|
DL Assistant
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah, I'm in to my second week for membership. The quality is still proving to be good; though for 39.95? Though there are many pics I liked. The models are really hot looking performers that do amazing splits. The pics can be enlarged to fit 1280 x 800 without noticeable degradation on the picture. Those the vids have a lot of these performers doing their exercizes; splits in the air; bending over.
If you like watching this type of thing. I would recommend this site.For just one month though..considering the price...
|
06-14-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
192
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from mike11w:
Excellent Review! My experience echoes yours but my DL speeds were good and I found the photography to be lacking. The cameraman in most scenes on most sites never took his finger off the zoom button, constantly zooming in and out. This is characteristic of amateur photographers and it surprised me on a site of this stature.
The never ending anti-white commentary and slurs in the scene descriptions and user comments were both insulting and unnecessary.
Most of the IR I have seen has been done better, and I ended my subscription earlier than I had intended. With DF's access to mostly hot women it is unfortunate that the site owners are not up to the task.
|
02-23-16 01:19pm
|
Reply
193
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from lk2fireone:
A fine, professional review.
I'm putting this network on my list of sites to join.
I was put off by the stupid-sounding network name, but your review has sold me.
LOL.
|
11-20-15 07:42am
|
Reply
194
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I think DDF and 21sextury would be in the same boat as double view since you'd still have to download 2 different versions of the same video to get the 2 camera angles and you also have to download the special player.
|
12-20-11 06:33am
|
Reply
195
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
As long as it's not the leased material then pics are 1280x850. I'm not sure exactly how many pics per set, but I wouldn't be surprise if there are about 80 to 100 pics in each sets. I'm more video so I only saved those files. I've noticed that if you scroll down on their preview page you see all the updates. I could be wrong, but I don't think so. Since you automatically get access to I think 35 sites. Simply look at the number above the sites at the bottom of the page and you will know which ones you actually get in the first month.
|
01-28-09 06:34pm
|
Reply
196
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from apoctom:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I understand how you could view it that way. I also got a comment from Khan (PU Webmaster) to that idea.
I don't believe that I received a free membership, since it is actually part of the network. The web admins simply added this site to my network access earlier than usual.
However, I also understand that it could be viewed as getting a free membership. Therefore, I have not and will not review this site.
At the end of the day, based on my conversations with the admins, I would like to think that they are giving me access in order to satisfy a customer, not to bribe me into a positive review. I feel that way because:
1. I did not change my review or comment of DP Overload, the review which started my conversations with the admins.
2. I cancelled my subscription prior to writing my initial review. I never offered and they never proposed that I re-join their service.
The bottom line is that if a website offers poor customer service, I would make sure that members of PornUsers know about it. Similarly, if a website offers customer service above and beyond, I want everyone to know about that, too.
|
08-05-08 11:14am
|
Reply
197
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dracken:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hmm... it might be one of my privacy settings on Firefox. I'll have to go and look through my add-ons and see if anything is in conflict. Sometimes I get this with sites that host adult content, just on the idea that some people have that porn=viruses.
Either way...any particular reason as to why you were disappointed with this website? The reviews seem pretty positive-ish...
|
08-06-09 11:32am
|
Reply
198
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wittyguy, you've got a creative mind. Sounds like the stuff of a Monty Python skit had they been on during the Internet Age. Or perhaps "The Man with the Web Cam in His Nose."
Anyway, I can see a "live cam" setup, and switches between the porn user and what's on the screen. Performance art for some, voyeurism for others, and exhibitionism for said man.
And for that mirrors-facing-mirrors effect, he could join Ero Nata!
|
08-03-08 12:51am
|
Reply
199
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Agreed - and Shap, I certainly wasn't implying any dishonesty on the part of Twisty's - as I said, it's perfectly legitimate for Twisty's to establish niche sites using your existing and new Twisty's content - as someone who values TBP and want them to be as accurate as possible in describing listed sites.
|
07-17-08 07:56pm
|
Reply
200
|
Euro Girls On Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from doomsday:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
i went back and added some video details to my reviews ;)
|
08-20-09 08:43pm
|
