Yes my site when you join gives to FULL ACCESS just like it says it does. :) I was just saying the longer you stay a member you will get fresh and new updates.. Granted the updates are not always movies there are some days with photo galleries and some days with movies, it varies.
Not trying to toot my horn by no means here. However I feel I would not offer a trial if I did not think you would enjoy the site and want to stay around longer to see more. :0) At least I am hoping this is how people feel.
I think offering a trial shows I have nothing to hide and it gives an option to fans who can't afford the full amount. With this in mind I did drop the prices to the site from $7.95 2 day trial to $4.95 2 day trial and I lowered the monthly rate from $24.95 to $19.95. The trial does recur at $21.95 which is still cheaper than before.
As for the publicity okay okay there are a few exceptions such as life. :)) Anyway I hope you all enjoy your weekend.
Hey badandy, I couldn't help but laugh when I read your reply and realized that is Lisa replying, "Got you by the balls" ha ha. Anyway, I think she explained it better in the replies, and I will try it for a month and review it soon.
She will probably read this, and I say this again and again. All most of these models need is a good push into the spotlight. Between her hair, which is a big deal to me, her pretty eyes which is also a big deal to me, her big natural boobs which is a big deal to 90% of our members here, nice butt which is a big deal to me and hardcore content, also a big deal to many. Her site could do great. It is like Real Estate, location, location, location. Except this is, exposure, exposure, exposure and most importantly showing that they are a regular person like us, the members will eventually start showing up.
As we have said before, this is the beauty of Porn Users. It shows that not all of us are porn freaks that watch porn 24/7 and it shows that the stars/webmasters aren't just here trying to take our money for little in return.
It is all new content when the content runs out, I have fans emailing me right away asking me for more..I don't rotate the content what so ever. Ask members if this is true. Once you seen the content it stays in the members area. The content is fresh and not deleted and moved around..
Well, the thing is, I didn't join any of the sites in their network. I suppose it could have been a cross sale from somewhere, but it's been more than a month since I've subscribed anywhere, and that was Phil Flash.
So basically, what it comes down to is they charged me without my ever actively visiting any of their sites. I don't know how they got my info, but as far as I know this situation goes way beyond cross sales.
Sadly, as a result, all the quality research in the world wouldn't have helped me.
I was about to join the website, when I saw the premium membership thing... It is absurd IMHO to pay 45$ for a membership that gives you all-around access. Why pay the 30 bucks just to see solo girls, or 30 bucks for G2G ?
I remember when inthecrack were using download tokens which you had to purchase to download the videos and you also had to pay for your membership.
Hey.. I had a similar problem when I first signed up with InFocusGirls, who share the same domain as SapphicErotica. I found that DownloadThemAll for Firefox was unable to do multiple chunks or pause/resume. I found a link on their support page to another download manager called "Free Download Manager" and it works even better than any other download manager I have used for years. It even has a preview movie mode to let you preview the start of the movie while you are still downloading it. May be you people who are having trouble with this could try this same program.
Im about to join this site for the second time. Last time I went there was when the site was starting, so the content was not that good. But after reading your review, im really interrested in re-joining.
I would like to know what program/method you are using to download the whole website to your hard drive, if you don't mind, just e-mail me :)
"I just want to say that it's been 15 minutes since my last download and I'm actually feeling OK about it. I mean I'm not tearing up my place and I feel rather at peace with myself. I just wanted to say that without you guys ....
Sorry, my next download just finished. Uh, anyway just wanted to say thanks to everyone for enabling me and my addiction and that my right hand hand has never been stronger. So when do I get my pin?"
i my opinion it is amazing that they give such a low special price. i don`t think that this can be overtopped by other great sites. this is a price that makes me really stay for also longer then one month :)
Well all the stuff I deleted is stuff I never found interesting in the first place. Sometimes I'll just download a whole bunch of stuff while I'm doing something else in the hopes that some of the scenes are decent. Probably 90% of my hard drive is movies so sometimes they pile up and I need to watch through them and delete the ones that aren't of interest. So the scenes I do enjoy are still on, I just got rid of a bunch of junk that didn't turn out to be anything worthwhile.
LOL! Oh man, your honesty cracks me up dude. This is exactly like holding a 12 step meeting at the bar, haha. Oh well, what can you do.
I'm actually pretty proud of myself, I spent 4 hours the other day going through my hard drive and organizing everything, and deleting everything that no longer interests me. Cleared up almost 100gb of space. Wow!
LOL, yeah, I can relate to this too. Boredom cane definitely drive me to watch more porn. Hell, I'm on break between quarters of school right now and I'm on this damn site all the time with nothing else to do really. Also, the high of watching it is always a factor too, and of course the interest in seeing the nudity and so forth. Good collection on my hard drive too, so I guess I qualify there as well.
My computer is limited as far as space, so I rely primarily on burning to cd. This is obviously out of the question for anything approaching 1Gig.
I actually decided to sign back up today, and a couple of things have dissapointed me. First I find the new layout to be thouroughly confusing; second and more importantly, on at least a couple of their sites they have removed all but the very lowest quality mpegs for their older videos. The older videos used to look almost as good as the new ones but now look like trash. This has basically removed alot of my motivation to keep the site now. I'm not quite sure why they would do this, maybe the needed to save bandwidth or something, but it is real turnoff.
All in all this network has always had alot of potential but lacks the business sense to really be taken seriously. It relies on a very hardcore niche market, but things like what I mention above only work to turnoff their most loyal constituency. I can see where they are now trying to make a play to become more mainstream with the addition of some newer more 'tame' sites. However these attempts come off as somewhat generic and bland. There's your generic "pantyhose site"; generic "monster cock" site; generic "first timers" site and so on.
Oh,and they have always had much higher than average vid quality, but you would never know it from their ads (poor marketing). I swear I have seen sites touted as "HD sites" where the vid quality wasn't nearly up to what they have here.
I was a member here for over a year (up until a couple of months ago)and I agreee with you about the vids, I tend to not mind though as I usually will download, them keep it for a couple weeks and get rid of it. Just today I strongly considered a return visit but held back for now.
My disappointment with reviews in general is based on the lack of (visible) consistency or accountability in the setting of scores. TBP for example do not show on what criteria they give scores. (‘Porninspector’ does something like it, but not enough.)
On whatever grounds you use (download speed, DVD quality, HD and so on)… If a table is set up - showing the scores (0-10/10, or 0-100/100 etc.) - and the same table structure is used over the board one gets COMPATIBLE results. The AVERAGE gives the score…
Let’s look at what happens when a new factor, like HD, comes in to the valuation;
At present you have no room for manoeuvre. (You have “painted yourself into a corner”.) With a template, as suggested, you don’t have that problem as you simply add HD to the template. – That’s basics in any valuation process.
Your point about Criticising or Creating a review is taken. My reason for not doing the latter is that I have neither time nor interest for it. Besides, I leave that to you guys. You are paid for it (I hope...).
If I have to choose between Camaro and Firebird, I stick to my bike until I have enough money to by a proper car like BMW or Mercedes…
I should not have bothered with Rachel Aziani in my last posting – I had not done so before.
My visit to Rachel Aziani was just a sidekick to AZIANI.com.
My comment to ‘ace of aces’ was as a reply to his childish previous remark, and ‘13’ is the impression I got of his mental age. I do not apologise for it.
The intelligent reader would have concluded that I was not 'bitching' about Videobox, but gave an example of how reviewers manage to paint themselves into a corner.
At first I thought "Why bother?", but for your benefit I shall explore;
As I was replying to 'ace of aces' 'review' on this site...what would be the point of making a statement, or comment, to the aforementioned 'review', on the Videobox site?
I have previously declared (nearly) all and every 'problem' I have with the 'Rachel Aziani' site... Although I could add that it is a bit too repetetive, but then again, that is just how it is with all the single model sites.
If anything, I should add to my original comment to 'ace of aces' 'review': What "hardcore"? The closest to it I have seen would not even shock a religious fanatic.
1. I don't really have much critisism about the site, but what I have, I shall account for when it comes to that - probably in September this year.
2. As I mentioned before, I am not happy with the inflation of points given to websites by reviewers in general. Unfortunately I have not found a proper forum, where to vent and/or discuss these matters. As it stands, the whole point system is, if anything, ridiculus.
More often than not, sites are not compatible on the same criteria - although they are given points as if they were.
As an example;
Presently I am subscribing to xmovies.com, which TBP has given a score of 86.3. (I cannot make out what the 86.3 relates to.)
In comparison with Videobox, which has a TBP score of 98.0 one is led to believe that Videobox is vastly superior to xmovies.com. I, however, do not see it in such easy terms.
Whilst Videobox is outstanding in it's quantity of videos as well as how they handle their data base, it is comparably shortcoming in other aspects, where xmovies.com excels like website speed, download speed and quality of video clips, and not least; an actual, working and polite customer service (24/7!).
Between the two, I have come to the conclusion that, for the best result, one should work the two places in tandem. AMEN!
I'd have to say that Monahan's description of the zips is pretty much accurate. It's a pain because they aren't very well described but I tend to rename them or edit my zips so, for me, it's not that big of deal.
The zip file associated with the sample I mentioned above is janaredlng.zip. I agree with you completely that an effort to use more descriptive zip file names would be a major improvement. These days, with substantially improved file naming protocols, there's no technical reason why severely truncated file names must be used by Twistys.
I just checked one photo set and one photo in it...here's the label...janaredlng_003.jpg.
It's a Jana Cova photo set posted today that they call "Dip and Lick" and the red, I suppose, refers to her bright red panties. There are clues, obviously, and I suppose their naming is better than others that use just numbers, or the same names for everything.
07-25-0807:05pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
