| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
MILF Mania XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from Khan:
FWIW, I notified the TBP Editors and they've already added a note that (according to a user report) the content isn't exclusive.
See the MISC section at:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/milfmaniaxxx/
|
06-01-12 02:36pm
|
Reply
27
|
MILF Mania XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from pat362:
Although I am certain that many of these videos are available on other sites. How many of them are available on download sites? If the bulk of the videos are only available on streaming only sites then they are in the right to say exclusif since they offer their customer he ability to download the scene.
You did make some excellent point and I do think it's important to submit an error report since the review is quite new.
|
06-01-12 11:56am
|
Reply
28
|
MILF Mania XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from Marcus:
Make sure you click the 'Report Error' link on the left and notify them.
|
06-01-12 09:01am
|
Reply
29
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(MiztaBlu's Reply)
I'm not trying to minimize what's going on, but I'm wondering if an explanation is that you and I downloaded mostly different material and that could be why you're experiencing a problem and I'm not. I downloaded 647 scenes that are mostly legal teen and anal themed. If your interests are big breasts and MILFs then it is possible that while we both had memberships at the same time we were downloading completely different stuff. Just a thought.
Of the 647 scenes I did download many of those were uploaded more than two years ago. Some date back nine years. You report having problems with mpg files (which you note were uploaded more than two years ago) and of the 647 scenes I got from here only four of those are mpgs and the remaining 643 are WMVs. Maybe, just maybe, our different interests meant you got more mpgs.
Please let us know how you make out with this.
|
05-11-12 07:23am
|
Reply
30
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from slutty:
(MiztaBlu's Reply)
Artifacts would be compression defects, like when it gets all blocky and strange looking.
I looked through what I downloaded about a year ago, and it was mostly wmv's, so perhaps they changed their formats? I didn't really see any mpg's in what I downloaded there - and some of it was quite old.
|
05-11-12 12:28am
|
Reply
31
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from slutty:
What do you mean by not working properly? If you mean lots of artifacts in the video, then I have seen that as well. If you mean the videos wont play, I never had any problems with that. Perhaps there are a few videos they didn't take the DRM off of? Are they older?
|
05-10-12 10:03pm
|
Reply
32
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I'm finishing a review of the same site and I've had none of the problems that MitzaBlu reports. I'm not trying to minimize his frustration, but my experience with the site is a lot more positive. I hope the support staff can resolve the problem.
|
05-10-12 03:19pm
|
Reply
33
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from Hustler:
Dear user,
Please contact our support so we can resolve your issues. This is the first I have heard of such problems so I imagine we can figure out the cause of it.
Our download options are standard mp4 and wmv files so they are compatible with many (standard) video players.
Please email support@hustler.com and we will take care of you. Thank you!
|
05-10-12 03:05pm
|
Reply
34
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from gaypornolover:
I'm amazed a huge and well-known company like Hustler has such basic technical issues and sloppy labelling on their website - much smaller companies manage to do it much better without their resources!
Really odd.
Excellent review.
|
05-07-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
35
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review from MiztaBlu:
Just so everyone knows...I lowered the score 3 more points because several of the HQ scenes I downloaded had no sound at all.
IMO, the people who run this site are fucking lazy, and pay absolutely no attention to detail.
My suggestion...signup...grab as much as you can in a month and get out. There are simply too many better ways to spend your money.
Classic example of a site with alot going for it in terms of content, but just so mediocre in other areas due to pure laziness.
|
05-07-12 12:47am
|
Reply
36
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from RustyJ:
Thanks for the review. Can you tell me if they have released new Hustler Taboo photo sets during the last year or so? I think they stopped publishing the magazine some time ago.
|
05-06-12 11:39pm
|
Reply
37
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from Marcus:
Good to know - I remember Little Lupe's site used to be terrible in this respect where you would download a video only to find out it's totally different to what you expected.
I guess it's not such a problem if you download everything, but I'm quite picky with what I download so if everything is mis-labelled it's a big problem to me.
|
05-06-12 09:12am
|
Reply
38
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from xexbot:
I have always been iffy about this site because I personally get bored with their content after awhile. Like so many others, I find maybe one out of every ten videos worth the search. They do have a lot of content, I just never quite got on board with their style. Thanks for the review though, very informative.
|
05-05-12 03:15pm
|
Reply
39
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(MiztaBlu's Reply)
Agree about Lexxy. Downloading the scene right now.
One more RK plus, good scene descriptors in the links; not like other sites with unintelligible letter/number combinations.
|
05-05-12 01:11pm
|
Reply
40
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from Monahan:
As a long time member and a first class procrastinator, I have intended to write a review of the site but never got around to it. Your review pretty much matches what I would say myself. One minor addition is that there are somewhat fewer girls with bogus boobies and more naturals on RK compared with Brazzers; and a somewhat larger percentage of attractive girls on RK than on Bang Bros.
And 89 is a "right on" score.
I'm curious, however. Who are the five girls who you found "fucking amazing?" There are several that make my little Richard emerge as big Dick that are not to be found elsewhere.
|
05-05-12 11:20am
|
Reply
41
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Gazette Risque:
(MiztaBlu's Reply)
Yeah, figured as much. Loved the live shows though.
Thank you for the info, much appreciated!
|
03-26-12 06:41am
|
Reply
42
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(MiztaBlu's Reply)
Ah, I think I see where our disagreement comes in. I move mostly in mature circles and at NA as well as Brazzers there was a preponderance of false tits in that niche. As opposed to most I am not particularly interested in young girls. See my age! :-)
|
03-25-12 12:02pm
|
Reply
43
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from messmer:
Good review, MiztaBlu even though I canceled after one month because of the "enhanced breasts" factor. I think they even must have Brazzers beat when it comes to fhat. If I were to rate the top four sites, they would be on the bottom because of that factor alone. But great review anyway and I do appreciate the fact that tastes differ.
|
03-25-12 10:28am
|
Reply
44
|
All Adult Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the review, MiztaBlue and especially for the mention of their shady update practices. All those $9.95 a month HOH Ltd. sites employ the same ruse. Show 8-10 and more updates under today's date, yet the majority have been part of their archive all along and what you might get is one new DVD if you are lucky.
|
03-25-12 10:15am
|
Reply
45
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Great review!
Could you tell us if they may have started with the live shows again?
After they cut that off I canceled my subscription.
I heard they did some tests with new live shows at some point but I wonder if they're back for good now.
|
03-25-12 08:30am
|
Reply
46
|
Download Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for the review. I'm always on the look out for sites like this and I've never heard of this one before. Now based on your review I can avoid this and continue looking elsewhere. (And for me, sound and video not being in sync is definitely a killer. That REALLY annoys me!)
|
03-23-12 04:14pm
|
Reply
47
|
Download Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
from messmer:
I only resubscribed recently and have never been so sorry. As you said, the quality isn't great and compared to other HOH Ltd. sites you don't get half as much content for the same price. I am still looking in vain for anything that is HD, something that is freely available on their other sites.
One thing that really gets me is their deceptive practice of listing about 10 (or even more) daily updates when in reality it's just old stuff that is being re-circulated, with the odd new DVD thrown in. An absolute scam!
I can't agree in connection with your slow speeds, though. The few new scenes I have downloaded have done so at 2.3 MB/s. Might be a local thing.
|
03-23-12 11:46am
|
Reply
48
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from malikstarks:
I made a comment about this earlier. You say 6 years behind. You are being far too kind. Take a look at Bangbros, or Brazzers videos from 2004-2005,there is no comparison, the video quality here is stuck at 2002-2003 levels.
I know the site launched in 2004 but they started out as a streaming only site, and therefore I think in order to cater to the online speeds of most people around that time had to downgrade their content. In other words good quality video would have been too much for most people to stream effectively.
They (reluctantly) made the switch to allow downloads only a few years ago. However they have never made anything except for very modest upgrades to the video quality. They also still seem to have that archaic download (with serious difficulties downloading even one video).
Like you said though the actual content is quite hot, these guys actually have a knack for producing compelling videos, especially with their teen sites, but they do a good job across the board in terms of site concepts, direction, camera work, models etc. I even love the hell out of their pic sets.
If these guys had 720hd or even high quality wmv downloads they would be mentioned in the same breath as Brazzers, Bangbros, RK, ect. Yet they refuse to change with the times.
It just makes you kinda scratch your head, because they while keep falling farther and farther behind, they still through out a few updates a month and have been operating this way for a least a couple of years. You'd think they'd just throw in the towel.
My theory is they get a lot of mileage out their excellent photography (although the pics still aren't big enough), which they can still throw up on free tpg sites and get enough guys who don't know any better to sign up for a month.
|
07-31-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
49
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from james4096:
If you ask me this network/site needs to be exposed and shamed as much as possible.
Poor quality and ridiculous download limit.
|
07-31-10 12:02am
|
Reply
50
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
from pat362:
Good sites should get good reviews but bad sites really deserve bad reviews. I think that you should write a full review simply because that will help sway more people than a simple comment.
|
07-28-10 06:47pm
|
