Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
csbadger49's Review
from monty2222:
I was about to say welcome to PU, but you've been a member a lot longer than I have so I'll just skip that. ;-)
Nice little review, Deluxe Pass was one of the first sites (if not the first) I ever joined, I didn't know it was still updating. Back then I thought it was great, but these days I agree with you that getting access to hundreds of small sites with overlapping content isn't that attractive an idea.
|
07-16-09 01:39pm
|
Reply
2
|
Housewife Gemma
(0)
|
Reply of
csbadger49's Review
from badandy400:
I site that "had it all" other than recent updates is hardly worth being bashed with a 50. A site no longer updating can be worth a few points taken off and certainly worth a warning, but a 50 is usually reserved for those sites that are true rip offs and in no way meet any of the expectations they instill into the viewers. This is not the first site you have called a complete failure only for not have enough content. It is important to remember that no every site will be a mega site the instant it starts up. In to cases now you have said that a site has good content that you enjoyed and it what you were looking for but gave 50s to the sites.
While I am not going to be jumpy about giving a negative trust just yet, it would be a good idea to consider what make a site a failure. In most members of PU opinions a site having great content can out weight so some extent a lack of content. Also, a site that no longer update might be worth for some people to join if they never have before to see what was their before the site slowed down.
|
07-08-09 07:29pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
