| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from mbaya:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I feel the price is fine considering the quality and quantity. I have never paid this much for a site, so I was also skeptical. In spite of its flaws, this is one of the best investments I have ever paid for porn.
|
03-15-09 04:34pm
|
Reply
202
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I couldn't agree more. What I want is lots of information before I spend my time and money.
|
03-12-09 01:54pm
|
Reply
203
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
|
Reply
204
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
205
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Hmmm - that's exactly what I was going to say!
|
03-09-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
206
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from mbaya:
First class review with a lot of helpful information and opinions. Keep up the good work!
|
03-08-09 06:23pm
|
Reply
207
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thank you for your nice words and the trust rating. At the same time as I was reading yours I got a totally incoherent negative trust from anonymous, calling me stupid. I was expecting disagreements with my review, but not such childish nastiness. C'est la vie as they say.
|
03-08-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from atrapat:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I believe Uncle Jessie is probably a reference only American PUs might understand.
I googled it and the only near match I could find is a character named "Uncle Jesse" in "The Dukes of Hazzard" TV series. With all due respect to the actor who played him, he is, in fact, an old man.
|
03-02-09 10:59am
|
Reply
209
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from CactusJack2:
I agree with everything that you said, but I've always been really mixed about this site.
Let's all get honest for a few minutes about the millions of photo sets and videos they are "remastering" (reselling back to us). Chances are that if you ever looked at any porn during the last decade, you subscribed to ALS and already download all this "old stuff" the first time around. If you think about it, most of all those models who were young and beautiful in the 90's are more than likely fat old housewives with a ton of kids now. Plus, the quality of the remasters really isn't that great, and is not even close in quality to 2009 technology. ALS just doesn't have the amount of material you'd expect someone to have for being in business for over a decade. The remasters to me are just a poor attempt to try and make it look like they have more material than they really do.
As for their new photo sets, the size and quality really can't be beat anywhere on the web, but again, they are so few and far between.
As for the new videos, the quality and download speeds are great but to me they get boring really fast. I mean how many videos of a girl sitting in a chair using a vibrator (that's louder than hell) can you really watch? Especially when most of the girls all look the same. Some of the Caribbean stuff is okay but to me like most of all the other sites they've just fallen into a rut. $100 says I can join a year from now and still see the exact same stuff I'm seeing today.
I swear one of these days I'm going to start my own damn porn site and show everyone how to do it right.
|
02-27-09 05:00am
|
Reply
210
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from wiild1:
Looks like trial has been removed, too bad, it seems like a good site, I would have liked to try it out for a limited time.
|
02-19-09 01:05pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
turboshaft wrote:
"Here we use sex, implied or otherwise, to sell just about everything, all without the benefit of full nudity. It gets ridiculous how we will be up in arms, in a sort of Puritan way, about how something goes a little too far with the sex or the nudity. No one cares about being enslaved to a product or company, but hint at a little nudity and suddenly the apocalypse is nigh!"
You are so right. The Janet Jackson "scandal" was a case in point, much ado about nothing! I could never understand and will never understand the North American attitude when it comes to sex. Movies showing a couple making love within the context of a love story will earn themselves an NC-17 for showing some flesh while the most brutal, violent movies are being shown under a PG rating. To me violence is much more obscene than even hard core porn (which I don't care for personally) could ever be.
|
01-08-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
212
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from TheRizzo:
I have tried Videoz as well in the past but I am not a big fan of the DVD sites in general. So when I find the mood strikes I find myself going to Video Box for the price. I am actually suprised VideosZ has never tried to get down to Video Box's prices.
|
01-07-09 03:07pm
|
Reply
213
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Someone had e-mailed Alex these commments - he responded to them in his Director's Blog today, so I thought I would post them where the comments originated:
"In response to the first comment: We are not going to change this. In a photoset of 200-400 pictures there may be 5-10 photos where we will step back and show the crew helping out. Whether it is Jimmy holding the video light or Jeremy videotaping the model, or maybe just an overview shot of the entire set, there are so few shots like this that I do not understand how it can be a problem. So my response to that comment is: get over it, man. If that bothers you, "wow!" Just delete those few shots from your set. The value in providing those behind the scenes shots is greater then the possibility of it upsetting a few uptight people. Especially when it is so easy to just delete the pictures that you do not like.
In response to the second comment: I see your point. Not everything we do will appeal to everybody. That is impossible. But we use baby oil in 1 or 2 (out of 7 or 8) sets that we shoot of a model because those are the sets that consistently get voted the highest. Not to mention I constantly receive emails from members saying how much they like that wet, baby oil look. Again, we try to please the masses but we cannot please everybody. As for the lollipops: yes, we have been using them for no more than one (1) set with each model lately. They offer the perfect prop that can give the model something to play with and it can be inserted nicely into the pussy and looks great going in and out. We are always open to new ideas on different things that we can have the models play with and insert, but the lollipops work so well and the models love them. Remember ALS Scan is about finding the hottest models in the world that are willing to insert the craziest things, presented in the highest photo and video quality on the internet, everything from glamour to hard shots. Anybody can find pretty girls and photograph them dancing around and posing, but get them to spread their pussies, or even better, stretch them to the max and insert wild and crazy objects, well THAT is what we do like nobody else can. Keep the ideas coming but they have to be reasonable and not hurt the model in anyway. Is everybody going to like everything we do? NO! But we do try our best and are open to new ideas such as finding something better to insert than lollipops.
My response to the third comment is simple. No worries, it is an extra feature and will never take away from any of our normal updates or offerings. It merely presents more material to our members at no cost that they may not have ever seen."
|
12-23-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
214
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I just can't swallow some of the fantasies or understand some of the fetishes, even though I have my own. I have the same "credibility" problem with those so-called MILF sites when the "young man" is obviously almost the same age as the "older woman." So, it's not the lollipops and uniforms etc. that turn me off, it's the incongruity of the scene. My requirement for enjoying any scene is that it should be reasonably believable.
|
12-19-08 01:33pm
|
Reply
215
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from Drooler:
I don't care to see the guys, but those pics just wind up deleted from my stash anyway. The "guest" galleries don't bother me, but that's because ALS Scan puts them in as "extras" along with their own updates on the same day, which is unlike 1byday, which replaces what could have been one of their own with an ALS Scan thing.
But the lollipop business has definitely gotten old. Each time I see a new set of a girl playing with one, I imagine a parody version of that song from The Wizard of Oz being performed by a chorus of ALS Scan girls:
We represent the lollipop shtick
The lollipop shtick, the lollipop shtick
We represent the lollipop shtick
That shows up too much at ALS Scan
I guess that's been my coping strategy. It's helpful as I just saw that Sarah Peachez has been added to the group.
The remasters have been great. The bonus with Zoe was something I'd been looking forward to for a long time. Wish they'd do that with Monique Alexander!
|
12-19-08 02:31am
|
Reply
216
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from badandy400:
About the guys in the "behind the scenes" scenes, I would have to say it is okay for them to be there. It is behind the scenes after all, and that means pretty much anything goes. It is not like they have their cocks out or anything! They absolutely keep them out of the normal shoots, so they are not breaking any promise here.
Lollipops are nice, but to a point. I agree they should not be used a lot. A few scenes is great, but it should be a small percent.
1080.....sounds great. I might just have to start thinking about updating from them! Funny thing, I was just watching some of there videos right before i seen your comment.
|
12-18-08 09:58pm
|
Reply
217
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from messmer:
Ah, now you've hit upon another one of my pet peeves: lollipops being licked by women over eighteen. That's a little girl thing and doesn't belong on a porn site. It looks ludicrous too. That and pony tails and school outfits on women in their twenties.
Thanks for the positive information as well!
|
12-18-08 03:32pm
|
Reply
218
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from MargulisAZ:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, that's one of the things I mentioned and wanted people to keep in mind with my comment and updated review. While I am talking about things that I believe could use with a change, it is still a good site. It could be even better in my opinion, but it is in no way bad.
Franziska is a good example, and I agree with what you have to say. And it wouldn't be a big deal to me if she was an anomaly. The scary thing to me is that she is one of 5 out of the last 6 "new girl updates" that are similar in the "not extreme" nature. One here and there and I'm not going to complain, but this is a lot, especially when a "new girl update" only comes once every two weeks, and even then you never know when you'll see a specific set.
Enough about my bitching about the release format, onto solutions. I believe that the way to handle the situation is to completely scrap the current system and move onto something more organized and reasonable. So a new model is added every two weeks right? Well then I propose her content to be COMPLETELY released within 2 weeks to a month. That is still longer than some other sites who fully release all girl's content the second they come on (FTV for example), but it's much better than what it is now. You can still have remastered material take up half of the updates, so that leaves the need for about 15 new vid and pic sets per month. As it is 2 new girl's content (the amount of girl's released per month) wouldn't quite fill that quota, but it would be close. With the remaining updates to fill the month they could continue to release unreleased material from past girls, or maybe even say take a Sunday off of updates. Maybe update Monday-Saturday, or at worst Monday-Friday. That would fill the update requirements, get a model's content out in a reasonable and dependable amount of time, and still leave room for all the remastered material. Voila, problem solved. :)
|
08-03-08 11:53pm
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from BostonPJR:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Loooved Belladonna pregnant.
|
07-27-08 02:11pm
|
Reply
220
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from BostonPJR:
Considering I gave it a much higher review I still do have to agree with your frustration of some of the pointless "waiting for crap to happen already" segments of the video. I may have reviewed the site with stars in my eyes, but I still do love it. But thanks for your honest review. Gave me something to consider.
|
07-26-08 11:11am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
A note of explanation. The shop knows me as a business customer so he could have thought he was doing me a favor telling me about the porn so that I could deal with an employee. However I did tell him when I brought it in the day before that he was to charge me, not my company, for the work done. In other words it was not a 100% MYOB deal, but closer to a 75% MYOB.
|
07-20-08 07:17pm
|
Reply
222
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from plan b:
(turboshaft's Reply)
What I did was keep multiple browser windows open. One with the model index by name, one with whatever search results I ended up with and then one for the actual model's page. Clunky, but it worked.
I'm also right there with you as far as all the European models. I just signed up for In The Crack, which has a fairly decent mix of American & European. But the content might be too extreme for most folks.
|
07-15-08 12:15am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Creeks and rivers! Good one!
|
07-14-08 06:20pm
|
Reply
224
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, she was also very beautiful with the shorter hair, but she didn't need the boob job (which got her migrated to ALS Angels). I just loved her natural breasts. Didn't seem too small to me!
|
07-09-08 02:27am
|
Reply
225
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from plan b:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, well I hit the limit so what does that say about me? :-)
My suggestion is to use the search. They're really good about tagging videos & photo shoots so you should be able to fill up with what you really want.
|
07-08-08 05:51pm
|
