| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(atrapat's Reply)
Thanks!
|
06-07-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(atrapat's Reply)
I always thought fluffers were pretty much nonexistent, especially today with the advent of Viagra, and I think they would fall more in the general category of the body fluid cleanup crew. It seems like most hardcore movies they tend to make quite a mess, so they have to have people to decontaminate the set afterward.
|
06-07-09 12:16pm
|
Reply
128
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey Atrapat, I haven't been to this site in ages. Is it still updating? What are image sizes like?
|
06-07-09 11:55am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(atrapat's Reply)
Thanks! If I hadn't learned that, I would have thought that a "fluffer" was someone who dreamed up "soft news." Well, that's certainly not the case! ;)
|
06-07-09 11:51am
|
Reply
130
|
Sandee Westgate
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cybertoad:
(atrapat's Reply)
Hi there,
Well hmm how do I say that Twistys has the exact same release I saw there. As I said in the review I have seen the same video elsewhere one is only a week or so old from today. The black dress one.
But thanks for the reply.
|
06-01-09 10:35pm
|
Reply
131
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(atrapat's Reply)
that`s not the same. i joined that what you did also and chosed active the videos, therfore i knew what i was paying. at this site you get sold a package which say spend more money and you get an extra discount and you won`t be billed, but what you get is a rebilling without getting credits...imo close to fraud
|
05-19-09 04:42am
|
Reply
132
|
Naked Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from mbaya:
This is a site I would have liked to check out, but after reading your review, I won't. Excellent review of a weak site.
|
05-19-09 03:38am
|
Reply
133
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(atrapat's Reply)
Thanks for the information, atrapat. I didn't look at the TBP data. Lazy. I just checked that there were no reviews or comments at PU or TBP, and figured there was no data. Before joining PU, I used to read the TBP pages, but since joining PU, I glance at TBP only rarely. I think PU reviews are more up to date and relevant because of member details and opinions. But you reminded me that TBP is still worth looking at to see what's there. You have "site facts" at TBP even if there is no TBP review.
|
05-15-09 03:09pm
|
Reply
134
|
Karlie Montana
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from Drooler:
This was a helpful review, as Karlie has been a favorite of mine even since I first saw her at Matts (overly dark photos). I won't join this site, though, 'cause it sounds like just another slapdash attempt to turn a buck.
The watermarks alone would keep me away.
|
05-11-09 04:01pm
|
Reply
135
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from nostromo:
(atrapat's Reply)
Thanks atrapat.
I uninstalled my antivirus and my firewall is turned off. It didn't work.
Thanks a lot.
|
05-10-09 03:52pm
|
Reply
136
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from exotics4me:
Interesting wiki on 420, having grown up in California, the original meaning that I remember for 420 was the time the group who originally made up the saying would meet to smoke marijuana. Seems like the saying would go, "4:20, not a minute late, still daytime, not quite night, hurry up and give me a light".
It is a much talked about saying out here. I remember someone once thought it was police code for marijuana, someone else thought there was 420 different ingredients in marijuana and so on and so forth. There used to be a site that listed all the myths around the number. The wiki is probably right in current times as I've noticed a lot of "rebellious" teens with shirts that say 4:20 on them, so I guess it has become part of culture over the years. Most of the schools out here, have banned the shirts since it gives the teachers/principals reason to wonder if the student is using marijuana at school.
I always liked Kayden, used to be a regular member on Suicide Girls in 2006-07.
|
05-07-09 03:50pm
|
Reply
137
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(atrapat's Reply)
I think you may be talking about just their "whale tail" videos (those with the thong panties showing above the low rise jeans, etc.) They currently have 26 whale tail videos.
They have over 25,000 scenes in 4,800+ DVD's and they update daily. The best part is that they offer DivX downloads along with WMV and MPG formats.
Downloads are somewhat sluggish during peak periods and about normal other times. However, I have experienced more interrupted downloads on this site than others.
Good assortment of sites (48) in their network and another 111 "bonus sites" that offer streaming only.
I'll provide more detail in my updated review.
|
04-27-09 04:23pm
|
Reply
138
|
Download Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(atrapat's Reply)
Yep, I've run into that before as well. Blame the user or his ISP or the routing. I am waiting to see what the webmaster has to say, either here or in reply to an email I sent.
|
04-22-09 12:51pm
|
Reply
139
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(atrapat's Reply)
Biggest con from my 1-month membership experience - even more than the plethora of fake-cock sites - they need new or additional servers - download speed was mainly atrocious.
|
04-21-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
140
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(atrapat's Reply)
Thanks for the news, atrapat. Sort of like some TV promos where they advertise upcoming shows long before they broadcast them. But that's a lousy way to run a porn site.
|
04-18-09 09:24am
|
Reply
141
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Balibalo:
(atrapat's Reply)
Hi,
3 times the price is too expensive. I have not tried these channels that's why I didn't written about them in my review.
|
04-18-09 05:26am
|
Reply
142
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(atrapat's Reply)
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(atrapat's Reply)
I'm not sure which it is, but there must be a reason why PU staff decided reviews and comments would expire after two years and no longer count towards site score. If that user-contributed content has lost part of its value, user points and badges earned from it should also lose part of its value.
One could counter that there must have been a reason why the PU staff decided NOT to have points and badges lose their value vs. the effect of points on overall site scores. I'd say it's in fairness to all in their respective roles.
What underlies the choice is a matter of intangibles, not logic or reason. That's why I made my point above about "values." Should we treat user-earned points and badges more like academic records or more like canned soup and frequent flier miles?
What's more, reading what Khan said in the forum, it looks like the original idea leaned in this direction. In fact, I was half expecting to start losing points soon, since I wrote my first reviews about a year ago. This is the forum topic:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=603
When, at my current rate, I eventually get the hardcore badge around the end of 2009, after more than 18 months of reviews, I will feel like those karate black-belt 12 year old kids exotics4me mentions in his post. And I will keep it for as long as PU exists, even if I were to stop contributing after that. If the original PU idea had been in place, there's no way I could ever get the hardcore badge.
Yes! Why lose the hardcore badge just because the earth makes a fateful rotation and your points drop just below 100? Doesn't seem right to me.
|
04-12-09 12:20pm
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(atrapat's Reply)
As I mentioned in the thread you referenced ...
Yes, we did consider expiring points at one time. We've since changed our mind. For now, we plan to stick with he single point system and trust that those who don't stay active will eventually be surpassed by those who do.
|
04-12-09 12:11pm
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(atrapat's Reply)
For the same reason? What reason? You haven't given a reason yet.
|
04-12-09 02:25am
|
Reply
146
|
Panty Pops
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from messmer:
Thanks, atrapat. This is a niche of great interest to me so I was happy to see your great review. May you sample many more panties sites. I've been looking in vain for thesite and your "bottom line" gave me an excellent idea what this one is like.
|
04-05-09 04:08pm
|
Reply
147
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from roseman:
That's right :-)
|
04-04-09 02:10am
|
Reply
148
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I've been trying to figure out what identity Mofos has in comparsion to Brazzers? I assumed Brazzers was just branching out to generate more revenue, just rebranding their stuff for the new place.
|
04-03-09 04:07pm
|
Reply
149
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from conflicted:
(atrapat's Reply)
Those aren't the ones as far as I can tell, but thanks very much for the pointer, I'll keep looking.
Dead on review btw.
|
03-28-09 05:07am
|
Reply
150
|
Mili Jay.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(atrapat's Reply)
After reading your review, I definitely see the resemblence. I have not as yet checked out the network so I can't say much. It should really be reviewed as a whole, so I will work on that next. I expect that on the whole it has a lot of content and you can't beat the price.
|
03-25-09 07:13pm
|
