Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from nadiencendia:
I think this is the first 100 that I see around here... Is it really all perfect? It does look good judging by the previews only, but doesn't it get a little repetitive? It looks like location and positions are always the same... Anyway, it's a little pricy for my taste, I don't think I will join... for now at least.
|
01-11-11 05:58am
|
Reply
2
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Goldfish:
Wow, the proverbial 100! LOL. I was recently a member of this site and I can see how you give it such high marks. Great quality video, super sexy girls in great sex scenes.
Good review!
|
01-10-11 08:26pm
|
Reply
3
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review from squirrel:
Thanks for your comments.
I'll give the "new window" thing a try, but I really don't think it resolves much of what my whole beef is about. This is not an "easily solvable" problem by any means. Again, if you just want to "graze" for content, perhaps that's OK, but if you want to comprehensively go through everything, you will still have to go through all of the insanity of the navigation.
As for the "50" score, I think it is absolutely justly deserved. It simply DOESN'T MATTER how good the content is, if you CAN'T GET TO IT in a reasonable fashion.
Presumably, the ultra-frustrating navigation has been designed to thwart auto-downloading software, but SOMEONE has to point out how it thwarts THE ACTUAL USAGE OF THE WEB SITE, as well.
WHY ON EARTH must this site "capture the back button" so that you can't easily proceed from one item to the next one?
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, some sites even (get this!) provide "PREVIOUS" and "NEXT" buttons to move from one set to another. WHAT A FREAKING CONCEPT!
I need to point out how there are DOZENS of other sites with the kind of quality and quantity that 21Sextury provides, but these other sites will HONESTLY EARN YOUR MONEY by providing one thing this one doesn't: THE ABILITY TO EFFICIENTLY DOWNLOAD THE CONTENT YOU'RE PAYING FOR.
In the end, that's what's got me so fried, and it really applies to the whole 21Sextury network probably moreso than just Pix and Video: I signed up for an entire year, but I feel that I have WASTED ABOUT THREE-FOURTHS of my money, due to the exasperatingly obnoxious navigation that makes it SO DAMN DIFFICULT to get my hands on much of any content.
It's not just about "going through one model's sets." It's about moving from model to model. Or day to day. Or month to month. Everywhere you try to go, you're doing about ten times the navigation just to GET FROM ONE ITEM TO THE NEXT, mainly because of the insane, idiotic "capture of your back button." NEVER IN MY ENTIRE EXPERIENCE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB have I experienced such an abomination that this one single design choice does to ruin my ability to efficiently use this site.
If the designer spent ONE TENTH of the time he spent trying to prevent auto-downloading on making the interface USEFUL TO THE CUSTOMERS WHO ARE PAYING MONEY FOR THE SITE'S CONTENT, this would be a wonderful site.
But if he insists on making this a CUSTOMER-HOSTILE site, dang it, I'm going to stand on the roof and keep on screaming about it.
|
10-24-10 02:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from nadiencendia:
I am also in the line of those who feel that a 50 is maybe too harsh a score for a site with one of the biggest and best archives of European gorgeus models, doing solo, g/g and b/g. Pix and Video was one of the first sites that I joined, usually combined with ClubSandy, and it almost never dissapointed me.
This said, I also agree with you, and with the other users, that the new design for the whole network is messy, it has less options than the original designs for individual sites, and it sometimes crashes on specific sets or videos. However, this never prevented me from getting the content that I wanted; just asked for a little more patience or skills (like the "open in new tab" trick they just mentioned)
|
10-23-10 02:02am
|
Reply
5
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Denner:
Just an update to my reply:
I agree with PP and RustyJ that a bad navigation is strict concerning squirrels low score in this case. BUT thats his opinion (and I certainly respect that) - even if we/some do not agree on the number...
BUT I think it's essential that someone put a serious question mark here about the entire navigations-system/design build at this (former) good ol' site/network..... they NEED to make new changes....
|
10-22-10 07:21am
|
Reply
6
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from PinkPanther:
I'm with Rusty in disagreeing with such a low score for navigation problems - but then a lot of the solo-girl model sites have haphazard navigation that makes this network look like complete and utter genius, so it's clearly not the most important thing on my list.
They don't have good navigation and you have to click away to get to a list of all scenes for a particular model and then trying to connect the Photo Samples with a particular scene is another bunch of work. I haven't experienced the problems with the back button for some reason - maybe I just never hit it.
My score for this site and network would be about 40 points higher than yours, regardless of the navigation - which is not good and ought to be made much better.
|
10-22-10 07:04am
|
Reply
7
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Denner:
Even though Pix and Video - and the 21. Sextury sites in general NOW has some very crisp material, very nice models (not a lot of new ones, though) I follow squirrel quite a bit along the way...
Never, Never got used to the new navigation in the whole deal - the entire network - mildly put: it's MESSY........Ok, time moves on and changes has to come - in this case compared to the old/former Pix and Video.
But again - this user, too - think they made a mess out of it - and oh, yes - squirrel: they should get another website-designer to redo the whole deal...
Do not want to comment on your score - I'm sure you got your reason...
And bottom line: Well spoken!
|
10-22-10 06:51am
|
Reply
8
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from tangub:
This is a worrying score for a site i've got on my wish list to join one day.
|
10-22-10 03:29am
|
Reply
9
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from slutty:
squirrel,
this type of annoying navigation is pretty common in porn sites these days, as RustyJ said it is a good idea to open a model page in a new tab, which isn't that much of a nuisance.
i haven't been a member of this network in about a year, but based on the last time i was a member i didn't find the navigation particularly poor (i've seen many that are much much worse).
|
10-22-10 12:37am
|
Reply
10
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from RustyJ:
I do it like this and it works great: Click on a thumbnail of a set you want to see with the right mouse button and select "Open Link in New Window" or "Open Link in New Tab" and when you would want to go back, just close the new tab or window.
I see it as a minor nuisance only now.
|
10-21-10 10:51pm
|
Reply
11
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Drooler:
I'm also more with ik2fireone. I really like the site and don't mind the skinny girls with small tits. I guess it's just a matter of taste. And you were fair enough to give it an 85 in spite of it all. That's pretty close to what I'd give, too, but for different reasons (bad lighting, blurriness, overly done scenes such as girls in puddles, etc.).
|
01-04-10 10:36pm
|
Reply
12
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from lk2fireone:
I agree that the videos are mainly a waste of time.
But you get a huge amount of photosets of yummy knockout babes.
You also get a huge number of contributing photographers, so the differing styles of the photography, while not wildly different from each other, should give most softcore teen fans of photosets plenty to find satisfaction with.
This is the best teen softcore site on the net for photosets, based on quality of photosets, quantity of photosets, the huge number of contributing photographers, the huge number of attractive models.
The large number of free live-cam hours for the models (part of the membership) is just a bonus.
|
01-04-10 06:59am
|
Reply
13
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Denner:
Different and refreshing review - and I agree....
Like Monahan, I go for the videos - AND they are not worth a membership.
And all those outdoor scenes are getting too much at MetArt.
But, I like skinny girls - just wish MetArt could make better and sexier shoots (indoor) and BETTER videos...
|
01-04-10 06:13am
|
Reply
14
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Comment
from Denner:
It cannot be that bad, squirrel........
But ok, I'd like a better model-search - with 'name-search' - and not just 'Models' where it's alphabetic - but only search by 'numbers'
The Calender/Gallery/Daily: I always open a certain model/date in a new window - then it's easier to 'go back'
And one navigation-deal, that would be great:
You get a models page up - and can watch what she's got at PixandVideo and Sandy and Zoliboy - but say, you're at Sandy and want some material at PixandVideo - you have to go back to that site and search - I'd be better if you can just click at at thumbnail in Sandy and get transfered to that scene at PixandVideo....
|
01-04-10 05:36am
|
Reply
15
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Monahan:
I was a member for a few months 2 or 3 years ago and felt the same way. Way too many standard set ups. But on several occasions a real knockout babe showed up with a super pro photographer shooting some outstanding stuff.
I quit because the videos (I'm more of a video guy) were tepid and mostly videos of the photo shoots (yawn...wake me when it's over please)and I found myself both bored and frustrated; bored with the sameness and frustrated with the difficulty finding good stuff to download.
So I'm in agreement 100% with your review. The score of 85 you gave it is very fair given the quality and quantity compared with other photo sites and reflects my view more than the higher scores posted by others.
|
01-04-10 12:02am
|
Reply
16
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Comment
from exotics4me:
Squirrel,
There should be a drop down box on the calender page that lets you select the month and year. Using the calender menu should give you a calender type page that shows a thumbnail of every day that month unless they've changed it.
The model list can be frustrating, but in my experience, in takes you back to the range you were in before clicking. This could vary if you have more than 1-2 files downloading when you try it.
|
01-03-10 09:20pm
|
Reply
17
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from Mr Fountain:
Its basically a niche site. Their niche is softcore for those who have fetishes, upskirts, panties, hosiery and feet. Its also could fulfill femdom fetish where models tease men without actually taking everything off--though I don't know if thats their intention.. I personally like it because they do softcore really well--gives me a slow burn-- and rebilled it for a second month. The site attracts different pool of models that don't care to be nude- so youre getting to look at a pretty big pool of UK based models who just want to do softcore. So their getting models pretty easily- hence their big database. Though you have to like clothes to like the site. I have to have another membership to a different site each month to get my hardcore fix; to get a stronger dose of pussy.
|
09-01-08 08:43pm
|
Reply
18
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
from mbaya:
I agree completely. They act like there is something wrong with a tasteful shot that has a single pussy hair. I know this is their way of doing business, but I felt it was tooooo softcore.
|
09-01-08 09:08am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
