| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Not as an excuse, but by way of offering another perspective from someone who's watched the industry from the other side of the fence ...
I find the amount of interaction a model is willing to do varies quite a bit. If they promise interaction but don't deliver, that's one thing. However, unless they hype up interaction, I think it may be considered a bonus. In other words, imo it's unfair to say every model of every site should have lots of interaction with the users ... even though we might wish they would.
The reason some don't participate will vary from case to case. Odd as it may sound, some are genuinely worried about fans stalking them. Others might do the modeling but have little else to do with the site. Of course there are others who know the value of interaction with their members and welcome it.
Again, I have no personal knowledge in the case of *this* site. I bring this up only as an alternative POV. Just a way of saying it might not be accurate to automatically assume that models who don't willingly communicate with members are jerks.
|
02-24-07 06:44pm
|
Reply
252
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
lol Dude. Just do a little research and you will find some, I don't have any favourite site of an individual model with short hair as I am not so interesting in such content :P
|
02-24-07 03:20pm
|
Reply
253
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from roseman:
yeah, she is very hot ... pitty that she didn't reply to your message, lots of sites have the same problem though.
|
02-24-07 02:26pm
|
Reply
254
|
Riot Whores
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from HeatherMcXxx:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Hi SnowDude ... thanks for the message! Yes, Arianna is Jewish. I encourage you to watch her scene again ... you'll see what I mean. =) I hope you have a great weekend! - Heather
|
09-29-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
255
|
Riot Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from HeatherMcXxx:
This is the kind of site that intrigues me because it's so unusual. I chose not to review it because it hadn't updated and there was such a limited amount of content. But I second all you say in here, SnowDude.
As a female, I enjoy Mason behind the camera, because she's so dark and adds to the atmosphere (as opposed to merely interrupting the scene). And as a Jewish girl, I *really* enjoyed the Arianna Jollee scene (which I won't say any more about here).
I do tend to gravitate at times toward material that's shocking, and this site had me perking up. Alas, there's so little content ultimately I felt disappointed.
Great review, SnowDude!
P.S. What's the other Meatmembers site that Mason shoots?
|
09-29-07 07:43am
|
Reply
256
|
Seska
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from marquis58401:
Interestingly, I was looking at this site this weekend too. After taking the tour and looking at other outside reviews (including that from TBP.com) I was left with the impression that seska.com is geared more towards photos and that the vids were very short 1-2 minute segments. That made me hesitant to try the site.
Like snowdude, I'd also be appreciative of any information others can provide on this site.
|
04-23-07 01:10pm
|
Reply
257
|
Sexy Cassia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(SnowDude's Reply)
HC is "Hard Core." Somehow I think it's transparent, but I can't recall seeing it used on sites or not. Sorry about that.
|
04-27-07 01:08pm
|
Reply
258
|
Sexy Olympics
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from elephant:
Looks interested indeed , but bet you find its mainly pictures and not much content here. I do have a fetish though for naked women in trainers and socks, dunno where it comes from but would love a site that catered for my fetish.
You may also like to check out nudesportvideos.com that site looks quite good
|
09-29-07 01:09am
|
Reply
259
|
Sexy Olympics
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Drooler:
FYI, I've seen some of this sports niche stuff elsewhere, such as Peach (the well-chested Renata) and Aneta Smrhova doing their soccer things. And that delicious brunette on p. 1 or 2 of the visitor's pages; kinda like Radka Novocova, but I think she's a different girl. Paul Markham and Viewpornstars come to mind. And maybe Bomis Premium (remember that one?). None of those sites I care(d) for so I'm not making any referrals here.
Went back and found "Phillipa" (etc. etc. names) under "figure skating." She's been out of circulation for ages.
It really looks like dated material. (crap!)
|
09-28-07 10:45am
|
Reply
260
|
She Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from littlejoe:
that site looks awesome. wish i had seen it when it was only $20. do u know of any other female muscle sites?
|
04-04-07 03:17pm
|
Reply
261
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mudman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
One correction here. I said it's up to 12 photosets per day. Actually, it's up to 16 photosets per day.
|
03-14-07 07:45am
|
Reply
262
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mudman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Dear Snowdude:
Yeah, it's just okay, much like dozen of other sites. I actually was thinking about the site the day before you wrote. There are 3 sites, Teendream, Teenrotica and Infocus. Actually, I confused my reviews. I'd said of Infocus, that the close-up rarely were infocus, but I was thinking of Teenrotica. Infocus actually fairs pretty well in using the camera.
The problem, especially with these 3 sites, is how indistinquishable they are from each other. The poses are so cookie cutter, that the photographer certainly must use index cards telling him what shot at what angle is next. The quality is generally quite skilled, but gets boring because there's so little imagination or effort in the shot.
All three sites do have volume, do have pretty girls, are shot in color, but simply seem to provide the expected same old same old. They don't need to go radical on every shoot, just do something creative once and a while, so there's a reason to get up in the morning and take a look.
So, for volume, pretty girls and a boring sameness, an 84. They fix the boring and a higher score. They lose their volume or girls and a lower score. They're good, not exciting, but not bad. A 5 page shoot, 3 pages of clothes almost off, 4th page naked 5th page money shot and see ya. ATK Galleria is a better chose for this, as you get unmatched volume, up to 12 sets a day.
Of the three, I'd say Infocus was the most interesting.
That's it.
|
03-12-07 04:55am
|
Reply
263
|
The Boss XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from Denner:
Really cool review...
Thanks to all three of you for the reviews. I'd been looking for a site like this and am not disapointed. Pretty good deal too....
No offence, but it's quite different with latinas that are not US-based - that we know well, and its ok. But this is a bit new and some of these girls are something else!
Best to you guys in the US
Denner
Copenhagen
Europe
|
04-06-07 09:42am
|
Reply
264
|
The Boss XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Cool! Thanks for the info :)
|
03-10-07 08:17pm
|
Reply
265
|
The Boss XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from roseman:
Greets Dude,
nice review, thanks. I am considering of joining the network ... I saw that Maria Moore is starring at one of their sites... does she worth joining ? :-P ( She seems BIGGER and BETTER )
|
03-09-07 11:39am
|
Reply
266
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Haha - I gotta admit the retro porn did catch my eye - I have a soft spot in my heart for the porn of yesteryear. Well I look forward to your review sometime in the future - that network looks like it will be an interesting ride! lol
Cheers :-)
|
01-06-08 10:37pm
|
Reply
267
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Khan:
Ok, I asked a TBP Editor about this one and was told that not all of the network sites are added to TBP yet because they don't (yet) qualify as "stand alone" sites. They are sites and you can access them from w/in the network, they're just not quite ready for a stand-alone listing. The most common reason would be their "join" page isn't functioning yet.
As Toadsith rightly guesses, those extra sites are on TBP's list "to be added".
Hope that helps.
|
01-06-08 06:18am
|
Reply
268
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Toadsith:
I think the TBP hasn't gotten around to cataloging all the sites - I've noticed that before when they've reviewed networks in the past. I figure it is a bit of an ordeal to add a site: gotta make the entry, setup the affiliate code, Photoshop a screen shot of the front page, do all the categories, et cetera - my guess is they've got a list and they are working on it.
Though when I wanted to do a review of Futafan on Porn Users here, I emailed the support address about it and it was added to both sites within days of the email. So drop them an email and they might rectify the situation - or perhaps one of the Admins will notice your comment and fix the site then. Anyway - after looking at the network's page - I believe you will get immediate access to all of the 18 (actually I count 19) sites they advertise when you join. I gotta say though, the production quality shown in those screen shots doesn't bode well for the network in my opinion.
Cheers!
|
01-06-08 01:32am
|
Reply
269
|
The Mother Fucker
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from Marianna:
awwww and they say that i TALK MUCH !!!! hihihihihi :o)
|
04-06-07 02:37pm
|
Reply
270
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Well, I finally joined, and yes, Riley has 2 great scenes on this site. Actually, this site is a pretty good deal, with all the access to other sites.
|
09-02-07 05:59am
|
Reply
271
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from Schnitzel:
Great review SnowDude.
I completely agree with everything you've said -- especially with regards to them advertising the videos as high quality, when the older ones are downright poor, and the new videos are probably still below average.
I think from the incredible income that Bangbros generate, they should get some better camcorders.
Would love nothing more than Tugjobs in HD 1080i, and the same goes for the rest of the network.
|
07-11-07 07:17am
|
Reply
272
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Thanks for the tip Snowdude!
|
07-05-07 08:05pm
|
Reply
273
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from jd1961:
Great review. i always wondered about the POV with only a cameraman. Some have called this videotaped prostitution. IMO, I find it to be a bit sleezy, not because of the sex, but because here's a guy and a camera and he's getting a HJ and actually making $$$ off it! I've always wondered why the girls tolerate this. Is Riley Mason on this site? I love Riley Mason!
|
07-03-07 10:20pm
|
Reply
274
|
Twilight Women
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Khan:
I'm not familiar with the site but looking now, I note the following comment ...
"We have an exclusive arrangement with Div Foré, who makes these films. They have never been seen before on the Web and are not available anywhere else."
... of course they also say, "This site currently contains no downloadable JPEGs." but if memory serves, you're mainly interested in the vid's anyway.
Anyhoo ... will look forward to seeing your review when/if time permits.
|
06-05-07 11:59am
|
Reply
275
|
Twilight Women
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Drooler:
You're entitled to your say, and I like reading your stuff. Don't let the ones with the "lame" hangups put you down.
Frankly, there's a lot of really lame, really pathetic, quick-knock-off-to-get-the-point reviews on this site, but it isn't like we have to get a can of spray paint and go around and write "LaME" on them. They speak for themselves.
|
06-05-07 11:55am
|
