| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I put more weight on the comments and reviews by PU members that I trust and understand than on the scores or reviews of TBP. TBP scores are harder for me to relate to or understand. Drooler and other PU members are paying customers like me, while the TBP reviewers are professional reviewers with a different point of view that has less relevance for me. That's my personal opinion.
I usually agree with and understand the reviews of sites that Drooler reviews or comments on that I have been a member of. Our tastes are somewhat similar. Not exactly the same, but close enough that if Drooler finds a site to be excellent and well worth the money, chances are the site might be worth joining for me. (He does not find a lot of those excellent and well worth joining sites, because he has a lot of contrary opinion and orneriness. Maybe old age is biting him in the ass, or maybe he was ornery at birth. But you can depend on him (and some others) to give a somewhat clear and understandable review/opinion of different sites. I don't get the same sense of understanding from the TBP scores or reviews. TBP scores and reviews have value, but it's easier for me to relate to the PU scores and reviews of members I trust and agree with because I have read their reviews and comments and understand more clearly what they are saying.
If this site has some special attributes that definitely appeal to you, then maybe it's worth joining, in spite of Drooler's negative comments. He made those comments a little over a year ago, and maybe the site has improved since then.
But unless you have some clear evidence that the site has drastically improved since Drooler made his negative comments, or unless you have a strong impression that there are special elements that will appeal to your personal tastes, then this site is probably a mistake or a waste of your money.
You're probably better off paying for another site, but I don't know of any specializing in softcore Asian. There are some very nice-to-excellent hardcore Asian that PU members have reviewed.
Wait. I recall one softcore Asian site, don't remember the name. I will look around and, if I come up with the name, will offer it as a possibility. The site was like a Met-art Asian clone (but not really associated with Met-art).
|
02-02-10 11:29am
|
Reply
102
|
World Shemale
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from Rick:
Hi GCode,
Thanks for the info on this! Looks like someone has corrected the url based on your report and we'll get the screen cap fixed as well tomorrow.
Wanted to leave a note for you and let you know tomorrow I'm having our programmer check as to why it's not letting you make site fact error notifications. There has to be a bug in the system. We'll let you know what we find.
Rick
|
01-31-10 05:46pm
|
Reply
103
|
Tranny Boss
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from seahorse:
(GCode's Reply)
Hallo GCode,
thank you very much for your warning!! In my case there was the first attempt today to charge me a for a site, which I never visited and never agreed to join (I even never heard of this allnetworkpass.com where they activated a membership). I immediately invalidated my credit card, so they cannot charge me for anything further. I am absolutely sure, they got the data from SOBVSITES.COM which are the billing comp. for Tranny Boss because they used data, which I only used for them! Therefore I can only strongly advice not to get involved in any business with SOBVSITES.COM!
|
01-30-10 11:19am
|
Reply
104
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from alexmedia:
Thanks for great (as usual) review! I have been a member of this site and think it's worth to join.
|
01-17-10 08:56am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from David19:
(GCode's Reply)
Getting a bit off topic but I think a strong argument can be made for the drinking age being higher than the driving age. Since drinking and driving clearly don't mix, giving young people both privileges at the same time could be a recipe for disaster.
|
01-13-10 08:17pm
|
Reply
106
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from plan b:
I'm not sure if you're still looking for an answer but i just got around to testing this today. The story is still the same. The WMV and MP4 files will play but they're not smooth. The AVI files will not play at all. Since most of the videos are still AVI files (and even some of the newer posts are AVI), don't expect to stream them to your PS3.
P.S. I'm running firmware 3.15 on my PS3.
|
01-01-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
107
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from exotics4me:
(GCode's Reply)
There are some top American models that show up occasionally. Like Aria Giovanni, she has over 20 sets on the network. It is probably 90% Euro.
1byday is the flagship site of photographer Denys DeFrancesco (DDF). It has been around for over 10 years and he is credited for discovering models like Sandy from Club Sandy, Eve Angel, Sophie Moone and a good portion of the Euro models who are now established stars. What I like about his work is his use of tease. He actually has videos of Eve Angel where she doesn't even masturbate. She teases for 20 minutes. Most of his sets are high on the eroticism. Though there is plenty of masturbation and hardcore as well. For the last few years, a month subscription to 1byday was $35 by itself, you get it and 9 other sites, including the excellent Hot Legs and Feet.
I would guess solo scenes are the most on the network. 1byday was mostly known for its solo scenes and would have 1 or 2 hardcore updates per week. He has some really good machine videos/picture sets too. One of Peaches on a Sybian, on an office desk, is about the hottest Sybian scene I've seen. The House of Taboo one goes into bondage, the more extreme content, though I usually don't go for these types of scenes, some of it is really good. It still maintains a pretty high level of eroticism.
|
12-31-09 03:16am
|
Reply
108
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(GCode's Reply)
I may be a jackass at reading but I am kinda confused about the 1byday site. Is this site part of the network?
1 by Day is part of the network offerings.
What's the network's specialization? I know you say all is covered, so is there a good ratio of all the fetishes covered or would you say one type stands out the most?
Covers the waterfront with all of the various genres. There are more big tit babes than most other sites, but you'll get a lot of BJ's, bondage, gang bangs, lesbo, solo masturbation, legs, fisting, pissing, foot insertions, toys, group sex, etc. No emphasis on MILFs or barely legal babes.
|
12-30-09 10:21pm
|
Reply
109
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from malikstarks:
(GCode's Reply)
LOL, it's all good man, I just took as a friendly debate anyway. And there is no question you are the preeminent authority when it comes to TS sites. I joined Shemale Club based primarily on your review!! (I had been a member before but you influenced me to go back.
And no unfortunately Rodney doesn't do TS but it's clear just from the site design that he has some ownership of it since it's exactly the same as his network. Really if they would just combine the two networks under one umbrella I would join in heartbeat.
I still may get try that site, but probably my next shemale site will be Shemale Asia (again based off your review) or maybe Shemale Yum (I still haven't been a member their either.
As an aside- I replied to your thread regarding Brazzers and it would be cool to get your take on it. Plus there is a rare link for the site at $9.95 I know it's not your thing. but it's a pretty good value at that price even without the HD.
|
12-30-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
110
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from malikstarks:
(GCode's Reply)
I know Shemale Strokers is not really a hard core site (hence the name). And I'm not really arguing with you especially since you have much more expertise in this area.
I'm just saying that in general a $5.00 difference is nothing when considering the sheer volume of content that the premier sites have, plus the vid quality for the majority of scenes. Plus I'd still be willing to bet that even Shemale Club has more solo masturbation scenes that Shemale Strokers just by virtue of being around longer (especially in terms of HD). When I was there last it seemed the ratio of solo to hardcore was at least 50/50. Overall it's not a killer, but I think they are more competitive at $24.95.
Don't get me wrong I think Shemale Strokers is a good site as well. I've not been a member but I like the Rodney Moore sites (same webmaster and similar production), and I love their photography. (even more than the Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum. )
Anyway keep up the good work.
|
12-30-09 05:30pm
|
Reply
111
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(GCode's Reply)
It's no wonder why I'm stuck on the same sites all the time. That was a great breakdown of the site, but the scripted sex is a deal breaker for me. Thanks for the reply though!
|
12-30-09 05:13pm
|
Reply
112
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from malikstarks:
They're making a mistake at that price point. It puts them in direct competition with name sites like and shemaleclub, shemaleyum which are only $5.00 more, have higher vid quality and (especially in the case of shemaleclub) blows them away in terms of hard core.
Especially shemaleclub you can basically see alot of the same girls both stroke and fuck in separate scenes.
|
12-30-09 10:43am
|
Reply
113
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from james4096:
Yeah, I can imagine what the webmaster might say about still being cheaper than the other sites and how much exclusive content they have, blah blah blah. They do offer a $5 off loyalty bonus after 6 months, but that's still and extra $30 they've made. It's a good site and all, but whatever.
That's a typical but nasty prechecked cross too. You can't see it on the first screen and it's $39.94.
|
12-30-09 03:34am
|
Reply
114
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yeah, I found the site to be quite slow when it came to download speeds. I found speeds could be so slow that files would simply break off, so starting a download and going to bed didn't give me something to look forward to in the morning.
As per my other comment, Vanessa's needs correction in terms of Ass Titans being a bonus of Clara-G.com as well - it is no longer a bonus - so that's 1/2 the material available to members gone.
|
12-28-09 08:30pm
|
Reply
115
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jd1961:
(GCode's Reply)
Did you ever see a colorized movie? Same effect.
I was here a couple years ago, I ended up deleting everything.
|
12-24-09 09:54am
|
Reply
116
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(GCode's Reply)
When I was a member, when it first opened, the models were Thai - I was a member for 3-6 months, I forget whether I did 1 or 2 90-day joins, but by that point I was so tired of the lacquering of the pics that I quit and never have considered joining again since all the samples have shown that this is their preferred style.
And yes, they gloss them up artificially - it's all very pretty and the models are all very hot but the lacquering gets to me.
I much prefer the style used by Graphis and other Japanese erotic photography.
|
12-22-09 09:01pm
|
Reply
117
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I have the same issue with this site as I have with their other site, Pier999, which is that ALL of the pics are heavily lacquered.
So they get great hot models, have them in hot outfits and hot poses, and then, for my tastes, ruin it all with the lacuering of their pics.
I want to see real skin tone. I find it very frustrating to see that being erased by their treatment of their pics. If that doesn't bother you, this is a very good site - and has the archives of Asian4You, (I hope I have that right), which also lacquered all their pics.
|
12-22-09 07:04pm
|
Reply
118
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from mbaya:
I wish I could answer your question, but this is the first time I have seen the site. It looks great except for the 2GB per day download limit. Given the size of the site and how interesting it looks, I am sure I would download that much in less than an hour or two.
|
12-22-09 06:50pm
|
Reply
119
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(GCode's Reply)
For the most part many of the machines are dildos of varying sizes attached to a steel rod(s). They pick some good camera angles so you get many different perspectives of the action. My main issue is not with the quality of the product but the noise of the machines and the fact that the action will sometime stop because the dildo came out.
|
12-17-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
120
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
No, she didn't have a cam. I subscribed to her site through Southern Charms and many of the models had the same set up. Pictures only but videos could be had for a price. Some models even sold their panties! :-) Still talking about outfits, there was such an intimitate atmosphere from being able to email Camillaq that many subscribers would actually buy underwear they liked, send it to her and she would model it in a future set. Nice and obliging lady.
|
12-16-09 02:16pm
|
Reply
121
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(GCode's Reply)
Many thanks, GC.
I reckon you covered it! ;0)
:0)
|
12-15-09 11:35pm
|
Reply
122
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
Would you believe I never had a single video of her. On her site it was pictures only. You could buy her videos but I never did. So, to see a video of Camilla will be a treat. She's a great lady and did a lot of requests for her subscribers. I especially liked it when some of them managed to talk her into wearing sexy old-fashioned underwear, the kind I'm forever looking for on a model and so rarely find. :-)
|
12-15-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
123
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
Yes I was a member of Score HD and gave a review of that site. I concentrated mostly on the videos because the pics were all screen caps. The Watermark was there but if I recollect correctly it was on the bottom in a more metallic gray and didn't bother me because it was out of the way. :-)
|
12-14-09 09:32am
|
Reply
124
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
I'm afraid I don't quite understand your question, GCode. The only review site I frequent is PU/TBP. If you mean have I ever been a member of 40 Something Mag the answer is no, because the samples I saw on the Usenet stopped me from subscribing. I always skipped them any time someone posted a batch or two. The models seem great but I couldn't get past that watermark.
|
12-13-09 07:50pm
|
Reply
125
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
Let's see now, as I see it, mature means forty and over. This is subjective, of course, because, as I keep reminding myself, when I was twenty, thirty was almost ancient. :-) Next the small imperfections that show up once a woman truly matures, a few additional spots (or freckles as you call them), breasts that are starting on their downward journey, not those artificial cones that jut out from the rib cage of so many. A few lines in the face to give it character, a touch of silver in the hair? A mature woman can have all those things and yet be breathtakingly beautiful. That's why I can't understand all those mature sites that are proud of the fact that their forty year old models look like thirty. Nothing wrong with having models that look like forty, or fifty, or even sixty. If you are not a youngster.
|
12-13-09 07:40pm
|
