| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(slutty's Reply)
Yep, it's after you put in a user name and password, as well as which plan you want to use .. this leads to the page I am talking about. No harm in trying because you don't need to give out any credit card details. Sorry, should have mentioned this in the first place. Blame forgetfulness!
|
01-24-11 11:07am
|
Reply
402
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks, slutty, that's exactly the quality of the scenes I got when I was still a member not so long ago. I was just wondering about the HD because it plays such a prominent part on their sign up page, there is a streaming video that compares ordinary scenes with "premium" HD scenes and the difference in quality is obviously startling. Just wondering if I overlooked something new. If you get the time check their sign up page and you'll see what I'm getting at.
|
01-24-11 09:20am
|
Reply
403
|
Virgin Off
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
You have a fantastic memory. I have a problem trying to remember which sites I have been a member of, and that's one reason I check PU before signing on to new sites. But if you are able to remember a log-on page that you had to use months ago, I think that's incredible. I only wish my memory worked one-tenth as well as yours does.
|
03-18-11 02:12am
|
Reply
404
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Celine:
Once you have installed the free version, you get 1 new girl dancing for you every day for free. Those girls stay 14 days on your computer then they are replaced by new ones.
During those 14 days, these girls can be bought for 1 credit, not 2 :)
Celine
|
03-23-09 02:19am
|
Reply
405
|
Viv Thomas Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
Hey slutty, I don't know what has happened to Viv. He had also been promising higher resolution pictures, but those haven't happened either. Still, like you, the quality of the action on the screen seems to outweigh the need for the highest technical quality of the videos. I wish he would update more too. Considering how much porn he has filmed, he has to have a few thousand clips laying around!
|
02-01-10 11:12pm
|
Reply
406
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from marcdc1:
Wow that sucks. Thanks for the tip. I usually don't give a lot of thought to my passwords because I don't often stick with a site long term.
You've certainly given me reason to be more cautious.
THANKS!
|
02-13-13 06:19pm
|
Reply
407
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I hope the log out is due to excessive traffic because that is good news for porn fans. More people joining a site means more money for the studio and that often translates into more porn. They have just signed Samantha Saint to a contract so hopefully we get to see her in some Wicked movies in the very near futur.
|
09-30-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
408
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the comments, slutty. I agree with you on the Octomom stuff. That's too weird for me...
|
09-16-12 06:54am
|
Reply
409
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for this info slutty, it goes to show how much the tour does hurt them. Heading into a slow period at work and have joined 3 sites, but none are Wicked Pictures, even though I had it at the top of my list to try out. I never had paid much attention or joined it until I saw it showing up in the toolbar of the members area on Brazzers. I think sites could at least give a model list with number of sets even without samples, just to let a potential member know who all is on the site and how many scenes. I'll join it eventually, but it probably has been pushed back another 2-3 months at least.
|
12-20-11 11:53am
|
Reply
410
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Belthazar:
(slutty's Reply)
Yes, but only one and I deleted it from my HD lightning quick. It is absolutely crazy.
|
08-07-11 09:03am
|
Reply
411
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from lk2fireone:
"a couple of the movies I have downloaded have the most ridiculous watermark I have ever scene - a solid Wicked smack in the middle of the video."
I don't remember ever seeing that before: a large watermark in the middle of a video.
Those might be collector's items some day. I suggest downloading all you can, and storing them somewhere safe. And if the videos themselves are any good, you can always show them at the porn parties you put on for your friends.
I know that I have seen old porn novels from the 1970s and 1980s advertised on the Internet. Those novels originally sold for $2-$4 each. The current prices can range from $25-$50-$100 each for a single copy of those $2-$4 novels, depending on the condition of the novels (which are paperbacks).
That gives me hope for the re-sale value of our porn stashes. Except that we would have copyright issues that don't come into play when re-selling an old paperback that we own.
|
04-15-11 05:00am
|
Reply
412
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(slutty's Reply)
Streaming works well - but there is the glitchiness of movies being advertised as added but not streaming for another 1-2 days and now they have movies added and then gone a week later.
I don't know what the issue is. Though I'd hate to see it, I wouldn't be surprised to see them turn the site over to the same company that runs FameDigital and EvilAngel.com, etc.
|
12-24-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
413
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(slutty's Reply)
I tried another download - a scene from Hosed, the most recently posted Wicked film. I was able to download it in HD, but the sound is out of synch, so I've got one download that broke off after the title sequence when I used a download manager and another download - not using a download manager - where the scene downloaded, but the sound was out of synch. Looking back to the Stephanie Swift era, the downloads list HD as an option - what that really means, I don't know.
I had totally ignored the area that says "download", because the "download" button is off to the side by the "Buy" button - makes this site much more valuable than I thought, if I can find scenes that download without the glitches.
|
12-18-10 10:47pm
|
Reply
414
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(slutty's Reply)
I gotta test some stuff out, because I had thought all their stuff was streaming and could be entirely wrong, though the download link that I tried on one random vid broke really quickly - I only got 22.8 mb - the title sequence.
That might be because I used a download manager, so I'll test some other stuff and post after that.
|
12-18-10 10:13pm
|
Reply
415
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from Goldfish:
Great review. I'd have to agree at that price it's a steal. I may have to put Wicked in the queue.
|
04-10-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
416
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I agree and that's why I'd rather pay my 15 Euros and get access to wakeupnfuck for one month. I usually join Pierre casting site every few months. It depends on what has been updated since the last time I was a member. He's one of the few man to get certain girls to do hardcore shoots so sooner or later you have to join his sites to get those.
|
05-23-11 05:56am
|
Reply
417
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I wanted to make a review of the site as well but since the site won't be added to the list then I did a quick one in the forum. You are correct on every point. I might have given the site a higher score than you because it has some exclusif scenes from some girls.
I think you get access to this site if you retain your woodman casting membership for 6 months or more. Seeing as Pierre site is expensive than it's not a route I'm willing to go down.
|
05-20-11 06:09am
|
Reply
418
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.
So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.
But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.
I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".
|
10-08-10 04:41am
|
Reply
419
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
|
10-07-10 09:42pm
|
Reply
420
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I think that Pierre wants it to appear as real as possible. Since quite a few of the girls on his site only do an interview and don't really have sex with him or another guy then the tampon is not too much of a problem unless she takes it out and then the go at it. In that case it's a pretty weird fetish.
My biggest issue with this site is that there are certain girls that haven't done hardcore anywhere else except for Pierre so if you are a fan than you probably will have to join his site to get that scene.
|
10-05-10 03:15pm
|
Reply
421
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I was a member in May of this year and I had no problem with the billing company when I chose not to renew. Some of the content can be found at Videobox and if you have bought any of Pierre's DVD's in the past then even more so.
A large amount is from is old Woodman Casting series that were released by Private and Hustler. I can't fault Pierre's decision to retain some exclusive material for his site because he does have a few scenes that have never seen the light of day anywhere but on his site and Pierre has always bbeen good at getting girls to do stuff for him that they haven`t done elsewhere.
The membership is a little expensive at 30 Euros and some of the content is just the interviews. As much as I might like to know some background on a favorite star. if there is no sex than it`s pretty boring.
|
09-27-10 07:53pm
|
Reply
422
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
it seems like there are a chunk of these sites that all seem to have the same content. 18onlygirls is another one. Am I wrong is there some unique stuff to each site or are they all the same pretty much?
|
04-17-17 01:32am
|
Reply
423
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(slutty's Reply)
oh ok cheers
|
03-29-17 02:48am
|
Reply
424
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from elephant:
How do you get the trial, I don't see one show up.
|
03-26-17 02:01am
|
Reply
425
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
They use many of the same models at 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn (those are Diesel Access network sites) and Wow Girls and Wow Porn (the Wow sites).
The furniture and locations and settings are usually minimal for the photosets and videos.
Back in December of 2012, the 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn sites were using the same preview pages. A PU member noticed this, and asked if the preview pages reflected what was inside the two sites accurately. I said the public preview pages did not show what was inside each separate site, but was a mixture of what was inside both sites. And the PU member thought that was false advertising.
Since then, they have changed the preview pages of 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn to show what is inside each individual site.
As far as I can tell, the public preview pages for Wow Girls and Wow Porn are different, and probably reflect content that is inside each site, and not a reflection of what is in both sites combined.
|
02-09-13 10:42am
|
