| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Gazette Risque:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Really? Think I missed that.
What has been done?
|
03-19-12 07:03am
|
Reply
127
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(hodayathink's Reply)
True. But she's not as spoiled as many others out there.
Just give it time ;)
|
03-17-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from slategrey:
(hodayathink's Reply)
I second that. The more the better (just dnt take away what i already got.
|
01-18-12 01:44am
|
Reply
129
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
from pat362:
That would be grest news if it was on any other site with similar content but NA has made sure to always have the least amount of anal than the other sites so their customers can't really be all that interested in anal. Who's going to join a site with the least amount of anal than all the other similar sites or for just one dpd scene. NA has 28 anal scenes this year while Bangbros has 52 and Brazzer has 194. I wish I could tell you how many Reality king has but their site is a clusterfuck when it comes to looking up scenes for non-members.
Maybe this is a new trend for NA and they'll start to shoot more anal in the new year but I won't hold my breath.
|
12-20-11 07:05am
|
Reply
130
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ipg386:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Thanks for the suggestion hodayathink. Calling them on the telephone and listening to more of their BS is probably just a waste of more time. I told them in writing in the online chat that they were basically stealing my money and they didn't care so telling them again by telephone seems redundant, but I will take the other route you mention and notify my credit card company that the charge is a scam.
|
12-08-11 11:59pm
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from tangub:
(hodayathink's Reply)
I sometimes wonder that myself. I have a huge archive of photos often entire sites that i've downloaded but once my subscription is finished i rarely go back and look at them again. I do get a sense of satisfaction though when a site bites the dust and i know i have their entire collection stored on my hd like last year when G18 Spot disappeared offline half way through my 12 month subscription, it's still nice to know i can go back and bowse through their 1/2 a millions photo collection from my hd even though its not possible to sign up again.
|
12-08-11 11:28pm
|
Reply
132
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(hodayathink's Reply)
I'll give you Naughty America because they shoot porn in California but but I can't give you RK and bangbros because they shoot porn on the East Coast. I think Miami is their normal hunting ground. What can I say. LA is probably the capital of breast implants. I don't think Miami can say the same. Another reason why RK and Bangbros have a lot less girls with implants is that they hire European and South American performers and implants is more rare for those girls.
I agree that Brazzer caters more to the large breast market than some other sites but I don't think that's what they set out to do in the beginning. I just think that the popular models have implants and Brazzer hired them for their popularity. They probably didn't get too many complaints because the girl was popular and people were willing to overlook the impkants to see her do HC porn so they hired more girls with implants and so on.
|
11-28-11 06:58pm
|
Reply
133
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
from Cybertoad:
Looks like a great review. I may consider this site as a next to see.
|
11-25-11 08:15am
|
Reply
134
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Piper:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Or it could be neutral. ;)
|
11-23-11 07:47am
|
Reply
135
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Piper:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Just to add in, we recently added a portraits section. Photos had been somewhat on the back burner because people seemed to be more into the videos, but we're working at restoring the balance and getting more towards a 1:1 ratio for photos/videos. And they will all be zipped. :)
|
11-23-11 07:45am
|
Reply
136
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(hodayathink's Reply)
OK, thanks for the additional info!
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-22-11 11:30pm
|
Reply
137
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
from Piper:
I really appreciate this review, hodayathink! It's nice to see you here.
The only thing that I don't quite understand is why it could be considered a con that I have a lack of variety. If the site was called "Camille's Place" or something, I could see why that would be a valid complaint. But it's called "The Art of Blowjob"... You wouldn't complain about a Chinese restaurant not having tacos, right?
|
11-22-11 01:03pm
|
Reply
138
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
from rearadmiral:
This looks like a really interesting and unique site. Thanks for reviewing it. I might consider this as an antidote to some of the 'extreme' blowjob sites on the internet like Facial Abuse. It looks like this site and Facial Abuse are at opposite ends of the BJ video spectrum.
|
11-22-11 03:58am
|
Reply
139
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Looks like you're right, that's one of the more natural sets of implants I've seen. I wasn't familiar with her work on Living With Anna, but see on Google that she did get implants. I would call those similar to Sandra Shine's.
|
06-29-11 11:34am
|
Reply
140
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Thanks for the explanation, hodayathink.
When I had dial-up, which I had for many years, I was lucky to see download speeds of 3-4 KB/s, which showed in the Windows system tray when downloading a file.
I switched to DSL, and then got 150-160 KB/s download speeds (again, from what appeared in the Windows system tray area when downloading a file).
I recently switched to a faster DSL, and now get up to 630 KB/s download speeds, which is a huge improvement.
I knew there was a difference between bits and bytes (8 bits per byte), but it was still confusing when I looked at speed ratings because I didn't know which were being used or referred to.
But if everyone follows the simple rule that "b" stands for bits, and "B" stands for bytes, then I hope to remember that.
But I ignore the difference between "K" and 1,000 (K = 1,024), because my brain can only hold so much. :)
|
02-09-11 01:20am
|
Reply
141
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Rotterdam854:
(hodayathink's Reply)
As they say never, never forget the fine print*
|
02-04-11 03:34am
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(hodayathink's Reply)
I completely forgot about Michelle lay. I forgot to mention her but there is also Ginger Lynn. My problem with Ginger is that I have a hard time with her newer stuff. She was so bubbly and energetic in her youth that her looks these days make me a little sad. She looks like she's had a hard life and that tends to make it hard to jerk off to.
The amazing thing is how much nastier Julia Ann has gotten compared to when she first started in porn.
There is something about India that attracts me. I don't know what it is but I always enjoy her scenes. She has some great lesbians scenes in Girlfriends Films.
|
10-29-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Yes....Puma Swede, sorry.
|
10-28-10 02:06pm
|
Reply
144
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(hodayathink's Reply)
Awesome, I'll try that. Yeah it's just a one month deal and thanks for the heads up. I'll try your trick and see how it works. Appreciate it a lot!
|
10-22-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
145
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Jay G:
(hodayathink's Reply)
It's not a proposal, just a prediction. The way things are now, we're used to getting tons of content for a low monthly fee on a model designed to try to get continuing month after month "memberships." Most of us, however, download the best stuff in the first month or two and get out because the recurring fee is way too high for the small number of "updates" (new content).
Pay per minute or video on demand is way too expensive, also, in comparison to what we're used to. Kink on demand asks almost as much for one scene or two as I'm used to paying for a monthly membership.
The model I'd try, if I were a web-master, would be a very tempting presentation like the girls outside the old carnival side show luring you to come in.
Well-defined pictures of all the girls available on one page. Then when you'd click on the girl you'd get a few more large pictures of her from each scene she's done. Clicking on an index for certain kinds of content (anal, oral, group, spanking, etc.) would bring up pictures of the scenes containing the content you want. You choose the scene and you'd get an instant download (and streaming at the same time, if you'd like) for less than a dollar. Tell me you wouldn't enjoy this candy store.
Instead of you downloading all my scenes in the first month to view later, you'd probably actually watch each one and you'd keep coming back for more, looking forward to each new update to see if there's one you'd want to buy at such a low price. I'm willing to bet you and I would spend just as much or more for our porn on this model.
The truth is, most Americans love bargains. I could actually spend a lot more on porn if I was tempted, but the current model has me joining only one or two sites a month to download tons of content (most of which I never actually view, to be honest). After getting used to tons of scenes for about thirty dollars, I'd have a hard time paying more than a dollar or two for any one scene.
|
09-29-10 05:48am
|
Reply
146
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from malikstarks:
(hodayathink's Reply)
I think such a pricing model would be dead on arrival. It could only work if:
1. There were no pirating. The only advantage to the current model we have over is going completely pirate bulk and convenience. Individual pricing models takes this away, and forces consumers to constantly be thinking about there wallet-unlike now where it's a one time transaction and enjoy. This would only make the pirates more profitable as some file hosting sites are paying both for uploads and new subscribers. Once the typical pirate/"independent sales partner" were to purchase a movie one time he could still post it on the forums and reap even greater rewards. Plus the average Joe could still find the content via the tube sites.
2. All and I mean basically all the sites agreed on the same model. Otherwise the sites that use the current model would hold the advantage of both bulk and convenience.
Individual pricing models only work for the music industry because of the advent of the ipod, and peoples desire to listen to music 'on the go'. People don't watch porn 'on the go', they do so in front of their computers, or occasionally on their cell phone in a bathroom stall.
This discussion would be better taken back to the forum as it's gotten a bit off the topic of Reality Kings.
|
09-28-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
147
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
from uscue:
I don't know where TBP got their info, but the price I see for joining is $19.99
|
09-09-10 10:35am
|
Reply
148
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
from Capn:
All video here, I take it?
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-09-10 09:06am
|
Reply
149
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review/comment/whatever you call it. :)
Very informative, nice details and opinions.
|
09-09-10 09:02am
|
Reply
150
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
from Yariana:
Thank you hodayathink,
I am glad to hear you enjoyed the site. I appreciate your assessment of where it needs improvement as well. It started one year ago 9/4/09 with only 20 BJ videos so it has been a long climb up. You mentioned all the issues we are in the process of improving upon now. This week the site is being moved to new servers hosted by a very professional company which is knowledgeable and experienced working with very large adult sites. This should vastly increase our download speed.
Next week a new top of the line content management system (CMS) is due to be installed on the new servers which will accommodate multi-format and multi-bandwidth downloads and streaming as well as search capabilities. This should make the site far more manageable, freeing up time so I can do more of what I love doing, video shoots. It will also improve navigation for users making the viewing experience more enjoyable.
My goal is, and always has been to keep the site truly amateur while improving it as much as possible without becoming too PRO. This is not an easy thing to do and I often struggle with the decisions I make. One of my biggest decisions now is whether to offer HD. Does it or doesn't it take away from the amateur feel of the video? This will be my next big move if I should decide to do it.
Thank you for visiting our site,
Yariana
|
09-09-10 09:02am
|
