| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ace DDF:
(zzzins's Reply)
Hi zzzins,
We only sell non-recurring memberships in August. They won't rebill at all!
Rebilling memberships will be available again in September.
Best regards,
Endre
|
08-22-09 01:22pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(zzzins's Reply)
Well, that just goes to show that there's more than one way to shake the fruit off the tree.
|
08-05-09 01:08pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(zzzins's Reply)
I always love these kinds of responses.
Thanks for letting us know. ;)
|
08-04-09 05:17pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from fortherecord777:
(zzzins's Reply)
try it out at your local costco! Mine has 2 week return policy! and no restocking fee of any kind.
|
06-23-09 09:45am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from fortherecord777:
(zzzins's Reply)
I had a very similar setup but age brings hardships so I just purchased a 65inch panasonic LCD tv for the office connected via HDMI to DVI for macbook pro. I sit 12feet away...can't say enough about this combo. For price reference I paid 2800 on craigslist. used obviously but perfect condition.
|
06-19-09 07:53am
|
Reply
6
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Comment
from Drooler:
One thing they've been doing again is reposting older content. Examples are Sophie Moone (Aug. 3), Teri (Aug. 6), Sandra Shine (Aug. 11), and Mercedes (i.e., Susanna Spears, Aug. 15). Maybe that helps to explain the drop in video quality?
I've said before elsewhere here that I personally don't mind them revitalizing older stuff in the new, 2000px format for images. Sometimes I'm really glad! The reborn set of Teri, for instance, replaced my older set from years ago, which wasn't even at 1000px.
There was a phase last year in which they labeled such content as "reloaded." There was a bit of an uproar here at PU about that, and a demand for really, purely new stuff. Anyway, they've dropped the label.
Maybe this is a stopgap as they get things rolling at their studio in France?
|
08-15-09 01:41am
|
Reply
7
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Hi zzzzins,
This only applies to the backstage vids. Unfortunately we only have them in such quality.
After the backstage vids are done, we will be back to the original quality.. if not better! :-)
Best regards,
Endre
DDF Productions
|
08-14-09 05:07am
|
Reply
8
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from dracken:
(zzzins's Reply)
Interesting info, I do enjoy behind the scenes material... Thanks for sharing.
|
08-11-09 02:53am
|
Reply
9
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from dracken:
Great review, thank you for sharing. I really appreciated your points and was unclear about DDF (but you cleared that in the reply section :)
Thanks, I'll definitely have to give this site a try.
|
08-09-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
10
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Ace DDF:
(zzzins's Reply)
Rollback is gone for good now.
Hopefully it won't take long to fix this!
Best regards,
Endre
|
07-07-09 05:06am
|
Reply
11
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ace DDF:
(zzzins's Reply)
Hi zzzins,
Thank you for your report.
We are working to solve this problem!
Best regards,
Endre
|
07-07-09 04:03am
|
Reply
12
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Hi,
Using download managers is still allowed!
FDM must be an older app that is unable to export the sessions from the browser. You should consider trying a different util. :)
I can personally vouch for the DownThemAll! Firefox extension, as I use it myself.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/201
Some other download managers that could be worth checking out:
- Flashget ( http://www.flashget.com/ )
- Getright ( http://getright.com/ )
- Flashgot Firefox Extension ( http://flashgot.net )
The design is a matter of taste of course, but the new layout has some new features like clickable keywords, integrated archives, and a proper search function.
Best regards,
Endre
|
07-03-09 10:23am
|
Reply
13
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monty2222:
(zzzins's Reply)
Thanks, and good reviews. :)
|
04-26-09 11:26pm
|
Reply
14
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from monty2222:
Pardon for asking, but was is "DDF". Apparently I don't know all porn-abbreviations yet. :D
|
04-26-09 12:40pm
|
Reply
15
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Marcus:
Thanks for the updated review. This was a massively disappointing site for me. Anna's great but the content is pretty poor, and I think there has only been about one hardcore update since I left over a month ago.
|
05-11-13 10:43am
|
Reply
16
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Marcus:
Thank you so much for the review. This site is incredibly high on my wishlist, and I would have joined it already had it not been for the sporadic update schedule.
Anna is amazing, really looking forward to enjoying her content.
|
01-23-13 11:08am
|
Reply
17
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from GCode:
Hey,
just so you know, met art is only $19.99 a month through a discount from the best porn site, so it's actually cheaper than this site (it says $29.99 a month at the best porn fact sheet). I Just thought I'd let you know for the future if you didn't know already. Pretty good review, adding that comment about kenny g style music really strayed me away from the thought of ever joining here :)
|
04-19-09 04:52pm
|
Reply
18
|
CD Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from doomsday:
(zzzins's Reply)
They started "offering" WMV-HD in October of 2007, but as of about a June 2008-ish (maybe) it started to get really crisp and clear.
HD videos are:
- 1280 x 720
- encoded with Windows Media Video 9 Standard
- video @ ~5000 kbps
- audio @ 128 kbps
cheers!
|
08-20-09 07:40pm
|
Reply
19
|
Enter Belladonna
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Jay G:
Yes, Belladonna would be just an average-looking girl with an OK body if it weren't for her sexual enthusiasm. That puts her heads (LOL) & Tails (LOL) above the average. Only a few pornstars are so dirty, dirty, dirty, & with such enthusiasm!
|
04-15-09 04:07am
|
Reply
20
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from nutcrackr:
Good review, I personally see the lack of explicit content as a pro as it keeps the standard pretty high. But that's just personal preference. Of course I agree that some of the recent vids have been sadly of photoshoots with the camera clicking and people talking in the background which is really unappealing - only Erro pulls this off. Really disappointing, when I look back years at some movies I see some quite good ones, but movies aren't the main thing here anyway. And yes download manager support is very good although others sites I use (hegre, met models and errotica archives) also support dl managers.
|
05-27-09 02:41am
|
Reply
21
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Wittyguy:
As some have mentioned, this site is definitely more on the artsy side rather than the erotic. If Met-Art branched out and did some shoots with toys and actual lesbianism it would score out at a 98 on a review for me. While the girls are amazing and there's tons to see it's just a tad too softcore for my long term viewing tastes despite my love of pictures over videos.
|
05-11-09 11:41am
|
Reply
22
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Jeffrey99:
(zzzins's Reply)
Thanks for the reply. It looks like Met Art is atop my list of sites to try soon.
|
05-11-09 05:51am
|
Reply
23
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Jeffrey99:
Nice review. I've always wanted to give this site a try but I'm just wondering, do they start the photo sets off already nude? Or are they clothed at the beginning and then strip to full nude?
That was one thing that killed me about FemJoy, was that 90% of the gallerys the model was already full nude at the start. To me just kinda makes all the photos run together. So was just wondering if that's the way it is here?
|
05-10-09 08:20pm
|
Reply
24
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
from Monahan:
Although I'm a video guy, I signed up for Met Art for a few months and was blown away by the volume and quality of the photo content. As zzzins suggests in his review, the videos are not why one signs up...and his comments are why I decided to drop the site altogether.
In photos, I prefer erotic over artsy fartsy, and Met Art does provide some good erotic stuff. But the majority of their material is more of the artsy style. There are no men in any of their material at all, no overt pussy or tit play, no insertions, but tons of gorgeous babes of all shapes, sizes and sexiness.
One other point. If you see a babe you'd like to see more of, you'll be frustrated because the site uses just first names and in more than one case the names they use are totally different than those used in other sites.
|
05-10-09 05:24pm
|
Reply
25
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TeenModels:
(zzzins's Reply)
No problem and thanks again for your comments. We are always looking to add new features to the site. I'm sure you'll see some changes soon.
Mike
|
08-18-09 10:15am
|
