Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
from OneMan:
Shouldn't the review be updated to reflect the fact that vids are "now shot in HD" ???
However, ALL the vids have this stamped on them, altohugh they cannot all be HD...so it obvioly begs the question....how many are ??? !!!
Still seems a little repetitive though.....same format, same cock......same old, same old.....? !!! And, TOO expensive. Halve the price and I may join.
The other "free" sites are not of the same genre and most people wouldn't find them of any interest.
|
10-07-09 01:58pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from GCode:
(fortherecord777's Reply)
Vizio is a good company, it's actually a branch of LG which makes good products for 'cheaper'. Kinda like how lenovo was considered cheaper products of IBM but still basically the same quality and company.
|
06-22-09 11:19pm
|
Reply
3
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
from jd1961:
gloryhole.com has over 300 videos. It costs too much, but how many gloryhole vids can a person watch?
|
06-22-09 03:19pm
|
Reply
4
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
from uscue:
FWIW, all 14 sites in the network are finally included when you purchase one site, which is hundreds of gigs of content. Each used to be separate which was crazy. Now you get Blacks on Blondes, Spring Thomas, Katie Thomas, Ruth Blackwell, Candy Monroe, The Minion, glory hole, etc. Literally hundreds of gigs of content.
|
06-22-09 02:21pm
|
Reply
5
|
DVD Rack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(fortherecord777's Reply)
Hi fortherecord777, I am glad your experience was more positive than mine. Just one example where our experience differs greatly. I had to cancel a solitary download last night because the one scene I was interested in would have taken over two hours. Eager webmasters will tell you that it must be your fault but quite obviously they have never heard of speed tests and comparisons to other sites. And as you mentioned their streaming is basically quite good, so why not the downloads?
My frustration is that the site looks neat and modern and clean, that the updates are large (five a day), but the many mistakes (no .. going back to the pages with mistakes in them don't correct those mistakes, at least not with me) and very slow speed even with one scene ruin the positive first impression .. ah, well, glad to see that others have a better experience with the site but I can only do a review based on my own experiences.
I haven't downloaded a single scene in four days because one look at the speed and projected download time do it for me. Cheers, and may others be spared my aggravation.
|
06-22-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
6
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
from Monahan:
Quick question.
Is there a comprehensive search function that one can use to find models with specific attributes, such as large breasts, small breasts, blond, large labias, outdoors, etc., etc.?
|
06-22-09 11:14am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from zzzins:
(fortherecord777's Reply)
Woah - 65"!!! I didn't know you could get LCD that big! Man I'd love to see some of those MetArt girls on that! You're a lucky man!
|
06-19-09 04:58pm
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|