| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Comment
from RustyJ:
Very good comment! Longer and more informative than many reviews I've read!
|
11-25-10 10:15pm
|
Reply
2
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Gee... wasn't it about five months ago that we were told by site reps that they knew things needed shaking up - and that things were going to change? Seems my cynicism is justified more and more these days.
Thanks for the heads up, dingle. Sorry you took the hit - maybe you can just look at it as "taking one for the team".
|
11-25-10 06:50pm
|
Reply
3
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Comment
from Capn:
Yes, I can understand your frustration.
I feel similarly about this site.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-25-10 11:56am
|
Reply
4
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Comment from dingle:
Ps missed edit time...
Jemma M in sept 2/10 video- to much hiding body and camera shots to arty and missing vital shots.
Jemma in Dec 7/10 video nice long naked shots and full naked'ness for much longer....
|
12-11-09 08:14pm
|
Reply
5
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Comment
from SueAnn:
Dingle, you'd never get slated from us, and feedback is always helpful.
At the moment the release rate for the solo site is one explicit shoot a week - this means the model spreads her legs and holds her vagina lips open with her fingers for pictures and for video- perhaps even inserting some fingers or her toy, whatever she likes.
The other four shoots we release per week will be a mixture of Nude Only (as Anna T's is - so you were never going to see more of this model's lady bits than you have)..
... and Open Leg (where the model spreads her legs but doesn't touch her vagina with her hands- frequently her lips are open on their own so you DO get to see pink - Kelly G, Melissa R, Ester, Felicity C etc).
All the Open Leg shoots give a variety of views of the vagina lips, shaved or non shaved and I counted 15 between December 4th and October 4th.
I take your point about the 'percentage' of nakedness in the pictures and in the video, and more nudity is always better in your camp :)
I'm sorry abbywinters.com has lost you as a customer but your feedback is welcomed and we will use it.
Sue-ann
|
12-06-09 05:13pm
|
Reply
6
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Reply from dingle:
**Big Edit**
Sorry.. Not "Sue Ann" But "Abbywinter webmaster" (CEO) explaining reason why, Thank you, i look forward to the new site!!!
|
11-22-09 07:09pm
|
Reply
7
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from badandy400:
(dingle's Reply)
I hate when that happens. Redownloading everything is a shame. My ISP has no cap that I know of, they are Embarq DSL which I believe is a nationwide company. AbbyWInters has a download cap or at least used to. The way it was set up is it did not limit daily access or anything but rather total bandwidth usage of a user. They did not want your usage to exceed the size of the site. Mine did not but they for some reason were worried it would.
What they do not want is people downloading the site more than once because they are using site cloners, which would grab all the video options and grab the reposts in later updates. Also, this happens when people share or hack user names.
I was not kicked off or anything, I was more or less just asked to "slow down and stay a while" I believe was their exact words.
|
07-16-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
8
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(dingle's Reply)
Hum....the only email I ever got from them was them crying about how fast I was downloading everything. This was about 2 years ago though and I have never intended on rejoining this site. I did not look but I do not remember rating it all that high either.
|
07-16-09 12:30pm
|
Reply
9
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Review
from messmer:
I, too, agree with your review. Abby Winters was the first site I ever reviewed and I was very enthused about it and gave it a high score. I re-subscribed as a returning member recently and let the subscription lapse because things had become so boring. I don't think I saved a single picture set because they lacked eroticism, same with the videos. I didn't have your patience, I usually stopped them and moved on to something else after enduring five minutes of idle chatter. If I were to write a review now it wouldn't be as low as yours but it would not be good! :-)
|
07-16-09 10:33am
|
Reply
10
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Never be afraid to call a site like you see it. I've gone against the popular vote more than once and even had to battle it out with an irate webmaster for it. But, if you can back your claim up with valid reasons, stand firm on your opinion. That's what this site is all about - actual user reviews
|
07-15-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
11
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
It's a shame to say it, but you're dead on with this. I'm not rejoining again either. I noticed a long time ago that the outdoor videos were grainy but, like you've noted, the pic sets and the videos in general have gone downhill. I never signed up to hear a girl yakking about what musical instruments she likes. First skin shows at 11:53 into a 15:59 video? I'll say it again - it's a damn shame.
|
07-15-09 01:10pm
|
Reply
12
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(dingle's Reply)
I missed your reply until now, but better late than never I guess. Thanks for your input - and saving me the $25. Sounds like this is everything a site can do wrong with a good concept.
|
10-12-09 04:54am
|
