Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : dracken (0)  

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428)

Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 318 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Elegant Angel

Elegant Angel
(0)
Reply of dracken's Comment from pat362:

If you check the con's in my recent review then you will see that they aren't being all that honest when it comes to which dvd's are available inside the members section. There are easily 6 dvd's that clearly state as being available but which aren't yet. They lost a couple of points for that one because it would take just a slight correction in wording.

I can't speak about the trial because TBP doesn't have any info and I very rarely buy trial memberships because what you describe is common in most of them.


10-03-12  07:23am

Reply
27
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from marcdc1:

Great review. Thanks for pointing out the videobox tie in. I just check out EA website but think I will try out their stuff on videobox 1st.

07-30-12  05:25am

Reply
28
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from RhyssAW:

As Creative Director of abbywinters.com I just wanted to clarify some points. All single and double masturbation videos are shot with just a camera and the model in the room. There is absolutely nobody else there, the operator sets the frame, lighting and sound and leaves the model in her room alone. This is designed to give the girl the most natural setting where she can masturbate to orgasm as she would normally do and offer the member the ultimate voyeur experience. All the girl boy shoots are done with real life couples, however the girl-girl shoots are almost always shot between non real life couples.

As mentioned in the review our site is about representing girls as naturally as we can, they all wear their own clothes and have complete control over how revealing they choose to be. We want to show real girls having fun and engaging in natural and provocative activities. That is why we make many of the stylistic choices observed in this review.

Whilst we feature amateur models we do pride ourselves of having high technical standards. So it was a bit of a surprise to read in this review that the video quality was criticized. We are all about keeping the focus on the model and not placing all of our efforts on technical quality but we still believe the standard of our videography and editing is strong and represents our girls well. We also have a range of quality equipment we use to achieve the naturalistic look we aim at.

Also I wanted to mention some features that have been added to the site around the time and just after this review that are exciting:

- mystery shoots- something never been seen before on abbywinters.com (some examples- girls commentary of girl-girl scene, orgasm race & POV Go Pro double masturbation video)
- radio podcast- 'girls talk' features girls talking about sex, last episode featured the topic of 'the female orgasm' with a live in-studio orgasm.
- aw education- models asked questions from topics (potential partners, sex, relationships and internet dating) with the view of informing men about women's issues.
- editor's choice- a fetish selected by the editors where the best compilation of footage from that fetish is compiled from our archive. Some examples are large breasts, hairy, red-head and peeing.

We also have plans to continue adding these bonus features to the site and advancing the innovation of the content we are releasing.


Rhyss


07-18-12  01:15am

Reply
29
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from elephant:

Yeah good review, the thing that keeps me away from this site is the price though, its a little on the pricey side for me, or at least make the site come with wakeupnfuck.

I really like Pierre and if I come into a bit of money I'd maybe join both sites but until then I'm gonna stay away for now.


07-10-12  04:54am

Reply
30
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from graymane:

Having seen about a couple dozen clips of this guy (Pierre) doing his casting thing, I became rather intriged with his routine step by step method of carrying on his interviews, Having his interpreier present, and ultimately his predictable finally of sexual positions and variations of places he wanted to put his dick.
Pierre, for his greater age difference with his younger, seemingly innocent partners, and all his vigorous bedroom sexual acrobatics, comes off doing pitifully little to impress me that he has what it takes. Now, the unusually desirable girls who surrender themselves to this unconvincing lothario is something else. You said it right about the type of girls he gets having that something extra.

Excellent review, dracken.


07-09-12  07:57pm

Reply
31
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from RustyJ:

Excellent review! One of the sites I need to join to see myself some day in any case. Woodman has been a favorite ever since the early Private days.

07-08-12  11:16pm

Reply
32
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from slutty:

Nice review dracken, I totally agree with your feelings on the HC scenes that feature pierre (I find them to be very subpar), although he does have some non-tripod stuff (with other men) which is pretty well shot. He definitely gets some of the hottest euro ladies around. I'm not sure why wake up and fuck isn't a part of this site, it is tiny, and overall pretty worthless as a standalone.

07-08-12  10:46pm

Reply
33
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from pat362:

Another great review. You are pretty dead on on everything and although I agree that BCC and ECC are similar sites. To me they do not come anywhere close to this site when it comes to the quality of videos. Pierre is a true filmaker so he understands how to use a camera which I find is not the same with the other two sites.

I plan on joining is site soon. It's a must if you want to see some really hot European girls do exclusif hardcore porn or first time anal and dp's. I'm sure money has something to do with why they accept to do this stuff with Pierre but it has to be a lot more than that because if it was only money then many others could copy him. I know there is no one other than maybe ED Powers that has managed to get so many exclusif things from girls and Ed isn't really doing this stuff.


07-08-12  06:53pm

Reply
34
Visit Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from mbaya: (dracken's Reply)

I am glad to be of help. Keep in mind that many of the models are not spectacularly beautiful. If that is what you are thinking when you say the quality of the models, you may be disappointed.
Mostly what you get here are ordinary looking women. This works for me.


07-08-12  05:14pm

Reply
35
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (dracken's Reply)

No but I'm way too picky to ever see that and I'm a past member so the total number of new videos that I downloaded this time around is rather small compared to past visits. My last review was in 2009 but I did join after that. it's just that I didn't bother posting a review of the site. I often skip posting a review if there is not much to add to my old review.

07-02-12  05:35am

Reply
36
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Claypaws: (dracken's Reply)

Thanks dracken. MetArt is one of my regular sites that I join from time to time. I am a current member of it and I usually find something I like there. Was hoping for more of a solo photography without masturbation angle from X-Art but your review is very clear about what it actually does have.

06-27-12  04:20am

Reply
37
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from Claypaws:

Another totally excellent review giving a great insight into the feel of the site. I read it after seeing RA's brilliant and more recent review. You both give a consistent impression. Since I do not care for video, bg, gg, toys or outdoor, I think it leaves not a lot for me! But that is the excellent thing about a detailed review and something that can never be deduced from the score alone.

06-26-12  09:53am

Reply
38
Visit Ten.com

Ten.com
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from rearadmiral:

Thanks for the review - and the warning. I could understand them offering a better price for streaming and a higher price for downloads, but to just eliminate downloads seems to be a bad idea. No downloads is pretty much a deal-breaker for me.

06-18-12  01:30pm

Reply
39
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(0)
Reply of dracken's Comment from pat362:

You can add that it appears to already be a dead site since they haven't updated with any new scenes since I joined and there aren't any annouced coming up.

This is your typical BS site that's added to a dying network. of the 13 most recent updates. Only 5 are exclusif. The rest are all leased scenes that can be found on many other sites and I dare say of equal or superior quality as here.


06-17-12  12:19pm

Reply
40
Visit Yank My Plank

Yank My Plank
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from Gazette Risque:

Great review!

Saw this site pass a couple of times and always figured it'd be crap.
Thank you for confirming my suspicions ;)


06-12-12  06:15am

Reply
41
Visit My Teen Oasis

My Teen Oasis
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from lk2fireone: (dracken's Reply)

I'm sure that a lot of the videos at this site are old.

But that's not what I meant when I said the content is dated.

When a photoset or video is posted at a site, and they also give the date of posting, some reviewers say the content is dated. That gives the viewer an additional bit of knowledge.

Other sites do not date their content, so the viewer has no idea when the content was posted.

Obviously, posting date is not the same as the date the photoset or video was created. But it's still better than no date at all.


06-10-12  11:03pm

Reply
42
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from Tree Rodent:

I'd have joined this one years ago if not for one of the biggest negatives of all as far as I'm concerned - pre checked cross selling. I never trust my credit card or money with anyone who tries to con me or trick me.

06-04-12  06:45am

Reply
43
Visit Young Porn

Young Porn
(0)
Reply of dracken's Comment from Marcus:

Good to know - thank you.

If a trial isn't an accurate representation of the site, then to me that site isn't worth joining, especially if it sends you on a wild goose chase through various portals and networks (which I always HATE).

At least finding this out only cost you a few dollars, though, and not a full membership.


06-04-12  04:36am

Reply
44
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from lk2fireone:

You write "It's always hard to review a mega site like this one", but this is, as usual, an excellent review, with lots of details and opinions.

06-03-12  02:35pm

Reply
45
Visit Nylons X

Nylons X
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (dracken's Reply)

As you already know, the Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash) keep adding new sites to attract more members. While they don't update many of their older sites. This site was started in February of this year, and it's already stopped updating.

The preview pages of Nylons X show many airbrushed photos. But that is just to make the preview more attractive. The videos and photosets inside the site are not airbrushed. The photos are the standard screenshots of the video shoots, and have little erotic or artistic content, unlike what you will find at metart or mpl studios.

And the videos are of lesser quality than what you will see at many of the other Royal Cash sites.

The theme/gimmick for the site is girls wearing nylons or pantyhose. So they dress the models in nylons. But no real effort is made to emphasize the sexy aspect of lingerie. There is no striptease in the act, little effort to make undressing sexy or erotic. It's more like teen girls, who happen to be wearing nylons, getting fucked in the standard Royal Cash manner.

I doubt the site will appeal to people who want to see striptease, lingerie, or eroticism. The site is the standard bread and butter sex you see at most of the Royal Cash network. And the site is small, only 25 videos, and it's already stopped updating.

So if you are a member of the network, it's worth checking the site out to see if you can find anything interesting. But don't expect a lot. There are other sites in the network with better videos.


06-03-12  01:55pm

Reply
46
Visit Dancerbating

Dancerbating
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from BabyGetReal: (dracken's Reply)

Hi, dracken. The videos appear to me to be high resolution -- very crisp. Also generally the lighting is fine, and the videography seems good -- that is, no extreme closeups -- mostly views of whole body. In fact, sometimes they could zoom in a little more.

05-29-12  03:58pm

Reply
47
Visit Mom Loves Mom

Mom Loves Mom
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from messmer: (dracken's Reply)

Hi Dracken, I too have the highest regard for Epoch because they are very trustworthy and honest in my opinion. I have never had a problem when it came to a charge or cancellation. As to their support, just for the fun of it I wrote another email to them the other day and they responded quickly.

I was less than pleased with their answer though. All that support mentioned was that I should have tried their on-line help first, ignoring the fact that I had done exactly that and had told Epoch so in my email to them. I told him/her: never mind following up any further in connection with this site (or sites owned by this company), I don't care if I ever use it (them) again. And that I only asked from idle curiosity why I was banned, but if it was too much trouble to dig into the reason why, to forget about it.

Your advice re. passwords is appreciated. I have been getting a bit careless and will follow it! Thanks.


05-28-12  07:29pm

Reply
48
N/A REPLY TO #9 from BadMrFrosty: (dracken's Reply)

If all you want to do is browse the internet and watch movies you could get a competent tablet for less than $100 :)

05-21-12  02:25am

Reply
49
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (dracken's Reply)

Thanks for the info. I'll be able to spread the good news.

05-20-12  12:19pm

Reply
50
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review from joekramer08:

I actually liked the "formulaic" nature of the videos. They choose sexual positions and camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body. So I don't mind that it's repetitive, because I know that for each girl I'm going to get some excellent full-body angles of her that really show off her figure.

I also like the "static" camera work. For me there's nothing worse than when a girl is stripping and the camera man zooms in really close on just her face, or just on her ass. I can't appreciate a girl's figure when the camera is two inches from her butt cheeks and is looking up at her. There is a benefit to just having the camera sit still for a while so you can take in a girl's body. Most sites spend so much time zooming in on ass cracks that by the end of the scene I could barely even tell you what the girl looks like other than her ass crack. In scenes from other producers I often feel like the camera man is on crack and has A.D.D., like he can't sit still and let the camera linger for a bit. When I watch porn, I want to see a lot of long shots to get a feel for the girl's entire figure. Anyway, to each his own...but some of things you considered negatives are actually positives for me.


05-18-12  04:09pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 318 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.25 seconds.