Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Comment
from nygiants03:
Thats cool i guess. Maybe they can get some better looking models from there. I also noticed they added a survey in the members area.
|
06-26-07 01:00pm
|
Reply
27
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from BostonPJR:
Besides, Qual certainly isn't the first to give this site a 100 or near-100. It's clear the site is well loved by many. (why on Earth have I not joined ...?)
|
03-28-07 05:06pm
|
Reply
28
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from BostonPJR:
Good, detailed and useful review.
|
03-28-07 05:01pm
|
Reply
29
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from roseman:
Good review, thanks for the info qualsite34
|
03-28-07 08:24am
|
Reply
30
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mudman:
(qualsite34's Reply)
Please don't think I was just picking on you. These 100's have been bothering me for a while and yesterday was my day to snap on it.
Unless you can measure it with some sort of ruler, when isn't it subjective.
Anyway, I agree, Abby Winters is the benchmark, standard bearer, leader of the pack, for amateur sites and I'd go further and included commercial sites as well. There's not a better site out there considering all things. They do some much brilliantly, but they're not perfect. You said as much in your reply and gave Abby a 100. To me it's a 98.
Perhaps the real issue is this cancer of grading on a curve. Sure made a lot of parents and teachers happy, but it is to education what the Ford Mustangs of the late seventies are to the Mustang line and cars in general. An ill conceived inflation of a good idea.
So forgive me, but I just couldn't take it any more.
Mudman
|
03-15-07 05:25am
|
Reply
31
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from SnowDude:
I agree with what everybody said, especially the part about it not seeming like a real review. The pros part is ok if he loves it that much, but the rest seems like an advertisement. It is definitely not helpful to the site to have him give it a 100 because no site is perfect. The only way I'd probably give a site a 100 is if they hand delivered everything to my house and I got to meet with the performers! But, as roseman pointed out, I would like to hear what he has to say because many have rated this site only a couple points lower than 100 and maybe it has fufilled all his needs, which would be awesome if I could find that for myself.
|
03-14-07 07:07pm
|
Reply
32
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from turismo:
Its not the 100 score that bothers me as much as the lack of an actual review.
I still don't know whether the site has DRM, the amount of content available or anything else for that matter.
Some more information would be helpful, especially regarding content, download speeds and updates
|
03-14-07 06:26pm
|
Reply
33
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from mudman:
100% Give me a break.
I've been a member off and on and on again for years. True, Abby's one of the very best out there, if not the best, but 100 %? I just can't agree with any 100 % for any site. Sorry
|
03-14-07 08:12am
|
Reply
34
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from Drooler:
I agree especially with this review. The site is a very good value, possibly the best (?), especially now that 1536px shots have become the norm since at least Feb. of this year. This makes it superior to ATK Premium, which costs the same and offers fewer pic sets per day at the same size.
The videos are below par in quality, though, and specific "encounters" are divided up into MANY small files strewn over several weekly offerings -- very annoying if you're into vids.
|
03-11-07 01:56am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
