| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from Gazette Risque:
I fully agree with you on the quality of the websites, though the navigation could use a bit of a make over in my opinion.
As for the fact that the other websites are not included, this really annoyed me at one point.
Also, for some reason I was waiting for something spectacular from this website.
Like a drill-do that just goes berserk and REALLY messes up a girl or whatever. Just something that we have never seen before.
Though that video is still to be made by Kink.com...
Otherwise a fun website for sure. Great review!
|
06-05-12 08:58am
|
Reply
2
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from Yanks:
Wow, thanks for such a spectacular review. You highlighted so many of the things we strive for in such a positive light and that feels very rewarding. Billie and I always pass along every review to our team, and while we don't get many negative ones, this is a gem of a review to share. Thanks again and we are very glad that you enjoy the site.
Todd
|
06-04-12 08:17pm
|
Reply
3
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Comment
from Micha:
Yes, Simon Wolfe is a hardcore horndog, but SimonScans doesn't have a penis anywhere in the site. Its been a couple of years since I was last there, but I found the videos to be unremarkable. While the stills are amazing, the vids are very deletable
|
06-30-11 01:08pm
|
Reply
4
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from GCode:
Ughh, thanks for pointing out this is a streaming site only. I was pretty excited at the content of this site after seeing the tour because it reminds me of the site College Fuck Fest which I rented a few DVD's back in the day when I rented stuff and enjoyed the content. But, I can't join a site that only streams, I'm a fan of downloading so I can watch at my leisure and especially now that my time to watch has diminished a lot lately. Thanks for the review.
|
08-27-10 08:31pm
|
Reply
5
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(qualsite34's Reply)
I recently signed up for AT Movs and there is a network of sites you get with the membership -- including Teen Sex Mania. It's a great network!
BTW, you are correct AT Movs hasn't made the leap to HD.
|
07-03-09 08:15am
|
Reply
6
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from rome476:
Can anyone compare this site with ATMOVS It sounds like this has better produced and photographed sets but I was wondering if anyone has had subscriptions to both. Also, is there any overlap between the content? Thanks if you have any information.
|
07-02-09 07:06pm
|
Reply
7
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from lk2fireone:
I really like the design of the site that allows you to preview:
-what the models look like.
-the quality of the model pix (quality of the pix is poor to OK, definitely not high quality).
-the quality of the videos. Good quality videos: sharp, crisp focus, good flesh colors, good lighting.
In a PU poll a few days ago, the question was asked: "In a porn shoot, how important do you think the setting and decor is?"
This is supposed to be a "reality site", where no effort is made to dress up the models or the action in the videos. The setting and decor are two steps below Hamburger Helper.
I'm not looking to join this site anytime soon. My personal taste is more for glamor pix.
But your review is nice: short, yet covers the essential points.
|
03-12-09 11:03am
|
Reply
8
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from uscue:
(qualsite34's Reply)
I tried the trial maybe a month ago, maybe longer. The trial was almost completely worthless, nothing like a Reality Kings or Bang Bros or Brazzers trial. Couldn't download on the trial either. I don't know if you have the full or trial membership though. But either way, it was a bad first impression for me, don't know if I'll go back.
Also missing a few updates that I saw on the tour.
|
03-12-09 10:39am
|
Reply
9
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Penelope:
(qualsite34's Reply)
broke down strippers would not be my way of putting it.
Comparing us to the 1000's of sites that offer non-exclusive content.
We are a homemade paysite. I would expect you to compare us to other homemade paysites. We do not try to compare to Twistys or FTVgirls.
Look at the other homemade sites and see if they offer custom videos for members, or video quality even half the size we have.
|
07-23-08 07:32am
|
Reply
10
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from ace of aces:
(qualsite34's Reply)
ok, now i know that i don`t try that site..i am a video lover :)
|
07-23-08 02:27am
|
Reply
11
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from Penelope:
well first of all it would have been nice if you were not happy to contact me. We have several sites I could have switched you with if you did not like this one. Even the one girl you said you did like has her own site.
Anyway you can see our pictures on the tour so not sure why that changes after you join. The pictures on the tour are the same ones in the members area.
Every video on the site is in HD. Some we have added a bigger file for and even the older ones too.
Some of your review is just trash talking so it is hard to even say anything and still be nice about it. Our site is made, filmed and ran by the ones in the videos. I am even in the videos so it does not make me happy to hear your childish remarks. Good luck finding your super model site and I hope you feel better about yourself by talking down to others that worked really hard to make their own site.
|
07-22-08 06:29pm
|
Reply
12
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from TheRizzo:
(qualsite34's Reply)
When I was last in the site that was not my impression at all. There were a good number that definitly came off as shot themselves but to me personally a lot of the shots and quality made me doubt others as well. Just an opposing view for others to look into for the site vs your review. Grain of salt.
|
07-22-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
13
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from TheRizzo:
My one complaint with the site was that a lof of the photos looked like they were not in fact shot by themselves. Sure it could have been on a timer but I still found myself believing it was staged and not true amateur girls shooting themselves which I find incredibly hot.
|
07-21-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
14
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Davit:
(qualsite34's Reply)
You said 'best is an objective term'. For something like porn, that relies on personal tastes, I would suggest it is entirely subjective.
|
01-11-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
15
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from PosterDude:
Do not beleve review. This site is one of best on
the internet. I joined over 100 site in 10 years and this site has best girls, best video, best picture quality. Some shots are very vaginal, that is true. Most shots are glamure. He must not be member, old videos are available.
This persons review is not to be trusted. Look at other reviews.
|
11-27-07 05:22am
|
Reply
16
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(qualsite34's Reply)
I just checked and it looks like that one is also already listed.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedcollegegirls/
If it helps, there's a step-by-step guide to using our SEARCH feature at:
https://www.pornusers.com/announcements.html#524
Let me know if I can help further.
|
10-09-07 11:09am
|
Reply
17
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(qualsite34's Reply)
Sorry, I was going by the URL you sent me in email which was the site I posted here. I'll be happy to look into the other you've (now) provided and barring any snags, the TBP Editors will get it added w/in the next few days.
Be aware, if it's a clone of the other site, it may will NOT qualify for a listing.
|
10-09-07 11:06am
|
Reply
18
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(qualsite34's Reply)
As mentioned, if you'll email us with the URL of the pay site in question, we'll be happy to take a look at it.
BTW, the site you've mentioned (I think) is already listed.
See: https://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedteens/
|
10-09-07 06:36am
|
Reply
19
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(qualsite34's Reply)
For sites not listed on porn users, try e-mailing porn users at "contact us" at the bottom of the page. Porn users has been very responsive in my experience.
Jay
|
10-09-07 05:59am
|
Reply
20
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from troglodite:
Ouch - sorry to see the snookering you got caught by. Yeah it is a rule of thumb that those checkboxes are generally "in addition to" the cost of the site you were actually trying to join. I've actually not seen any site trying to hawk anything more than a trial membership off with that option. Pretty shady if you ask me. You might consider putting a warning note on the Exploited College Teens site (if you haven't already).
That said, I'm with you on this site - very staged (there's no such thing as reality porn) and very amateurish. I'd be surprised if anyone really thought they were getting their money's worth here, but you never know. Although - he does have an Ellie Idol episode up, and that's worth a lot by itself :)
|
10-08-07 03:23pm
|
Reply
21
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Comment
from roseman:
Thanks for the info
|
09-03-07 09:26pm
|
Reply
22
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from Drooler:
This review really sums up at lot of what I think has happened with the site as well and how I feel about it. The "Premium" label is now like a 93 octane tank filled with 87.
If they'd make their videos HD, their pics 3000, the poses more erotic and less routine, and the models in greater variety, then they'd be premium again.
|
09-03-07 05:27am
|
Reply
23
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Comment
from Khan:
In future, this kind of "add on" would probably work best as a "Follow-Up" to your original Review.
|
09-03-07 05:17am
|
Reply
24
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(qualsite34's Reply)
I do remember when ATK had the AMKingdom logo instead of the ATK one, and do believe their main office is in Florida. The CS rep that responded to my email kept mentioning UK and members "favourite" model instead of favorite. I actually wrote to complain to them also about the treatment of some of the models in the behind the scenes clips. If you have watched any of those, everyone from the photographer to the hairdresser/make-up person, and the woman who asks questions have British accents.
In one though, with Eve Angel, they go to Hungary, her home country, and have her walk around the cities with them explaining history. She speaks and understands very little English. They start asking her the dumbest questions, "What happened at this spot in 1958?" because there is a marker that says 1958. She was born in the early 80s. Also, "Could you point at that building and tell us what it is?" It was obvious that pointing is seen as rude in Hungary. She says no. They continue with these boneheaded questions. Then it hits a boiling point when the cameraman asks her to, "dance a little" thousands of Hungarians walking around. She says no. He says, "Ok, show us something." She says no. He asks something else, the woman with him asks something else. Finally, Eve says, "I'm not doing that! All the f*cking Hungarians around, it is not right!" she also tells them she is not happy with the shoot, they are being too personal that she is there to model.
I expect this type of badgering from some of our US sites like Bang Bus who are in it for humor as well as sexy. But I thought it was really sad for the ATK sites to badger a model like this. She was fine with spreading nude, in privacy, for the behind the scenes, changing clothes in front of them, everything, but you could tell they went too far by going against Hungarian customs.
See, I'm on the opposite end as you when it comes to women. Being from California, most of the US pornstars look just like girls I see everyday out here. I have some US models I like, Eva Angelina, Aria G, Teagen for example, but I tend to prefer the Euros. Even so, didn't want you to think I was trying to debate your score. I was mainly just letting you know what they had told me.
|
07-07-07 09:04pm
|
Reply
25
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
from exotics4me:
qualsite34,
I too have wondered about the Premium label. I wouldn't have posted this if I hadn't seen where you are from USA like I am. Seems they speak a different English than we do, according to the email that I received back from them, "ATK Premium is a collection of the best from each of our sites, ATK Galleria, ATK Hairy, ATK Exotics, based on model popularity."
Which does make some sense when you think of it. Kind of like a Greatest Hits cd or Best of cd. I explained to them that I thought maybe it would be higher quality on the pictures and/or videos. Their reply back, "If it were higher quality video and pictures; don't you think we would be charging more for it than we do for the other ATK sites?" I thought about digging a hole to bury my head in!
|
07-02-07 05:41am
|
