| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from dieselman:
(Denner's Reply)
Hello Denner, I see this is not a first time you are spreading your dislikes about us but I never read any real reason for that in your topics.
Today you are talking about non exclusiveness of our content, saying that nothing is exclusive on our sites.
This is kinda begging for a harsh reply. My guess you know close to nothing about us. And since you are not really replaying to the original complain by tangub , I also guess you are just a "big fan" of us for some hidden reason.
Let me give you a little intro about exclusivity of our sites, something you have missed:
- 95% of our content is exclusive. About 70% of it I film myself.
- We were first to put our solo girls on live cams and we have these exclusive live cams until today, at no additional cost for our members. There are about 6-8 hours of live shows from our top girls everyday and they are very popular.
- A lot of our girls, we find ourselves and we are very good in bringing amazing faces and personalities and in most cases they are also willing to share their hardcore life. We film rare girls in hardcore action.
- Talking about exclusivity, everything is made by us here, starting from access system to our member areas, we never work with outside firms and our latest member area platform, called Lioness, is another state of art technology we created ourselves.
- We are even filming scenes exclusively per member wish and we released quite a lot of scenes which our members planned.
- Our approach to run our sites as itself is exclusive in all possible ways. When we start to working on new project, we always start with, lets make it different.
- We have currently 8 active sites and all of them are full of exclusive content and we are growing in mad speed.
I would love to hear some real complains, otherwise, please don't trash discussion here as we are trying to get in contact with our members and improve our services.
|
10-25-11 02:46pm
|
Reply
252
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner, you might be right when it comes to the videos. The reason this might not have been obvious to me is because I don't look at all updates indiscriminately. I go to search and click on lingerie, panties, stockings, sheer and usually get what I am looking for. I wish there were more content like that overall but the site nevertheless deserves the high score, in my opinion, because the lay-out, the quality .. everything .. is top notch and the videos we might find boring might very well be enjoyed very much by the multitude. Or, in my case, since there is the possibility that I find something boring because I've become jaded, I have to make sure I don't make a site suffer for it in the score I give it. :-)
|
10-21-11 10:24am
|
Reply
253
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from juanchopancho:
Good find, this one gets added to my favorites.
|
10-19-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
254
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Capn:
Yes, it is getting a bit creaky in some respects.
Perhaps the page format & their policy re. updates.
I don't think it is that surprising though given the amount of content they are getting through.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:47am
|
Reply
255
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monty4321:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner thanks for replying, so you've seem some of what I absolutely. Would you be able to help with the following that I posted:
I need help choosing a decent site to check out. I prefer a mixture of both videos and photos - with more of a concentration on photos.
PHOTOS:
good quality without heavy editing (natural is more preferred)
fully body shots
not a huge fan of close ups - occasional close-ups are fine
not a fan of anal - keep it minimum
Ethnicity - I like variety (it's not a must, but it would nice),
age group - not real preference [(20's through mature (40's)]
size - petite through thick
Poses:
need a variety
woman lying on back with legs spread and a little spreading, etc.
VIDEOS:
a little HD. variety: some hardcore, softcore, female masturbation
option to download videos as clips is a must.
I tried ATK exotics, ATK galleria and ATK premium. I haven't tried any of the other ATK sites yet.
|
10-17-11 04:10pm
|
Reply
256
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
They've just started with Kitty Jane (as "Romana"). My GOD, she's amazing! The kind of girl that you look at and just go, "WOW! I mean, INCREDIBLE!"
"Beyond HOT!"
|
10-15-11 08:01am
|
Reply
257
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner, much obliged. I just put this site under "my favorites" to be subscribed to next. It really appeals to me. It was the "Glamour" that made me nervous and you have put that unease to rest.. :-)
|
10-14-11 10:24am
|
Reply
258
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
Are they usually starting out fully clothed or only partially?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-13-11 09:23am
|
Reply
259
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner, sounds great! I am looking for a solo girl site but am afraid to find models with their faces caked and glistening with make-up.
I'll take the tour again and will have a closer look.
|
10-13-11 09:12am
|
Reply
260
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Capn:
Another question,
From the tour it looks to be pretty well exclusively nude material, with the exception of the odd set of hose.
Is there any proper stripteas material here?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:06pm
|
Reply
261
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from messmer:
Looks like a good site, Denner. One question: because glamour often means way too much make-up (as in DDF) are the models heavily made up or do they look more natural? Thanks.
|
10-12-11 11:59am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(Denner's Reply)
Totally agree: the old facial with perfect timing where the man pulls out at the last second and cums over the pretty face is best of all for me. Seeing a man jerk off for a half minute while the girl's face waits patiently and tries not to look bored is not that great a "happy ending."
|
10-08-11 05:35am
|
Reply
263
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah, I like photosets to start where things start, with some sexy facial expressions and alluring eyes, and some threads to peel off as the girl is showing you what she got.
So why MC-Nudes prefers to start at a later point is beyond me ... with pics, anyway. Now with vids, it's a different story with Ze Droolah. I like to get them started "in the middle," assuming they're hardcore. (Not MC-Nudes, of course, but hardcore from other points of access.)
I suppose that sounds kinda of inconsistent. Well, it is. And weird, 'cause it's softcore with foreplay but "straight to it" when there's actual sex.
I just don't understand it myself.
|
10-05-11 12:36pm
|
Reply
264
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
So far there doesn't seem to be any overlap. Take the model "Gloria" for example. She has a number of sets at Young Legal Porn and she is the sole model at Skinny Super Girl and there was no real overlap. Sometimes the video from a shoot would be on YLP and the photos at SSG, but no real overlap.
I'll definitely be putting a review up, but I can say for certain that the score will be MUCH higher than 62. This is a great network for those who like these models.
|
10-05-11 08:54am
|
Reply
265
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner,
Speaking of Zombies (and with all due respect to Rod Argent), I've just noticed that some of the photo content of Lizzie Ryan that was on Teenrotica has been showing up at MC-Nudes. The pics are bigger, but fewer. The Teenrotica stuff of course takes you through a big, long stripping session, with lots of pics, but the MC-Nudes starts kind of "in the middle," shall we say.
FYI ...
|
10-02-11 08:24am
|
Reply
266
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(Denner's Reply)
Hmmm I will have to join up Teen Dreams, but the ones at http://www.vivthomas.com/home.php seemed good quality to my old eyes LOL.
|
09-21-11 01:16pm
|
Reply
267
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Nick Spillum:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner, yes the main difference is in quality. All our scenes are available to download without DRM as CyberToad mentioned in 720p - currently 239 full scenes: http://www.vivthomas.com/videoByCategory.php/26/HD
|
09-21-11 06:57am
|
Reply
268
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from elephant:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner
That is one of the reasons yes that I wasn't crazy about, the confusion on what you got on the site you join as unsure why there is 2 sites which seem to share the main content, I think it would be much more better if they merged the 18 only girls and the Young Legal Porn. I've always joined the network but really confusing as to what you get on each site, much clearer to just have one.
Even when ou are on one of the 2 sites there seems little mention of the other sites you get with no link to the network sites they have, can't quite understand why they do that, be better to advertise the other network sites too but I don't see any mention of them in any link.
I have a feeling the confusion as to what you get is one of the main reasons this site is maybe passed by by people. And $39.99 for the network isn't that cheap when you compare it with Teen Sex Mania is it.
|
09-19-11 09:29am
|
Reply
269
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Khan:
We do show the date last updated as March, 2010
|
09-18-11 07:32am
|
Reply
270
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
I don't know what that "24b" means, either. They're 72 dpi (dots per inch), if that's part of any equation. It's a common resolution on the web, 72 dpi.
Anyway ... Teenrotica is what I call a "zombie" site, the kind that lives on well past its days of content-generating life. It's probably a decent "cash cow" for the owners, with no more content to produce and new subscribers coming along to plunk down their dough for a big fat download session.
The funny thing is, Denner, that I thought it deserved a 65 for the pics when I did my review of it 2007! I even said so, but gave it an 80 because of the vids! Ain't that a kick?
Well, these days, it ought to get a 65 just for being a dusty old zombie site, LOL.
Oh, BTW, it is exclusive material, so that speaks well of it. It's also the first site where I saw Lizzie Ryan! Yeeeeooowww!!
|
09-17-11 12:36pm
|
Reply
271
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
Let us know how you get on with the alternative billing issue, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-16-11 01:07pm
|
Reply
272
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
I knew there was a reason I am not currently a member...
That would do it! ;0)
Cap'n, :0/
|
09-16-11 01:00pm
|
Reply
273
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from elephant:
Hi Denner
Sorry can't help with this site just to say I too haven't seen anything new from her in a good while now, she is one of my alltime fav models and it would be great if this site was updating still, sadly though the updates page has been the same for ages too and no dates.
|
09-15-11 05:26am
|
Reply
274
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from tangub:
I believe this site stopped updating in 2009. I was there in the back end of 2009 and the updates had already stopped and looking through the tour i don't see anything new from when i was there. I think they have removed the dates from the content to cover up the fact they are no longer updating so those poor quality 2011 vids you mention are probably a few years old. As a pic fan i quite enjoyed what i got from the site for what its worth but without updates i won't be going back.
|
09-09-11 10:19am
|
Reply
275
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from dracken:
Good review man. Sorry to hear that the site is not really up to modern day standards.
Since the site focuses on images, would you mind talking a bit about the images? Like what sizes do you get? If they are HD and competitive to Met-art or such sites I might maybe consider joining...
Thanks anyways for the work on this one :)
|
09-09-11 09:29am
|
