Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from otoh:
Aha - I was a member at Holly Randall a while back (will likely join again sometime) and remember that model. I find thenude.eu invaluable; a quick search there shows a few other sites you can find her:
http://www.thenude.eu/Tiana_4543.htm
|
01-06-12 07:28am
|
Reply
227
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from noche:
I was a member about six months ago. I believe the review from 2010 is still accurate. I found the site awful, but your experience may differ. I am only interested in higher quality video and downloads. I only found downloads available on 1/3 of the video that I was interested in, and of those only some of them were 720p or 1024x768. It's three slow loading page loads to get to the point where you find this out, so it's a slow going slog.
|
01-04-12 10:32am
|
Reply
228
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, it's too bad that governments and businesses do such a lousy job of managing money. Hell, they probably have no idea of how well we manage ours! Anyway, fuck 'em!
|
12-29-11 07:57am
|
Reply
229
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey, Denner: There are things in Pornoland that I simply cannot explain but I've found to be true. One is that "where there are toys, there's probably not much ass," but "where there are feet, there's probably ass." Kinda like prescription medications that have "alternative uses." And this site turned out to have a nice "toehold" on some cheeky stuff the way I like it.
As for the pics I wound up getting of the girls' feet in focus with their faces blurred in the background and so on, those have been popped into the trash can.
Thanks for the input. Happy New Year!
|
12-29-11 07:07am
|
Reply
230
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
You are welcome, my friend.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 06:31am
|
Reply
231
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Capn:
Well, the deal basically is that selected older items ( over 4 years old, I think ) from all their other sites is moved here.
It isn't just the amateur stuff.
If it is old but popular content, it has a fair chance of showing up here at some point.
As yet there is no content from Petites, as that hasn't been going long enough yet.
It is very good resource for photo freaks.
Especially to catch up on older content from sites you have never or seldom subscribed to.
Probably less use for video folk as the quality won't be state of the art.
Hope this helps.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 06:21am
|
Reply
232
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(Denner's Reply)
lol, you are quite funny. You have to understand that my reviews focus on the technical side of the sites :-)
But if it is not helpfull I won't review any more sites.
|
12-23-11 08:59am
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
"BTW: We've got a lot to thank Larry Flynt for...."
I can't stand Larry Flynt. He seems like a massive asshole. But I agree 100% with your comment that we owe him a lot. And not just those of us who like porn. He pushed freedom of speech for everyone. And the fact that he took Jerry Falwell down a peg or two didn't hurt either.
|
12-16-11 07:52am
|
Reply
234
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Denner's Reply)
As a very lazy person, I really appreciate hard workers like you guys.
|
12-14-11 09:34am
|
Reply
235
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the comments Denner. There still isn't a lot of HD material being added, but it is there. One big advantage to VB is that they let you tour through the entire site so you can make an informed decision on whether you want to join or not. They stress quantity over quality but are still an impressive site.
|
12-13-11 09:19am
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Denner's Reply)
No Denner, there's no basic change. It's just we hadn't had one for cartoon chr's before so we made an exception this time ... just as we did for several of your poll submissions. ;-)
|
12-13-11 07:45am
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Denner's Reply)
Ditto. I regularly check out my "favorites" stash but not "all the time." That's why I voted "other."
|
12-09-11 08:16am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
Tea is a Northern English term for the evening meal ;0)
|
11-28-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
239
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Radik:
We have content for Both the girls; when we bought the site we got alot of stuff. The problem right now is sorting it all.
We also bought out all the contracts for Theory so he's back shooting. We have new stuff coming in; and a mountain of stuff
to process. The solo sites will remain as a bonus site.
We might just take them down if they continue to cause issues. Just bonuses for the real site that is updating etc glamdeluxe.com
Problem is people are finding these bonus sites thinking it's all solo models; and I admit that seems like an issue.
|
11-27-11 05:14pm
|
Reply
240
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from tangub:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner there are currently 253 vids with an HD option on the site, doing a quick count up i found 106 with the HD WMV option, as far as i can tell everything released in HD since December 2010 has had the MP4 option.
|
11-18-11 08:00am
|
Reply
241
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes. It was pretty rare to see an HD scene in wmv format. I didn't download a lot from this site, but I only managed to get one HD scene in wmv. Most of them are mp4 and it looks like all new HD material is mp4 only.
Maybe tangub can add to this as he's got a membership here too.
|
11-18-11 05:47am
|
Reply
242
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks Denner. I appreciate your comments.
As for wmv HD, it really looks like they've decided that HD material will be in mp4 only. Those of us who prefer wmv are out of luck.
|
11-18-11 03:58am
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
I agree with Denner; I could do without seeing the feet. I have yet to figure out foot/footwear fetishism--different strokes for different folks--but I'm certainly not against seeing them in every photo or video I watch.
I have watched a number of videos only to realize at the end that I never saw any tits nor did their absence bother me, though they are definitely not hard on the eyes and can you ever really have too much boob? That being said, breasts are never my end goal in porn or in real life, otherwise I would be happy with softcore smut and living the life of a virgin as long as I just get to see and touch some breasts.
However if there is no pussy then I can assure you Turboshaft will protest! >:-(
|
11-17-11 06:46pm
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
In my day that might have worked, Denner. Many girls were coy and felt obliged to say no even though they meant yes ,, but nowadays .. no way.
I would take "no" to mean no and stop immediately. In any case in my youth I always stopped when I got a no. Might have missed some adventures but I never believed in playing games.
|
11-14-11 09:39am
|
Reply
245
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Capn:
Thanks for drawing my attention to this & NU Dolls too.
TBH I had missed both of those. :00
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-04-11 07:29am
|
Reply
246
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from monty4321:
(Denner's Reply)
So last night i made the dive into karups pc. I signed up for a membership.
Sorry guys but here's my first opinion thus far - buyer's remorse. :C
My two main disappointments are:
1) Pic sizes. Indeed the photos are 1500x1000 which are way too small. I have a 26 inch flat screen monitor.
2) Overall pic quality. Not good. If the quality was good, I can sacrifice the photo's size.
My disappointments are only based on viewing with a 26", so I may be a bit biased. That said, I think the pic sizes and quality are fine for someone using a standard laptop.
|
11-02-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
When the clothes go off and it's not nearly as good as you thought it would be, Mr. Johnson heads for the golf course, so to speak.
That NRPS title ("Better Every Beer") reminds me of an experience I had once. It took a LOT of beer, that's for sure. Nothing happened outside of playing around, but then she was calling me a lot. And man, I don't know what had gotten into me, 'cause we're talkin' SEA HAG!
And then she was saying I was gay because I wasn't hot for her any more and trying to embarrass me in front of a bunch of people, about half of whom were gay, by the way, so that made lots of sense. LOL.
|
10-28-11 02:35pm
|
Reply
248
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Nubiles Captain:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks Denner, you beat me to it! The alternate billing is on the join page. It says Problems with CCBill? Join with Epoch Here.
|
10-27-11 08:44am
|
Reply
249
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from dieselman:
(Denner's Reply)
As you can see, I have nothing against negative comments, quite the contrary, love any critic, it makes my day when we get a change to improve our sites.
What I ask though is to keep discussion in line of the topic. So if our member express his opinion regarding the price of all our sites upgrade, it has nothing to do with questioning an exclusivity of our content. For the sake of order, it will be way easier to open a separate topic about that, rather then sticking the same issue all the time, especially when you post comments which are exactly the opposite of what we offer to our members. Makes no sense for me.
Of course, you can keep posting whatever you want, it was only my wish to keep it line and was not intention to limit your freedom of speech.
Would be happy to hear some real critic of yours regarding our sites as they are nowadays.
|
10-26-11 07:56am
|
Reply
250
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from dieselman:
(Denner's Reply)
BTW, I found your account with us, last time you joined our sites in 2009.
Looks like a good timing (and great price) to come back and finally let us solve all your issues. I am sure you will write a great new review, like Ego's review in Ratatouille :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IvnptQJ__U :)
We will eagerly wait for you, Sir!
|
10-25-11 05:02pm
|