| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Hot MILFs Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Wraith0711:
Yeah they were pricy out the door wanting full price for just a few scenes, they also have a new lesbian only site called excogi girls.
|
03-31-24 08:04am
|
Reply
2
|
Dirty D's Adult Web Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Wraith0711:
I clicked on the join links and it did go to a card processor.
|
12-06-23 05:55am
|
Reply
3
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from LKLK:
Go to the PU page:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_billing.html?id=44
That has the contact information for Rocketgate.
Their phone number. Which is active, and gives you a choice of contacting billing
Also, there's a link to customer service to cancel a membership.
Rocketgate is a reputable payment processor.
I've had one account with them for a Metart site for years.
I never contacted customer service, because I never had any problems with the membership.
But it should be fairly easy to cancel a sub.
Let us know if you have any problems.
If you do have problems, reach out to the PU staff, for assistance.
In the past (prior owners), they were more than willing to help PU members who had a problem with billing or membership issues.
When I say it should be easy, I don't mean it's easy. Rocketgate is not as easy to cancel a membership as CCBill or Epoch, which are easier to use.
But keep trying. It's frustrating to be billed for a service you don't want. I've been stung in the past by sites that didn't deliver the service they promised.
|
02-14-23 04:37pm
|
Reply
4
|
Sinful BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah its strange some sites remain unsecure still in 2022. Thanks for the warning
|
12-22-22 06:22am
|
Reply
5
|
Sinful BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Tom D Admin:
I visited the link without incident. But the site link is unsecured. Depending on your browser's security level settings, that can trigger a warning message.
Better safe than sorry. And there is no denying that a secure connection is preferable and the current industry standard.
I have reported your warning to the appropriate person to request an updated link. Or if necessary, it will be delisted. Thank you for your vigilance!
|
12-16-22 08:57am
|
Reply
6
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from marcdc1:
I'm currently a member. If they have a download limit I haven't hit it. And I've downloaded dozens of 1080 HD videos in a session.
Hope this helps
|
09-15-21 01:52pm
|
Reply
7
|
Lethal Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I'm currently a member there and it seems legit to me. One thing that did concern me was that when you go into a DVD to see the scenes there is an option to buy the scene for $5.99. My worry was that I paid for a subscription but all that did was get me behind the paywall and then I had to pay for each scene. But that doesn't appear to be the case.
But there's a caveat. When I joined LH I was having a credit card issue. I was getting strange charges from a VOD site. I cancelled that card so if any addition charges wouldn't show up anyway. But I have no reason to believe that there is anything shady about the site.
I posted a review recently if you'd like more information.
|
06-05-20 02:11pm
|
Reply
8
|
Adult DVD Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from AdultEmpireCash:
@pornpundit I'm sorry you are screaming right now that we do not offer downloads in our unlimited membership. If you are looking for downloads you are right Unlimited is not for you but we have thousands of customers who would disagree with your statement not to join streaming only sites. Streaming only might not be for you but I assure you there is a far greater percentage of porn watchers who stream only than download.
|
02-25-20 12:31pm
|
Reply
9
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from WeedLordVegeta:
They have gone back to something pretty close to their old subscription model, so it's not really all that bad from that perspective. That said, the site navigation is a bit of a mess right because it's still setup for their failed channel subscription model.
|
11-18-18 10:51am
|
Reply
10
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I read on another forum that they've recently scrapped their new model that required subscribing to individual 'channels' at a high cost and went back to their old model of one subscription gets you access to everything. I take it from your comment that this isn't your experience?
I'm a big fan of the site but there's no way I'll rejoin until they fix their billing model.
|
11-12-18 12:50pm
|
Reply
11
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from jook:
Thanks for the comment. Would you care to elaborate a little more? Previous comments (including TBP) inferred less than stellar quality, though that was a while ago. Are the videos HD? Are they updating? Another earlier complaint was that the scenes were very much alike.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
05-29-17 02:18pm
|
Reply
12
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from pat362:
The reason marcus gave seems logical but is it possible that they changed their name because they were having a harder time recruiting women to appear on their FA site because of their bad reputation with talent? Maybe they think that they can fool new girls in appearing on their new site since they won't equate the old FA with the new FF.
I would rather they went out of business but that's just me.
|
09-01-14 04:58pm
|
Reply
13
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Marcus:
I suspect it is probably because sites glorifying 'abuse' are likely to get blocked in certain countries (eg, the UK).
|
09-01-14 01:42pm
|
Reply
14
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Lews Therin:
I don't know the reason why they don't cooperate anymore, but it's one of the only bbw sites that has regular updates so I wouldn't be bothered by it tbh. Just make sure you read what your signing up for.
|
07-29-14 04:32am
|
Reply
15
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from pat362:
My rule of thumb is that if TBP doesn't want to do business with them they would you?
|
06-30-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
16
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
from Monahan:
The site's name says it all.
|
12-14-13 11:33am
|
Reply
17
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for reviewing this. I'm a big fan of BDSM stuff and might have considered joining this but, like you, I don't see the point if there is no sexual contact. You may have saved some of us some money here.
|
12-13-13 02:12pm
|
Reply
18
|
USA Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
from FuzzyBunny:
Any insight into whether new videos are actively being added? I liked this site's contents a few years ago, but I'm worried that not much has been added since then...
|
07-10-13 09:47am
|
Reply
19
|
High Def Teen Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from alexmedia:
That's true. TBP and PU should check their information.
|
01-10-10 05:09pm
|
Reply
20
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(pornpundit's Reply)
Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!
All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.
To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.
Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"
|
07-15-08 10:24am
|
Reply
21
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Khan:
We've looked at this several times now and don't see a problem. Each time we check, when we enter the id/pw/email and click the "join by credit card" link, it brings up the page where we'd enter CC info.
We can only suggest that you contact the site directly.
Sorry we can't be of more help but again, the site seems to be working fine for us.
|
07-15-08 08:58am
|
Reply
22
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from mr smut:
I would have been able to enter my credit card details ... strange isn't it? Have you tried to contact them via mail?
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-22-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
23
|
Dirty Director
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from HeatherMcXxx:
(pornpundit's Reply)
Hi pornpundit - I'm not sure what e-mail you're referring to. Sorry.
|
09-16-07 04:50am
|
Reply
24
|
Dirty Director
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from HeatherMcXxx:
Pornpundit, why not write an official review of the site? Or have you opted not to become a member based on your criticisms above?
|
09-15-07 08:49am
|
Reply
25
|
9Buck Fat Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Pelcito:
This site has been corrected and now you can download all content without any restrinction for a simple $9 monthly membership. There´re no limits of any kind nor any kind of extra charges.
For a $9 membership you can download all content in DVD Quality and have access to all bonus sites aswell. This includes access to watch and download over 5,000 movies in MPEG format at 640x480 (closest to DVD Quality), iPod format, WMV formats as well without any limits.
Thanks and hope you can still consider this site, as we understand is one of the best valuable offer over the net.
|
09-05-07 04:57am
|
