Well, as the Civil War was gaining steam, Maryland was definitely a southern state. Lincoln had to travel through it incognito to begin his presidency as people there were out to get him. Still, I wouldn't have guessed "southern porn," either. It is the decor, the occasional palm tree? Does Alex DeLarge speak with a drawl? Are Mili Jay and Judy (Lenka Horokova) from "south Czech"? Did I miss one of them smearing pecan pie all over herself?
Actually, it's not true of Eve Angel's site, as I'm a current member and none of its archives have been dropped and recycled as new.
It's a funny coincidence, but I just recently had to go into the early parts to redownload a couple of galleries, and since finding them was a chore due to the terrible organization of the Eve gallery collection, I went through all of the calendars from day 1. Finally found everything. Jeez, how many bath sets has she done?
But will Eve's site stay "new" day-to-day? Who knows? One big problem is a lagging pace of updates; it's currently behind by 6 days. I hate it when sites get behind schedule on the behind schedule ...
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I think the main thing she will need to do is just keep a steady update schedule going and continue the quality content. 21st Sextury for example, has in my opinion, about 50% of their content that I have never even looked at. I could say the same for Onebyday. With their re-launch, I haven't found more than say 25% of the new updates worthy of downloading. I'm not for sure if the top level models are cutting back on their work for other sites, but I'm an admitted snob when it comes to new models who really aren't separating themselves from the dozens of other new models.
Could be like I was telling Denner in another review that I've collected all of the material that I want from the top Euro sites and rarely do I find any new material on them that I want. Sort of a site burnout. When you think about it, there hasn't been any newer models in the Euro porn sites that has made herself an established star. It is still about those original 10-12 Euros being head and shoulders above the rest.
If you click on the words, "Announced yesterday" you'll go to the announcement w/ more details. Note the change was in TBP listings, not PornUser listings.
Yes, you are right. But also, I would say that it is important that you really like the site you chose in the first place, because, with this twice-a-week update system, after you have searched the archive, it's quite easy to get bored and have the temptation of cancelling the subscription right away.
Me, for example, I am a satisfied customer of Sweetsophiemoone.com, and I have stayed there for six months now, so I'm getting quite a lot of bonus sites. When I joined Footsiebabes, however, I didn't quite like the site, so I didn't want to keep paying for a site I didn't like just to get the bonuses...
So, if you are sure that you are going to like the site you join, a long-term membership is the best option; but if you only want to check it and look through its archive, 1 month will be more than enough, and the bonus sites won't be enough to keep you interested -I think.
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Sandra also has a great sense of humor. I don't know if I posted it here but when I was on her solo site before, I sent an email in and asked her if she was planning on doing any b/g scenes in the future. She has a b/g hardcore photo set out with 2 guys, but I want to see a video! I told her in the email that I had seen the video on clubsandy where she is sitting on guy's lap while he uses a dildo on her. Her reply was, "Silly, that my husband! I should never film video while horny!" She really does seem like a nice person, who enjoys what she is doing. I believe what will help Sandra's sites the most is her connections to other models. I would say in a year, if Sandra keeps everything going on these sites that the combo package of her site and Cruising Girls for $40 a month for both will be similar valued as pixandvideo w/clubsandy.
The previews show me that the site content has exactly what I like and that there's a ton of content that I have to look forward to, so the periodicity of updates really isn't much of an issue. It becomes one only after I run out of currently available content, which looks like it won't be happening soon.
I wished to have to review deleted due to my serious mistake which rendered it meaningless, but for some reason the webmaster refused. So I have edited what is here.
Oh, stop your whining, PinkPanther. I was totally up front about the kind of review I was posting -- with specific negatives *and* positives (this wasn't a hatchet job) -- and you and anyone else reading my review had every right to dismiss it if you saw fit.
More over, while I hadn't been a member in a year, I'd been a member previously not once but twice; I'd also revisited the ALS page several times since, including just before I wrote the review -- to gauge what sort of content was being featured, who the new models were, etc. I wasn't merely conjuring up a review from some distant past with an Alberto Gonzalez "I don't recall" sensibility.
If you found my review worthless, so be it. I imagine if I read all of your reviews, I might feel the same about something you've written -- and I'd ignore it because my experience (and taste) were different. What I wouldn't do is attack the user for posting a review that differed in assessment from my own, especially if that person made it abundantly clear how they'd arrived at their evaluation (and in what context).
You're right, you did make that clear enough. I wound up interpreting it as a "implied" message that it would be better if other reviewers waited at least a month. Well, that's my fault for laying that interpretation on it. Sorry about that.
And that definitely, since the reviews we write turn into pumpkins after one global orbit around the sun, it only follows that pumpkins don't qualify as newly dated reviews! (I read through that whole discussion about ALS Scan before coming back to reply now.)
Well, at least I know of ONE reviewer whose work I'll take with a measure of caution. ;)
What I'm about to say isn't intended to be taken personally, but I think I can give a "fair enough" review of a site even after having just joined.
We can only report on a site's history, whenever the time of the review may be. No matter what the time period is of my own subscription to one, there's no way of knowing absolutely for sure whether it will improve, get worse, or stay pretty much the same, during my subscription time or after it, as I see it myself.
So what's "fair" is fair at whatever time I write the review. There's no way that I can reliably choose a time that's going to be fairer than any other time.
I think you mean that your experience of a site during a subscription period may change the longer you are with it, and I can't argue with that. And when you write the review, you can feel more certainty that you are giving a richer account of your experience of it.
The trouble is, it is your experience, and not someone else's. So what I conclude is that no matter what any reviewer does to ensure that a review is "fair" in terms of choosing a time to write it -- unavoidably, in terms of their own experience -- there's no way of knowing whether it's going matter in the minds of other subscribers.
I've asked the webmaster here to delete my review. i saw the link you spoke of just now, it was not there previously, I know because I checked and double checked. It was not there.
I agree about DDF in the "Hall Of Fame". I once had a problem with one of their sites that took a few days to correct, and they gave me a free month membership to the DDF site of my choice!
Thanks for taking time to give us an honest review. Its reviews like this that we study to see how we can improve. We have been working hard and are going to work harder to get our photographers to direct better. We have been working with them hand in hand to teach them how to do it better, especially with the hardcore.
I do agree that our photographers who have shot some of the same girls as ALS and ALS has done a better in with some of the girls. In all fairness if we do compare ALS to Nubiles, I would like to point out that ALS uses one photographer, its much easier to keep the consistency. On the other side, using over 30 different photographers and allows more variety of girls, we would not otherwise have. And we need to have so many photographers to add so many new girls. Nubiles also updates way more content and new girls than ALS and doesn't rotate content in out like they do. This is not an insult toward them just two different ways sites can be run.
They also don't have many Russian girls which we have. The Russian culture is much different than USA or other parts of Europe and it can be very hard to get the girls to lose the serious attitude that deal with everyday. But on the other hand many of these girls are very popular and many members seem to love their content.
At the end of the day we are going to improve on the girls we can and we do have to, and when it comes to the girls who grew up with the USSR we ask ourselves are we better off with them or without them? I get feedback over and over again to keep getting those girls.
That's a very insightful and important point you made, in a well-thought out manner, about the excitement factor. (So I'm seconding jd1961's comment.) It's a problem with Nubiles for sure, and as you show via comparison with ALS, the problem most likely lies with those "directing" the model.
I guess the folks recently giving it 100's and 95's somehow hadn't noticed this problem. A-hem ...
What you've said and also what I've been noticing about the Eve-Lora-Mya triage (slowness with updates, recycling, and funky content like Lora and Mya's poorly lit photos of Euro-sex performances and visits to porn fests) add up to a general flagging in the "integrity" department.
I'd say at the moment, Eve's is the most "principled" in the continued offering of fresh content, bless her little heart, although they haven't had a blasted update this month since the 1st.
Thanks for the reply and relating your experiences about it.
It's too bad. I remember when I first stumbled on Eve's site, with months of content already there. Wow. I was entralled! Esp with Mia Stone and with Eve.
REPLY TO
#2
from troglodite:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Kimmy fans need to check out www.lillexy.com (not yet completed - she goes by Lexy now and has changed her hair color) and www.lillaura.com. Kimmy is all over the place at Lil Laura's site. I put a review of that site up a month or so ago. Don't get too crazy with excitement though...she's not in any of Laura's hardcore scenes, only the girl-girl ones.
REPLY TO
#3
from Boobs4ever:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
the reason I see why they dont take the hd route is because they want you to buy the dvd:s being realesed instead of download and get perfect qaulity I think Vividmovies have that strategic aswell when what Ive heard there quality isnt the best compared to other sites.
we reply to every single support ticket we receive. Please apologize if your ticket got lost somewhere - please send me an email to customersupport -at- adpayout -dot- com and I will take care of your case personally.
Hmmm, that's strange. I'll send you an e-mail via Pornusers right now and discuss the preview, as well as determine why I never received the e-mail from you.
Thanks. I found it. Didn't expect it because I didn't know where to look. I just wasn't thinking in terms of it being 4 clicks deep into the tour, but that's how it's set up.
Thanks for the heads up! I'd been through Nikky's site and am not so sure if it has had any further updates. "Ambra" is a gift from heaven! Verunka is a rare, mysterious, warm/cool type.
Maybe you'll do a review of this package? I'd really appreciate it if, assuming you do, you'll say how many galleries and videos are in each of the sites. I know it means "taking inventory," but I'm sure many PornUsers will definitely appreciate the effort.
Thanks again, PinkPanther! (Mancini music playing in the background ...)
08-25-0705:33am
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
