Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
2 sets a day
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money |
| Cons: |
Navigation not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Site is not quite as reliable as some others. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a member of this site 5 or 6 times over the years and keep forgetting to write a review. It keeps drawing me back.
Here's the good and bad (absolutely no ugly).
This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open. I've never used this word in a review before. Delicious.
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 3000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful unobstructed view.
So..what's not to like? Well...I know the webmasters are working on improvements, but there are a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best. I know they will be reading this so forgive me if I direct some of my points to them.
First, the navigation is a little off. there are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. Click back and you are taken back to the top of the gallery page regardless of where the image was that you clicked on. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I have been told they are working on fixing this and will happily report when it is fixed.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. |
|
08-30-14 09:40am
Replies (5)
|
Review
27
|
Fetish Network
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young attractive models.
Newer sites seem to have found a niche.
Newer video quality is good.
Site layout is pretty good.
Navigation is pretty good.
Videos are user scored on a 5 point scale.
Updates are dated.
Download speeds are OK.
Current sites are 1080p.
A few videos are 4k. |
| Cons: |
Many older sites no longer update.
The newer sites are not BDSM sites, they are "Simulated Peril" sites. (Can we coin that phrase, maybe?)
Only 1 update a week across all sites.
HUGE video blocking watermarks on every video
Infuriating page load delays until you scroll down to view the next sections.
Images but NO ZIP FILES!
File resolutions and sizes not listed.
Video file naming could be better.
Repetitive nature of themes is unfortunate.
Very limited set and male actor variety.
OH. Cancellation process is worst on Internet!
Cancel fine print says you have to cancel at least 30 DAYS prior to next billing. That's nuts! |
| Bottom Line: |
I'll start by saying that my review is primarily about the dedicated, updating micro-sites in this "network".
When it comes to BDSM material, I think the gold standard is probably the Kink network. That network provides a lot of really raw, tie-the-girl-down-and-make-her-come-a-million-times true BDSM that is consensual but incredibly intense. Some of it is a bit too brutal for me, though, although it is clearly all consensual.
In the middle, I don't know, several sites where a model/actress is tied down and you can't quite tell if she is acting or not when the guy puts a vibrator to her clit. BBB comes to mind, but there is a moderate amount of acting there.
Then there are these "simulated peril" sites. The girl is tied up loosely or only has her hands tied together during sex, with a backstory that implies peril. Sites in this category include the main micro-sites here and those on the sister site punishteens.com. These sites may have popular models and porn stars, but the scenes are nowhere near as intense as scenes found on true BDSM sites. (The best of this simulated type that I ever saw was on the Hustler site. Guy breaks in and attacks the girl, girl gets a gun, girl makes guy seriously fuck her, then at the end the girl points the gun at him and after fade-to-black, shoots him. Awesome Karma!) Sorry, I digress, but it was best-of-genre and memorable.
All that said, there are 7 micro-sites here that I consider current and not a purchased collection.
They are: (scenes in p
Teen Creeper (8 )
Teens in the Woods (12)
Helpless Teens (42)
Brutal Casings (56)
Brutal Pickups (12. last update: 5/16)
Sexual Disgrace (130. last update 8/16)
Strap-on Squad (60. last update 9/16)
Sexual Disgrace is a pretty good traditional dungeon-style BDSM site with a lot of content. Strap-on Squad is an all girl dungeon-style site. Both of these seem to be no longer be updating.
Note that there is 1, one, one, ONE primary male actor on all of the sites listed above, except Teen Creeper, and he is also often found on punishteens as well. He is a very, very busy guy.
There are also 11 "collection" sites that do not update, many of which are so old (i.e. 2011) as to be all medium to standard def. There are a total of about 1,130 videos in these collections. There is some true BDSM here and some good images.
Just in case you can't guess, here are the themes:
Teen Creeper: Break-in and forced sex. 1 or 2 girls. A few of these scenes are pretty good but all are nearly identical in format. This site uses a different male actor who is a good creeper.
Teens in the Woods: Girl(s) in the woods find their way to a house where a forest ranger serial rapist lives.
Helpless Teens: Stranded girls who need a ride do stuff in the front and the back of a van for that ride. Many get dragged back to a dungeon-like bed for additional sex.
Brutal Castings: Exactly as it sounds. Starts out nice, then the guy goes ape-shit on the girl, ties her hands and screws her.
Brutal pick-ups: Girl on a street gets pulled into an alley, hands tied and screwed.
They all sound pretty good, don't they? Well, although the first one of each of these that you watch will be entertaining (Ava Taylor in Brutal Castings, for example, or Gina Valentina in the first few minutes of Teen Creeper), they are all so similar that they quickly get boring. Add that the girls are usually not really tied up and are clearly just doing their usual porn acting stuff, complete with the usual porn sequences from blow job to money shot, and the whole thing goes pretty limp. Honestly, the best part of each scene is the moment when the guy "grabs" the girl and you can't quite tell if the initial reaction from the girl is acting or not. (That sounds really creepy, but, hey, that's why I joined!) The limited themes and settings, the repetition and the occasional re-use of an actress on different micro-sites, detracts from the overall entertainment value.
Overall, the sets are well done and well lit. The guy does a pretty good job of acting and the girls' acting varies. Video quality on these is good,although the actual video size is not consistent across all the sets. You don't know if "HD Hi" is 2K or 4K until you start the download and file sizes are not listed.
The newer sites have a frustrating "feature". When viewing the 4-8 sets on a page, the section of the page that is not visible does not load until you scroll down. So you spend a truly stupid amount of time waiting for the page to load as you scroll. This is unnervingly slow during peak internet hours. 4 to 8 sets per page? Why should I have to wait?
Oh, and there is no easy way to cancel.
Uh oh. Ran out of space. I would recommend this site to those who really like the simulated BDSM style, or for anyone looking for a bargain in older true BDSM. I downloaded what I wanted and will probably not be back |
|
02-09-17 06:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Flexy Teens
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Newer videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros) |
| Cons: |
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or really poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
Image downloads in one size (medium or small)
Many videos are SD
No model pages or search.
Site layout and design is ancient. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money. |
|
02-04-18 09:47am
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
Gamelink VR
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good selection of videos.
Many different sources.
Amateur and pro material.
Preview images provided |
| Cons: |
Site is a pay-per-download marketing venue for other VR sites.
NO original material
VERY SLOW download speeds
Frequent download failures |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of a growing number of pay-per-download sites. Downloads average about $10 each and come from various other sites that are seeking additional ways to get their videos seen and/or are looking for extra revenue.
In this new age of unlimited downloads, I don't really approve of this type of site, but there are a few that provide independent material on behalf of their clients. This site is NOT one of those sites. This site resells videos that are otherwise available from other websites. They make a few bucks for distribution, the author-site makes a few bucks in roylaties and they also get their name out there. Unfortunately, what these author-sites don't realize is that it is far too easy to provide a negative impression when a pay-per-download site does a poor job like this one does. My impression of Badoink, for example, is somewhat worse than it was when I wrote a review on them last month.
Bottom line? Considering that 3 downloads here equals a one month subscription to most sites, check to see the SOURCE of the video you are purchasing and go there to see if simply subscribing to the site would be a better option. If the content-source site looks like a better deal, sign up! If not, go ahead and download it here but be prepared to wait longer than you should for it to download.
I hope that was helpful! |
|
02-09-17 09:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Several very popular Czech nude models here
Site layout is decent
Updates every other day or so.
Top notch photography
Models are tastefully done-up
As the name implies, this is a glamour site. |
| Cons: |
All of the sets are older.
Site sometimes makes you log in again.
Kind of pricey for what you get.
Not all models are fully nude.
Most sets are not very explicit.
Downloads are very, very slow.
Sets are not dated, just numbered.
No original shoot dates. |
| Bottom Line: |
Glamour.CZ is a fairly well done site overall, similar to the photographer-centric sites in the Met Art network, probably most similar to Arrotica Archives. The models are familiar and most are OMG beautiful, Iveta, Little Caprice, Monika Vesela (104 sets!), even a bunch (33 sets) from Marketa Bolonova(which is why I joined). But although the sets are generally very good to excellent, they are older material. Monika and Marketa have not been modeling for at least 8 years, probably more like 10+.
The overall format of the site is model-centric, so if you go to a model page, you will see a listing of all o the sets and some thumbnails. Click on a set and you will see thumbnails of every image in that set.
Most of the sets are not very explicit, although the models do look pretty amazing just posing. Monika Vesela, who is known for relatively explicit sets elsewhere, is for the most part just standing around in most of her 104 sets here. She is quite young in several sets, but they are not in any kind of order. All of Marketa's sets are from later in her career and when she was no longer very explicit. This is well done glam stuff mostly.
This is an image-only site and images come in small and large. Large is 4000x2666. No idea what small is. Downloads are very, very, VERY slow. A 145MB zip file takes about 12 minutes to download. Images take painfully long to display. I can almost hear the modem crackle.
Sets are between 25 and 45 images each and it is fair to say that they break up sets a little....well...a lot.
Overall, this isn't a bad site, especially if you fancy some of the models that they seem to have a lot of. Go browse through the model directory in the free section. If there is anyone there that you lust over, go ahead and sign up. |
|
11-08-17 06:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large collection (about 1900 sets)
Huge variety of young models
Many are very atractive
Many familiar models
Photography is generally very good
Recent images available up to 4K+
Website redesign provides excellent navigation
Models are user scored and user tagged |
| Cons: |
Photography and models are sometimes not quite as spectacular as some of the other Met-Art collection sites.
No significant discount for current members of other sites in the Met-Art network.
Re-sampling of older images kind of a mixed bag in terms of quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
I did a review several years ago and decided to refresh it since Goddess Nudes is now a full blown member of the Met-Art network. A few things haven't changed but many have.
This site has about 8 years photo sets at about 5 updates a week. The models are generally Eastern European and a few have been on Met-Art, but the vast majority of models here are NOT ones that you see on other network sites. Some are quite attractive. Interestingly, I was unable to find a few models that were here before, like Mila I from Met-Art....not sure why.
One thing that I noticed immediately was that when I went to the models tab and sorted by "top rated", only a half-dozen or so out of the top 40 were girls I easily recognized from Met-Art.
The top girls here are more earthy. THEN, starting about 40 girls in, you see Emily Bloom and several others that are also on Met Art.
There is some integration, culling and renaming going on, too, because a few girls are listed more than once with different names, with different sets in each name.
The brand new site overhaul is a HUGE improvement, making the site look and feel much more like the others in the Met-Art community. It brings every feature that Met-Art has to offer including the user definable options like default image size and my favoriate, the "open images in new window" option.
All sets are dated and scored and user tags are available. File names have changed throughout the site to a format that closely matches the Met-Art format. (site, date, model, photographer.) This is great going forward. I may end up with duplicates, but I'll deal with it.
In general, many of the sets are not as polished and the models are not as well made-up as they are on other sites in the Met-Art network, especially the older sets. One significant difference that I think I notice is that there is little or no airbrushing here.
I would define many of these sets as "Naked girl in the woods" sets. There are a lot of indoor sets also. None of them are awful. No dorm rooms, laundromats or cheesy offices but no bazillion dollar LA homes either.
Recent sets, starting in about 2014 are much better quality. That probably coincides with the Met-Art merge. That also coincides with when several of the more popular models started showing up, like Emily Bloom....but have I seen these Emily Bloom sets elsewhere?....possibly.
Also starting in around 2013-2014, I noticed a practice that I truly hate. Melena A is named Mariska on this site. She has a total of two sets here that are one set broken up into 2 releases! 84 images in February of 2014 and another 38 or so in March. This is the only case like this that I see, but it is a practice that I truly despise.
It looks like the older sets have been re-sampled to accommodate the default image size ranges provided for download. Even the oldest images are available in 2400x3700, but the re-sampling has an adverse impact on the quality of those images.
Interaction with the photographer is generally very good, depending on the experience of the model, and many look like they are having a pretty good time. Kudos to the photo crew for that.
In terms of clothing, the models either start out with one or two pieces of clothing and immediately get naked, or they are naked throughout the set. Sets that are more than a few years old are pretty conservative in terms of overall view and close-ups, but the sets have changed a little since Met-Art got involved, so many of the later sets are a little more Met-Art-like in terms of what you see. Still, this is a solo-girl softcore site. If you are looking for spreading, insertions, masturbation, B/G, etc., you won't find it here.
Bottom line? Met-Art is doing a lot to improve this site, but in general it remains kind of a b-side site with a lot of sets that, for whatever reason, either didn't quite make it to the main event or, possibly, where once on other sites in the network. In any case, with 8 years worth of content, there is a lot to look at, but unlike Met-Art, there is not enough here to make me want to stay long-term or even return more then once every couple of years. If you have never been here or have not been here since Met-Art started running things, go ahead and join for the $20 price that is available. If you've been here within the last year or two, you might want to pick a different Met-Art site to visit. |
|
01-19-17 09:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Decent collection (about 1000 sets, I think)
Generally very attractive models
Many familiar models
Excellent value for the money
Photography is generally very good
Images available up to 3200x4800
For the price, you will not be disappointed! |
| Cons: |
Navigation is extremely basic
Site formatting is also very basic
Only a couple of videos (it is a photo site...)
Only 2 zip file sizes (but good choices)
Only 2 image file sizes (but big enough) |
| Bottom Line: |
For less than $10, I figured I didn't have much to lose and I ended up getting MUCH more than I expected.
This site has several years worth of about 5 updates a week. The models are generally Eastern European. Many have been in Femjoy or MetArt, but there were also many, some quite beautiful, that I had not seen before. Some of the best European models on the planet are on this site, although most have different names. If you like Dominika, Katya or Mila on Met Art, they are all here. There are even a few nice sets of the now-retired but forever revered Marketa.
Neither the site nor the sets are quite as polished as some of the more expensive softcore sites, but I guess that is to be expected in this price range. There are many models that I've seen elsewhere and I just cant tell if the sets are from when they were younger, or if the girls just aren't wearing make-up. The tendency here is to use less or no make-up, so if you are not into the glam look, this is another treasure-site.
The sets are generally good quality, both indoors and outdoors. Lighting is good. The amount of "reveal" depends on the models, but most sets start out in lingerie or fully nude and about half have close-ups. There are no toys, insertions, etc., although there are a few scenes with two girls. This is not an "in your face" site...more of a girl-in-the-woods or girl-in-her-bedroom thing. Interaction with the photographer is generally very good, depending on the experience of the model, and many look like they are having a pretty good time. Kudos to the photo crew for that.
All sets are dated on the main thumbs page for each year. File names are reasonable for both the images and the zip files, so you don't have to go through hoops to save them. Since each set is listed since the site was created, you can tell that there is no recycling going on like at some other sites.
The navigation on the site is very, very basic. The update page is not formatted, so the update thumbs just go down the left side of the screen for ever. The two choices under each thumb are "screen sized" (currently 934x1400) or "print sized" (currently 3930x5988) older images are slightly smaller, but still pretty big.
So for navigation, you click on an option under a set image (screen or print) and then click on an image. To get back to the main page, you back out with your browser. There are no pop-ups or viewers. Once in a set, you can also download a zip file of images in the size you chose to get into the set (screen or print). NO toggling between image sizes or even choosing multiple zip file sizes once you commit to screen or print for the image sizes. No forward or backward movement once you chose an image to look at. Just page back and pick another image (or shift-click to open a new window). This works, but it seems so 1990. Perfectly acceptable, though, for the no-frills price.
I would have scored this site a little higher if it were not for the navigation. It is an honest site that is in the business of providing quality softcore images. They don't fluff it up and they don't steal your money. That is a rare and terrific thing in this industry and I will be back both for the images and to help ensure they stay around.
Bottom line? This site is a terrific deal! If you are tired of paying $30 to get into a new site only to be disappointed with quality or quantity of content and you like the softcore genre, then this site is a must-visit. C'mon! for under $10, you've got absolutely nothing to lose! |
|
11-30-13 12:49pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
33
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Nearly 300,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002. |
| Cons: |
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Hegre.com, formerly Hegre-Art.com, is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicity, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...not an ounce of fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc.
(Although some sets called explicit really are pretty explicit.) The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, most of these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat. Peter Hegre and his staff are masters at showing the bests of the female form. There are a few pretty exclusive models here that are as amazing as any you will ever see elsewhere and some of the sets and behind the scene videos, like Ana S. standing nude near the Eiffel Tower, are simply unforgettable.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are close to 300,000 images in about 4500 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your closet with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while. It is every bit as good as Femjoy, Watch4Beauty or MPL studios and at its best may be better than Met-Art. ...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus! |
|
12-12-17 06:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Hegre Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Over 268,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002. |
| Cons: |
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
There have also been occasions lately where one or two models dominate the daily sets. Great if you like the model(s)... |
| Bottom Line: |
Hegre-art.com is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicities, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can find not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...no fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc. The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are, according to the site, over 268,000 images in 4332 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your room with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus! |
|
10-05-16 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Hegre Art
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
hegre-art.com is a spectacular erotic photography (softcore) site with some interesting and remarkable features. The girls are beautiful and the photography is always stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent, but the signature component to this site is probably the very well done erotic massage and tantra massage shoots and videos. Navigation is generally very good and the images come in a wide range of sizes up to 10,000k. The models are predominantly european, with a few well known US names mixed in. Oh, and the site is an excellent value for the money compared to other similar sites. |
| Cons: |
Couple of small things. First, it is too difficult to get to the larger images for each set and when they load, you cannot move through them because they each load to a separate page. The page-back navigation is a little clunky, too, as it usually does not immediately take you back to where you were before. Oh, and I was completely unable to get the site to work on Internet Explorer 9, although it works fine on Chrome. Something about cookies, I think. Not a hige deal as I use several browsers but it might be for others. Generally, if you can get into the previews, you can get into the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is dominated by really well done single model erotic photo shoots and softcore single-model videos, but most of the models are absolutely beautiful and the photography is among the best on the planet. The models are probably mostly 20-30 with a few really outstanding 18 year-olds. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all shapes, sizes, ethnicities and colors, but generally very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here.) There is full nudity, but many models are conservitive, meaning they don't all do close-ups, spread eagles, etc. There are very few sex scenes and I can't recall a single toy or vibrator on the entire site. There are a lot of beach scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. The result is more of a veuyers nude-beach fantasy than a photo shoot intended solely to get you off.
Perhaps another, much more esoteric way to put it is that this site is like a fine wine store. You can get a great buzz on fine wine, but part of the experience is appreciating the wine as you do. If you are just looking to get drunk quickly, go to the liquor store and buy some mad-dog. If you can appreciate this analogy, this site may be right for you. If not, skip it and go straigth to a hard-core site.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionaly done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. Lookout, though, there are a few of these sessions with men.
Navigation is generally very good, with the option for thumbs, slides or something called journal, which takes all the images in a set and stacks them at roughly screen size.
There are, according to the site, over 200,000 images in 3300 galeries. The collection dates back as far as 2002. The images from that timeframe, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
The site seems to use mostly eastern european models with a few nearly exclusive resident models. Look up Anna S, an apparently French stunner, or Luba, a long-time regular.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want a lifelsize image of Melissa Mendini standing against a white wall in nothing but high heels for the back of your closet door? (assuming you can print it.) Well, here's the place to get it and many, many more like that. The only problem is that you can't get to these large images via the thumbs. You have to go to slides, click through the slides, preview the image you are interested in and then choose the size. You can also go to the journal, wait for all the images to load, then scroll down and choose your size from there. There are, on average, about 6 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for some really beautiful women to look at for a while. I would also recommend this site to anyone who likes Met-Art, or Femjoy.
I hope this was useful! Trust me if so! |
|
08-11-12 01:08pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
36
|
Holly Randall
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of popular porn stars and models of all ages, shapes and sizes but a lot of D-cups and above. (i.e. curvy girls)
Perhaps one of the last "Glam-core" porn sites but with a lot of extra stuff like insertions.
Very high quality all-in-focus images
Mostly solo but some G/G and B/G
Good quality videos that include masturbation.
Several newer sets/videos that are full-on hardcore.
Several download sizes/formats for images and videos.
2+ updates a week.
Affiliated with the Met Art network
Great navigation (search on Model name, tags, etc.)
All sets dated. |
| Cons: |
Number of images in a set is sometimes rather small.
Some of the porn-star models are rather mature...
Some older sets seem a little monotonous (same shoot sequence formula).
Some newer sets may be unreleased older sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you don't know who Holly Randall is, she is a 2nd generation past nude model and current erotic photographer. She and her mother both shot for Playboy as well as several other magazines like Hustler. They practically invented that trademark large format everything is in focus image style that was/is common in those publications. She has shot for websites as well, like Twistys. She has won all kinds of awards for her photography and videography - awards she totally deserved.
I haven't been a member of Holly Randall since 2012, so I thought I would join to see what has changed and to collect the best of the 6 years of material that has accumulated since I was last here. I was not at all disappointed. The sets, models, make-up, lighting and image quality are all excellent, just like I remember.
The glam look is still there, too. I really like that done-up look and whoever is doing the doing-up here, um, knows what they are doing without over-doing it. Models you know, like Connie Carter and Candice Luca, look like a million bucks. Every pose is perfect. Nothing is out of place or overlooked.
Just take the best from Met-Art or Femjoy and turn up the glam a little bit. That's Holly Randall.
Couple of things I really like about this site.
In almost every set, there is nearly 100% eye contact. None of that voyeur, girl-in-the-woods or innocent looks into the distance crap. These women are all looking at you because they know exactly why you are looking at them. Nice power play.
There are a few close-ups in every set, but they are almost unnecessary because the sets flow naturally and already show everything. Some photographers on other sites (Met Art, for example) tend to add close-ups into sets as sort of an afterthought. On Holly Randall, the girl is making eye contact and striking many different poses with progressive levels of openness. Also, and this is huge, Holly knows how to use depth of field so EVERYTHING you want to see is in focus in almost every image, from her eyes to her high-heels and everything in between. None of that six shots focused on her face and one identical shot focused ONLY on her not-face nonsense. (I really don't like it when a photographer uses depth of field to tell you where to look.) Here you get the whole picture, all in focus and you get to look wherever you want in every image.
What's new since my last visit is the affiliation with Met Art, which has brought an updated and improved web site. Holly Randall is not on the Met Art pull-down sites menu, though....not sure why.
The site has been around since before 2009, but that is as far back as the sets go. Figure 15 sets a month for over 9 years, that's about 1600-1700 sets. Of course, the older ones are not in today's image resolution, but they still aren't bad. Around 2012, the site started to go a little harder. Many sets include an image or two with spreading, fingering, insertions and/or masturbation and the more recent sets almost always have them.
So....what's not to like? Well, there really isn't much. Some tiny things, really. Like although navigation is generally the same as it is on other Met Art sites, you can't set your preferences so images in a set show up in a new window. Big deal. Maybe a few of the porn-stars are a little past their prime (but Holly makes them look awesome). Not a deal killer. Occasionally, images are a little grainy or soft. Might be because they have ben resized? Not sure. Also not a deal killer. Ok, here's one. The sets are sometimes pretty small. Some are only 40 images or so. But when that happens, the images you get are usually very good. Most sets are at least 50 images and some are nearly 100. And lastly, there may be some photoshopping here and there, but I don't think it is obvious.
Ok, bottom line. If you like glam-style images of past and preset popular models and porn stars (like the images from Twisty's), then this is a site you really have to visit. Unlike Twisty's this site is easy to navigate and is managed by a highly reputable group. The only reason I am only giving it an 85 is because of the more mature models/pornstars that are not my taste.
It has taken me a couple of weeks to sift through all the material that has accumulated on this site since my last visit several years ago and I downloaded a lot, which says a lot.
Go ahead, give it a try! |
|
02-02-18 08:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Holo Girls VR
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Wide variety of VR porn types
Very large collection for this genre
Generally very good quality
Huge mix of actresses/actors here
At least a few major porn stars
Excellent navigation, sort and search functions
New video every couple of days
Unique "position" icon on each video shows whether you should be standing, sitting up, laying back or flat on your back to watch the video. (Very nice feature!)
The site remembers what type of VR you have so you don't have to select from a list for each download. (Nice!)
A few of the upskirt/face sitting scenes will, ah, take your breath away. |
| Cons: |
Many scenes don't really take advantage of VR
(i.e. some scenes are across the room)
Huge mix of actresses/actors here.
Girls are generally more mature.
Videos are not quite as polished |
| Bottom Line: |
Disclaimer: My goal here is to compare VR sites and to explain particular VR things that a site does well or not so well. As always, my objective is to share my experience. If your experience is different, you are welcome to share yours too!
=======================
HoloGirlsVR is large for a VR site. But to be this large, it has perhaps made a few sacrifices in quality meaning you have to sift to find really good stuff that appeals to you.
HoloGirlsVR Stats:
105 Videos
74 models
Models appear to be popular US, Canadian and European porn stars.
Most girls are in more than 1 video
One new set every 3 or 4 days
Release dates are listed
Each set is rated on a 5 star scale
Frame rates are not listed
File sizes are not listed
I'll use an analogy the webmaster may not like, but it is what comes to mind. Men's Warehouse. Now there is some pretty schlocky stuff at Men's Warehouse, but if you are willing to sift through enough stuff, you will probably find something you like. Conversely, Men's Warehouse sells a LOT of stuff, so SOMEBODY must like what they are selling,even the schlocky stuff. So this site is the Men's Warehouse of VR porn. Something for everybody. If that's what the webmasters are going for, they are killing it!
One of the ways that the site tries to categorize things is by defining niches or collections. Nice job on that! There are several niches/collections that really lend themselves to the VR genre, and a few that don't. The face-sitting series is a great example of what VR porn can do. These girls stick their junk just beyond your tongue's reach above your face and I guarantee you will groan in approval when you experience a good example of it. However, one of the drawbacks of HD is that you might not really want to see some of these girls that close in good light. Keep looking, though, there will be a few that you like. It's OK to groan. Really. Slightly more tame is the upskirt category. This takes the porn upskirt genre to a higher level because you are laying prone under the girl involved as she stands directly over your head. Depending on the set, there is a broad range of views here from white panties (that get pulled aside) to complete nudity. This can be awesome if you find the right girl. Find her.
Other collections include the Mistress T collection, which is a whole dom series where YOU are the submissive (not my thing but, hey, some folks love it.) and the GFE (Girlfriend Experience, I think) collection, which is generally a younger girl talking to you, masturbating and occasionally fucking you. There's an only girls collection that let's you watch two or more (up to about 8, I think) girls getting each other or themselves off. There are also a lot of uncategorized videos in a range of activities. I recall foot fetish sets and stocking sets and a LOT of girls covered with tattoos. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it is not something I'm used to. Sorry to bring this up, but something else I noticed was that several of the males in the sex videos were black. Seriously, Kudos to the site management for appealing to that potentially lucrative "blacked" porn market segment, but I'm a straight white guy who cannot get used to the idea of enjoying a VR segment with a hot girl when I look down and my junk is black. Again...men's warehouse. Something for everybody. Cool.
With the larger variety of videos comes a wider range of talent. I'm not sure how to define this other than some scenes are seriously over acted. A few of the girls seem to never shut up. I'm not sure if this is just the girls or if it is actually scripted this way. Again, different tastes....but less is usually better in this case.
The sets are generally nice, shot in homes or hotel rooms. The lighting is good but the masking for the VR is a little annoying when you notice it. They have blocked out anything that might distract you from the scene in front of you, which is more distracting than if they had left it.
File sizes are not listed but they are pretty big! Vive/Oculus files are a gig to 2 gigs each. Oddly, the high-res generic files are 2-4 gigs each. Download speeds are pretty slow.
File types:
Android 5.0+
Gear VR
Oculus (High and Low)
Iphone/Android pre 5.0
Generic H.264
Tech stuff
Update: I now have a dedicated VR computer with a very fast processor and video card. All o fthe Oculus/Vive files play fine.
...personally, although there are a few amazing sets on this site, I am a little disappointed. Why? Because many of the sets are watch others have sex sets rather than the fully immersive ME having sex sets. This completely defeats the opportunity available in VR.
Overall, this is a great site to visit because of some of the unique sets you can find here, but I'm not sure how long it will be before I come bac |
|
12-02-16 11:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
In The Crack
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure |
| Cons: |
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...) |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site. |
|
10-06-16 09:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Looks like there are about 1500 videos
Videos date back to 2004
Good quality streaming videos
Many popular US porn stars here. Many!
Some of the videos are quite good
All videos are dated |
| Cons: |
Videos are STREAMING ONLY
Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH.
Navigation is pretty basic
Navigation is frustratingly slow
Scenarios can be a little monotonous.
Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not sure what to say about this site....
I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.)
I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing).
But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something.
There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems.
Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But...
The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room...
The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress.
There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough.
My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed.
I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch.
The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like?
OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep.
Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it. |
|
10-09-16 10:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
40
|
MC Nudes
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent selection of models (350+)
Mostly 18-26 or so.
All shapes and sizes but mostly petite
Very large collection (650+ vids, 200k+ images)
Exclusive content
A few of the most popular European models
Older sets of spectacular popular models
Navigation is good
All galleries are dated
Generally very good photo quality
Newer sets use good file naming convention
Videos have been in 720p for several years
Newer sets up to about 5800x3500 pixels.
Lots of new models you've never seen before |
| Cons: |
The site is often slow.
I had difficulty logging in a few times
All zips named small.zip,medium.zip,large.zip
(meaning zip files are not unique)
Videos are mostly from photo shoots
Good lighting/imagery, but not consitenly great
Color/white balance on some of the sets is off
Some of the sets are pretty short
Top rated model, though beautiful, is from 2005
Not that many new stand-out models
Lots of models you'll never see again
Oddball, quirky 3D sets
Bland color scheme |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very good site that anyone who is into solo or two-girl modeling should absolutely visit. It has tremendous variety of mostly eastern European girls that are perhaps a tad more natural than what you might see elsewhere.
That said, I find it very difficult to rate this site up there with the best of this class. I've been a member of this site off and on for about 8 years. When I first joined, the site was way up there with the best. It is still very good, but there is just a little something that makes it less appealing for me personally. The folks at MC-Nudes put together a very nice site and I know from my experiences with them that they are conscientious enough to read this, so I'll explain as carefully as I can.
The first thing I notice are the colors...or rather the lack of them. Everything is in tan or cream or some color of rice, wheat or straw. Everything. Even the sets are mostly in these nuetral colors with very low color saturation. I am pretty sure that this is because they think they might want to convert sets into 3D and the red-blue 3D doesn't work well if there are bright colors. But sadly, it is detracting from all the sets and the entire site. Go look at Met Art or Watch4Beauty and the colors on the site and in the sets leap off the page. MC-nudes? The colors stick to the page like this mornings oatmeal sticks to the bowl. If this reduced band of colors is to support 3D, I really think you should dump 3D. The site needs more POP.
OK, next. Years ago, MC-Nudes utilized mainstream models that were among the most beautiful on the planet. Marketa, Monika Vesela, Bambi, Zafira, Eufrat, etc. There are some fantastic sets here if you are into these mainstream models from 2004-2010 or so. They still have several models that have recently become very popular (like Nika and Dominika).
At the same time, they managed to find some ungodly beautiful models that you'd never seen before or since. This unknown but beautiful girl Simona is still their top rated model (from 2005 and with only 3 sets...)
More recently, I think they've gotten into using new and unknown models a little more. This is a great thing for those of us who like a lot of variety, but you have to go through a LOT of girls to find one or two true stars in this field. Nearly all of the MC-Nudes models have spectacular figures, but because of either the lighting, the make-up, the inconsistent eye contact with the camera or perhaps because they are new and don't seem to be having much fun, many of these girls just aren't as appealing as they could be. Some of the brighter or more popular models have figured out how to tease and play with the camera a little. But a really good photography team should be teaching them ALL how to be playful. It makes a huge difference.
Couple of peeves. The site is often very slow. I also could not get in a few times, getting an Apache server-type error message instead of the web site. I know that account management is tricky, but I have several subscripions (and several computers) and I have not had this kind of trouble before...pretty much ever.
Although the file management is better than it used to be, the zip files still need to be named and dated or coded in such a way to make them unique. Webmaster, if you do that once for each set, your thousands of customers won't have to do it at all.
Bottom line? Go check it out! If you like what you see in the samples, sign up! There is enough quality material to keep you busy and happy for quite a while. If you don't stay, check back every year or so. With daily updates, it will be worth your while. |
|
09-22-13 02:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models on the planet!
The site is HUGE!
Spectacular imagery and sets
Dozens of outstanding photographers across Europe
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Excellent search capabilities
Excellent navigation and "window" management
Excellent range of photo and video resolution
Download speeds are consistently fast.
Customer service that ANY on-line company would be proud of. |
| Cons: |
Only one thing in the CON category:
Too much cross-selling to the other sites in the network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I noticed there were no current reviews of this site so I thought I would write an update to a review I wrote two years ago.
I've been a member of this site off and on for over a decade now and am a loyal, permanent customer. It is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period.
Navigation is also very good and the way the site opens tabs for sets and individual images is the best I've seen. I've actually used this site as a reference to other webmasters with sites that have mediocre navigation.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. Many are well known European models but many are women you've never seen before but will want to see again and again. The girls are almost entirely all natural. The images you see on the main page and tour are perfectly representative of the images in the site as are the scores of the models (over 150 legitimate 9+ models).
To be clear here, this is a SOFTCORE site. If you enjoy looking at incredibly beautiful naked women positioned in ways that tastefully show off their assets, this is a great site for you. The site is mostly solo sets with a few two-girl sets and an occasional masturbation set. Sexy, but no sex. If you are looking for hardcore, insertions or kink of any kind, you will need to look elsewhere. Pretty much the only gaping here will be your mouth just before you say "Oh my fucking god this girl is beautiful"....and you will say that a lot!
There is really only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. Met Art is part of a pretty big network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives, Erotic Beauty and a few others. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each of these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the individual owners want to maximize revenue. What I find a little annoying is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, although there may be more of this model on Met-Art, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model exist. Since I first mentioned this a few years ago, I have seen a few other networks that do it but some of those are all inclusive networks with free access to the other sites. There is always a link on the top of each page that will get you to the models "profile card" within Met-Art (just click on the model's name), so after a while you will learn to ignore these links at the bottom.
Now, in-spite of that cross-selling tactic, the guys at Met-Art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join Met-Art, sometimes providing significant discounts, as low as $5-10 for a month for each site. To be fair, these sites have their own flavor and plenty of unique sets. And pretty much every site on the network is the same or nearly the same quality as Met-Art, although some of these other sites are considerably smaller.
Oh, and here's an interesting one. They have a cam site called MetCams.com. I do not partake in cam sites very often but browsing this one brings up several of the top models that are showcased on the Met-Art site. A few years ago I, um, came across Mila I., one of my all time favorite Met-art models, on the cam site and I could not resist. She did not disappoint, I was completely satisfied and I have a memory that (oddly, I admit) rivals a few from high-school. Clearly, the cam site is not soft-core....
I also want to say that the customer service for Met-Art and their network is simply outstanding. They are very responsive and have cleared up billing and other questions/issues immediately whenever I have had to contact them.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I have an annual membership and have joined nearly every one of the other sites in the network for at least a month. This site and every other site on the network is totally, completely worth subscribing to. |
|
03-22-15 08:02am
Replies (4)
|
Review
42
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation |
| Cons: |
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course! |
|
08-23-12 10:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
43
|
Morey Studio
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
Updated site goes back to 2007
If you like Black and white sets, there are a lot here.
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Good download speeds. |
| Cons: |
Navigation is awful.
Sets are are on multiple pages
Sets are no longer dated except when paging through update history.
Looks like some sets are either recycled or older.
Some sets are very small.
If you don't like black and white sets, there are way too many here. |
| Bottom Line: |
In a prior review, I listed this site as a pleasant surprise and gave it one of my highest scores. Sadly, a few things have changed, including the standards of the other top sites, while Morey Studio has remained more-or-less the same and in some ways declined. The quality of the work is still excellent and most of the models are beautiful, but the halo is gone.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art.
Release count has dropped to a set every other day or so.
Sets now only go back to about 2007. (before it was 2001)
About 325 models.
About 1250 sets.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets. But I have to warn you, a LOT of the models are just glam-style with very conservative sets.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites but there are several popular models, especially in the older sets. You won't find a single apple, grape, watermelon, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude. The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well. Sets, lighting and Colors are generally great.
There are a LOT of black and white (B&W) sets. I understand the artistic concept behind B&W images, but there is a major flaw here because a lot of the harder scenes are in B&W. A girl/girl set or a set with dildo masturbation is pretty much intended to get the viewer off. Converting it to black and white does not make it art, it just makes it a dissappointing set. Many other sites include B&W white images in their otherwise color sets but here, entire sets, sometimes all sets for a particular model, are B&W.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is Poor-to-OK. The site has changed a little since the last time I was here, I think, and it is not up to par with the other top softcore sites. I also noticed that some sections of the site are inconsistent with others.
You can search on model name or set keyword.
When you do that, one set comes up "highlighted" and you have to then open that set, or you can open other, thumbnail sets that are related. Navigation is single-threaded so you have to deliberately open things in new tabs if you don't want to spend half your time paging back.
Sets are laid out with 12 images to a page and multiple pages. If you get to a set from the updates page, it takes you to the set page and you have to click again to open it. Some sets are pretty small and some shoots are pretty clearly broken up into smaller sets. There are also several sets from the "private collection" which translates into unreleased sets taken years ago. They are usually good sets, but there is probably a reason why they were not released in 2010 when shot, and it reduces the amount of new model material on the site.
Sets are no longer dated on the set page itself, which is weird and deliberate. It opens up the likelyhood of recycling old sets. The only way to see dates is to scroll backwards through the incredibly clunky updates pages. There is no year/month index to take you to a date. You have to scroll past 100+ sets to the bottom of each update page and click "previous updates" to
get to the early sets.
Model pages are also a little..off. If a model only has one set, all of the other slots on the model page fill with other models. This makes it very difficult to see how many sets a model has. Very odd approach.
Another thing I noticed is that several very popular models from years ago are here, but they only have one set. And of course, you don't find this out until you join and go to the model page. That seems marginally deceptive. Ther was one model that I saw in a preview shot that I never found on the site. No idea why.
Bottom line: Although this site has lost a little of its previous luster, it still has a ton of excellent solo-model and girl/girl softcore material. For $14.99 for the first month and 9.99 a month after that, it is a very good deal, but be prepared to do a LOT of browsing. |
|
01-04-19 12:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Morey Studio
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
All sets are dates
No recycled material
Site goes back to 2005 and sets got to 2001
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Great value!
No advertising!is generally very good. |
| Cons: |
Navigation could be a bit better in some areas.
Sets are are on multiple pages |
| Bottom Line: |
Every once in a great while, you stumble over something that you should have known about but somehow didn't. Like finding that great restaurant that has been in your neighborhood for years. That's the way I felt when I stumbled onto this site. Wow! What a great collection! How is it possible that I didn't know about this? No idea, but I do now and I can tell you that there is something about it that I really like.
OK, here's the scoop.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art. Although it is European style, I think the photographer and most of the models are American or at least English speaking.
Currently releasing a set a day.
Been around since about 2005 or so. Sets date back to 2001.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets.
I can't tell exactly how many photo sets there are, but it looks like there are about 400 sets and maybe 80 videos.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good. In general, these videos seem more interesting than the average met-art video, possibly because there is audio. Watching the photo shoot videos is interesting because the photographer is often in the video so you can see an hear how the photographer and model interact. This isn't necessarily something to get off to, but it makes you part of the shoot.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. No amateur shoots here but the sets are...not quite as glamour-oriented as Met-art perhaps...this may be because the color saturation is more realistic here than it is there. Colors are generally great.
The models come in all shapes, sizes and ethnicities. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full but (thankfully) none of that totally unkept could-never-wear-a-bikini stuff you sometimes see at other sites.
These models seem all natural and un-enhanced.
Popular models here include Connie Carter, Nessa and Gisele. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites.
You won't find a single apple, grape, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude.
The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
Model interaction with the photographer is generally excellent. Watching the photo shoot videos with sound confirms this. It adds a nice quality to the shoots.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is generally very good. You can search on model name or keyword. Personally, I really dislike having to page through an individual set, though. There are only 12 images on a set-page and many sets have 4 or 5 pages. That is painful, frustrating and no longer needed except to reduce the load on servers.
Download speed is good and I never had a fail. I do not use a Download Manager, but on occasion had 3 or 4 downloads running at once. This didn't break anything.
About the only thing I am not fond of in this site is the large number of black and white photo sets. even a few of the videos are in black and white. I get that it adds drama and is the photographers prerogative. I just prefer realism and true-to-life detail. On the other hand, the black and white sets completely remove any preconceptions that an observer might have about, say, a darker skinned model. Eliminating the color allows one to see just how beautiful a model really is. Nice touch.
Bottom line: If you are into nude photography and enjoy sites like Met-Art, Femjoy, MPL Studios or Hegre-Art, you owe it to yourself to try this place. For $14.99 a month, it may be one of the best bargains on the internet.
I hope you found this useful. |
|
08-09-16 08:55pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
45
|
MPL Studios
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Still one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Set management is among the best in the business (make-up, lighting, wardrobe, location, atmosphere, image quality and composition are all superb.)
Most of the models are beyond beautiful.
Models are generally not shy, most are quite open and model Eye contact is excellent.
Nice mix of full-body and close-up shots.
All of the models appear to be enjoying themselves!
The previews are highly representative.
Usually one new set or video daily.
All sets are dated
Thumbnails are on a single page for each set. (Thank you!)
Redesigned site provides excellent design and navigation. |
| Cons: |
Not much to list here...I have to dig deep to find things:
Browsing is single thread from updates page to model-set page to individual images. No new windows for sets, thumbnails or images.)
These are all REALLY minor things, though.
Some might not like that there is no comment section for each model, but seeing how that tends to get abused at other sites, I don't blame the webmaster for that decision at all. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've had an annual subscription to this site for several years, now and have never once regretted it. Gorgeous models, really well done sets and excellent overall. Customer service when I contacted them was prompt, helpful and courteous. Billing is
This site has been around since 2003 and the collection is pretty massive. At last count, there were about 328,000 images and over 725 videos. 1 set a day would put it at around 5400+ sets. Older sets are very well done but not quite as revealing and the resolution is not quite as high. (A few sets prior to about 2008 are non-nude or partially nude.) There appear to be nearly 400 models, the vast majority of whom are simply stunning. All of the models are completely natural. I see a lot of sites where the model ratings are artificially inflated to 9. Not here. Here they are nearly all true 9s...or better.
Images come in four sizes both for viewing and 3 sizes in zip files: 1200, 2000, 4000 on the long side. Older sets are at least 1200 and 2000.
As I mentioned above, the sets are excellent. I can't really recall seeing anything I didn't like. The girls are happy, friendly and open. Lighting, focus, composition, etc. are excellent.
This is generally a solo-girl softcore site, but there is a toy occasionally and some of the video sets include masturbation. Girls usually start out clothed or partially clothed but many of the outdoor sets start out completely nude.
Newer sets are usually about 80-120 images each, which is more than many other sites. Some older sets are a bit smaller. Older sets are also a bit more conservative, although the imagery is just is good. Some older sets are also continuations (I.e. 30 shots in one release and 30 more from the same set sometime later), but it isn't enough to be a bother and they don't seem to do that anymore.
Note that many European models have a different name on this site. If you are looking for a particular model, start with one of the global model listings to see if she is on this site. If she is on Met-Art of Femjoy, chances are good that she is here, too.
The videos, which come out about once a week, are probably better than many of the comparable sites in this niche. They break the videos down into 3 ratings: Lifestyle, Sensual and Explicit. The first category might be BTS or travel with a model. Sensual videos are bed, shower or similar model showcases, And the explicit vids are just that. You either get a view of every inch of the from pretty much every angle or they are masturbation videos. One main model, Karissa Diamond, has over 700 videos covering all three categories and I'm pretty sure she has video proof that she has gotten naked or gotten herself off in every major city in Europe. Life would be so much mor fun if there were a Guinness record for that....
All sets are properly dated and although there is no flat out recycling, occasionally there are "Director's cuts" that provide a new mix of images from an older set of a popular model. Every set all the way back to 2003 is unique as far as I can tell. The girls in those "new old stock" sets are gorgeous enough for you not to mind at all.
Another really nice thing is that the highest resolution of each image is native. An image displayed in 4000 was actually shot in 4000 or higher. (Occasionally you may find a low-light inside set shot near the ISO limits of the camera, which tends to make the largest images a little grainy, but that's not because of resizing.) Older shots at 1600, 2000 or 3000 were shot in that and not resized. there isn't a single fuzzy or obviously up-sized image on the entire site as far as I can tell! Kudos to the team for that!
About the only negative I can find on the entire site, and it is a truly tiny negative, is the single threaded browsing. No new windows open when you drill down. This is probably to keep the website traffic down, but I prefer the Met-art style where images appear in their own windows. Yes...I can type a key while clicking to open pages in a new window, but it seems like it should be a preference setting. Otherwise, navigation is very good. Once in a set, all images are presented on a single page and you have forward, back, thumbnail and open image in any available size options.
Bottom line: If you like the Met-Art, Femjoy or Watch4Beauty sites, you will really like this one. It easily rates up there with the best. There are occasional specials, but even at $29 it is a good deal and the annual rate of $99 is one of the best annual rates out there. This site gets my highest recommendation. |
|
01-05-19 03:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
46
|
MPL Studios
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Set management is among the best in the business (make-up, lighting, wardrobe, location, atmosphere and composition are all superb.)
Most of the models are beyond beautiful. Some could stop a 747 in mid-flight!
Models are generally not shy.
Model Eye contact with photographer is generally excellent.
Nice mix of full-body and close-up shots.
Outdoor sets are the best I've ever seen (no stalking-style girl in the woods sets here!)
All of the models appear to be enjoying themselves!
Navigation, search and voting all pretty good
Customer Service was prompt and courteous. |
| Cons: |
Really not much to list here...I have to dig deep to find things:
A "User settings" option would be nice. (Image size, thumbnails-per-page)
I'd like all set thumbnails to be on one page. Typically you have to click through 4 pages of thumbnails to see all of them in a set.
Navigation could be a little better (browsing is single thread from updates page to model-set page to individual images. No new windows for sets, thumbnails or images.)
Page back sometimes takes you back to unexpected places like the log in page.
These are all REALLY minor things, though.
I had some minor issues with IE-11. Chrome is fine.
Some might not like that there is no comment section for each model, but seeing how that tends to get abused at other sites, I don't blame the webmaster for that decision at all. |
| Bottom Line: |
I promised that I would try again to get into this site and I'm really glad I did. It is simply top-notch. Gorgeous models, really well done sets and excellent overall. Customer service when I contacted them was prompt, helpful and courteous.
This site has been around since 2003 and the collection is pretty massive. About 195,000 images and 395 videos. 1 set a day would put it at around 3600+ sets. Older sets are very well done but not quite as revealing and the resolution is not quite as high. (A few sets prior to about 2008 are non-nude or partially nude.) There appear to be about 250 models, the vast majority of whom are simply stunning. Al of the models are completely natural. I see a lot of sites where the model ratings are artificially inflated to 9. Not here. Here they are almost all 9s...or better.
Images come in three sizes both for viewing and in zip files: 4000, 2000 and 1200 on the long side. Older sets are at least 1600 and 1200.
As I mentioned above, the sets are generally excellent. In fact, I can't really recall seeing anything I didn't like. The girls are happy, friendly and open. Lighting, focus, composition, etc. are excellent.
This is generally a solo-girl softcore site, but there is a toy occasionally and some of the video sets include masturbation. Girls usually start out clothed or partially clothed but many of the outdoor sets start out completely nude.
Sets are usually about 30-40 images each. Some older sets are a bit smaller. Older sets are also a bit more conservative, although the imagery is just is good. Some older sets are also continuations (I.e. 30 shots in one release and 30 more from the same set sometime later), but it isn't enough to be a bother and they don't seem to do that anymore.
The videos, though not as common, are somehow better than many of the comparable sites. I think this is because the girls tend to interact with the camera more. In many of the videos, You get this little "you like?" look once in a while. Why yes, yes I do!
All sets are properly dated and there is NO recycling. Every set all the way back to 2003 is unique as far as I can tell. Some sets seem like they might be a little older, but they are otherwise unpublished. And the girls in those "new old stock" sets are gorgeous enough for you not to mind at all.
Another really nice thing is that the highest resolution of each image is native. An image displayed in 4000 was actually shot in 4000 or higher. (Occasionally you may find an low-light inside set shot near the ISO limits of the camera, which tends to make the largest images a little grainy, but that's not because of resizing.) Older shots at 1600 or 2000 were shot in that and not resized. there isn't a single fuzzy or up-sized image on the entire site as far as I can tell! Kudos to the team for that!
About the only negative I can find on the entire site is the single threaded browsing. No new windows open when you drill down. This is probably to keep the website traffic down, but I prefer the met-art or FemJoy style where either sets or images appear in their own windows. Yes...I can type a key while clicking to open pages in a new window, but it seems like it should be a preference setting. Otherwise, navigation is good. Once in a set, you have forward, back, thumbnail and open image in any available size options.
There is another option I discovered eventually that makes navigation a little easier...there is a flip-book on the lower right side of the main page for each set. You can flip through it to an image you would like to look at and click on that image. When you do THAT a new window opens starting at the first page of thumbnails (not the image or page of thumbnails you clicked on). This little flip-book is actually pretty nice because you can quickly flip through all the thumbnails in a set. Not sure why it doesn't just take you to the image, though...
Bottom line: If you like the Met-Art or Erotica Archives sites, you will also really like this one. It easily rates up there with the best. |
|
12-21-13 05:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The ultimate reference for every naked actress scene in every A/B and foreign movie ever made.
Good site navigation and search functions.
Auto-login
Montages by topic (steam rooms, GOT, tiny girls, best boobs, year in review, etc.)
Some scenes are slowed down and enhanced for lighting, etc. |
| Cons: |
Not really a porn site, per se, but still...
Videos are streaming only
A few current scene examples have blurred bits.
A few scenes a not on the site.
Older movie scenes, of course, are lower resolution.
Still images are, of course, video caps.
If you are looking for nude actors, this is not the site you are looking for. None here. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site slogan, "Fast forward to the good bits" is totally accurate. Every actress you've ever been enamored by is here in the most naked scene she is in. Alexandra Daddario? Check. Margot Robbie? Check. Turns out very, very few popular actresses have NOT done some kind of nude scene at one point or another. Now, there are a few teases here. A few actresses have had doubles or have been filmed in a way that doesn't really show much, but a lot of the fun is in watching the little montages that they put together and going "Wow, SHE did a nude scene?" And, of course, the best use of the site is when you spot a particularly attractive actress and wonder "Hmmm. I wonder what she looks like naked?" Whoever she is, if she has ever been naked in a film, chances are excellent that Mr. Skin has the clip that answers your question.
To be clear, this is not a site where you will get completely off on watching nude scenes of popular actresses...well...most of the time, it is more like a collection of reasons to go Hmm, Ah, or wow and fully appreciate how awesome many of these actresses are.
It is worth noting that this site catalogs actresses only. No actors. For example the reference for Movie Wild Things shows about 6 scenes of the actresses but the full frontal scene of Kevin Bacon in the shower is absent. (I suppose there is a Mrs. Skin?)
There are also a few nude scenes that are somewhat disturbing, or at least mood ruining. Scenes from horror movies or those odd cinematic cases where they move between a love scene and a bloody war scene, for example.
Can you find many of these scenes elsewhere on the Internet for free? Well, maybe, but they won't be as good quality, as easily found or cross referenced like they are here.
Bottom line: They are offering lifetime subscriptions for $99. I bought one. |
|
01-16-18 08:22pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
48
|
Naked Gymnast
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Some videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros) |
| Cons: |
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
No model pages. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw a couple of sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. I went ahead and did this in spite of there being no reviews for the site. here on PU. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log along the left side that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com instead of naked-gymnast. On a hunch, I went to Flexyteens.com, which has a very nice looking front entrance, and signed in my Naked-Gymnast login. Surprise! I got the exact same site, except at the top it now said "Flexy Teens"! So I will be dropping this review there also. I would be so pissed if I had signed up for the same site under two different names. Fortunately, I did not.
The models are typically young, but there is a general lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are just strange, neither gymnastic nor flexy. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but this site is not worth visiting by itself. |
|
03-23-16 08:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
49
|
Naked News
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very Entertaining site
Newscasters of every age, shape and ethnicity
You can download and keep the newscasts
pricing is good. |
| Cons: |
Can be a little monotonous sometimes.
A few of the newscasters are not great newscasters.
Slightly higher percentage of tattoos than I'm used to. (personal preference only) |
| Bottom Line: |
OK, first off, the site is EXACTLY what it is named. Naked News. It is not a porn site, exactly... The newscasters don't have sex and don't do anything more than strip. But... I watch an hour of regular news every morning at 6AM and many of the same stories are on the day's production of Naked News at 7PM. But I have to say it is MUCH more entertaining to watch the 7PM show. This site has been producing news for nearly 2 decades (December, 1999!) so clearly they are doing something right!
Naked News is a softcore site with primary focus on the day's events in a newscasting environment. The only difference between this and a broadcast news show is that the newsgirls strip as the newscast progresses. There are different segments like headlines (called bulletins), sports, movies/hollywood and there is even a travel segment along with guest interviews with porn stars and nude models.
There are 6 HD shows a week and the shows last about 20-25 minutes. You can sign up to get an email when the show is released if you want and the show can be streamed or downloaded in one piece or just in the segments you want. The production quality is every bit as good as most national news shows.
I gave the site an 85 because, although it is one of only two sites in this genre that I know of (the other is a not-so-great Playboy branded production), this site does what it does very well. Just DO NOT expect anything other than what the name implies.
Honestly, a few of these women would make terrific regular news anchors, but they are probably having way more fun doing this. And some of the news interview and remote segments are so good you would not know they were not on broadcast TV.
Let me ask you this. Do you have a favorite news show? Is there a hot newscaster on that show? Well, if the answer is yes, it is because that show has tweaked the newscasting formula to keep you watching. Naked news does the same thing, only they aren't sly about it. They KNOW why you are watching.
There are a few ancillary features of the site also, like a cam site, snapchat subscriptions and even clothing optional vacation options like a naked cruise to Alaska! They have some interesting streaming options, too, like a subscription to watch the show on Roku.
Downside? Well, sometimes they have guest or audition newscasters that are a little rough in one way or another. And once in a while I skip a segment because I don't like the look of the newscaster (personal preference again). And there will be times, maybe, when the news is actually more interesting than the naked girl talking about it.
Bottom line: This is a different kind of site. It isn't porn but it IS entertainment. If you watch the news regularly like I do, but you don't like the boring way news is sometimes presented, than this might be a great site for you. Or...if you just hate watching regular news but feel it is important to stay informed. Ta Da! Naked News is PERFECT for you!
After watching it for over a month, I've found a good balance between actually watching the news and watching the generally hot newscasters strip down to their fully shaved nothings. I don't think you will never find a more entertaining news show! Try it for a month at the discounted price. |
|
02-12-18 05:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Relatively large collection of VR porn
Many major US porn stars
Huge variety of girls
Generally good quality
You get the entire Naughty America site. |
| Cons: |
Video direction could be better
Videos are not continuous (brief fades out and in)
Many of the actresses are..um..very mature.
Navigation for VR is really poor. There is a VR tab that shows the VR videos by date, popularoty or your favorites based on your scores, but you can't search just VR for a particular actress. You get all of her videos with no clear indicator that any videos are VR until you click on them individually. Somebody didn't think this through. |
| Bottom Line: |
As always, I'm just laying out what I see and experience about a site with a minimal filter. I encourage you to share your experiences as well.
Amazingly, I had never joined Naughty America before joining them specifically for the VR porn. Fortunately, a subscription for one of their areas provides access to the entire network and I generally like what I see in the network. This review is just for the VR portion of the network.
Naughty America VR-specific Stats:
About 95 VR sets
I can't tell how many models there are because they are not broken out into VR only. Probably about 120.
One new set every 3 or 4 days.
Sets are dated and scored on a 5 star scale
One large zip collection of medium resolution images for each set including a strip from the actress (kind of a screen test set) and then images that match the video, possibly screen caps.
Format is side by side 180 degree with a fish-eye perspective. So far, they seem pretty consistent with good optics.
Wide variety of girls and settings here, the same girls that are in the regular Naughty America videos. Some are beautiful, many are a little older and some are much older (40 plus). I have a very hard time watching the more golden-age girls.
I joined this site as an add-on to another site called Real Teens VR, which is all sub-25 actresses. The two sites are affiliated with the young stuff going there and everything else landing here. It's about $$.
As far as I can tell, all of these videos are participatory sex videos or 3-ways. There are no videos where you just watch a girl get off like I've mentioned about a few other sites. I think that is a plus. The scenarios are very basic, which is also a plus. Friend of your girlfriend, best friends girlfriend, friend of your daughter, stepdaughter, stepsister, etc. The category "Your mom's hot friend" is the tip-off that it is an older actress. For the most part, the male surrogate (you) in these sets is silent. There is occasionally some grunting or groaning or talking, which is a little disturbing sometimes.
One thing that this site does a little differently is use multiple male positions in many of the VR sets. So they may start out with you (the male participant) sitting. Then you may be prone, naked and inactive. Then you are standing or kneeling on a bed thrusting away having active intercourse. It is much more of a traditional POV style. The active positions can be nice, but the transitions are instantaneous so you don't have a chance to prepare, mentally or otherwise. Ideally, there should be warning or the set-up should transition as part of the video. A few of the videos lead into the transition with the girl saying an appropriate thing like "OK, now I want you to fuck me doggie style", but most do not.
Actually, I feel like the VR sets here are a little over-produced and under directed. There is a billboard image for each set that reminds me of old VCR video covers, so somebody has the budget to make these, but the direction in some of the sets is marginal. I can sometimes see the girl looking at somebody and clearly being directed to do something differently. And the videos often "drop out" for a second as they splice in two non-contiguous takes or cut out some error. That drop out can be very distracting because often the position will change, clothes will vanish, or an initial insertion will be missing. The removal of clothing and an initial insertion are kind of porn video gold from my perspective. They should never be omitted from a video. In a few videos the drop-out literally happens every few seconds. It really ruins the whole VR vibe. You can do cut-away's all day long in a traditional porn video, but you can't do them at all in POV or VR. Apparently somebody doesn't know that.
Tech stuff.
After looking through the 100 or so VR videos from their representative "billboards" I pulled down the images and about 2 dozen high-resolution Oculus-Rift/Vive videos. Unfortunately, the high resolution vids stutter and pixelate on my Vive set-up, so I had to pull down the medium resolution versions. Those work well and I can hardly tell the difference in the videos. (I am in the process of building a much faster machine for VR and will test with that, but apparently the fastest AMD CPU chip made to date isn't fast enough...Which explains why Oculus only supports Intel CPUs.) In any case, the video files are HUGE and they take FOREVER to download. (My entire VR collection is about 200 videos so far and it already exceeds one terabyte.) Expect it to take 20-30 minutes to pull down several files.
I'm about out of space...
Bottom line: Decent site. Huge variety. Popular and sometimes older porn actresses. It is totally and completely worth it to join Naughty America VR for the handful of VR sets you will like and the bucket-loads of POV and other regular video material that comes with it. But my rating is for the VR portion on |
|
12-14-16 08:11pm
Replies (0)
|
|
