Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good quality videos
Decent sized collection
Dates back to 2007
Almost entirely young (under 20), petite, slender attractive models (no unibrows, etc....some eastern block teeth, though.)
Several popular European models from when they were younger
Most models are shaved but a few are trimmed or full.
Every update is dated
"Bonus" videos from other sites like Wet and Puffy
Cons:
The site IS updating, but only one small addition once a week.
When updates occurred before, they were once or twice a week but were very small. one video segment from a larger set, just screen caps, just photos, etc.
A few choice photo sets, like one of Caprice, have broken links.
Some MPG/WMV videos are actually avi. No idea why.
No scoring of videos or sets.
No ability to tag favorites.
Downloads are very slow.
The price ($29.95 USD) seems a little steep for the content, but not outrageous.
Bottom Line:
This is another "18" site
Mostly solo but some girl/girl sets
Stripping, masturbation, penetration, some speculum, some peeing, some panty stuffing.
The name says it all. Some serious close-ups of mostly really cute, young models!
The site video content is very similar to InTheCrack.com (ITC) and it also reminded me a little bit of ALSScan.com (ALS) or First Time Videos (FTV). ITC does a lot of close-ups and ALS is almost entirely teen models. FTV is another site similar to this one except this one is almost entirely indoor shooting. The collection here is nowhere near as large as those sites, but it is larger than many other similarly priced but lower quality sites
The girls are all eastern European and several have been on other sites over the years. Caprice and several others will be easily recognized, although some have different names here. There are also many that I don't recognize from other sites. Most are quite pretty and many have that "cute" factor that is solid gold for teen sites. Sadly, as is the case with many semi-pro eastern European models, their expressions can be a little off by American standards...a little goofy, frightened or spooky. Fortunately, the majority of the videos are not focused on faces at all.
At first I thought the site had stopped updating. I think that was because navigation for the site is a little tricky. The Videos page shows recent updates but the Photos page shows mid 2015 as the most recent update. And the upate log page has not been updated since 2015. Some udpates can only be found by scrolling down on the "home" page. The page only shows 6 sets from mid-october back to September, so anything that might have been here between September of this year and July of 2015 might not be showing up anywhere. They are not updating in the update log, in models, etc. Updates are occurring about once a week and they are single videos of a larger model set, or images, or bonus content. Honestly, this is one of the most confusing sites I've seen when it comes to finding stuff.
Some quick stats:
126 models or female couples
About 725 video segments
About 25 20 meg photo sessions (1333x2000)
Screencaps for most videos
Sets date back to 2007
There is an update log (through July of 2015)
Everything is dated.
Videos come in multiple formats, usually 3 sizes. Unfortunately the format of the files is often incorrect (MP4 instead of WMV, AVI instead of MP4, etc.) The sizes are usually correct, though.
Downloads are slow. Very slow.
Navigation is pretty basic. You can view by update or by model or you can view the update page or look at the update log to see all updates through mid-2015. I have no idea why they continue to post updates on the home page, but do not add them to the log or update model info. Something is kind of messed up with that.
There is a search function, sort of, but it allows you to search by a specific attribute or video activity like anal, boobs, cervix, discharge, finger, gape, etc. Kind of odd, but it does seem to work, at least with newer videos.
One thing I like is that all of the videos include a little synopsis of what goes on in them....similar to ITC but without the check marks for the best videos.
Also, the file names seem to make sense. Girls name and segment number.
There are about 21 bonus videos from Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy and Nubiles.net. These are full length videos, not just teasers.
Bottom line: I'm giving this site a 77 because a) it has some really good solo girl content, but b) navigation is very basic and links are broken or mislabeled, c) the webmaster is not posting/cross referencing updates correctly, and d) downloads are very slow.
If you like "InTheCrack.com" but also have a preference for the younger models, this site might be worth a visit. Take a look at the models and know that none of them are the least bit shy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some nicely done videos
Some great looking models
Decent collection
Cons:
This is actually a referral site.
All or most of the content is from third party libraries or sites getting referrals.
Site layout and navigation is inconsistent and generally awful.
Preview page is not representative of content
Preview page makes many models look under 18 (scary)
Update 3 times a week, maybe.
Cross selling on every page. (From the sites with the content)
Bottom Line:
I've reviewed a pretty significant number of websites, So I hope the PU webmasters understand that as the consumer reports of porn, they need to watch out for misrepresentation.
At first, this seems like one of those sites that is trying to model itself in the image of WOW or W4B. The recent videos, though not exclusive, are very nicely done and follow that genre.
There is a section called DVD movies. Click on it and you are taken to an area with commercial streaming DVDs. It is a really poorly implemented area, though, because each video includes an option for HD, but generates an error when you click on HD. These are mostly old DVD from before 2008 or so, probably from a commercial re-licenser/aggregator.
Then, as you navigate through the site, there is also a large collection of videos that generally remind me of the stuff you can find on RedTube or other free sites. It is not bad, but I've seen much of it elsewhere. Funny thing...once there, you can't get back to the main page. This is because you are no longer on 18X. You are actually on a different site called Webmaster central. Another content aggregator. Another funny thing. Many of the videos have the lower corner blurred out or have been cropped to eliminate a watermark. This is probably because the aggregator bought the rights to these videos from sites that no longer exist.
But here is where the really sleazy website garbage comes in...stuff this site deserves to get slammed for. The Thai girl on the preview page named Eaw is not on the site. She can only be found by clicking on the "tour videos" link at the top. "tour videos" interesting description. I'm thinking it really means "Browse videos".... Ah, there she is, 2nd one down. Click on it, and up comes a video of the girl and some screen shots along with "click here for more" So I click on it and....What the fuck?...I'm redirected to a site called "Thai Girls Wild" and invited to join! Are you f-ing kidding me!!?? There below Eaw is a nearly famous picture of the beautiful Melena from Met-Art, also on the preview page. I follow the link and, BAM, it actually takes me to a Met-Art sign-up page! The girl on the top of the page, named Alyssa Hart here, is actually a referral to a site called Petite18.com.
Wow, so I've paid to see models from the preview page who are actually not on this site at all except for a few images and one video that are REALLY on sites that are paying this site for referrals. NOPE! NOPE! NOPE! DON'T DO THAT! IT IS AMONG THE MOST DECEPTIVE THINGS A PORN SITE CAN DO!
So...bottom line? Well, as far as I can tell, there is either no or very little original content on this site. It is an aggregation of libraries and referral agreements that provide content from other sites. And in addition to that, the site is deceptively advertising models on its preview page that are actually bait images for referrals to other sites.
As unlikely as I think this is,it is entirely possible that the webmasters of this site do have some unique content, are trying to create something and are only a referral site while they build up their collection. If that is the case, I apologize. However, you are deceiving people and my score reflects my disgust for this kind of deception.
I have never had to say this in a review before, but STAY FAR AWAY FROM THIS SITE!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD!
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons:
Lots of effort to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting.
More fetish material than expected.
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line:
It seems that 21Sextury has decided to add shelf-space and increase revenue by breaking up their network into 3 separate networks. That's OK, I guess, but the lines between these networks are a little blurry and arbitrary and the material in some doesn't make sense.
Here are a few stats that I could figure out.
21 Naturals:
About 780 sets on main site.
About 250 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Videos are all HD up to 1080p.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Bonus sites contain another 1000 or so videos.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.
21 Naturals is billed as the "natural" site with young, fit girls in the no-longer-trending white-room style of video shooting. If it were a site filled with JUST naturals, as billed, I would be pretty happy...but it isn't. It is also the default location for foot fetish and anal videos. In fact, those types of videos seem to outnumber the videos that I signed up for. If you are into anal there is some decent stuff here. Unfortunately, I'm not. Same with foot fetish stuff. I'm not into that either. Oh well, I guess I should have read on the preview page......oh wait, they don't say ANYTHING about fetishes within 21 naturals on the preview page. They say you have access to over 15 sites and over 100 new videos a month and don't elaborate any further. They show 2 OTHER sites called 21foot-art and 21erotic-anal, but they look like different sites in the preview, not integral parts of 21naturals. Similarly, the images on the 21naturals preview page are young solo models or straight sex images that fit with "natural". No fetishes shown or implied at all. More than a little misleading, especially if you think, like I did, that one of those other sites might be 21sextury. Nope. They are all micro-sites with a specific theme like Asian, big boobs, booty, more anal, DP or whatever. Now, in all honesty, these are awesome bonus sites compared to those offered in some other networks, so I can't knock them. But even the bonus sites don't really lend themselves to categories in some cases. The Bitch Club for example, includes many different types of scenes including, yep, some foot fetish and anal.
The videos are well done, well lit, well directed and the models are usually quite beautiful even in the bonus sites. The bonus sites, by the way, have the same look and feel, both in navigation and in content, as the main site, so I suspect that these bonus sites may be available in the other two networks. Don't know for sure.
Every scene is scripted and acted out. The interaction between the couple is often somewhat limited and you often don't see much chemistry between them. It isn't that the chemistry isn't there, I guess, but you don't see it. Scenes are often slow and the couples often don't even look at each other during sex, with very little kissing or affection. Kind of weird for this style of video, which can be both more affectionate and more kinetic on some other sites.
They do have an interesting "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand that, although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive.
Overall, I would compare this site to WowgirlsX-Art or Joymii. The material is very similar, with interaction perhaps a little less intimate than those sites. But these webmasters really missed the mark on determining where to separate their three networks and how to market them. Half of the material here belongs in a new network called 21fetish.
Is it worth visiting? Well, yes, it is,especially for the relatively low price. If you like anal or foot-jobs, there is some good stuff here. There is also some good straight sex stuff here, all in HD. But I am going to penalize the site a couple of points because of the totally whacked way they threw the fetishes into this otherwise young-girl straight-sex site, how the filters don't work and how the landing page shows you locked sets from the other networks in an effort to bait you into signing up over there.
I hope you found this useful! If so, a trust vote would be appreciated!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected (if you are into it)
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD back to about 2009
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons:
They try very hard to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting. (i.e. slow...)
More fetish material than expected (if you are not into it).
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line:
21 Sextury is now one of three 21 Network sites that are marketed together but subscribed to separately. There is very little logic regarding which videos end up in which network since they all contain straight and fetish material
Here are the stats I could find (as of 5/10/17)
21 Sextury:
About 9700 sets on main site.
About 2200 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Recent Videos are HD up to 1080p.
Lots of older videos that are not HD.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.
21 Sextury is the original site in this network and as such it is larger and older than the others.
Overall the quality of newer videos is very good. They are are high quality, well directed and well lit. The actresses are good looking and they come in all shapes, sizes, colors and and ages, but most of them are in the 20-30 range with a few more mature gals. The newer material is along the lines of Wow Girls or Joymii. The older material is....not so much. Much of it seems borrowed from old sites from this company, like Club Sandy.
There is a lot of fetish material here like peeing and anal. I thought 21 Naturals was the foot fetish site, but there is some here, too.
There are some backstage videos that include things like shaving and tweezing eyebrows. Meh. There is some light femdom and lesbian bondage, a few "doctor" videos involving a gyno chair and speculum as well as regular sex, and there is something called Nude Fight Club that is a lesbian wrestle then sex thing. You would think that this would be loser gets pinned and has to do whatever the winner wants, but they didn't think it through the much, so it is "Wrestle a little, tear each other's panties off, start munching and, oh here's a dildo. Interesting to watch once or twice...
There is also a lot of bonus content that is excepts from other sites or straight from DVD.
This content appears regardless of which site you have subscribed to.
One of the frustrating things about this site is how much effort they put into selling you subscriptions on their other two sites. The landing page includes updates from all the sites with a little lock over the ones you can't watch unless you purchase access.
Another surprising frustration is in searching for specific things or models that you like. There is SO MUCH material here that you can't just move through the models page looking for the ones you like. Doing that could take days!
There is NO SEARCH function. Instead, they have
a "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes, behind the scenes, etc. And the options to select are very limited, so I can't search for videos that have, say, reverse cowgirls in them. Oh and lastly, once you select a video from the filtered list, when you return to the filter page, it has reset so you have to start all over. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand how this should work. Although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive and pretty-much useless.
Fortunately, there is a list of network sites in the left column. Micro-site names like Asshole Fever, Gapeland, Lezcuties and Footsie Babes help when searching for some stuff.
When you scroll through the models (pornstars) pages, you will see a lot of great looking girls (and guys), many of whom have different names than what you might expect. You can sort by most recent, most viewed, highest rated or alphabetical order. Only "most recent" gives you any idea of the age of a model or set. "Highest Rated" includes several models that have been out of the business for many, many years among the top 20. Also, the dates of the releases often do not reflect the dates of the videos. Bonus videos released recently might actually be videos that are 10+ years old.
Some are straight from DVD and many are not HD.
Bottom line is that there is a lot of material here and much of it is very good. There is a significant amount of fetish material here also.
But be prepared for your favorite models to have names that are different than you are used to. This, and the odd non-filter, means you will have to look very hard to find your favorites.
The site is worth it for a month, especially when you can find it at a discount, but the frustrations start to outweigh the pleasures by the end of your first month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
Body types tend toward curvy/larger breasts.
Generally one release a day
Newer videos are good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Videos are dated.
Cons:
Site design, presentation and navigation is horrible.
No search functions
Some releases are actually re-posts, remastered or previously unpublished sets of older material dating back as far as 2001.
Teeny-tiny thumbnails for photo shoots.
The narrow range of sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes things a little monotonous after a while.
Rather than break sets up into fetish types, each set includes the full range of material for each model (strip to speculum or whatever)
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here.
Un-named billing service posts site name on CC.
Bottom Line:
I haven't been a member of Als Angels since about 2005. Amazingly, the format and overall type of content seems EXACTLY the same as it was then. Really. The site design may have changed a little from 2005, but it is just as clunky.
It is very difficult to determine volume because of the antiquated layout.
About 3500+ photo sets/videos
Several hundred models
1 video and 1 photo set a week (some recycled or previously unpublished old material)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Mostly solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
Videos are dated but photo sets are not.
No scoring.
No search functions.
Horrible navigation.
ALS Angels is the other site run by the guy who runs ALSScan, now a part of the Met-Art network. ALS Angels is still independent (NOT part of Met-Art network) and it includes many more full-figured and popular models (Like Lucy Li). It also includes some material that used to be on ALSScan, like the old body-paint and nude-in-public sets. The type of material on this site is identical to the type of material on ALSScan, but the models are not limited to the super-young, relatively thin girls on on ALSScan.
ALS Angels is mostly a lesbian and off-beat fetish site, but there are a few newer boy/girl sex scenes. The girls on this site are more large breasted, curvy, perhaps a little older, but all are shaved and many are quite beautiful. A few headliners like Lucy Li are easily recognizable without much make-up.
Just like ALSScan, practically every model gets fisted at some point. There is also an odd fascination with otherwise un-viewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
The girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
Each set, regardless of age, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first.
The photographers have a very good rapport with the models and this shows in the sets. They are encouraged to please themselves and are often helped by another girl.
Navigation on this site is among the worst I've ever seen for such a large site. There is no search function. Models are listed alphabetically with an index. Photo-sets are displayed 10 sets across with no dates, names, or other info about the set with over 1000 sets on ONE PAGE! Once you open a photo set, you get between 5-10 pages of images, 6 images across, that are also very difficult to see. The sets are large, but many images are very similar.
You get two size options for display and 2 size options for downloads.
For me, the most frustrating thing about this site is the all-inclusive nature of every single set. I'll compare this to In The Crack, for example, that has many of the same types of scenes. Here, you get one scene or 1 video that includes everything from stripping to fisting to, speculum use to peeing in THE SAME LONG VIDEO or photo set. I don't want that. I want to see these beautiful girls naked, maybe oiled up and spreading, but that's about it. ITC separates out the sets so I can download the scenes I want and pass on the ones I don't. ALS should be doing the same thing. Compartmentalizing the fetishes will make the basic sets much more appealing to non-fetish folks and allow the people who like specific fetishes to just pick them. Win Win!
I also don't like that the photo sets aren't dated. You have no idea if the photo set you are opening is from 2001 or 2017. That's OK if you are a first-time visitor, but not OK if you are looking for material that has been published recently. ALL SETS SHOULD BE DATED. This failure troubles me enough to take away about 10 points from the score.
Bottom line: If you like ALSAngels, you will probably like this site. Keep in mind, though that the models are curvier here, which is a good thing, but the navigation is terrible.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are very good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2004.
Sets are scored
One update per day.
Navigation is good.
Search function is good.
Cons:
About 1 in 10-14 releases are actually re-posts or remastered sets of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not cool if you are returning.
The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while.
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here.
Bottom Line:
I last reviewed this site back in 2012. Some things have changed since then. Most, not so much.
About 4900 photo sets/videos
Several thousand models
1 set a day (many recycled)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
ALSScan is primarily a lesbian and off-beat fetish site. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. Many of the girls from older sets and some from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Kimmy Granger, Gina Gerson, Dakota Skye, Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up.
ALSScan "screens" a lot of models, evidenced by the proliferation of casting shoots throughout the sets, but only a small percentage of these girls are above average looking. The really great looking ones have sets that are re-posted, which is serious cheating. There is a lot of new content, but the way the site re-uses content, you can't really tell if it is new or not. Considering there is no recycled content anywhere else within the Met-Art network, this sin takes about 10 points off of my score for the site. This would be a much better site if they stopped recycling content.
But the success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide, even if some of it is recycled.
Until recently, there were NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though. Just since 2016, a very small number of B/G scenes have appeared. In typical ALS style, though, many of these scenes are unusual in that the guy inserts something into the girl, like a bottle, her fist, his fist, a vegetable or dildo, before he inserts himself into her. There are only a couple of B/G scenes so far.
Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paradise.
There is an odd fascination with otherwise unviewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that moment is.
Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that a lot here!
The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was cool. That was about 200 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the lollipop is.
This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
To be fair, each set, new or old, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first. In one video, Gina Gerson uses an inflator dildo and the photographer keeps saying "Are you OK?" That about sums up my thoughts when I see the stuff they insert into the girls.
Alsscan has a sister site called allsangels that is not within the Met Art network. The "Director" has no qualms with showing you a set of girls in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership there. Models at THAT site include Lucy Li, Dillon Harper, August Ames.....all it does for me is piss me of that these good looking, curvier girls are there instead of here.
The photographers here have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having a lot of fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camera.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment, which they do.
There is a section where some of the girls go to a tropical island. Once there, they run around naked and have sex with any girl they want. Unfortunately, the last time anybody went to one of these tropical islands was in 2009...doesn't stop them from re-posting them as new daily sets though.
Bottom line: I've been to this site about 10 times since 2001. For the last few times, the material has been so similar and so many sets have been recycled that I can no longer tell what is new and what is not. It is a great site to visit once. Just once. I keep forgetting
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006.
Cons:
Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years.
Bottom Line:
OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.
Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)
Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.
So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few recent videos are pretty good
Layout is OK
Navigation is straightforward (28 pages, 24 videos per page) and consistent.
Choose your own PW and it can be saved for future logins. (There is a very easy captcha at login.)
Cons:
One new video per week
Seems like a lot of 3rd party stuff
Many more recent Japanese videos are Pixelated
Only HD since about 2013
All HD videos are 720p
Videos are average quality
Many videos are non-nude
No photos
Only one video format per set
Older videos do not stream and must be downloaded
No video details
No model details
No search
Many, many broken videos in the bonus sites
Nobody seems to be enjoying themselves.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site because the previews show very flexible, relatively fit looking women, which happens to be a niche I like a lot. But the site was a pretty big disappointment as the updates are only weekly and the video quality is generally pretty bad. There are a few pretty good videos, but you really, really have to look for them.
Here are some stats:
Site has been open since 2004.
1 update a week
672 videos.
NO images.
HD videos began in 2013 (about 150)
About 60 HD videos (2013-present) are Japanese and pixelated due to Japanese porn laws.
The models are a mixed bag of mostly eastern Europeans with some western girls and the aforementioned Japanese videos. There are very few memorable/savable girls in the entire collection, which took me about an hour to go through. This is the only site where "flexible" does not always equate to fit. I now know that even the plumpest girls can lift their legs over their heads. That's not something I ever really wanted to know...or see.
Each video provides just two options: Watch or download. The older videos will not play in Chrome or IE11 and MUST be downloaded, which means you will be downloading, watching and deleting a lot of videos. Fortunately, they only take a few seconds to download because they are small. A large number of bonus videos are broken and
The video sets are broken down into 3 or 4 videos/segments for each shooting of each model. So, since they release one new video a week, it takes a month to get one complete video shoot.
Sometimes they are sequential, sometimes not.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this site is that although the girls are flexible, and a few are even attractive, the video and choreography is so poorly done that it really feels like a couple of horny middle school kids filmed their older brother's girlfriend. The videos are are not stable, not framed well, not focused and rarely positioned in an appropriate way. The girls rarely look at the camera, rarely pause in open positions and only a few recent videos actually provide an unobstructed view of things while the girls are flexing. Most of the sets have a video of the girl flexing while clothed, flexing while partially clothed, flexing naked from the side or back (not showy), then BAM some guy shows up and, without the slightest hesitation of foreplay, starts fucking them. The sex is not particularly good and the girls are either clearly not enjoying it or making faces that are the worst porn orgasm faces on the planet. These videos could have been so much better! All they needed to do was slow down, let the girls enjoy themselves a little and showcase the natural talent from rarely seen angles for a few minutes.
Before I forget, the site uses a couple of different charge providers. Make sure you get one you trust like Epoch as it is easy to cancel through them. I tried to cancel through the cancel page on the website and they were unable to find my account. Fortunately, I found it immediately on the epoch site and cancelled it there.
Now, to be fair, the site advertises free access to a bunch of other sites in their network, which is called "Extreme Movie Pass". I found these sites, at least the ones I ventured into, to be about the same or a little worse than Amateur18. These sites have names like EXGF Sexxx, Crazy Monster Cock, Crazy Beauties, Crazy Old Moms, Big Breast, Asian Hot Bunnies, Rubber Babes, Nylon Worlds (sic), Extreme Tranny Movies and many more. One, called Flexidolls.com, is both interesting and creepy. Each video starts with a guy taking a girl out of a box, a suitcase or a closet like she is one of those real girl dolls. He then poses her in an impossible looking position and immediately proceeds to do something to her with a dildo or his dick. The entire time, the girl has a totally blank expression and is staring into space because, you know, she's supposed to be a doll. I recall that most credit card servicers will not allow site videos to simulate drugging a woman in any way. These are as close to a "play with an unconscious girl" videos as they can get away with, I guess. Meh....
In general, all of the other sites are mostly standard def and fair-to-poor videos. Many videos are broken.
Bottom line: At $30 a month, this site is not really worth it when you compare it to all of the other top-quality sites out there. It might be worth it for a month at $20, though. with all of the bizarre other sites that comes with it, there might be something you like but there almost certainly will not be much of it and you will have to sift through a lot of junk. Be careful about cross-checks when you sign up and be sure to use a known service provider. I've put about three hours into looking at ALL of the content on this site and most of the network sites that look interesting. I will almost certainly never be back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Many "petite" top European models
Site claims no silcone, all natural.
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2006!)
Decent navigation
Over 320 models
Many of the models seem to be having fun.
Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons:
Site design is a little busy
Navigation could be better.
Many videos are rather slow when watching.
Constant use of teen and pre-teen props can get old.
Although all models were legal age when the shoots were done, some sets do seem a little borderline.
Bonus site is marginal.
Bottom Line:
Amour Angels follows a fairly specific formula in that it often attempts to portray its models in a very innocent, young or teen-oriented way. The models are generally very young looking and very petite, mostly A or B-cups although several are larger, and the sets and props help promote that type of fantasy. Most of the time, this portrayal can be very effective. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Many of the models here are also on other sites like Met Art, but here they look or are made to look younger. This is in part because many of these models WERE younger, probably just 18+ and just starting out when these sets were shot. A great example is a model named Marika on this site. She is petite and looks extremely young in sets from 2016 with a more mature looking set from 2017. Today she is a featured model on Watch4Beauty who goes by the name of Helga Grey. Other models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Amour Angel with several sets from very early in their careers and a few more current sets.
Note that this is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertions and very little spreading, although many sets do include fully spread legs. The emphasis, for the most part, is on the beauty of innocence.
The teeny-bopper effect is achieved by the use of primary colors, props like lolli-pops and hooded pajamas, striped leggins and tights, rainbows and hearts, chocolate, etc. Many of the sets don't include any specific props like this and would probably be just as home on another site like Met-Art, except that the models, as hard to believe this is possible, are even more petite. Just find the youngest looking girls on a Met Art or similar site and chances are good they are here.
The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2006. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1600+ sets. There are over 320 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can always go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (At least 120 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale. There are top models of the month and year and profiles of new models. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Amour Angels gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but set quality is typically very good.
Navigation is good and download speeds are good but the site is a little more ornate or busy than most due in part to the teeny-bopper them.
Older material is sort of "girl in the woods" with just posing and varying levels of eye contact. More recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. Oddly, the resolution of the videos is not clearly listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 40 to about 130 images. Videos are 10-30 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around.
Oh, there is a bonus site called "Teen Art Club" that appears to be similar material but much, much older,perhaps the prior generation of this site. The largest images on Teen Art Club are 1024 by 682, there are no videos and I don't recognize any of the models.
Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, petite models then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I joined after searching for discounts and finding one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge collection.
Many reasonably attractive girls
Network includes multiple sites, depending on what you signed up for.
Many models have different types of sets listed (masturbation, foot fetish, lingerie, etc.)
There are early sets of a few popular models here.
Site is multi-lingual
File download speed seems pretty good.
What you see in the previews is representative of what you get.
Every set is exclusive to ATK
Cons:
Site is often slow
Site often crashes (lots of 504 server-database errors)
Pages time-out so you can't go back or refresh
Lots of cross selling
Can't tell how many images there are.
Can't tell how many videos there are.
Navigation is a bit more challenging than it needs to be.
Many sets are nearly identical.
Some sets appear to have been recycled (Sets in only small resolution from 2011?)
Since every set is exclusive to ATK, chances are good you will see it elsewhere on an ATK site.
Bottom Line:
I'm having a hard time finding a lot to like about this website. Perhaps the best way to describe it is middle of the road. The models are your basic cross section of college-age Kmart or maybe Target shoppers. Some are attractive, many are not. None are truly stunning and almost none are truly hideous. This is a side effect of the amateur-type site status, I guess. There is a wide variety of body types from super skinny to...um...super plump, so if you like bigger girls, this might be a good site for you. These girls are all natural, ranging from nothing up top, to some giant melons, but breast size is proportionate to overall body type (i.e. fat is distributed evenly). There are no really fit or smoking hot bodies here, but a lot of nice 18-24 year-olds. The grace/awkward ratio is about even. Overall, there is a huge collection.
Navigation Is difficult. It is single threaded, and if you try to open multiple windows, the servers either throttle access or time-out...in other words getting through the images quickly is simply not possible. You can set how many thumbnails you want to see but, again, everything is single threaded so you have to wait to open a picture and then wait to return to the gallery.
The photography on this site is about average. The images are clear and consistent, but the lighting in the mostly indoor sets is not well developed or particularly flattering. You can tell that many of the sets with a model were shot on the same day in a different corner of a room or a different room in an apartment or hotel room.
The sets are a very standard formula. Girl starts out standing, clothes on, peekaboo, strip (often bottom first for some reason), show ass, spread, gaping spread, then depending on the type of set, on to other things like toys, masturbation, foot fetish, watersports, etc. "Artistic" is really just a normal set that they converted to black and white. Really dumb. This image shooting sequence makes many of the sets monotonous, even boring. In general, the girls do not look like they are having a very good time. It is all pretty much just straight show-me-the-money stuff, not very glamorous. Lots of gaping close-ups if you are into that. A handful of sets are girl/girl or guy/girl scenes but the vast majority are just solo.
Images come in three sizes, 682x1024 (who uses this?), 1080x1600 and 2000x3000.
Make-up is generally very good. No goofy eastern European eye shadow that I can find. I also noticed that the girls are generally very clean and well groomed. Mostly no pimples (anywhere), slap marks, bruises, razor burn, bad tattoos, etc. I don't think there is any or much photo-shopping...
The ranking of the models is a little odd. On a 1-5 scale (5 highest), there are a lot of unknown young models at the top of this list with only a few votes. Shyla Jennings is a 28th, Tiffany Thomspon is 15th. Early Zoey Kush is 94th. Early Jessie Rogers, complete with original Brazilian tan lines, is 62nd. Riley Marks is 85th. These model scores are not the sum of the scores of the sets, but a separate score for the models themselves. The reason I mention this is because it is not really possible to find the "best" girls or sets using the ranking system. You might find a model you like down in the 100-200 range. Oh, there are 657 ranked models. Surprisingly, most at the bottom are not bad looking, just victims of a bad photographer. Just reinforces my point about how useless the ranking system is. Might be more about the images than the girls.
There are quite a few videos of the models. Some masturbation videos are quite good, but many are just videos of the photo sets. Even a few guy/girl videos are just the photo sets, which is immensely disappointing. There are also a handful of behind the scenes videos...a big NOPE on those. Some of these girls you simply do NOT want to see before they put on make-up. Finding a video with the right combination of attractive girl and decent videography is very, very rare, but there are a few. Forget about anything hardcore, though. There are a couple, but it is extremely rare.
Perhaps the thing that taints my opinion of this site the most is the navigation speed and server response. When you try to open multiple windows, even to view images, the site times out. Oddly, download speed seems OK, though.
Bottom line? Well...if you are into amateur-ish solo photography, there is a huge collection here. Take a look at the previews and determine if this is the type of thing you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality videos
Top rated models
Decent photo sets
Good lighting and sets
Cons:
Site is small
Must pay extra to access "network"
Far too much cross-selling
Difficult navigation
Site is oddly generic
1 New video released every other day or so.
No scoring system, just "likes" Really?!
Acting reminiscent of 16mm porn movies
Almost no model interaction with the photographer whatsoever.
Very little chemistry...either between models or between models and crew.
Nobody is having any fun!
Bottom Line:
Note: I think it is possible that they reworked this site since 2013 as I can't find some of the features mentioned in prior reviews. This is not the same babes.com website I was a member of 10+ years ago.
Well, here's another one of those sites that looks good from the outside, but it leaves you oddly unexcited when you finally buy in. It has all the right components, top models, great quality videos, nice settings, but there's something just a little...um...off about it. You would think that a video, for example, of Ariel and Caprice getting each other off in every way possible would be pretty heavenly, right? Well, it is nice, but the acting (and moaning) is a little artificial, the rhythm is a little too slow, the chemistry is lacking, the music is a little too 80's cheesy and the sex is just so-so. There are lots and lots of videos like this. Maybe the best image I can conjure up is this: These are like porn versions of Met-Art videos. Beautiful women but really, really boring videos. I have NEVER seen a boring Angelica video....until now (the fact that she is moaning while on her knees jerking the guy off doesn't add much). The more I think about it, the more I think it is just really bad direction. Really bad.
The photo sets are OK, but each follows the related video very closely and I can't tell if they are shot together or not. My guess is that they are. Some of these shots are at odd angles and a little off center like the photographer is standing beside the videographer.
This odd photography and video quality and the way the site is laid out makes me think these webmasters are much more about making money than they are about making quality product. They've put all the elements in place to make masterpieces, but every video I watch is a disappointment. I'm a jaded old guy who has seen a lot of porn, though, so feel free to think I'm crazy.
So, here's the kind of odd money-hungry thing I'm talking about. Across the top, you have options to join Fuck-now, Brazzers, Twistys, Digital Playground, Reality Kings or MOFOS. You can join ANY of them with what they call UNLIMITED ACCESS, for $69.00! Like any Ronco ad, they show that a lifetime Twisty's membership, for example, as a $349.00 value! I'm thinking, woa, that's a great deal! Ah, but of course, THERE'S A CATCH! It is unlimited access for AS LONG AS YOU MAINTAIN YOUR MEMBERSHIP IN BABES.COM! Wait..what? No, I would not keep my membership to babes.com for more than a month (not enough content), so the unlimited membership would be pretty useless. They do have $10 off deals on the monthly rate for these other sites, but again you have to remain as a member of babes.com
Bottom line: Sorry, with so many other great sites to choose from, I can't recommend this one. This is the porn version of that movie with all the great actors that you ended up falling asleep in. My apologies to the webmasters.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality VR
Very consistent
Multiple downloadable formats
Many popular US porn stars
Decent navigation
All vids are dated and scored
File sizes are listed
Cons:
Site is still a little small
Highest bit rate files don't work well on underpowered PCs.
(but other formats do and I can't really tell)
You can't sort vids by score or model. (Everything is in reverse chronological order.)
Models are not in alphabetical order (also reverse chronological order)
There are only a few representative images for the sets and no zip files. I get that images seem counter to the technology, but you can't really tell what goes on in a VR video without them.
Bottom Line:
My viewing tools expanded recently and now includes an HTC Vive. If/when you buy one of these, be prepared to lock yourself in a room to binge a little on the relatively indescribable experience of VR porn. Remember to eat.
That said, I joined 3 sites in search of quality VR porn and of those three, BadoinkVR is the best for my tastes, which is full-on straight sex.
You can't rate these the same way as a "flat" porn site because the tech is new and there just isn't that much media out there...yet. So I'm going to score these a little differently, comparing them to each other rather than to a traditional site.
BadoinkVR stats:
About 90 sets
About 90 models (some sets have multiple girls)
So far most models only have one set.
Models are mostly popular US porn stars with a few young eastern Europeans in the mix.
1 New set each week.
Each set is dated and scored on a 10 point scale
The scoring is pretty honest, maybe a bit lower than it should be.
The frame rate is either 30 or 60 frames per second. Most are 60, which is terrific.
File sizes are listed
(Update: I recently built a new desktop computer that is dedicated to Vive VR use. On that machine, all of the High-res Oculus/Vive VR files from this site work perfectly.)
Nearly all of these videos are 180 degree with side-by-side 3D. (This is nice because you can set your player once and not have to change it when the video format changes.) Most are shot with a person's body (AKA you) in the foreground laying on his (your) back. There may be a portion of a scene where you are standing (i.e. getting a BJ or ramming a girl from the rear who is also standing or doggy on a the edge of a bed). Typical POV-like stuff. If you line everything up right, you can be 20 again with a buff porn-dude bod. The males in these scenes never make a sound, which is terrific and correct for the scenario. (You WILL hear a male voice while watching these, but it will be your own.) The thought that I was really watching somebody else fuck that girl truly never entered my mind...in other words, the video crew did it right.
The sets are typically very nice...most are in nice homes or buildings...but not too distracting. The lighting has to be perfect for these things and it is. The acting is pretty decent and the scripts are not embarrassing. Overall, the quality of the sets and the videos is impressive. I swear I could feel breath on my face a few times and caught a whiff of stripper perfume once or twice as well. Funny how the mind works.
The vast majority of these sets include full-on sex but some are just VR masturbation scenes. Whoever runs this site knows what they are doing. There is a solo masturbation/toy scene with Tori Black, who is a world-class sexy-talk teaser. Also, there are one or two straight sex scene from a woman's POV and a few scenes with other couples. (Most notable is a 360 degree scene from 2015 with August Ames and 2 other couples. Yes, August ends up riding you.) Some scenes have an extra girl or an extra guy that the girl you are screwing is messing around with. A few scenes are two girls getting each other off. Noticeably absent from this site so far are any two girl scenes with one girl on your dick and the other on your face. I'm sure they will have that here eventually...
Formats include:
Mobile LQ
Mobile HQ
Vive/Oculus
Gear VR
Playstation VR
(Some of these files are the same, but they spell it out by device to make choosing easier)
These files are HUGE so expect it to take some time to download. A 25 minute video ranges in size from about 2 gigs for low-res mobile to about 5.5 gigs for high-res Oculus/Vive files. Overall, though, download speeds are not too bad considering the size of these things.
Tech stuff:
I have been having trouble getting the Steam-based Whirlygig or Virtual Desktop players to work correctly for my Vive, so I've been using Simple VR and downloading the High def mobile videos instead of the "Vive/Oculus" videos. The high-def mobile vids work fine. Video compression is good and there is no stuttering, although there is some pixelation when I fast forward too much. One minute there's a beautiful girl bouncing on my dick and the next minute it is a block character from Minecraft. Woa! Pressing pause seems to fix it. (My very-fast AMD Opteron gaming rig is only about 2 years old but I had to buy a new 8-gig Radeon RX480 video card to support VR. The card is a little buggy and might be the issue.)
Bottom line: If you have a VR set-up and are into straight-sex, this is a "must join" site for at least a month. The site is well-run and what they lack in quantity, they more than make up for in quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of Passion-HD network.
Young, popular attractive models
Good quality videos
zipped images from video sets
Cons:
Very small site
Many downloads are broken. (now fixed)
Very slow download speeds (compared to other sites in the network).
No support.
Not already included in Passion-HD platinum Pass.
Watermarks on videos and especially images are HUGE and very distracting.
Ever watch a silent movie and see all the exaggerated facial expressions? Lots of that, especially in the images.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Passion-HD network, but like a lot of the sites in that network, it is marketed separately and there is no indication from the preview or sign-up screen that it is part of the same network. Once you are a member of any site within the network, Baeb.com is part of the $69 Platinum Pass if you purchase it now, but is not included if you already own the pass, as I do. Pure money grab.
Details:
15 videos as of 4/1/17
Good quality but several were broken (fixed)
Videos are scored 1-10 stars
Videos are dated
Model index
Photo sets and zip with mid-size images
Several of the videos were broken when I first downloaded them, failing about 1/2 to 3/4 of the way through when played. The downloads complete. The vids do not. I think this has been resolved but it is an odd issue.
When I tried to contact support about the download issue, the ticket system did not work. It kept asking me to put a name into the name field even though I already had. Giving up on submitting a ticket, I tried again to download the videos a few days later and they now appear to work.
The format of these videos is exactly the same as Passion-HD with the exception of a little less POV (no top-down or cowboy POV). This is all straight sex as far as I can tell. No anal or fetish. I think the logic behind this site is that it is supposed to be an actress showcase rather than a niche site. Not sure, though.
Bottom line: I can't recommend this site by itself due to the small collection size, broken videos, slow downloads and lack of support. Passion-HD is a much better value. Look for a deal on one of the sites (Including this one, which I saw advertised for $14 someplace) in the network and then consider forking out the $69 to get permanent access to all of the sites (That access is for as long as you maintain the original membership.) The network membership should then include this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons:
In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line:
I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.
This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.
It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.
Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.
The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.
Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.
No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...
Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.
So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
About 120 VR videos on CzechVR alone.
Site is part of a larger network.
A few Czech models you might recognize.
Fetish videos on sister site are interesting.
Decent navigation
Mostly young models
Site does a few things that are unique
OK quality videos
Cons:
Models are young but several are not necessarily fit or conventionally pretty
Lots of distractions
Models are not always enjoying themselves
Bottom Line:
I have been scoring these sites based on their VR-only content for the most part. I have also been comparing these VR sites to each other, not to non-VR sites, so my scoring is a little different. The assumption is that you are here looking for VR material.
Quick stats:
VR videos:
CzechVR: 120
CzechVR Fetish: 42
CzechVR Casting: 55
65%+ observational.
Unknown number of models (model page includes non-VR sets)
There is a VR update every 2-3 days.
Entirely Eastern European models that are mostly not well known elsewhere.
Downloads available for Smartphone, Gear and Oculus Rift
Most files are 60 FPS.
Resolutions and file sizes are good and listed.
Run times are listed and vary from 10-20 minutes.
Publish dates are listed.
Download times are OK
multiple downloads are OK
Videos are user scored thumbs up or down (highest score: 100% lowest score: 33%)
CzechVR is part of a larger group called Mentalpass. It includes two other VR sites CzechVR Casting and CzechVR Fetish and 6 non VR sites . In total there are about 200+ VR Videos here. That is a very large number for a VR site/network.
One interesting thing they do here is what I'll call the missionary mimic. Basically, the girl lays down and the VR camera moves forward very close over her. She makes appropriate sounds and moves as though the viewer is mounting her. Then she gyrates up and down as though being fucked. The technique is sometimes used in those solo simulated sex sites and it is an interesting experience in a VR setting. The only issue is that the camera moves, which can be unsettling in VR. When done well I'm sure it can be very satisfying.
The other thing that they have here are VR fetish videos. This includes virtual face sitting, fisting, nylons, latex, peeing/pee-play and girls getting golden showers from the male participant. If you are into those things and you have VR equipment, this is a pretty good place to get it. I grabbed a couple of the face-sitting videos and was highly entertained. The rest are not my taste.
That said, as much as I would like to say this is a great site, it falls short in a couple of key areas.
First, the girls are all young and some are quite beautiful, but several are not conventionally attractive. Some are a little large and/or flat-chested for porn roles and some have a (politely) average look. Combine this with oddly done make-up, poor dental work and occasional hygiene issues and this makes a few of the videos difficult to watch. I was asking things like "Where did this girl get her neon eye shadow?..." Some girls also "pull faces" which didn't help. Now, to be fair, I'm a white American. What the fuck do I know about the tastes of people in other countries? Nothing.
This site also illustrates how prevalent tattoos are in eastern Europe. There are also some unusual piercings in places that I have not seen before. Again, these are all things that distract from the scenes. I should be enjoying the scene, not wondering what something tattooed on a girl says.
Only about a third of the videos are participatory. The rest are observing sex, have the girl masturbating or are lesbian scenes with no male participant. Somebody here doesn't get VR. I do not want to be watching, I want to be DOING!
The sets vary a lot in location, lighting and quality. There were a few scenes where the VR perspective (i.e. the camera) moved unexpectedly. In VR, this can be VERY disorienting. Many scenes have unexpected noises that make you want to pull off your VR gear to see what's happening in your room or who is at the door. Table and bed thuds, sirens outside, things dropping and noises that simply shouldn't be there. This was VERY distracting. Several sets also had distracting things within view. I found myself looking around far more often than I should have been.
To be fair, the majority of the models are pretty good looking and they seemed like they were enjoying themselves. But a few almost seemed to be in pain... When a girl looks to be in pain and never takes the guy all the way in, the scene can be unpleasant to watch. Culture, maybe...
Several of the girls spoke English, but a few spoke native (Czech?). I was guessing which line was "Do you want me to take my bra off?" and which was "I want you to fuck me!" Sometimes it was pleasant. Sometimes not.
Bottom line? Well....The fetish stuff is interesting and there are some pretty good videos here, but given the huge volume of VR videos here, the overall score is a little disappointing. You will have to sift through a lot to find the good ones. Those websites that list CzechVR among the top 10 porn VR sites clearly haven't looked lately. The site has some videos out on Pornhub if you want to sample them. After seeing some of the best VR the internet has to offer elsewhere, I have a hard time recommending this site for the general porn viewer. You decide
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge collection
Several niches
14 "sites" plus 2 pay sites
Models are generally attractive
Reasonable variety of girls
Lots of nice looking porn starlets
Sets go back to 2001!
Good navigation
Cons:
lots of overdone porn stars
Many, many enhanced body parts
Average model age is late 20's early 30's
Ads on every page
Image download options could be better
Had a fairly hard time with logins and customer support (they require a captcha for EVERYTHING)
The regular price is insanely expensive.
Bottom Line:
I've been around long enough to remember when DDF was owned by Dennis De Franco, a European photographer who shot for magazines and made Sandy famous. His work was simply spectacular. That was nearly 20 years ago. Since then, DDF has gone from his name, to DDF productions to DDF network. Dennis has either sold the site or no longer has very much to do with it. That's a shame because whoever runs things now is trying to be all things to all potential customers.
The site feels a lot like Twisty's or the long gone Danni's Hard Drive. The collection is huge but the girls are...let's just say many of them have moved a little too far down the porn star path to be really attractive. There are a LOT of enhancements, tons of porn moans and the percentage of anal is far above my threshold of tolerance. (Why so many beautiful or once beautiful girls subject themselves to anal is completely beyond me. And what is with all the gaping asses? If you are into anal and gaping asses, sign up now! You won't be disappointed!)
But I digress, let me tell you a bit more about the sites:
"1 by day" is one of the original sites that provides one video/photo set a day. You know many of these models, but it could be from years ago. Zafira (current), Peaches (last set in 2008) and Eufrat (2013) are among the most popular. Almost every set starts with the girl clothed, then a strip, then maybe a few straight nude shots, then come the fingers and toys. Lots and lots of toys. (If you like toys, then sign up now!) Many of the newer sets look truly new and are of girls I have not seen before. But the formula is generally the same with every set including (simulated moaning) masturbation or insertion. The oldest sets in 1 by day go back to 2001 and the old ones look almost exactly like the new ones except there are no anal shots and not as much insertion in the older sets. With 15 years of sets, you WILL get lost in here if you aren't careful. DDF Busty is a site full of...huge, huge boobs! These are mostly double-Fs at least. Some look pretty good but many are clearly not well done and a lot of the girls have the full figure to support that mass up front. This is more of a full porn site with sex, fisting, blow-jobs and boob sex, with the obvious feature up front. If you are into truly ginormous boobs, you will get your fill of them here. DDF Busty goes back to about 2005 with a set every two or three days for that entire time.
Hands on hard core is pretty much as it sounds. These sets go back to 2003 with SV videos and images in each older set. I can't quite tell when these went HD but I see some 720 as far back as 2005. This is the site that is...um...filled with anal and there is some double penetration and multi-way stuff as well.
Hot Legs and Feet is a fetish site for stockings, shoes and feet. Most of the sets are regular porn with the camera or video emphasizing the feet. Lots of shoe heel insertions... If you are into that stuff, the sets are not bad. The sets go all the way back to 2001 with a few sets a week for that entire time but there are a lot of duplicates to the other sites.
One other site I want to mention is House of Taboo. This is supposed to be a B&D and kink site but if you have ever seen any of the better commercial sites of that genre, you will be pretty disappointed here. Maybe 1 scene in 15 looks even remotely genuine. There are some pee scenes if you are into that, though.
There are several other much smaller sites including "only blowjobs", "Euro Girls on Girls", "Euro Teen Erotica"(6 sets with Anjelica here), "Hairy Twatter" and "Sex Video Casting" which is a collection of casting videos. There are also a handful of one-girl sites like Sandy and Cherry Jul.
So, the bottom line is that there is a LOT of stuff here and there are micro-sites that look like they fill most niches. The quality is decent, the models are mostly popular porn stars and the navigation is consistent and fairly intuitive. But the problem is that they try to fill so many niches that the site doesn't really excel at any of them. I'm not really into hairy twats, feet, peeing, fake bondage, watching blowjobs, fake orgasm moans, bolt-on F-cups, massive insertions, double penetration, anal or gaping. So the sites that feature those things are not something I want to pay for. Fortunately, there is a reasonable amount of good quality solo and straight material spanning a decade and a half. is it worth the $44 or so regular rate? Well, sorry, no. I waited and finally got an intro deal for $25. If you see it for $29.95, go ahead and try it.
If you are into a wide variety of different niches I mention above, sign up now. If you aren't into some of those things, look around for discounts and sign up when you find one. But if you are into any of these niches exclusively, you should probably sign up for one of the many other niche sites out there.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the net's most beautiful imagery
Many, many US models you've heard of.
Some files back to 2003 and beyond
Zip files in many sizes for most sets, some up to 3000k.
Many videos now in 720P
Good layout and consistent navigation
Many of the best US models in the industry have their roots here.
Very good variety of models, most of whom have exceptional proportions.
The download process isn't bad if you aren't trying to download every image on the site.
It seems like they may be rescanning older 35mm sets in higher resolution when they re-release them, but I can't tell for sure.
Some content goes back as far as 2003. That's ALOT of images.
No cross selling!
For the price, you can't go wrong. (Part of why I rate them so high)
Cons:
Site seems a bit slow to load compared to others
Recycling of old images cheats number of new releases.
Only 1 release per day and almost ALL of them are re-releases. (Less than 1 new set per week)
Quantity of new releases really seems to be dropping (Quality is good, though).
No original dates on sets so you can't tell if it is old. Chance are very good that it is.
Older videos in 480P or less and with no original dates for the models, you can't tell until you click down.
Bottom Line:
Important bits:
Mostly solo scenes with a few very good girl/girl softcore scenses (good because the girls are usually into each other and not just standing there.)
No boy/girl scenes that I recall.
Very few toys....but a reasonable number of fingers.
Good mix of outdoor and indoor scenes. These guys love sunlight (a very good thing for the images and girls, apparently) so many of the indoor sets are actually set up outdoors.
Nothing hardcore, but if you are the type that likes "unobstructed views", there are a lot of those.
Sorry, but I can't just bullet point this one. There's somehow more to it. As a frame of refgerence, my taste is for well done images.
This site has an ambiance about it that is somehow different from the the other, mostly european softcore sites. One of the fun things is looking at how the girls are transformed from the initial Audtion shoot. When they come in, they are good looking and trim. For the shoots, most are OMFG awesome! Now, it takes a good model to make this formula work. A good recent example of this is Amber Sym. In the audtion shots, she is hot, with a well toned, cheerleader type body. In the photo sets, she is simply ungodly beautiful.
Many models shoot stills well, but are really awkward in videos. The folks at DD (I still want to call it DDG) really know how to shoot video to bring out the grace and beauty in a girl. There are dozens of examples like this.
Another thing this site does is understand what the typical male, um, comes here for. I think the word I would use to describe these types of sets is Inviting. The models are aware of the photographer and use that element to tease or play with the camera a little in a very subtle way. Imagine if a really hot girl said to you "Hey, I'm going to take my clothes off and maybe fool around with myself a little. Stick around and watch if you want because that makes it more interesting for me." It is subtly different from how the European sites do it. "Flirt" sets even have th egirls talking at you...but sometimes less is more. Very good directing on the photography team's part.
Most of the sets include an ample number of really nicely (as in tastefully) done close-ups. And sometimes there is a tiny bit of Astroglide..I guess..in the right place to make things more interesting. It seems somehow more personal...sharing...inviting than the "girl frolicking in the woods" shoots you see elsewhere.
Another subtle thing that makse the experiance nicer is that there is very little cross selling or other advertising going on. This is a freestanding site, so you get what you get. It just seems so much more respectful of my time and privacy to NOT be mentioning that there are also sets of this girl on the blah-blah-blah sister site. (Compared to, say, Met-Art, that accosts you with ads for sister sites.) I guess the reason they don't have more cross-selling is because nobody else does some things the same way that they do. Kudoos for both.
Once a set appears (or re-appears) they are placed into specific categories that you can browse through. Categories include Dreamgirls, XXX Stars, Young and Fresh, Flashback, Interviews, etc. This helps if you are searching for a particular look or Genre, but it appears that they are not producing a lot of new material for many of these categories.
Now that you can tell that I'm clearly enamored with the models and photography, let me tell you a few of the more frustraing things about this site.
It is slooooow, mostly slow for pages to load. Downloads seem to be about average in speed. Not sure what that is about.
As I mentioned above, many of the older sets get recycled, apparently more than once. I don't have a major issue with that as many sites do it, but this site passes them off as new every time they come back around (sometimes multiple times). Fricking QUIT THAT! Introduce them in a different category and include the original dates for the shoots as well as the original dates for the models introduction to the site. Yes, some of the sets are the best they've ever done and deserve to be re-introduced (take a look at Alyssa Lovelace, for example), but re-datestamping them is just plain wrong. It destroys the model timelines and, at best, seems deceptive.
And here's another thing. As I looked back through my 12+ year collection of DDG/DD images, I noticed that a lot of material from the late 1990s and early 2000s is no longer there. Some of it is big-hair and bushy, but a lot of it is completely timeless. You should consider putting more of the images back on the site in the appropiate area so your subscribers can enjoy them.
Ok, bottom line. If you are into softcore, this is absolutely, positively one of the sites to visit as there is over a decade's worth of material. If you were here less than a year ago, there is not much new content, but it might be worth it to visit for the new lower price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Erotic Beauty, formerly MetModels, leans a little more toward old-style softcore nude photos in natural settings. The models are generally not mainstream, so you find a few that are very interesting and different. The site is billed as "Naturally Beautiful amatuer nudes" which probably says it better than I can.
Cons:
Hmm. Can't quite put my finger on it.... a little slow, maybe. Nothing major wrong.
Bottom Line:
This is a really good amatuer nude site. It is good because the photography is good, the models are generally attractive and typically squeeky clean (can't tell if they are photoshopped..), and there is a tremendous quantity of stuff going back to 2005. And remember, this USED to be the site where the Met-Art network put its most beautiful models so even the old stuff is pretty good. (The new stuff is good, too!) Many of the sets are outside.
Navigation is average or a little better than average. You can search by model, most popular, date, etc. Images do not open in a new window, so you have to remember that if you are used to some of the other sites like this.
There is a HUGE variety of models here, all apparently european. They are also all natural. I don't recall a single enhancement. And the models mostly seemed to be enjoying themselves, or at least comfortable with the set and the photographer.
I got into the site this time on a $12.50 special because I was already a member of Met-Art.
Absolutely worth a visit, especially if you like natural nude photography.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has been part of the ever-expanding Met-Art Network for many years. (i.e. high quality)
1 exclusive set a day since 2005 (over 3600 sets, easily 100,000 images)
Models are usually beautiful and popular
Sets are very well done.
Many sets are as good as the best Met Art sets.
Models might be a little more revealing here than on Met Art.
Cons:
It seems as though the The site has become sort of a spill-over from Met-Art where archived shoots or perhaps extra shots from a set are packaged and displayed.
Many sets are models we will never see again (because they only did one or two shoots and then quit.)
Navigation, though good, is not quite as good as Met-Art.
Bottom Line:
I published a review of Errotica Archives in 2012 and rated it among the top soft core photography sites on the Internet. That review expired so I thought I would refresh it with my impressions from the 6 or so times I have joined the site since then. It is still up there among the best nude photography sites on the Internet, but I can't rate it as high as I did in 2012.
The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. Many of the models you know and love were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With over 12 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. All but the newest European models have sets here. All of them!
Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I STILL wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network sites..)
All set come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution. Everything is available in zip files and downloading is relatively fast.
The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photographers. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind showcasing their assets with close-ups.
There is a new set every day. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set but these are not re-releases, just archive or perhaps extra images from a different set. All sets are clearly dated.
Just a reminder that this is a softcore site. There are a few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude modeling site.
Met-Art links all of their sites together so, for example, you can see links to sets on other sites for a model you are looking at, but each site requires its own membership and associated fee, so the links can be frustrating at times. Once in a while they will allow access to a site on the network for free for a limited time but generally, you have to pay for access to each site. There is a pull-down menu that allows you to jump between sites in the network that you are a member of.
So....what about this site isn't as good as it used to be? Well, I think it might be two or three things. First, this is clearly a site for surplus or archived sets (hence the name). Some of these sets were archived because they were not quite suitable for Met Art. Either something didn't click with the set or, on the other hand, maybe there are too many close-ups! (Not really a problem for me...). But there seem to be more of these B-grade sets than there used to be. Second, there are also a lot of slightly less impressive one-hit wonders in the mix. Occasionally, there will be an introduction set for a new model on Met Art. Then maybe there will be one more set on Met Art, then some time later a third set will show up here. This is because the model only did a few sets and then quit, but there are sets on the shelf. And sometimes....these models were not A-list models to begin with.
In fact, that is the third reason the site doesn't rank as high this time around. Global supply. In 2010-2012, there was this bevy of incredibly beautiful women in eastern Europe that were shooting for the Met-Art, FemJoy and a few other networks. It was a bumper crop of OMFG women! Now, there are still many, many incredibly beautiful women within the Met-Art network, but to produce the kind of volume this network needs to provide 15-20 new sets or videos a day, there has to be a constant flow of new and consistent talent. Personally, I think that talent is becoming harder and harder to find and the result is a higher proportion of sets with unpolished or less attractive women. This is probably pervasive with all of the sites that use Eastern European models and it explains why some photographers are heading to Brazil and central America more often. I'll leave it at that but I'm sure you get the point. The supply, relative to demand, seems to be dwindling. (and I'll bet the popular models are getting more expensive.)
OK, where was I... In spite of my opinion that the site is not quite as good as it was in 2012, it is still an outstanding site! If you like Met-Art, Femjoy or similar sites, you will love this one. And considering the volume of material, it is still an excellent deal.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is the second best site in the Met-Art network behind Met-Art itself. Very large volume of high quality images of truly beautiful women in natural indoor and outdoor settings. See details below.
Cons:
Nothing much in the way of cons as long as you remember it is a nude modelling site. No hardcore here!
Bottom Line:
This site rates up there with the best nude photography sites on the Internet. Tons of photo sets (not much video, though), many, many different models of all shapes and sizes. The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. And many of the models you know now were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With 10 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. (At least 1 new set a day, 50 images per set, that's 3600+ sets and 180,000 imaegs!)
Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network..)
Small, medium and large zip files are available for every set since 2004 (although "large" wasn't that large in 2004)
The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photograper. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind, um, showing us the money.
There is a new set every day. Very few of them are continuations of earlier sets and there does not seem to be any common location where the majority of shoots are done. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set, but unlike some other sites, I don't think they are re-releasing anything. For example, a set came out earlier this year of Marketa when she was relatively young. The set may have been 8 years old, but it had never been released anywhere before as far as I could tell. Contrast this with DDG or Earl Miller, who fairly consistently re-release older stuff.
All sets come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution.
Now, if you are looking for ANYTHING other than straight images of unbelieveably beautiful girls, then this might not be the site for you. There are a very few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude girls site.
I got in this time on a discount because I was a member of Met-Art. Once in Met-Art, it was just $12.50 to join additional sites in the network. Well, I'm dropping the lesser met-art network sites but will keep this one for at least another month or two.
As I mentioned above, overall this is one of the best nude photography sites on the net. Every time I log in, I find myself surfing the site for an hour or more. I don't think I've ever been dissapointed with this site...and for me...that says a lot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many of the best models from Met Art
Outstanding photography
Perfect settings and lighting
Sets are usually more revealing than Met Art
Good site layout and navigation
Videos are often not boring!
Models and sets are user-scored
Searchable tags
Cons:
Not a huge site, but larger than many
One update every 2-4 days (usually 2)
No tiered pricing for existing Met-Art network members
No other cons!
Bottom Line:
This site is a satellite in the Met Art universe that is exclusively presented by one of Met Art's best photographers, Arkisi. I can't find any profile information on Arkisi, but he/she is a very, very busy and talented person. The site includes many of the best models from Met Art in really excellent sets. Many of the videos are also excellent, which is often not the case elsewhere in the Met-Art world.
Overall, I'd say that this is 2nd or 3rd behind Met-Art in terms of best within the network.
Some basic stats:
About 720 sets (15 a month since 2014)
About 172 models
Sets range from about 35 to 120 images
Videos are about 6 to 22 minutes
Images come in three sizes 1k, 2k and 4k+
Videos come in several formats from 270p (why?) to full HD in MP4, WMV and Divx.
All sets are user scored and user tag searchable.
All sets are dated
The basic shell is very similar to Met-Art, including a user-options page that allows you to tailor your experience....except the option to open each image in a new page is not present.
The models here are every bit as amazing as they are over in Met-Art, but many models here are a little more...open. There are a few sets insertions and some other things like candle-play. Several videos start out showcase and end up masturbation. I actually joined this site because I wanted to see....um...a little more of a particular, exclusive model and, wow, I was not disappointed. Keep in mind, though, that this is strictly solo and some two-girl scenes. It is up a notch or two from Met-Art, but it is not at all hardcore.
In addition to the popular models, there are a few casting sets and a few sets with models I've never seen before. These might be girls that are popular elsewhere or girls that didn't stick around for one reason or another, I'm not sure.
I'm scoring this one an 90. The site is excellent overall, but isn't quite as large as most A sites. So it got that score based on the quality of material.
Bottom line. If you like Met-Art, do not hesitate to join this site. It is well worth the $20.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
04-08-1206:17pm (Update History) Reason: corrections and updates
Pros:
Girls are generally very attractive. The site includes the typical collection of European girls that are on other (softcore/glam) sites, but there are also a few that are unique to this site. Image quality is high. Video quality is generally high. Tech support response to my issue was practically instantaneous.
Cons:
site navigation is not up to par with many other similar sites. Page refresh and image downloads are nat very fast. Zip file image naming structure is absolutely infuriating! (ie every set has an image named 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg, making downloaded image management impossible! Saved images in older IE browsers appear to be only BMP, not JPG., making them much larger than they need to be for both downloading and storage. (Google Chrome and other browsers are probably fine)
Bottom Line:
Overall, this is a pretty nice site, but it is not up to par with the best-of-class (i.e. Met-Art, Femjoy, Erotica Archive, etc.) This applies in four areas. First, the navigation of the site is ok, but not great. You can't, for example, sort the models based on user rating. Even sorting by name is a little clumsy. Second, actually downloading files is truly painful.
Once you are in a set, clicking on an image opens a small thumbnail. To open an image large enough to download, you have to click on an icon below each image. When downloading ZIP files, there are no model name or set references, just numberd image files starting at 1. The only workaround to this is to create folders for each set. Very frustrating as there is no reference to the model, the set name, anything in the zip files. ...where was I.. Oh, the third and fourth things are the models and photography. The models are attractive, but there is something a little off about either the models, the shoots or the sets. The only way to describe this is that it appears nobody is having a good time. Very few geniune smiles, little laughter, no conversation at all in the videos. Not much fun. In many of the sets, out of dozens of pictures, there are only a few where the model looks like she is even remotely enjoying herself. Compare this with, say, Femjoy. It is the interaction with the photographer, or somebody else on the set maybe, that brings out the absolute best images in the models. So the models on Eva's Garden may be beautiful, but the images are not engaging. I compared many of the same models between this and other sites. Something is just not as good here. These girls should be surface-of-the-sun hot. They are on other sites. Somehow, not as much here. There are a few outstanding sets and OMG models, but many, as I said above, are a little off. Oh, and the fourth thing, is the sets. Out of the dozens of sets I've looked at so far, and probably hundreds of overviews, nearly all of them are indoors in carefully controlled lighting. A few are outdoors on a cloudy day or under a covered awning. Many images are shot with what appears to be a wide angle lens(probably to increase the depth of field and get more of the model in focus), but the result is a distorted image. I've never seen this on any other site. The indoor sets vary, of course, but the lack of variety contributes to an almost monotonous feel to the site. I never thought a website full of naked beautiful women could be monotonous. Apparently, I was wrong. If you have not already been to one of the top softcore/glam sites, I suggest you try those before you try Eva's Garden. This site is nice, but just not top tier in the genre.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Large collection (Over 400 scenes)
All college aged models
Mostly attractive models
Mostly exclusive models
Access to a couple of other sites with similar themes.
Cons:
Photo images sizes are small
Identical format for each video can be monotonous.
Seems like one guy just recording his conquests...
Navigation is very basic
Bottom Line:
I apologize, but I cancelled my membership here before I had a chance to collect stats and do a review. Here's is what I do have.
This is obviously a "college-girls paying for tuition" site, real of fake, I can't tell. The videographer/blurred out male star of the scenes travels to different colleges and records his meeting with, conversing with, squeezing, fingering, often jamming a sex-toy into and ultimately fucking and then coming all over the young, relatively attractive girl in each scene. Being relatively attractive is kind of easy when you are in the most admired demographic on the planet (18-22 female), but a few of these girls are truly beautiful. There are many scenes, although only the recent ones are in HD (720p) and the oldest ones are an unwatchable resolution like 640x480.
The newer scenes alternate between POV and fixed camera off to the side. Some of the POV and POV-like (i.e. camera at foot of bed recording a reverse cowboy) material is quite good, but much of it is jittery and the field of POV view is limited.
Some of the scenes have a split video (POV and from another angle) which I personally dislike a lot. I do not recall any issues downloading the videos or zip files. Images are small, like 1200-1400 pixels on the wide-side small.
The network includes a "casting couch" site, and a "broke model" site. Both of these sites followed a similar, narrow scenario which made me immediately fast-forward in search of the good stuff. There was also a site called "net video girls" which just seemed like a lot of unrelated amateur nude-model stuff thrown together like a slightly pornographic subreddit.
Bottom Line: There are a lot of sites that use this format but this one is as good as any of the others that I've seen, perhaps a little better. So if you like the format, you have nothing to lose by signing up for a month...well...except for $25 if you really hate the site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great model interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not at all shy
Improved site layout and navigation
Token based login (remembers you)
4 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 6000x4000 pixels
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation much better but still a little quirky
Videos are a sometimes bit snoozy
Bottom Line:
This is my third review of this site in about 6 years, and I'm happy to say that, with an improved layout, better file size options and less inhibited models, it is better than ever.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best.
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on the number of sets, but it is now up to about 5000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last 4 years. The pre-2010 sets tend to be a little more "Naked girl in the woods" but for the past several years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in many different poses...standing, reclining, come-hithering, you name it. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Photographer interaction with the model is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward, ugly or uncomfortable anywhere. The photographers here are simply the best in the industry. They start with beautiful women and turn them into breathtaking goddesses. Stefan Soell, for example, manages to regularly find and photograph some of humanity's finest examples of the female form in some of the most beatiful settings on earth. And the other photographers are just as good, providing you with uncluttered, nicely focused, obstruction- free, mostly prop-free views of beautiful, confident, 100% natural women.
Just a reminder that this is relatively soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and a few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want harder core in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views from every angle of great looking models. In the past few years, the sets have become somewhat more explicit. That is a huge change from prior years and adds another level to the awesomeness of these models.
The videos usually follow the pattern of a similar photo shoot. They are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. There are a few close-ups, etc., but there is usually no masturbation. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (480p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
The photo sets typically have about 80-120 images in them and the images can be downloaded individually or in zip files of the whole set. Image sizes in the recent zips range from a now-puny 800 pixels across to a decent poster sized 6000 pixels across. To get the really big images, you have to download the zip file.
Femjoy updated their site layout a couple of years ago and overall it is a huge improvement. Very large set thumbnails include the model name, the set name, the photographer name, the set date and the number of images in the set. The main pages are an uncluttered design with weekly videos on the right, favoriate models toward the bottom and a couple of other sites referenced at the very bottom. There are also pages for just photo sets and pages for just videos. On those pages, you can navigate easily to any month of any year all the way back to 2004. Nicely done. No aggresive partner marketing in your face like so many other sites. There is a search function for models and photographers, a set card for each model and photographer, and a scoring system of 1-5 stars for both the model and the photographer.
The ONLY thing I still have not gotten used to is the in-set navigation. It is much better than before, but there are no options for opening an image in a new window and th eback button doesn't really work. Everything here opens in the original window and if you try to open an image in a new window, some functionality, like image size selection or next/previous is lost. Click on a set and you get nice large thumbnails of all of the images in the set on one page. HUGE PLUS. There is a large X in the upper right hand corner that will get you back to the page you came from. Same with the images. The first time you select an image, you get the smallest size until you chose a different size, then the site remembers that size but only for the current set. And the X in the upper right corner will take you back to the previous page, but it takes you to the TOP of the previous page rather then where you were. A little inconvenient if you are looking at images at the bottom of a set or a set thumbnail at the bottom of a page.
OK, I'm out of room....
Bottom line? If you are into medium-soft core and like young, showy, confident, OMG beautiful young women, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content and good pricing. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. I will have a subscription here until either the site or I are no longer around.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation still not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Bottom Line:
I noticed my review of this site expired and there are no current reviews, so I'm updating my old review. Very little has changed since 2014 except the number of sets has gone up a lot.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open and the site seems to e getting a little more explicit than it was in the early days. No problem with that!
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 4000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views of great looking models.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
So..what's not to like? Well...there are STILL a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best.
First, the navigation is still a little off. There are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. You have to click "back to gallery" or pageback to return to the gallery page. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving because you will inevitably close an image and end up exiting the set. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I was told they were working on this in 2014. Apparently, they lied.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, showy, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
