Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
MC Nudes
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hi-Res Photos
Zip Files
HD Video
NO DRM
Lot Of Models |
| Cons: |
Erotically Mild
A Chore For Collectors |
| Bottom Line: |
Finally joined this site after thinking about it for a long time. Decided to because it offers high quality, high resolution photography.
The photos are very professionally produced. And they come in 3 sizes: 600, 1200, 4000 px. They can be downloaded in zip files. The download speed is fair to good.
The vids are HD, 1280x720, very lush. They are not DRM protected.
There are 10 pages of models, many well known. All told, there are about 1400 sets. They have (to date) 382 videos. A good solid archive.
So why the low score? A couple reasons. Much of the photography is as unerotic as it comes. I will give them big credit for not having repetitious shots (ie 14 in a row of a model standing around in the same pose). But many of their sets are, well, kind of bland.
Another problem is if you are a true collector of fine nudes, it is very difficult and time consuming to use this site. For instance, when you download a set and unzip it, the folder is named "Large", or "Small", whichever size you downloaded. So you will have to rename the folder after the set. And the cover of the set is not included in the folder. Therefore you must download it separately. All very time consuming, a real drag. What is so difficult about labeling a set's folder, and including the set's cover in the folder? Makes one wonder if this is a deliberate action to force the paying customer into spending more time at the site than he would wish. Every file being labeled exactly the same? You see the problem. Downloading should be fun, and not a chore.
If you're thinking, I don't care, I just want to download some hot nekkid girls---forget it. This site isn't for you either. You'll be bored quickly.
The site has it's good points, but I don't have the time for all the chores it demands. Met-Art is much simpler to use than this site! |
|
01-01-09 08:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
52
|
18 Years Old
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots Of Hardcore Material
- Some Hot Girls, Including A Few Well Known
- Videos Well Done With One Exception (See Cons)
- A Riley Mason Set! |
| Cons: |
- Site Design Is Poor
- No Photo Zip Files :(
- All Photos Per Set On One Page
- Cameraman/Director Can't Keep Quiet
- Weak Bonus Content |
| Bottom Line: |
OK, I have a thing for Riley Mason, so strike that pro! I have mixed feelings for this site. I primarily collect photos, and collecting them here is a chore. No zips---no good! They also have each set's photos loaded onto one page, and sometimes when you click and save, the page reloads, some pages have up to 700 pics---no good. The pic quality varies also. A lot of the pics are very good though. I do like vids too, and their's is a good selection. All exclusive, the vids are fun and hot. Well vidoegraphed, but the cameraman is constantly chattering away, I hate that! Why don't porn producers of all people realize that we are not interested in the guys! They are props, and should be seen and not heard! Focus on the girls please! They're more natural in front of the camera. But, I don't think you'd be disappointed in these videos if you like hardcore with young ladies. The vids have an atmosphere of lightness, compared to a lot of the grim circus porn you see nowadays. Bonus content isn't worth looking at, but personally that doesn't concern me. I would give this site a higher score if it was better designed. If all you care about is vids, you'll be just fine. But for pic collectors, you have carpel tunnel syndrome ahead of you. |
|
07-18-07 11:56pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
53
|
Ivy Summer
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Zip Filed Photos
- No DRM
- Network Access
- Nice Looking Girl |
| Cons: |
- Poor Server
- Doesn't Update Any Longer
- Small Photo Sets
- Only 7 Videos
- Expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
Ivy's site is part of a network that includes 29 other sites. Downloading the photo zips is fast enough, but loading a single 1024px photo is like using dialup. Irritating when trying to take a peek at a set. Ivy is a pretty girl, and the photosets are nice, but the sets each contain a small amount of photos. She has 122 sets, a lot of them are split, but it looks like this site has not updated in quite a while. There are no time stamps. There are only 7 softcore videos here, none available in full length. Although there are 30 sites available, a lot of them have little to offer. The $34.95 price tag therefore is a bit pricey, but there is some good material to be had. |
|
12-30-07 12:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Digital Desire
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Hi Res Photos
-Zip Files
-Lots Of Material
-Some HD Video, NO DRM
-Decent Price |
| Cons: |
-Below Average D/L Speed
-Some Very Dated Material
-Fake Body Parts |
| Bottom Line: |
There's just something missing with this site, I can't put my finger on it. They have plenty of hi-res photos (up to 3000px) with a wide and varied collection available in zip files. Some of the material is very dated, it would be OK in a retro site, but is totally out of place here. All the fake breasts made me think I was in the 1990's again...yecch! So ugly. Shay Laren has a very extensive collection here though that is worth downloading, and some of her videos are nice. There are some HD vids, but mostly they are in the 480x360 range, and available in wmv, divx quicktime. I can't prove it, but I swear their servers are rigged for slow downloads. The speed is below average at any rate. The price is good, but I think this site needs a complete overhaul, a new look, and they need to get rid of a lot of material that is pretty amateurish looking. When I quit, they begged me to stay, but, although I don't think the site is a rip off by any means, I just couldn't think of a good reason why I would stay beyond a month. |
|
12-24-07 11:49am
Replies (2)
|
Review
55
|
Hand Domination
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The Men Don't Play With Themselves
- Hi-Res Videos
- NO DRM
- Screencaps |
| Cons: |
- The Cameraman Talks...And Talks...And Talks
- No Photo Sets
- Not A Lot Of Content Yet
- Some Poor Acting |
| Bottom Line: |
"All of our handjob movies have long post orgasm milkings; these girls don't stop until they drain your cock completely dry! You will NEVER see any guys finish themselves off. Our girls dominate these defenseless cocks from start to finish." That's the enticing description from the site, and it is an honest one. A lot of the guys are actually tied up, so they can't disgust us by stroking themselves even if they wanted to (and you know they do, but the girls won't let them at any rate.). The premise of the site is women in sexual control. When done well, it is very erotic, and there are some well done vids here. There are some problems however: In many of the scenes, the cameraman jabbers away! I've asked this before---why do these guys imagine that we are interested in hearing anything they have to say? Sometimes it's so distracting that I had to hit the mute button, which minimalizes the effect. If you have to direct the girl, do it off camera. And please don't chat. What a turn off. Some of the girls can't act very well either. However, there are some good scenes where the guy is tortured by the forced "milking" and denial, and slapping and so forth. I almost feel sorry for them! And give the site credit for keeping the guys under control, they never get in the way of the scene. The site updates once a week, and has about 25 vids so far, all at 720x480, no DRM. They come with a lot of screencaps, but with no regular photos. Please Mr. Cameraman...shhhhhhhh! |
|
12-14-07 12:18am
Replies (4)
|
Review
56
|
Hegre Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Hi_Res Photos
-Zip Files
-6 Sizes Of Photos
-NO DRM Videos |
| Cons: |
-Not Many Attractive Models
-Lots Of Advertising
-Photography Mostly Unerotic And Boring |
| Bottom Line: |
Here we go...the great "genius" Petter Hegre, I hear that over and over again. So, I thought I better give this another shot, and see if I can change my quick score from last summer. I couldn't. Hegre is a former colleague of Galitsin (whose site is closed), and IMO, he can't carry Galitsin's camera case. I see nothing original or exciting in this man's photography---competent? Certainly. Even professional. But the cause of raving praise? Hardly. And his models? Mostly anorexic types. A lot of them very plain. His site leaves me....limp. That's the only way to put it. Maybe the problem is he believes all the hype about himself. Maybe he doesn't want to pay high class models. Whatever, I won't be back. A real disappointment. Technically, the high res photos come in 6 sizes, zipped up and convenient, very impressive. Too bad the photos are boring as milk. The videos are as boring as the photos. 640x360. Good server speed. Nice looking site. Easy navigation. B-O-R-I-N-G. Maybe Mr. Hegre should be photographing Athens at dusk. Or shoe models. I hope Mr. Galitsin solves his legal trouble and gets back in business. That's all. |
|
02-10-08 08:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Little Lupe
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Little Lupe Is A Cutie
- She Does Hardcore
- Access To Other Sites |
| Cons: |
- Photos Have Huge Ugly Watermarks Smack Dab In The Middle :((
- Access To Bonus Sites Is Limited, And You Have To Sign In Again
- Tech Support Is Rude And Unsupportive |
| Bottom Line: |
Little Lupe is a fairly new site I decided to check out. She is a very cute web model who also does hardcore, and she looks very good doing it. I am not sure why they did it, but the photos there have huge disfiguring watermarks in the middle of the photo, a major negative as far as I'm concerned. A very big turnoff. While Little Lupe is a worthwhile model, the guys in her sets are kind of creepy, with members that are too big for this very petite girl Lol! I was left wondering what gutter they found these guys in. I had a legitimate problem with the site, and contacted it's tech support. I got a letter back telling me I could quit if I didn't like it, which is what I proceeded to do! A shame though, because Lupe is nice. |
|
06-07-07 07:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
58
|
Retro Raunch
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Unusual Vintage Material
- Easy Navigation
- No DRM Protection |
| Cons: |
- Small Photos
- No Zip Files
- Very Low-Res Videos
- Not Much Material |
| Bottom Line: |
For those interested in Vintage pornography, this site may interest you. However, I have seen much better material than I see here. This site provides photos and videos (films actually). The material ranges from pre-1920's-1970's. I wouldn't expect the films to be in great shape of course, and that's OK, but the videos are tiny Quicktimes and most of them are silent. They are downloadable. Hard and softcore is available. A lot of old stag movies, which is interesting, but the quality varies, some very poor due to age. You will also find burlesque shorts here, but with no musical soundtrack, by that I mean a modern soundtrack which you will see elsewhere. There are a few Bettie Page films as well, and also some bondage which was interesting. Grandpa was kinky! The photos are OK, nothing approaching hi-res, and due to age the quality varies. Hardcore, Fetish,"Cheesecake" and Gay are the categories here. I find some of the old stuff very erotic, sometimes weird. Of course, you'll see plenty of black socks and even masks during sex! They also have a novelty section with such items as dirty playing cards, and "Tijuana Bibles" which are unusual. Good collector's items. The price isn't bad, and there is some interesting material to save for antique collectors who get bored by the mechanical productions of today, but I have seen much better material out there than is displayed here. |
|
10-22-07 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
59
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
71.0
|
No Review.
|
08-07-07 09:20pm
|
Rating
60
|
Street Blowjobs
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
08-29-09 07:28am
|
Rating
61
|
Tiny Tabby
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
12-13-08 05:14pm
|
Review
62
|
Teen Flood
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots Of Material
Zip Files
Lots of Extra Sites |
| Cons: |
Many Unattractive Models
Low grade Material
A Lot Of Outdated Material, Retired Models
Poorly Designed Site
Expensive
Most Extra Sites Small And Poor Quality |
| Bottom Line: |
This was probably considered a great site many years ago, in fact, much of the material looks like it is from many years ago. Remember Daisy Dukes (Melissa Milano)? She disappeared into real life many years ago, but her sets are still here! (Poor girl, I bet she would be thrilled aboutr that!). This looks like a site that hasn't awakened to the new age of internet porn. Some of the newer material is good, photos at 1500px, and vids at 640x480 (wmv). But an awful lot of this material is stuff you could find on some low grade blog for free. The site is very unnatractive, nothing interesting to it at all. Navigation is very basic and cumbersome. I didn't find much to save from this site. There are a bunch of extra sites, mostly small and unappealing, with the exception of Teen Eva, a small site with photosets of the former Zora7, no zip files here, but a real cutie, although not much modelling ability. If this was 1998, I'd say this was a killer site. But in 2008, Teen Flood must catch up with all the HQ sites competing for our money with their newly bloated prices! |
|
01-12-08 01:12am
Replies (4)
|
Review
63
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A Lot Of Material
- Access To The Whole BB Network
- The Models Understand The Concept
- Good Video options
- Riley Mason Twice |
| Cons: |
- Producer/Director Doesn't Get Concept
- Photos Are Low Quality
- Video Production Poor
- Plastic Love Dolls Would Be Preferable To Male Porn "Talent" |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to me that the males in pornoland do their best to ruin adult entertainment. It's epedemic, and this site is a perfect example. The concept of this site is POV handjobs. In other words, the girls are to pretend that they are interacting with the viewer. And the girls are outstanding at it, they always are. they understand this business. The male element do not understand at all. Take the POV genre. If they could only understand how irritating it is to hear them talk to the girl with the camera and microphone right next to them, thus destroying the illusory symbiotic relationship between me and Riley, um the actress! Duh!!! $23.95 for this site, more for their DVD's, all the production costs, and fees for the girls, and these slugs are still acting like these videos are being made for their personal pleasure!! OK, male porn performers are not the brightest bulbs in the lamp, so I place the blame on the producers. Especially in a POV site that should be showcasing the great girls who mean everything to the business. Dear producers: We don't give a $@#&*! about the males! Control them! The camera work in these videos is abysmal. Girls without heads. Too many closeups of body parts. Only amateurs think they have to constantly move the camera. get a tripod! A perfectly simple concept destroyed! Photos aren't worth talking about. Access to the whole Bang Bros. network may salvage this for you. But I swear with Johnny Wadd as my witness- I could do better! |
|
09-21-07 03:44am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
64
|
Private.com
(0)
65.0
|
No Review.
|
08-31-07 08:54pm
|
Rating
65
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
60.0
|
No Review.
|
12-06-09 01:31am
|
Rating
66
|
Club Red Light
(0)
50.0
|
No Review.
|
12-03-09 11:50pm
|
|
