Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Machine Dom
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of Machine Dom******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week
- There have been 4 videos added in the last week. Hopefully, they keep up the aggressive update schedule.
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space |
Cons: |
- Models have been from Europe either poor or no English skills. This is a major downer for me since I like hearing the action.
- Video range from 10-15 minutes
- videos look compressed (I'm not an expert in this - so that maybe the wrong term?)
- when juxtaposed against the rest of kinks content. This is clearly lacking. Sound quality and direction/film work is also not as good as native kink content.
- as of August 11, 2017 only about 5 videos available. (******the full site of Machine Dom videos has closer to 100) |
Bottom Line: |
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content of Machine Dom to add to their network. I can't tell if Machine Dom.com is still updating or not.
It's great to see kink throwing in more content - who could complain about that? It's clear from the directing and production value that this was not shot by them (they also make it clear with tags). That said this content is so lacking it only makes Kinks already difficult navigation problems worse. I wish they'd saved their money and pickup someting better.
The limited content, sub par quality, and actress that don't seem as they're going through the motions keep this one as a don't buy for me.
Since this is content available on another network but the review goes with the main site I kept the score higher than I otherwise would. If I were basing it just on what's available through kink I would have said 65 |
|
08-11-17 07:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
Strapon Squad
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of strapon squad ******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Dirty talk is emphasized ("you want this don't you" - that kind of thing.) But often sounds put on and disingenuous.
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space |
Cons: |
- Sound quality was an issue. I would guess they don't use a boom mic so action goes from bearly audible to wake the wife up LOUD.
- The last update was in 2016.
- Videos are about 20 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of August 11, 2017, only 15 videos available. (******the full site of Strapon Squad has 100s) |
Bottom Line: |
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content straponsquad.com to add to their network. I liked what was available more than I thought I would although the production value isn't as high as native kink content. I've certainly been spoiled with my membership. The focus of the site is pretty straight forward girl on girl domination often 2 on 1.
I wish there was more available through kink.com The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. With only 15 adds since January, it doesn't make sense to buy kink.com if this is the only site you're interested in. However, if you liked SS and are missing them since they haven't updated in months kink has similar sites that will scratch your itch. |
|
08-11-17 06:52am
Replies (1)
|
Review
153
|
Wasteland
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of bizarre video******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Variety of fetish content (bondage, insertions, master/slave, wax play, machines, latex, humour - rare find)
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space-
- Thye have been adding a new video every day so hopefully, the lack of content problem will get better. |
Cons: |
- Videos are about 15 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of July 28, 2017, only about 6 videos available. (******the full site of wasteland.com has 100s)
- videos can be disorienting - some of it looks like it was shot on a shoulder cam.
- It's hard to say many cons when there's such limited availability. |
Bottom Line: |
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content wasteland.com to add to their network. I wish there was more available through kink. The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
Kink now has over 40 channels (but counting this one with only 6 videos in it is a little inflated.)
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. Wasteland may be worth checking out on its own but if you think you can get enough of their content through a kink subscription - you're wrong. |
|
07-28-17 07:14am
Replies (1)
|
Review
154
|
Bizarre Video
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of bizarre video******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Wide variety of fetish content (bondage, insertions, feet, master/slave, workplace, latex)
- Many models from England - the accent is sexy
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space |
Cons: |
- Video range from 10-30 minutes (shorter than most kink.com videos)
- Some scenes in languages other than English. I like being able to understand what's being said.
- videos look compressed (I'm not an expert in this - so that maybe the wrong term?) - to be clear most videos are in English (with accents)
- when juxtaposed against the rest of kinks content. This is clearly lacking.
- as of July 28, 2017 only about 90 videos available. (******the full site of bizarre videos has 100s) |
Bottom Line: |
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content of bizarre video to add to their network. From what I see it appears bizarrevideo.com no longer updates.
It's great to see kink throwing in more content - who could complain about that? It's clear from the directing and production value that this was not shot by them (they also make it clear with tags).
The limited content, sub par quality, and actress that don't seem as they're going through the motions keep this one as a don't buy for me. Nice bonus. But not worth it on it's own. |
|
07-28-17 06:23am
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
Butt Machine Boys
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****Review from the perspective of straight man***** I've only browsed this part of the network long enough to provide a competent review. For that reason I marked a 1 month membership despite being a member of the network for about 6 months.
- The title of this site is what it says it is. Many different toys are used so there is some variety on the concept
- As noted in the comments it is updating again - but only about once every three months
- Good preview policy you can see 5 previews a day.
- Over 160 shoots
- Model diversity: while most are buff gym guys there is some diversity both in body type and ethnicity.
- High quality 1280X720 4.1 mb/s
- some partner action but most of it is solo material
- zip downloads for photos |
Cons: |
- Slow update schedule
- Cross sells inside the membership side
- Poor organization. You have to know either the model or the date to find anything.
- the concept can get old fast. Not a lot of novelty to explore (imo)
- small catalog (considering when the site started) |
Bottom Line: |
Since I've been reviewing the rest of kink.com I wanted to included this site for completeness. This isn't my niche but I thought a review might be useful for those interested. I've tried to be as objective as possible.
I liked the "sister site" lol. So if gay porn is you thing I would think you'd enjoy this as much as I enjoyed fuckingmachines.com
I would rate this as a pass. The lack of catalog and slow update schedule makes me think you'd be disappointed. If you want the network kink is top notch but if you were looking to buy just for this site, I wouldn't recommend it. |
|
07-17-17 05:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
156
|
Naked Kombat
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****Review from the perspective of straight man***** I've only browsed this part of the network long enough to provide a competent review. For that reason I marked a 1 month membership despite being a member of the network for about 6 months.
- Guy/Guy fight than get it on. Fun idea. Seems like a unique take on gay porn.
- Updates about once a month
- Fun idea winner gets to have his way with the loser
- Good preview policy you can see 5 previews a day.
- Over 260 shoots
- Some group play; but it's not the focus
- I know kink uses top of the line fetish models in their other sites. I'm giving them credit for also selecting well here.
- High quality 1280X720 4.1 mb/s
- zip downloads for photos |
Cons: |
- Slow update schedule
- Cross sells inside the membership side
- Poor organization. You have to know either the model or the date to find anything.
- I couldn't understand how scoring was conducted
- concept can get old fast. Not a lot of novelty to explore (imo)
- If you were hoping for multiple partners there's not much of that. Maybe one out of four (if that high). |
Bottom Line: |
Since I've been reviewing the rest of kink.com I wanted to included this site for completeness. This isn't my niche but I thought a review might be useful for those interested. I've tried to be as objective as possible.
Interesting site. If this kind of porn appealed to me I think I would like this site. It's well shot and sound is also good. The "contestants" all have athletic bodies and in the post interviews they describe enjoying the experience.
I would rate this as a buy. Despite the slow update schedule there's a big back catalog and enough models to find something you like. |
|
07-17-17 05:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Intense gangbang content. 4-7 guys in each shoot. Very rare to find a site dedicated to bondage gang bangs.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Close to 100 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top models. Asa Akira, Bobbi Starr Christy Lynn. SARAH SHEVRON, plus plenty of international models
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Download video stills as a zip file |
Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had
- DEAD SITE hasn't updated since 2013 (this is what kept it score out of the 90s) |
Bottom Line: |
While kink.com transitioned to a different gang-bang theme (hardcore gang-bang) there was a different flare here so it's not a true translation.
Other than no longer updating this is a great site and I recommend it even though it's small. The shoots with Sarah Shevron alone are worth joining for.
There are plenty of good setup for those of us who like "plots": paying off gambling debt, cheerleader captured by other team, boss with tables turned, etc.
If you're looking for the perfect combination of bondage and hardcore content. This is it. |
|
06-28-17 07:08am
Replies (3)
|
Review
158
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Unique niche Sonia is probably better described as a GILF instead of a MILF at this point.
- Exclusive content
- Fetish content: public, nylons, cuckolding, large breasts (fake), humiliation (light compared to the kink sites I've been reviewing.)
- good mix of her talking directly to the camera and working with partners (sometimes groups).
- Over 1,000 videos
- pictures available as .zips
- 1080; 5mbps files look great. Production value is good (light and sound is professional). I didn't care for the editing - see below. |
Cons: |
- I don't care for the editing style - the cuts jump abruptly and sometime move back and forth in time. It's unique but now what I like.
- She brings in new talent. This is sometimes a welcome bit of novelty but all too often these performers are too green to be exciting (especially compared to "Sonia"/Gil)
- While there's bonus sites I didn't find anything interesting there. |
Bottom Line: |
I was a member years ago and rejoined to check it out. I'm still very please with her site -still a satisfied customer. I also won't wait as long in between memberships. There's a lot her and she keeps regular updates. That said there wan't enough excitement her to keep me on a multiple month membership. Especially if you can find this site on a deal - go for it!
Her preview area lets you sample about a minute of video so you can get a good feel for her before you buy. The price is very reasonable for all you get.
She's an active twitter user so there's plenty of social interaction via that - but nothing through her site per se.
For less than $15 there's no reason not to look around this site. Even if a hot MILF doesn't excite you here back catalog includes photo shoots from her in her 20s.
She has a sexy attitude and body that's very alluring. Plus tons of creativity. Shoots are rarely repetitive. |
|
06-19-17 06:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
Captive Male
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of verbal abuse and pegging. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty interrogations.
- zip files for pictures
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Even though the site is old (see below) I love a lot of the talent they used. Both the male and female talent has all-stars from the hardcore community: Wolf Hudson, Mz. Berlin, Shy Love, Bobbi Star, to name just a couple.
- Even though there is a formula of dominated abused men they always find a new path to end up at that same spot. They balance theme and novelty well
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - good production value. Sound and Light could be better. But I'm not complaining. |
Cons: |
- Only about 60 videos available - all seem to be over 5 years old.
- While there are scenes being added it seems like those are from the dead twisted factory catalog. I don't know why they don't just put everything up at once? - Or at least faster than 1/3weeks.
- Organization lacking - but with only 60 videos it's not a problem. If the site ever grows again they'll need to update the search capacity
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that. For me there was too much abuse for it to be fun (CBT does nothing for me) - but to each his own. |
Bottom Line: |
Although PU doesn't show it as part of the network - I had access to this site through my kink.com subscription. Not sure why the discrepancy? To add to that fellow PU reviewer Jay G says his membership isn't giving him access. So there is a bit of a mystery here.
Looks like Kink bought the catalog because these aren't new videos.
Kink is a great network and it's nice to seem them added a whole catalog that I otherwise wouldn't see
Many of these performers aren't even in the business anymore - so it's great to have access through kink.
With such a deep catalog and great production it's hard to say no to kink. They have a reasonable review policy (5 videos per day if you create an account - which means giving them an email address).
Captive male fills an important niche - but isn't my cup of tea. However that's not why I kept there score at the low point of "good" for me there just isn't enough here. So unless you really want to round out your collection of Harmony, Mz. Berlin, Penny Flame et. al. I would skip this one. |
|
06-18-17 06:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- zip files for pictures
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. - Mz. Berlin did a lot of work for them and I really like her 😃
- Good scene mix there's always a plot from the dominate boss, to the strict teacher. Things don't get dull even though there is a formula
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. |
Cons: |
- Only about 60 videos available - all seem to be over 5 years old.
- Organization lacking - but with only 60 videos it's not a problem. If the site ever grows again they'll need to update the search capacity
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. The feet insertions were a bridge too far for me - but to each his own. |
Bottom Line: |
Although PU doesn't show it as part of the network - I had access to this site through my kink.com subscription. Not sure why the discrepancy?
Looks like Kink bought the catalog because these aren't new videos.
Kink is a great network and it's nice to seem them added a whole catalog that I otherwise wouldn't see
Many of these performers aren't even in the business anymore - so it's great to have access through kink.
With such a deep catalog and great production it's hard to say no to kink. They have a reasonable review policy (5 videos per day if you create an account - which means giving them an email address). |
|
06-04-17 06:38am
Replies (2)
|
Review
161
|
TS Seduction
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus - including a second TS site (I also reviewed that one)
- Updates once/week (pattern is every Tuesday)
- over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour
- Lots of different cross kinks for example: "mommy" play/public/domination/humiliation/multiple partners |
Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Cross sells on the member side plus a "buy kink gear" adverts seems unnecessary given the high membership fee. But there is NO BETTER for these niches quality than kink sites. |
Bottom Line: |
Important note: This is not my fetish, so in all candor I've only explored enough to write a competent review. I hope you find it useful.
With a large catalog and president updates I think this site is a firm buy if this is your kink. I went with a rather high score because I think this is a rather hard to find niche and people who are looking for it will appreciate the hard work kink.com puts in.
Shoots are long (about 45 minutes of action). And varied I'm constantly amazed at the imagination of the "writers".
Kink brings together top talent (on all it's other sites; I'm assuming the same is true here - sorry I don't know much about TS models) and great production value. If you can handle the high price you'll be very happy. |
|
05-16-17 02:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
162
|
Naughty Hillary
(0)
72.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*******Defunct site no longer updating and has't in years******
- Singer/hotwife/cuckold content
- picture downloads available as .zips
- Videos available in multiple formats: wmv, mp4
- Only a couple of dozen videos. Good mix of solo and hardcore couple, limited mmf and girl/girl action
- pubic hair - It's almost a novelty these days. Lol
- Good lighting/sound/dialog. Action is easy to see and hear.
- lots of great dirty talk which I really appreciate. |
Cons: |
- Content is non-exclusive.
- Lack of updates is really a killer. With ~50 videos there isn't much to work with here
- Picture sets look good but again like everything else I've said dates quality. It would be nice if they went back and re-encoded everything in a high quality.
- While she's a good actress the action sometimes seems put on (more so than other solo site. The fun of a solo site is to bring the fun ; Hillary seems like she's working. |
Bottom Line: |
I like hot wife/cuckold content so this site has that going for it. Unfortunately there are just too many down sides to give this one a "buy" rating. The fact that is hasn't been updated in what looks like 10 years or more is just a deal breaker.
Unless I'm mistaken this one one of the first solo sites for Hillary Scott. I like her as a performer and liked the niche of this site. If she hadn't moved on to a contract performer (I'm assuming) I think she could have turned this into a very successful site. Instead it looks like the content has been bought by another company that just milking every last dollar out.
In fairness, I'm glad the content is still out there. It would be a shame to not be able to access it. Hillary is hot with a dirty mouth (I love that). If this site were to come back I would be a loyal member. However at the current price - stay away.
If you're a big Hillary Scott fan then grab a membership to round out your collection. But that's the best I can say. |
|
04-28-17 07:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
163
|
Michelle's Bedroom
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
******No longer updating and hasn't in years*******
- Sexy english accent
- Hot blond. While I agree she has the typical hot porn star look - she's incredibly sexy. I wish she was still performing.
- picture downloads available as .zips
- Video quality was good for the time - today it looks dated. There's been no improvement from the 700k, 468x312 that they were 1st uploaded as.
- Hotwife/cuckold theme to many videos.
- Good lighting/sound/dialog. Action is easy to see and hear.
- lots of great dirty talk which I really appreciate.
- She had some great costuming always seemed like overlap with naughtyathome.com Maybe there was a connection between the 2 sites at one point? I can't remember. |
Cons: |
- Poor video quality (see above)
- small catalog under a dozen videos. This is one of the smallest sites I've ever seen.
- 600X900 picture size was fine years ago. Again they don't update/upgrade
- picture sets are almost all solos shoot.
- Only about 50 photo shoots available |
Bottom Line: |
Yikes. Don't bother with this site unless you really are a fan of Michelle (I think she's also used other names with other companies). The catalog is too small, the quality is too low, and there are no more updates.
I had a membership years ago when the site looked a lot more fresh. I rejoined only because I found some package deal a few months ago and it was thrown in.
She's very hot and the action is good I have to give her that in fact I burned a good deal of what I downloaded from my 1st membership onto DVDs (that gives you some idea of how old this content is)
Anyway, I wish she would make a come back, she was a great performer: sexy accent, incredible body, and fun content with an ability to act. It doesn't get much better than that. Too bad there's just not enough her to warrant a join. |
|
04-28-17 06:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Barbi Sinclair
(0)
94.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Lots of hot content. Barbi specializes in the slut wife/cuckold fantasy. There's panty of hot action with just her and her husband while also having the full range of content. There's MMF,FFM, solo, interracial, gangbangs, creampies, public flashing, public masturbation, wife-swapping, and guest appearances from other pro-am models.
- About 250 videos
- Good lighting and sound. The action is easy to see and hear. A real bonus because Barbi and the male talent all talk dirty during sex something I really like
- Good setups there's a plot to go along with the action. Most of it is centered on her husband's fantasy to be cuckolded.
- Stories (both hers and fan submitted). I don't remember this the last time I was a member
- call your husband, dark caravan, cuckold.com included.
- navigation is greatly improved since last time. I had no trouble finding what I was looking for and weeding through the things I wasn't interested in.
- Oldest quality was 720X480 1.6 mbps. New is HD |
Cons: |
- Limited previews. You can access 5 previews but most of the previews are the 1st one minute of each video which doesn't give you a good feel for how hot the action is.
- Limited updating. In the years since my last review there's hardly any new content.
- Dropped some of the bonus sites that used to be included.
- Little interaction with Barbi |
Bottom Line: |
***This is a re-review for me****
I really like this site. Barbi has a lot of personality and does a great job of filling the "slut wife" niche - a genre that I really enjoy.
I ended up lowering the score a little bit because there isn't as much new content here. While she is updating the pace has slowed some. That said there is a strong back catalog and more than enough hot stuff to be satisfied with. Her videos have a tag in my hard drive so I can find them easily!
What I love most about her site is Barbi is having a great time. You can see her sexuality and passion in every shoot. There's nothing as sexy as joy.
I love this site for the hotwire/cuckold content. I wish she kept updating more aggressively. I like that she shoot with plenty of different talent (both male and female).
I give this one a buy. You might just stay for a month and download everything that scratches your itch. There a lot to like no matter what your into especially: interracial, public flashing/sex/dogging, slutwife/cuckold, MILF. For $30 (or less if you find a deal/buy multiple months) there more than enough to be satisfied with. |
|
04-22-17 07:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
97.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates once/week
- Close to 700 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/pregnant etc. than any other network I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. |
Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had |
Bottom Line: |
***April 22, 2017***** After reviewing some wise comments from the community I decide to back away from the 100 point score I previously entered. I hate the notion that "you can't score a 100", but they are correct this is not the site to exemplify that notion. THANK YOU for taking the time to critique me.
I know some people will challenge my rating of 100. Please read this before killing me in the comments. I rate a site based on what it reports to be. And S & S does exactly what it says. They deliver hardcore kinky BDSM content with flawless production values. You can see and hear all the action. The camera doesn't jerk around wildly and there are interesting "plots". I could knock them down to a 98 or 99 because "no one is perfect" but to me it's not about an arbitrary measure of perfect; it's how close did you come to delivering what you promised. Sex and Submission hits the mark.
Kink is a huge player and I view Sex and Submission as their flag ship site. It is one of the more frequently updates; gets the bigger talent, and has the broadest appeal. That said: Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here.
Although it is pricy I think everyone should check out kink.com; and S&S in particular. They allow 5 previews a day and the previews give a good taste of what's inside. Along with Brazzers, Reality Kings,and Naughty AmericaI I view kink.com as something you owe it to yourself to at least get a months membership once. |
|
04-20-17 02:42pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
166
|
Foot Worship
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Unique focus. I know there are foot fetish sites out there but most are amateur sites that don't bring all the weight kink.com can bring.
- Lots of model diversity: Pregnancy, interracial, female-female, male-female.
- great imagination: everything for kinky nuns to squirting strippers. I like the unpredictability of what the next update might have brought.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers. Penny Paz and Christy Mack were smoking hot.
- Allows download managers |
Cons: |
- Defunct site. Last update was March of 2015
- Just over 100 scenes
- Foot insertions were a turn off for me. But I can't complain too much it's a foot fetish site.
- Organization is hurting. Shoots are uploaded chronologically, while there are keywords they're misapplied and overly broad (bare pussy for example). You can search by model but if you don't know what you're looking for you have a hard time finding it.
No way to "favorite" things for future viewing |
Bottom Line: |
I'm not a foot fetish guy but there was still enough her for me to enjoy. Lots of different set-ups and model types kept things interesting. Part of what kept it's score down was the lack of content, no longer updating, and being too far out of the mainstream for me (I wrestled with that after all it is a foot site in a network named kink - but all the foot insertions were too much for me)
Had the site kept updating and had they been a little more sparing with the insertions I probably would have scored this site closer to a 90.
Streaming and multiple formats keep things simple.
The price is too high for just this site. That said if you are into kinky stuff this network is a gold mine. There's so much here it's certainly worth a months membership to explore. I intended to join for just a month but stayed longer and will return later now that my membership has lapsed |
|
04-10-17 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
93.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
To start, I'm not a fan of transexual porn but since I was reviewing the other parts of the network I thought I'd help out anyone who was interested.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Over 250 scenes. 2 updates/month. Still updating
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price. Perhaps the price is worth it because this is a hard to find niche? |
Bottom Line: |
I'm not an expert in TS porn, but it since I don't stumble across it often I'm thinking its a harder to find niche. For that reason I bumped the score into the 90s (from what would have been the high 80s) because I think it's filling an underserved niche.
Another nice plus is the setups. They diversify the action. To be perfectly candid I looked at titles and skimmed about 10 videos so that I could complete a fair review.
This site doesn't have some of the extreme treatment that much of the rest of kink.com has. For sure there's rough sex, but it's not as over the top as many of the other sites.
I think if you're at all interested in TS content you should try this site. Kink has a great reputation and there other work is solid. The production value is always top notch (good camera angles, good lighting and sound, good set ups). Plus they allow 5 previews a day so there no reason to not give them a look. |
|
04-10-17 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great lighting and sound even when there's multiple partners (a problem many other sites have)
- Humiliation included: "slut" "cock breath" that sort of thing
- Almost ever shoot has anal
- More model diversity (ethnicity) than you find in most places.
- Great talent. If you have a fetish model you like that shoot from 2010 to 2015 she's likely here. Lexi Belle was the 1st model.
- Over 225 shoots.
- In a site like this it matters who the male talent is and they are also exceptional Kirk Lockwood, Otto Bauer, Maestro, really bring out the passion in the female talent.
- Allows download managers. |
Cons: |
- No longer updating. Last update was March 2015
- Disproportion number of tattooed models (does't bother me, but I know it's a turn off for some. )
- Organization could be better the tagging system is weak there are missing tags and search is limited.
- Pricy. If you're only looking for this site and not the power of the network then don't spend you money for just this site.
- No way to favorite things you'd like to come back to
- Stark settings mostly a dull room with ropes for suspensions. (I know I know it's a dungeon) |
Bottom Line: |
Great mix of bondage and rough sex. I found a lot to like here. I wish the site was still updating.
While not worth the price to join in and of itself as part of a wider network it, I consider it a buy. I keep my membership for a few months.
Some advice for those that follow after me: let the comments that accompany each shoot be your guide. I wasted a lot of bandwidth seeing what I like and what I didn't.
Plenty of great talent I really liked Roxanne Rae, India Summer, Bella Rossi, and Penny Pax (love Penny's kink content). |
|
03-25-17 11:57am
Replies (2)
|
Review
169
|
Bound In Public
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*Important Note: I'm a straight guy - since I've review most of the sites on kink.com I figure I would finish up. I tried to be fair and objective. I hope you find my review useful*
- Video have high production value at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Lighting and sound are well done. You see had hear all the action
- Almost 250 scenes in the catalog
- Good use of theme. While they seem to be in safe places (one way windows for example) you can lose yourself in the fantasy that this is public humiliation stuff.
- Fit models. Everyone looks to be in prime shape
- Varied action (anal/oral/multiple partners, analingus, etc.)
- Access to 24 sites in the kink network. Including 8 gay themed sites.
- Unique situations from pool to laundry room, from santa clauses to cops it's never a dull movement on this site. |
Cons: |
- No longer updating. Last update was June 2016
- Intense content "cum starved sluts humiliated and fucked hard in public by hung studs" is what's on their home page and they certainly keep it extreme. (maybe this is a positive?)
- Pricy - but it can't be cheap to shoot the extravagant scenes they do. So this is probably a case of getting what you pay for.
- Poor organization. There are some tags used but it's sporadic. You can follow the model tags if you have a favorite. |
Bottom Line: |
Too be fair I did not watch any shoot for start to finish. I jumped in and out of about a half dozen videos to be able to write a competent review. I keep the score in the 80s because while the action looks good and sounds good they're catalog is limited and they are no longer updating. If they were to come back I'd probably move it to a 95.
Although the content is intense the model does a scene at the end explains how a good time was had.
I don't know how prevalent gang bang gay sex is. Maybe this is a rare gem and should be appreciated. If that content is easy to find I would pass on this site and find something cheaper that is still updating. |
|
03-25-17 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
170
|
Device Bondage
(0)
91.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates about every 2 weeks
- multiple download formats available
- About 900 videos in this site many more across the network
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of ethnicities and age. Not much in the way of body build diversity. That's probably because the intensity requires a fair amount of athleticism
- top talent. Many of my favorite stars have shot here. They pay a lot of attention to production value and talent getting "into the role"
- Post shoot interview where talent assures audience the experience was enjoyable |
Cons: |
- Nearly ever scene uses the same male dom. He's talented but mixing this up is also fun.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. But you get what you pay for.
- No photo sets available. (The older content has zip files available. It then they stopped doing that. They've reported that they are bringing back photos - but it's unclear if all the back catalog will be filled in)
- Very hardcore domineering.
- Little to no set up/plot. I like an expiration with my porn (Call me old fashioned)
- Cross sells inside the member site. |
Bottom Line: |
Kink is top of the line in terms of quality and quantity. The also book top fetish talent and new comers. Of course all that comes with a price. While I wish it was cheaper I also wish coffee was still $0.50. This is the way of the world and you get what you pay for.
With such a deep catalog and great production it's hard to say no to kink. They have a reasonable review policy (5 videos per day if you create an account - which means giving them an email address).
Probably the best part of DB, and this is true across the kink network, the talent is well directed. It seems like each starlet is allowed to bring her personality to the performance so while each shoot follows a specific pattern you don't feel like you rewatching the same thing over and over again.
This site is certainly on the extreme side of the line so preview before you buy - least you find it's not what you're looking for. I like hardcore content and most of this was too much for me (although I did find some great scenes in the vast sea of nearly 1,000 videos). |
|
03-10-17 07:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
171
|
Men In Pain
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Excellent quality 1.6mbps 1280X720.
- Unique niche. Not many online sites focus on straight guys being dominated like this.
- Great talent. I really liked the shoots with Bobbi Starr and Maitress Madeline. And I think some of the cuckolding content was among the best available.
- Well directed. Each actor/actress come across as having their own personality. I don't feel like I'm watching cookie cutter porn.
- Excellent production sound and light are done by a team of professionals and it shows.
- Access to the extensive kink network - arguable the best BDSM content on the net.
- Average shoot lasts about an hour, with a follow up interview where the talent gives a testament to how much they enjoyed themselves. |
Cons: |
- Unlike most kink sites I have a lot of down sides for this part of the network
- No longer updating (last update was August 2013), in fairness much of this niche is now covered by their site: divine bitches. Than again when I talk about an "extensive network" as a pro - that's less impressive when the sites in essence changed their names.
- Only about 400 shoots in the catalog, this is one of the smaller kink sites.
- I like a lot of the domination aspects but myself I didn't care for the beatings and floggings. I can't say I didn't know what I was getting. I'm only saying I wish their shoots took a slightly different focus. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
- Similarly the testicle weights/torture and extreme treatments were too much for me. Along with lots of pegging. If you want pegging content you'll find it her in abundance.
- Organization is awful. I noticed that searches for keywords don't deliver all the content it should. |
Bottom Line: |
If you're looking to join just for this site, I wouldn't. If you're thinking about it check the devine bitches stuff 1st since that site is still updated. Also avail yourself of the preview policy. You can see up to 5 videos on the network a day - to try before you buy. Also on the con side - kink is one of the pricier networks out there. You get what you pay for, but they are more than most.
I'm really frustrated with their search. I was looking for cuckolding content and found that it missed a bunch of shoots that it should have found. When there's so much content across their network it's very frustrated to not be able to find what you want.
On the plus sides they do have beautiful features and amazing talent. I loved looking back through the catalog and finding women that have left the business.
All and all - only if you really want extreme male domination, and only if you have checked that the stuff that is in the back catalog, should you join this site. I found some real gems in all the wading though the content. But I'm only satisfied with those few because the wider kink network is so strong. |
|
03-04-17 01:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
172
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Many set ups are witty and interesting. If you remember the clown mania from about a year ago - they have a send up on that.
- Probably the best gang bang site I've ever seen. The lighting and sound are impeccable (as always with a kink.com site). Also you can follow the action. This is the problem with many other sites, the editing is too choppy. Kink avoids this pitfall.
- Updates about ever 2 weeks.
- About 225 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- zip download pix are back
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent.
- videos run a little over an hour. |
Cons: |
- Intense. While models make clear their enjoyment and pleasure in a post interview, many of these scenes imply a non-consensual fantasy.
- Search is sub par. This is made worse by the fact that the female talent is often not the 1st one listed in the actors credits in scene descriptions.
- Expensive
- Most shoots don't have images available for download
- Cross-sales on the membership side |
Bottom Line: |
I liked this site a lot. It definitely needs to be seen as fantasy role play and I'm please they include the model interview at the end of every video to reassure the conceptual play nature of the work.
There's no two ways about it these scenes are rough. Anal is in almost every scene, double and triple penetration. Many shoots have bukkake, double vaginal and/or double anal. Again this is a very intense site and if you're not interested in that you'll be unhappy
There is a preview section that allows 2 minute clips so try before you buy. Plus look for deals (they have an email list and you can sometimes save money with that).
There's a lot of top talent that has shot here. Some of my favorites were: Krissy Lynn, Holly Hendrix, and Kristina Rose |
|
02-22-17 01:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Sadistic Rope
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Top talent. The women are beautiful. There is not much in the way of body diversity - this is a very athletically inclined site.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
Cons: |
- No longer updating last update was March 2015
- Small catalog (by kink.com standards) just over 100 shoots.
- The male talent is mostly from the same actor (he does a great job so when it ain't broke don't fix it. But I know some will prefer variety)
- Not a lot of ethnic diversity. Kink is usually better about that.
- Most scenes are just m/f. There are some with multiple partners but they are few and far between.
- Narrow focus. For me this niche was too tailored and didn't keep my interest.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (They are brining pictures back to the network, but I don't think they'll alter a defunct site) |
Bottom Line: |
The concept is pretty straightforward: girl is tied and "punished" before being pleasured and ultimately orgasming. There is usually suspension play to go with the rather intense "torture" (clothes pins, rough anal play, whips, etc).
While I enjoy the kink network and appreciate the size and scope of the network I was not disappointed by the shutdown of this site. Much of it's niche is filled by other parts of the network. Much of the content was just over the top for me. Usually reading the descriptions was enough for me to know I could skip that one with nothing lost. There are some gems here for example: Felony, Phenix Marie, Ashley Lanes, Ashley Fires (always a fav), and Skin Diamond.
Sadistic Rope is too small, too expensive and too narrowly tailored to be worth a buy on it's own. If you join the larger kink network check out this site for your favorite models, but there just isn't enough here to warrant a recommendation. |
|
02-22-17 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
174
|
Hogtied
(0)
91.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
02-22-17 11:51am (Update History)
Reason: trying to move from "good" to "excellent"
|
Pros: |
- lots of intense bondage. Models are not just tied but also weighted down and teased with toys and impact playUnique plots keep things interesting
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates about every 2 weeks
- multiple download formats available
- Over 1,000 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities
- top talent. Many of my favorite stars have shot here. They pay a lot of attention to production value and talent getting "into the role" |
Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. But you get what you pay for.
- older material had lower quality (still great for when it was shot - technology just got better)
- No photo sets available. (The older content has zip files available. It then they stopped doing that. They've reported that they are bringing back photos - but it's unclear if all the back catalog will be filled in)
- Very hardcore domineering. While I didn't find this as over the top as some of the other sites in this network - make no mistake this is kinky content. (Duh with a name like kink?) |
Bottom Line: |
Preview before you buy. If you want BDSM content this is a solid buy. They have a lot of content. They record the best in the business and I don't know if any website that keeps the high level of sound and video that kink does. Even when shooting in a "dungeon" the light and sound let you take in all the action.
While kink is a little price you get SO much here. I have no regrets about my membership and have added them into my rotation of sites I'll keep going back too.
The size of the kink.com network. With 24 sites and thousands of videos make kink a very attractive package. If you're looking for BDSM content this is one of the best places to find it.
There's no shortage of excellent scenes. Some of my favorites were with: Dani Daniels, Mz. Berlin (she is often a Dom so it's fun to see here switch things up), Krissy Lynn, And Christina Carter (she is one of my all time favorite fetish models). |
|
02-20-17 04:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Whipped Ass
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 850 videos each video 45 minutes to an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- Allows download managers
- They stay true to their niche. The site is intense with fisting, clothes pins along whole body, and large strap ons.
- Plenty of ethnic diversity.
- Lots of top name talent. Many of my favorite fetish stars were here
- Lots of anal content (could be a con?) |
Cons: |
- Cross sells included in membership side. So when you look through something you're sometimes given the chance to buy content from other sites. I don't care for this when I've already bought a membership
- all content is girl on girl
- high price of membership (but you do get great production and top of the line talent.
- While there is ethnic diversity there is little diversity of body type.
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help. |
Bottom Line: |
Lots of extreme content. Definitely look at the previews before you join to make sure it's what you're into. Many scenes feature multiple partners. Plenty of fisting (including anal fisting) and BDSM until skin is red (not bloody as a generalization). Each scene ends with a model interview where everyone says they have a good time. A lot of scenes have squirting and the orgasms look real to me (but I also think professional wresting is real).
I found the niche a little too narrow and a little too repetitive. I also don't care for exclusive girl/girl action - so maybe this site just wasn't a good fit for me.
The have a huge network and that a very significant plus, along with great production value. If you really like this niche - this is right on. If you're not already a big fan - I don't think this kink "channel" is going to convince you.
For me, not being a dedicated fan, the price is too high for this one. |
|
02-13-17 02:31pm
Replies (0)
|