Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 151-175 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 151 Gloryhole Swallow (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 195 exclusive scenes - Many true amateurs - Among the most realistic sites around - Great site for fans of oral, cum play and swallowing - Simple and effective layout - Multiple download options - Supports download managers - No download limits - Broad range of models - Excellent camerawork and lighting given the conditions - Excellent choices in editing - Updates weekly Cons: - Limited thumbnails of model - Broad range of models means you’ll see some you don’t like Bottom Line: I look for objectivity in a review, and I strive to provide the same when I write reviews, but sometimes a site comes along that makes it tough for me to do that. ‘Heat’ in a scene is definitely subjective, and in this case, for me, the heat isn’t just turned up to eleven, it’s turned up to ‘insane.’ I think my monitor was about to catch fire. I wouldn’t normally join a gloryhole site, but I’ve been trying to collect as many scenes by a beautiful young and relatively obscure model named Claire. She’s not done much, and she looks like a pretty girl-next-door type, so I was surprised to see her doing something like this. She has four scenes on the site and at least one of them is already a favorite. But to my surprise, I was hooked on this site after watching a few scenes. For me, the heat comes from the realism. I recently started joining casting sites, where the premise that an unsuspecting model comes in for some information on the adult business and ends up trying out. Obviously, in a world with legal requirements for ID these scenes are staged. But here, while they are still staged, there is an element of realism that I’ve never seen before. While the female obviously needs to be properly documented, the males can be a lot more anonymous. It doesn’t strain credibility to think that a model could be brought into a video booth and guys would stick their dicks in for some oral. To add to the chances that these aren’t fully staged, the site’s FAQ page has contact information for anyone who’d like to have their penis star in a video. Some scenes have a bit of a setup with an interview, but others don’t. The action takes place inside a booth where the model services between five and ten men, sometimes more. In most scenes there is cum-play and swallowing. Some scenes have vaginal sex, a few have some anal, and several have two girls. The average length of the scenes is around 35 minutes, but some last over an hour. Speaking of the girls, there is a broad range of looks. There are some that are young and beautiful, some heavily tattooed and pierced, some BBW, some MILF. The upside is that there is likely some here for every taste. The downside is that you might see some models that you don’t like. Unlike most casting sites, I can’t find much information on many of these models, which may means they’re true amateurs. With a video booth as your set it would be easy to have poorly shot videos. That doesn’t happen here: the videos are well lighted and shot. The cameraman obviously knows what he’s doing. With scenes like these the editor might be tempted to cut lots of dead air out and keep the action flowing. That doesn’t happen here. First, there isn’t a lot of dead air, and second, the editor’s choices keep the realism and heat up. Bad editing could ruin the site, but the good editing they have adds a lot to it. There are currently 195 scenes uploaded, but maybe 20 of those are two-part scenes so that reduces the number a bit. The site updates with one new scene added per week. All the scenes offer some choice in how you view it. Streaming is available, but only at a fairly low res. Downloads are MP4 only and usually offer 480x270, 960x540 and 1920x1080. I downloaded the 1080 when they were available and those come in at that resolution with a bitrate around 5000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good. On some videos the highest is 960x540 but those are rare. Others here have reported a daily limit. I downloaded a lot in a few days and never hit any limit, so that may be gone. I used a download manager to queue scenes and had no issues with that. The download speed was always the maximum that my manager will allow. The site has a simple design, but since it focuses on one niche it doesn’t need to be more complex. You can sort by update and model, there is a search function and each scene has tags. One minor flaw is that there are limited thumbnails of the models so you can’t really tell if you want the scene. That’s not a big deal since you can open the photos and see more. There are photos, but I can’t speak to them. This really is a video site. One innovation in most scenes is an unobtrusive ‘cumshot counter” in the lower left of the screen that counts off a running total of satisfied customers. I like it and miss it on the scenes where it isn’t used. As with any niche site, there’s no sense in joining if you don’t like the niche. But here there are several covered: oral, cum-play, swallowing and multiple shots. If you like any of those, you might like this site. If you do join you’ll get a lot of unique and exclusive scenes on a simple but effective site and those scenes are well shot and edited. You’ll get all this for a very fair price making this a great value. Not only do I recommend it, I’ll be a regular there myself. 03-10-14  03:43pm Replies (3) Review 152 Seymore Butts (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique porn from a great producer/director/actor - Some unique female models - 192 videos from approximately 50 DVDs - Videos in MP4 format - Videos look good considering their age - Offers a full trial - Bills through a reputable biller - Supports download managers Cons: - Last update was seven months ago - Not organized by DVD title, though that’s how it was produced - Site is poorly designed, even for such a small site - Many of the videos are available elsewhere - No options for downloading – one format, one size - No ‘tour’ pages for prospective members Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of Seymore Butts’ movies. He was one of the best and most prolific producer/directors in the business for a while and his movies were unique. He offered a true gonzo style that was fun to watch, he focussed heavily on anal sex and ass play, and he had some hot women who worked almost exclusively for/with him. The porn business was better for his contributions. This is purely speculative, but I don’t think that this site has any actual affiliation with Adam Glasser, aka Seymore Butts. I think this because Glasser seemed to take a lot of pride in his work, and justifiably so, and, excuse the pun, was anal about his work. This was demonstrated in the series about his business titled “Family Business” that aired on Showtime. There is nothing about this site that shows Glasser’s quest for high quality. The really odd thing about this site is that while SB was all DVD-based porn, the site isn’t arranged by DVD title, it’s arranged by scenes only. There are a dozen scene thumbnails per page with a brief description of the scene but you’ll need to open the link to a scene before you can see what DVD it’s from. And even then the DVD title isn’t a clickable link to the other scenes in the title and there appears to be no way to search or sort by title. Maybe this will annoy only me, since I prefer to put the scenes from a DVD in a folder with the DVD title. There are currently 192 scenes on the site, though saying ‘currently’ might be misleading as it implies that the site is updating. The last scene uploaded was about seven months ago, so while I can’t say for certain that the site isn’t updating, it sure looks like it isn’t. And with only about one-third of SB titles uploaded it isn’t like they’ve already run out of material. It appears that the site had a major renovation between the time when RustyJ reviewed it 14 months ago. Rusty reported the downloaded files were in WMV format and were all large. There are no download options offered: there is one link labelled ‘download’ and you take what you’re given. I downloaded 116 scenes and all of them are in MP4 format. While there are a few files that come in slightly over 1 GB, the average file size is about 300-400 MB. The files I downloaded are all 1280x720, 3000 kb/s and 29fps. Those aren’t bad specs for scenes which are at least a decade old and in a lot of cases may be much older than that. Subjectively they look good. The site itself could also have benefitted from a renovation. While I’m a proponent of keeping things simple, this site might be too simple. The layout is basic with not a lot of options to search. The ‘pornstar’ tab only lists 12 models, to give you an example of how weak the site design is. But with less than 200 scenes offered, the weak site design isn’t a big issue. Streaming is available, though I didn’t try it, and there appeared to be no streaming options. I used a download manager to queue scenes for download and had no problems. Download speeds were what I usually get with other sites. I downloaded a lot in a day and never encountered any kind of limit or throttling. The site offers four membership options: two trials (three and seven day), one month and an annual membership. I wouldn’t normally offer advice here, but I think it is sound advice to say that no one should consider an annual membership given the size of the site and the fact that there’s been nothing added in seven months. I opted for the seven day trial but in hindsight I should have gone for the three day trial instead, but without any kind of a tour available to prospective members I didn’t know what to expect. More advice – learn from my mistake. As Warren Buffet once said, it’s great to learn from your mistakes, but its better learn from other people’s mistakes. The seven day trial was full access and TBP reports that the three day trial is too, but I can’t confirm that. The site bills through Segpay so you can be assured that your membership will be fairly easy to cancel. One thing I didn’t try so can’t confirm, is whether your access is cut off after you cancel the trial membership. While SB videos are offered elsewhere, such as Videobox, the file specs here are better, so if you’re a SB fan and looking for some of his stuff, this may be what you’re looking for. The bottom line is that if you’re a SB fan this can be a good value if you opt for a trial. The downside is that if you’re a SB fan looking to add some titles you don’t have there is no way to see which titles are offered here, and once you are a member there is no way to easily find the titles you’re looking for in the site. The upside is that for such ‘ancient’ porn as this, it’s been encoded in a way that makes it look good despite much of it having been shot on videotape. I’d recommend a trial membership, but make sure you go in with your eyes open. 03-08-14  10:38am Replies (6) Review 153 Nubiles Casting (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 24 videos - 6 of the videos are casting interviews lasting just a few minutes - Updates with a new full scene added per week (interviews aren’t counted as updates) - Unique take on a relatively rare niche - Beautiful models - Great productions - All scenes offered in six different resolutions - Allows download managers - Excellent use of tags - Photos available (as singles or zips) Cons: - I’m not a big fan of the editing style Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of the casting niche; I find that when it’s well done it can be exceptionally hot. Yes, I know the models are acting, but when they are relatively new to the business and seem a bit nervous it adds to the heat. Most casting sites follow a fairly simple formula: the model arrives, is told about the business and is then asked to strip and eventually to perform for the camera. That’s present here, but the site adds a twist that I’ve not seen elsewhere: there is a ‘casting director’ who is behind the camera and he’s assisted by a beautiful model who is also trying out for a casting director position. There are two broad categories of scene here: interviews with the prospective female casting agents, and then the scenes where new models are put through their paces. There are currently six interview scenes and these are fun to watch and involve some nudity. They’re pretty short though, at less than five minutes long each. As of today there are 18 actual casting videos. Those range from 15 minutes long to just under and hour, with the average around 35-40 minutes. Like most casting sites, they follow a bit of a formula, and that’s not a bad thing. The prospective model arrives and there is some talk between her and the female casting agent, the model is talked out of her clothes and photographed and videoed by the female agent. The female agent gets partially nude, a male model is brought in and the female agent directs the action. (I should add, just to be clear, that the female agent is a porn star too and also very beautiful. All the models fit the Nubiles mold for beauty.) This is purely subjective, but I see casting videos as a bit of a hybrid between hardcore and behind-the-scenes stuff. I find the editing style here leaves too much out. This is just a preference, but I’d like to see more of the set-up and the move to different positions rather than an edit. I suspect that at least some of the motivation is to maintain the high standards that Nubiles has. Two things that these videos really have going for them over standard casting videos is that the interaction with the female agent really adds a unique twist, and I really like the fact that the scenes ‘break the fourth wall’ and we see the female agent taking photos and videos. The added bonus of this is that we also get two different camera angles. Each scene is offered in five MP4 resolutions and one WMV. MP4s are 1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360 and 480x270 and the lone WMV is 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4 files figuring that they’d be a good compromise between quality and size. Bitrates vary, ranging from under 4,000 kb/s to over 10,000 kb/s. Frame rates also vary, with a few scenes at 23fps, some at 59 and the majority at 29. I won’t pretend to understand why the site made these choices, but I can report that whatever the site does, it does it well: these scenes all look sharp and crisp with no pixilation with movement. This is, admittedly, nit-picky, but for those who prefer a specific file type there is an issue you’ll want to be aware of. My choice was to download the 1280 MP4 files. When I went to each scene the download choices are listed at the bottom in relatively small font. The problem is that the placement of the links for the 1280 MP4 and WMV files are swapped in at least six videos. All you need to do is pay attention, but if you’re like me and don’t notice it until later you’ll wonder how you managed to click on the same place for each scene and get two different file types. Clicking on the second-from the left file option is usually the MP4, but in some scenes it’s the WMV. The site updates with a new scene added each week. The interviews are short and don’t count as an uploaded scene. Like the main Nubiles site, this one uses tags to select for certain things you might be looking for in a scene. It may seem like overkill now as the site is small, but as it grows these tags will become a real advantage. The main Nubiles site does a lot of things well, but their use of tags sets a high bar and I’m glad to see them use it here too. I don’t collect photos, but it appears that this site follows the same high standards for the main Nubiles site. Photos are available as singles or zips in three resolutions: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. The bottom line is that this is a small and growing site with a unique take on the casting niche. The price may seem high, but for the fee you get access to the full Nubiles site too, which is certainly a great value. The models are stunning, the production values are great, the site is well laid out and the scenes are hot. I’d recommend the site and it is one that I’ll rejoin once it grows more. 02-24-14  06:22pm Replies (4) Review 154 Sex And Submission (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Kink.com family of sites - 480+ scenes - Updates weekly - Standard-setting production values - Many viewing / downloading options - Many A-list models - Rare niche (bondage AND sex) - Supports download managers - Clear model consent - Excellent value - Photos available as singles and zips Cons: - None Bottom Line: For those who know Kink.com’s sites, Sex and Submission needs no introduction. S+S is one of their older sites and dates back nine years. All Kink’s sites focus on consensual BDSM play with each site adding a twist. Here the twist is sex. That may seem self-evident, but many of Kink’s sites don’t have a lot of actual sex and when they do it is secondary to the specific niche. Here the sex is front and center. The sex isn’t plain vanilla though, as there is always an element of D/s play and sex while in bondage or restraint. Kink.com is, in my opinion, the best BDSM company operating today. For those unfamiliar with Kink, don’t confuse them with “Abuse” sites. Those sites seem to revel in making the model miserable. Kink is the opposite: the models get to explore this facet of their sexuality in a controlled environment and it is clearly all about their pleasure. It’s hard to explain, but this isn’t misogynistic BDSM. As with other Kink sites, this one goes out of its way to ensure that the model fully consents to the play. There is an interview in each one where the scene is discussed and the safe word is made known. I know there are some who reject this approach and think that the consent itself is forced, but there is no evidence to support that position. One factor that, in my opinion, speaks well for Kink’s professionalism are the numbers of A-list stars who shoot scenes here, and many of them shoot multiple scenes. I suspect that if Kink coerced the models that no A-list star would work for them, let alone shoot multiple scenes. Adding to this position is the fact that many of the A-listers are definitely not fetish models. The site currently has 480 scenes. Older scenes start with an interview and jump right into the action. Newer scenes are scenario-based which can add to the heat. There is bondage in several positions, with sex in most of them. If the model does anal, there is usually some anal. The scenes close with an interview which can be interesting to watch to see what the model liked about the shoot. The average length of the scenes is a little over an hour. The scenes can’t be said to meet usual standards in that Kink.com sets those standards. Set creation and production values are the best there are. For scenes that strive have a dark feel about them, they succeed but they don’t look actually dark. They are all well light, shot and edited. The site updates with one new scene being added per week. As with all Kink sites there are a lot of options to watch the scenes. (Obviously the older scenes have fewer options) There is streaming in four available resolutions. Downloads are available for portable devices, in WMV and MP4 formats. Each of those offers a choice of resolutions. I opt for the highest quality MP4s and those come in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. My experience with the next largest is that they are 960x540 at 1500kb/s. A few of the older scenes appear to have been remastered to a higher quality, but some haven’t. The highest resolution for some of the older scenes is 640x480 at 825 kb/s, but keep in mind that these were shot in 2005 so they were up to standard then.. Another difference exists between the oldest and newer scenes on the site. When Kink first started the scenes were relatively simple: ropes, chains, spreader bars, etc. were common implements. As Kink matured the scenes became a lot more innovative in the means to bind the models. Kink clearly has some creative minds at work. A majority of the scenes are innovative and very interesting. Photos are available, though this is really a video site so those are secondary. I don’t collect those so I have no information on them. Download managers work for queuing scenes. I found the links timed out at about an hour, which is reasonable. Kink.com isn’t a network so each site requires a membership. The good news is that when you’re a member to one site you get a discounted price for the others. I usually take advantage of this by joining the cheapest site I want at the full price and then get the discounted price on the others. I’m on their mailing list but haven’t seen an offer in several years. The bottom line on this site is simple: if you have any interest in this niche you should seriously consider joining. For the price, you get access to almost 500 scenes, regular updates and many big-name porn stars doing some interesting fetish work for the best company in the BDSM business. The scenes look great, the bondage gear is innovative and the models really seem to enjoy the play. This is an excellent value and I highly recommend it. 02-22-14  10:14am Replies (1) Review 155 Naked Gym Girls (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 9 videos, 7 picture sets - Unique niche - $20 membership - Videos in three resolutions - Photos in zips or singles - Photos in two resolutions - High-res photos look amazing - Supports download managers for queuing files - Definitely all exclusive Cons: - Small site - No obvious update schedule - Music replaces sound - Would be much better value packaged as part of a network Bottom Line: Leave it to the folks at The Best Porn to expose me to a niche I neither knew existed or liked it: girls getting naked while working out. There is really only one reason why I joined, and that’s to get access to a scene by a model I like who has only done a small amount of stuff. The fact that the site isn’t terribly expensive at $20 and billed through CC Bill sealed the deal. The site is very small, with only nine videos and seven photo sets offered. While that’s definitely small, you need to keep in mind that many of the scenes are well over an hour long and one falls just short of two hours. The site has a very narrow (and unique) focus: girls at a gym, solo, who begin a workout, strip off their clothes while working out and complete the workout while naked. There is little variation: there is one scene with two girls with some sex, and one scene is shot outdoors, but other than that it follows the same formula. Consider this more a nudist site than a sex site. The scenes are undated so I can’t determine what update schedule, if any, exists. The site allows member comments on the scenes and the most recent scene has comments. Yesterday when I checked the comments the most recent said it was posted three months ago. Today it says it was posted on December 2, but doesn’t give a year. I think it is safe to assume that if the site is updating there is no set schedule beyond glacial. The site offers videos in three resolutions: 1920x1080 (9000 kb/s), 1080x720 and 640x360. While I found most of the video to be crisp and clear, I did find in some of the videos that where there is fast movement the edges become slightly pixilated. I don’t understand the tech side of this so I don’t know if this is something the site could even avoid. A unique feature is that you can download an ISO version that can be burned to a DVD to watch on TV. The site permits download managers for queuing scenes and zips. The photos are available as singles or zips and in two resolutions: 3744x5616 and 1200x800. The high-res pics look incredibly good. If you’re a photo collector these might be worth joining to get. Photo sets range from 100+ photos to 800+ photos. My biggest complaint about the scenes may be subjective, but I suspect that many others will agree with me. I’ll let any potential members decide on their own. The site has chosen to overdub the sounds of the workout with music. This isn’t that there is music playing over top of the sounds; the sounds are gone and completely replaced by music. To make matters worse, in my opinion, is that the music is that techno-shit that seems to be overplayed in gyms. You might be able to convince me that this crappy music belongs in a gym (but don’t bet on it) but you’ll never convince me that it belongs in a porn video. Even a solo video where the intention may be to create a sort of gym atmosphere. I’d rather hear the interaction with the crew than the music. This site is one of ten that was added to TBP recently from a company called David Weisenbarger (David Nudes, HD Studio Nudes and more). I do not have memberships at any other of these sites but it appears that they are all relatively small (though some are fairly big), that they feature mostly solo models with rare g/g sex. My role in the porn biz is as a customer, and as a customer I am unlikely to join any of their other sites simply because they aren’t a good value at $20 to $25 per site. (And keep in mind that production costs here are at the low end of the spectrum: no expensive locations, solo nude, no sex, no masturbation.) All the sites added together would make a fair-sized network and by charging a fair price they’d probably generate exponentially more business. This has nothing to do with the review, and I’m obviously only speculating. The bottom line? the site is small, but it is relatively inexpensive at $20. It bills through CC Bill so you can join in confidence. If this is a niche you like or there is a model here that you want to see then you may be willing to spend the $20 to join. For everyone else, the site is too small with no predictable growth to make this a good choice. As it stands now, and with no obvious changes coming, this site isn’t a good value. If this site ever becomes part of a network or package deal I’d reconsider my opinion. 02-18-14  03:55pm Replies (2) Review 156 Teen Core Club (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Stunningly beautiful young, legal models - Tons of anal (yes, I know this isn’t a pro for all) - Supports download managers - Excellent production values Cons: - No obvious updates - Very expensive - Not great value for the price - Some overlap with other networks - Each site must be entered separately - Sites ‘time out’ during use requiring that you follow an emailed link to get back in - Make your username and password short and easy; you’ll be using it a lot - No network model search function Bottom Line: I have mixed feelings about this network. I suspect that my opinion would be a lot more certain, and a lot more positive, if the price weren’t so high. Speaking of price, let me address that first: I see cost as only one part of the value equation. Yes, cost is important, but this isn’t the first time and it won’t be the last time I spend this much. If the site / network offers a lot of great and unique material then I’m much more willing to pay the higher price. Unfortunately, when you add up what $50 gets you here it doesn’t add up to a good value. While I’d normally take the time to list the network’s sites and what’s available, I won’t do that this time. First, there’s no need since Evernight took the time to do that in his review, and second, because I just don’t have the patience to do that on this network. The good news here is that this is a network of 27 teen-themed sites. This is a true network in that the sites offer variations on a theme rather than just being a loose collection of scenes that could have just as easily been put on one large site. You’ll find most major porn niches here: oral, anal, gangbang, IR, etc., but keep in mind that all of the sites focus on fresh teen models. The real advantage of this network lies with the models themselves. If you like fresh faces and pert bodies then this network will surprise and delight. Honestly, the quality of the models will almost make a member forget the network’s serious shortcomings. The models are a who’s who of the Russian and Eastern European legal teen porn biz. Many of the biggest stars are here. Of course, you’ll encounter a familiar problem with these models in that the sites seem to give them different names every day so that makes it harder to follow a model you like. This network doesn’t do you any favors either, because there is no way to select a model and find all her scenes on the network. That seems like something pretty basic that any network would do. The production values on the scenes are top quality. The lighting, editing and sound all contribute to the high quality scenes. The newer scenes are available in WMV or MP4 and in a slightly different resolution for each. There are also individual clips available. I downloaded the hi-res MP4s when they were available and those are 1920x1080 at 6,500kb/s and 29fps. They look great on a monitor and 50” TV. When the hi-res wasn’t available I went with the next best which is 960x540 and 3,500, which, obviously don’t look as good. When I say that the newer scenes are hi-res, that’s a bit of a guess because the scenes aren’t dated. I can’t tell when they started offering HD. But an educated guess is that about half of the videos are in HD. Update schedules are also a bit of a mystery. I’ve been a member for a week now and I haven’t found an update, but that’s partly my laziness due to another network flaw. I have no idea who would think this was a good idea, but there is no real ‘home page’ for the network. There is no page where a member can go to see everything on the network including the recent updates. This network is a true collection of 27 sites and when you want to visit a site you’ll need to enter your username/pass and a captcha. Every site. Every fucking time. There were rumors of daily limits so I went looking for it by downloading a lot and found none. What I did find that periodically I was booted off the network and had to go to email for a link that would allow me back in. Download managers work too. While I expected the scenes to be exclusive for this price, I did find some overlap with other sites. Not much, but then those are just the scenes I recognized. One major reason I joined is a major reason why many others may not join: there are tons of anal scenes here. Anyone who doesn’t like anal will justifiably think that the whole network should be called Anal Teen Core Club. There are sites that are anal-themed where every scene is anal, and there are sites that aren’t anal-themed where only half are anal. You’ve been warned. So what about value? I don’t think it’s here. While you get access to about 1700 scenes, many of which are HD, and most of which feature stunningly beautiful models, you have to suffer through some poorly designed sites to get those. Some may disagree, but I think a reasonable comparison is with Teen Mega World (where some duplicate scenes are located). TMW has 3300+ scenes for a TBP price of $20 while TCC has 1700 scene for $50. The last time I spent that much for a site was because the site offered some unique porn that was expensive to make and had a limited audience. TCC makes great porn, but it isn’t unique and it isn’t more expensive to make than comparable sites so the price just isn’t worth it. I’m glad I joined because it is exactly the kind of porn I like, but with the lack of information on updates and the high price I won’t be back. 02-13-14  05:24pm Replies (8) Review 157 Roxy Raye (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Provides photos and videos in an under-served niche - Wide variety of anal-themed videos - 235 videos - 185 photo sets - Updates with a new video every three days or so - Has live cam shows regularly - All but a few videos are exclusive - Part of a small network - Supports DL managers - Active webmaster Cons: - 50GB daily download limit, but there is also a 10GB / hour limit. - Probably a bit too extreme for many porn viewers - Streaming begins on opening a scene link Bottom Line: I seem to start off a lot of reviews with this statement: this site is definitely NOT for everyone. A regional brewery near here used to have a tag line: “Those who like it, like it a lot.” The same might be said of this extreme anal play. Roxy Raye exists in a very narrow niche of extreme anal play. The only other site I know of that is similar is hotkinkyjo, the site featuring the Russian model with an expandable colon. The big difference is that with Roxy Raye you can download the scenes while with HKJ they are streaming only. I know that any reader who either has no interest in this niche or finds it abhorrent will wonder how I can describe this site as having a broad range of scenes within the extreme anal niche. But Roxy really does cover a broad range of activities, albeit with the common theme of something large going into her ass. There are sex scenes (b/g and g/g), there are IR scenes, there are the large toy insertions, there are pissing videos, there are speculum videos (vaginal and anal), there is fruit and vegetable insertion (hey, she’s looking after her health), there is fisting (vaginal and anal, by self, men and women), there are regular camshows (with downloads available shortly after broadcast), there is some public nudity and there are even rosebuds. And don’t ask what that last thing is. If you don’t know, do yourself a favor and don’t bother learning about it. The site currently has around 235 videos with a new video being uploaded about every three days. A vast majority of these are exclusive, though there are a few uploads of scenes that she’s done for Evil Angel. Approximately 30 of the scenes are downloadable files of the live camshows that she does regularly. I didn’t have an opportunity to take in a live show so I can’t comment on those. The only drawback to the live shows is that prior to mid-2012 they are very low resolution. I suspect that this is dictated partly due to file size because the newer ones aren’t great resolution (640x480 with some at 960x540) but are still as large as 1.5GB. Most scenes have some download options with files being offered as both WMV and MP4 formats. More than one resolution is usually offered too. Obviously the options and resolutions improved as the site kept up with evolving industry standards. The newer MP4s come in at 1920x1080, 3000kb/s and 29fps. That seems like a low bitrate, but the scenes look crisp. The other most common resolution for older, non-HD scenes is 960x540, 2500kb/s. These look fine on a 24” monitor. Photos are also offered, with most of the sets being taken as part of the video shoots. Resolutions vary here too, but most are decent at 1225x816. Photos are updated with a new set being added once every ten days or so. The site layout is relatively simple, and that’s not a bad thing. If you’re familiar with how Hustler looks, it is pretty much the same as that. I can’t find any link between Hustler and this site, but they look a lot alike. While there is no search function there are tags that help sort some things out. The site commits one sin that is too common these days. I may be the only person who dislikes it, but I dislike it a lot: when you open the link to a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish that sites would stop this. There is a download limit of 50GB per day, which is reasonable for a site with so much exclusive material. But there is another limit that is easier to hit. If at any time in a one hour period you exceed 10GB you’ll be shut down for a while. I don’t know how long, but it seems to be an hour or so. The site supports download managers for queuing up scenes and I had no obvious problems with links timing out. The membership includes access to ten sites in total. Normally I’d provide some information on the other sites but in this case most of them are MILF-oriented and therefore not something I have a lot of interest in, so I didn’t spend any time there. Of note too is that there is an active webmaster who responds to questions here and by email. That’s rare and appreciated. The bottom line (pun not intended) is that this is a very good site offering some videos and photos in a rare niche. The site is easy to navigate, the videos are available with some choices, streaming is offered, there are a lot of variations on the main theme and the price is right. The biggest caveat to anyone considering a membership is to make sure you have an interest in this niche. If your porn experience is glamcore then this isn’t the site to dabble in something new. This site is an excellent value and I’d recommend it for anyone interested in the niche. Maybe the whole site can be summed up in something that Roxy says during a scene. How often do you hear an attractive young lady say “I think this is the biggest apple I’ve ever put up my ass”? If you’ve ever heard those words spoken for real before, I need to hang out with you. 02-11-14  08:24am Replies (2) Review 158 Amateur Allure (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 580+ videos - HD available - Lots of download options - Many lesser-known models - Some A-listers early in their careers - Beautiful models - HD available in approximately 400 videos - Owners are remastering old videos - Remasters don’t count as updates - Regular updates - Serves a few underserved niches Cons: - Daily download limit - Some may find the scenes repetitive (see below for details) Bottom Line: I joined this following my interest in ‘casting’ site. While this isn’t a true casting site it is close enough that it made it worthwhile joining. The site follows a simple but effective formula: models show up to tape a POV scene with lots of oral and usually some fucking. Before deciding to join the site I read the reviews here and at TBP. Two recurring comments were obvious: the scenes were too formulaic and many of the models aren’t amateurs. While I agree that the comments on these two facts are accurate, I think how you see them is more subjective. There is a definitely a formula here: there is a short interview, the girl gets on her knees and gives the guy head (with various POV camera angles), there is some vaginal sex, there is more head with an oral pop shot, some cum play and a swallow. Then there is another shorter scene where pretty much the same action happens. There is nothing about this niche that requires such a set formula but I like it and it works. The goal is to show off the model and the formula works well to do that. As for some of the models not being amateurs, this is also true. There are many well-known models here but that doesn’t detract from the site. Some of the best known adult stars are here, but they’re early in their careers. If you’re like me, this is a strong draw to the site. Also, even those models that aren’t as well known are often listed on index sites but that also happens with many other ‘amateur’ sites too. Porn is fantasy based so if I get to see an A-list model early in her career I’m still happy. To be fair, often when the model is an adult star the site makes note of that and doesn’t try to hide it. The site currently has close to 600 videos, with most around 20 mins long. The newer scenes are uploaded with a lot of choice. 95%+ offer streaming, and downloads are available in Quicktime, mobile (for phones and higher res for tablets), WMV (HD and SD). Newer videos are 1920x1080, 8,000-12,000kb/s and 29fps. Some others come in at 1440x1080 and 1280x720. Approximately 400 of the videos are HD and that will increase since new videos are being added (one per week) and the older videos are being remastered to improve them. This seems like a sure sign that the site owners actually care about giving the best product to their customers. The good news is that the site doesn’t count the remastered scenes as updates, but the bad news is that the oldest videos on the site are low resolution and often only offered in Quicktime. I don’t know how often remastered videos are uploaded. Photos are offered and are available as zips, but this really is a video site. Site navigation is simple, but on a simple site why complicate things? The site supports download managers for queuing downloads, though TBP reports that download managers are blocked for simultaneous downloads. Links seemed to time out after 30 minutes or so, which is reasonable. This won’t be a negative for everyone, but if you’re a fan of anal then there isn’t much here. The site lists six anal scenes (which isn’t accurate since there is at least one other that isn’t listed), but only three of the anal scenes are actually exclusive. The site bills itself as being mostly about oral, but they sell themselves short. There is vaginal intercourse in almost every scene and if you’re a fan of lingering cum play, sucking after the guy has come and swallowing then you’ll appreciate the site too. One other ‘niche’ that I like but is rare is where the guy stays fully clothed and the woman is naked. That happens in a lot of scenes here and was a pleasant surprise. One of the reasons that the model may stay clothed is to hide tattoos. Some models I’m familiar with had clothes that hid tattoos, and the camera angles stayed away from any visible tattoos. I’m no fan of download limits and I’ll never see them as anything other than a negative but in this case the site has at least set a reasonable limit or (nominally) 25GB per 24 hour period. While that is the stated limit, my experience was that I was cut off at anything above 22GB. I was also cut off at below 20GB which leads me to believe that any streaming also counts against you. The problem with that was that the only photos of the model were in the banner on the page so I often ran the first few seconds of the video to see if I liked the model. Doing that seems to count against you. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that has a lot to offer. While I don’t agree with all of the choices the owners have made, most of that is subjective. Some people have complained about the price, and it is higher than average, but considering that this is an independent site with 580+ exclusive videos of beautiful models, the site is an excellent value. I definitely recommend joining, and I’ve already added the site to my ‘rejoin’ list. 01-31-14  10:56am Replies (2) Review 159 Hardcore Gang Bang (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Rare niche - Coupled with Bound Gang Bangs - Membership gives you discounts to other Kink sites - Many A-list models - 59 scenes - Updates weekly - Usual well-done Kink.com site - Supports download managers - Streaming and downloads - Choices for file type and resolution Cons: - Not for the faint of heart, probably among the most extreme sites on the internet - Female model name should be more prominent Bottom Line: Let me start with a few of caveats: • This is probably one of the most extreme hardcore sites on the internet. Consider this a “may not be suitable for all audiences” warning. • Many of the scenes use a r@ape fantasy as the scenario. I say this for two reasons, first to warn potential members of this fact, and second to tell people that I had an email chat with Khan and while he okayed describing the scenes in this way he said that using the actual word could cause problems for this site so if you’re commenting DO NOT USE THE WORD lest you incur the wrath of Khan. • Each scene, regardless of the scene set-up, has an interview with the model both before and after the scene. The initial interview CLEARLY shows that the model will be shooting the scene fully informed of what the scene will entail and fully consents to it and that there is a safe word in use. The concluding interview makes it clear that the model had nothing occur that she did not fully consent to. In all the interviews I watched the models reported that they enjoyed the scene. In all my years of buying porn online this is possibly the most extreme hardcore site I’ve ever joined. Other Kink sites come close, but the use of a particular scenario in many of the scenes is what put this over the top. A membership here is definitely not for everybody. Unlike a lot of other Kink sites, this one does use a scene setup. There is a storyline that plays out at the beginning. What I mean that is with sites like Device Bondage and The Training of O, which can be quite intense, there is really no scene setup. A model does a shoot and that’s it. Here, there is a story and much more often than not that story involves some sort of force by a group of men against a woman. No matter how you slice it, most of the scenes here involve simulated r@pe. If you think you’d be offended by that, and I’m sure a lot of people would be, then don’t subscribe. Apart from the setup, the entire scene tends to follow the script with lots of slapping, spitting and generally rough sex. If done wrong, these scenes could likely cause some problems for Kink, but each scene has an interview with the model both before and after the scene where it is made clear that model knows what she’s getting into and then the post-scene interview confirms that. There is no mistaking that this is pure fantasy. Speaking of the models, one thing that struck me about the site, and it likely speaks to Kink’s good reputation in the business, are the number of A-list porn models who appear here. With material this extreme you’d think that only the hardest of the hardcore or fetish models would be here, but that isn’t the case. Models like Chastity Lynn, Casey Calvert and Tara Lynn Foxx are here. Sure, they aren’t exactly wallflowers but I am still pleasantly surprised to see them here. There are currently 59 scenes uploaded with a new one being added each week. Most of the scenes last about an hour, with some exceeding that. As with all other Kink sites, they get the technical stuff right. The site is well laid out and the user can change how the site looks by selecting how much information will be displayed on the main page. One minor quibble is that with each scene the entire cast is credited. I have no problem with that, but the female should be given top billing in all cases. Sometimes you have to read through several names before you get to the female model. I buy porn to see the women. The men are just props. Streaming and downloads are both available, and Kink offers a broad range of choices. There are four streaming resolution options available. Downloads are available in WMV or MP4 with each format being available in five resolutions. I downloaded the MP4 HD option which is 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. (For comparison, “large” comes in at 960x540 at 1500kb/s and “medium” is 640x480 at 825 kb/s.) If you can spare the space it is definitely worth it to download the HD files. They are large though, with the average being 2GB. Videos are also available as clips if you have a slow connection or only want one specific part of a scene. The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out with five or more scenes in the queue. To add more value to this membership, it includes a membership to Bound Gangbangs. BGB stopped updating in August 2012. A member explained here explained that this was due to billers being uncomfortable with the content so in order to save it the models were no longer to be bound. There are 93 scenes that are pretty much like what you’ll find on HCG but with the models in bondage while it happens. Obviously the audience for this material is limited, but if you like this extreme porn (with full consent from the model) this is an excellent choice in a rare niche. I’m not aware of any other sites like this, but if there are some, I’m betting that this is better than the others. 01-12-14  09:07am Replies (11) Review 160 Only Teen Blowjobs (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 372 BJ scenes - 200+ (and growing) scenes in HD - Lots of up ‘n comers - Beautiful models - Updates regularly - Impressive options for both streaming and downloading - TBP/PU discount - Supports download managers - Comes as part of a collection of sites giving access to almost 2700 scenes - Appear to be exclusive Cons: - Older scenes (pre-mid-2009) are in low res only - Page-to-page navigation could be improved Bottom Line: I realize that I wrote in my My XXX Pass review that I didn’t really see this as a network so it may seem odd that I’m now writing a review of something that I don’t necessarily see as a stand-alone site, but I wanted to offer a counterpoint to some of the criticism aimed at the site (and the main site, MXP) by other PU members. First off, while he may not be around to defend his position, I think that there is a high probability that PornoPro’s comments are really directed at the other BJ ‘site’ on this network, Throated. PornoPro wrote that “When a guy puts his hands on the back of a girls head and tries to ram his cock down into her stomach, it turns me off big time.” That may describe the BJ scenes at Throated, and with a name like that it shouldn’t be a surprise to find rough oral. I can’t say for sure that this kind of rough oral doesn’t exist on OTBJs, but if it does I haven’t seen any in all the scenes I’ve downloaded and watched. Regarding the main site, others have complained of problems with emails being sold and slow download speeds. I’ve been a member several times and have never experienced anything negative and only had fast downloads. Moving on to the review, this is a great site that delvers what the title promises: there is only oral, and all of the models certainly look like they’re 18 or 19. Many of the uploads feature models who are relatively unknown or who are just beginning their porn career. This means that you get some fresh faces, but you also get access to some early scenes of models who will go on to be A-listers. The model’s looks are fairly consistent: petite, some tattoos and piercings. Basically what any 18 or 19 year old looks like these days. There is very little ethnic diversity though. The scenes follow a bit of a formula in that they usually start off with some interaction between the model and her partner, there is often a bit of striptease and then the oral begins. The scenes may not be true ‘couples’ porn, but they’re close. Most of the scenes run between 20 and 25 minutes long. I can’t guarantee that these are exclusive, but I’m 99% sure they are. As with the other ‘sites’ here, the options for viewing or downloading the scenes are impressive. WMVs are available in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. MP4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. No member should feel cheated on these options, unless you’re hooked on HD in WMV format. I downloaded the 720p scenes and those come in at 1280x720 at 4800kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look crisp and sharp. The ‘site’ currently has 372 scenes uploaded and it is updating with a new scene being added every week. While that sounds like a slow pace, keep in mind that this ‘site’ is packaged with seven others (a new one was recently added – Sun Lust XXX) so you’ll get two, three or sometimes four updates per day. (Keep in mind that your membership gets you almost 2700 scenes in total.) The one flaw here is the same one that pops up throughout this network. Some may have no issue with it too. The problem is that sometime in mid-2009 they began uploading the HD stuff. That’s not bad, but there is a sharp cut-off point where you go from having the highest resolution at 360p and then it takes a leap ahead to 1080p. It would have been great if back in 2007 or 2008 they had started offering 720p. Having said that though, over half the uploads are available in HD and all new scenes have that option. The site allows download managers and I experienced no time-outs, though in the past I found that links timed out at around the two hour mark. I found downloads to be fast and steady. I had no periods of reduced speeds and never had a download stop on me. One minor complaint that I’m going to start complaining about in reviews is that when a site is structured to show multiple scenes on a page and then there is a list of page numbers on the bottom, the site should also give members the option to select a page number directly. At the main site there are 179 pages, but if you want to go to page 100 you can only click forward five pages at a time. This would make the site much more easily navigated. And this occurs in lots of sites, I just happened to complain about it here first. As I said at the beginning of this, I don’t want to detract from the other reviews and comments but I do want to let other PU readers know that I experienced no problems with this site or the others that come with the membership. Further, I really like this site and the others offered. They offer great value at the discounted price available through TBP/PU, they have a large number of HD videos and they continue to add more daily. I highly recommend that anyone interested in this type of porn take the plunge and join. 01-09-14  04:07pm Replies (0) Review 161 Club Red Light (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Red Light District makes some great porn - Access to lots of their catalogue - Supports download managers - Good download speeds - Most of the newer uploads have good file resolutions Cons: - Scenes not associated with the DVD they were released on - Scenes widely available on other pay sites - Many ‘sites’ in the network are not updating - Last update at all was almost a month ago - Site may be dying or dead - Some scenes offer no video - File resolutions vary widely - File resolutions not provided - Photos offered are poor quality Bottom Line: I find that studio sites can be a gamble. For every one like Evil Angel that does it well, there are ten that come up short. Club Red Light is lumped in with the majority of studio sites and continues the tradition of being mediocre. Most people will know the Red Light District studio well since they have been around for more than a decade and their material is widely available on DVD sites. As a mainstream porn studio they cover all of the regular niches. Their offerings are almost exclusively gonzo and are harder-edged. This really isn’t couples porn. The site markets itself as a network by creating different niche ‘sites.’ But since the scenes are all from RLD DVDs and are all available on the main page then it really can’t be treated as a network. (While CRL is the name of the network, it is also a separate site within the network.) The sites, with some stats (number of scenes / last update date), are: Club Red Light – 1099 / Dec. 7, 2013 Addicted to Boobs – 188 / Nov. 16, 2013 Ass Crazed – 148 / Nov. 8, 2013 Choke on My Load – 79 / Oct. 27, 2013 Cumfart Cocktails – 38 / Oct. 31, 2013 Cum Stained Casting Couch – 191 / Oct. 28, 2013 I Just Fucked My Best Friend’s Mom – 88 / Sept. 21, 2013 I Just Fucked Two Chicks – 45 / Nov. 9, 2013 In it Goes Out it Cums – 137 / Nov. 1, 2013 I’ve Been Sodomized – 265 / Oct. 18, 2013 Sluts Fucking Sluts – 72 / Dec. 26, 2012 So You Think You Can Squirt – 41 / Oct. 3, 2013 Teenage Fuckholes – 350 / Nov. 5, 2013 Throat Gaggers – 110 / Jan. 24, 2013 Toe Service – 28 / May 29, 2013 Young Tight Latinas – 104 / Oct. 26, 2013 One caveat when counting the scenes: I have no idea because they aren’t labelled as such, but some of the scenes only offer photos and no videos. Another caveat on updates: you’ll note that the last update on the entire site was three weeks ago. Many of the sites haven’t updated in months. I won’t be the one to call for last rites, but maybe we need a porn priest on speed dial. I really can’t understand why a studio who produces DVDs wouldn’t structure their website around those DVDs. To make matters worse, while some of the sites have some RLD series names, and the sites have scenes from that series, there are additional scenes in there too making it harder to sort. For others like me who have a large porn collection, not identifying the DVD title means that I inevitably downloaded a lot of scenes that I already had. Apart from not having the scenes associated with their respective DVDs, the site is laid out in a logical manner. The main site shows thumbnails for 24 scenes per page spanning all the ‘sites. Opening one of the thumbnails brings you to that scene’s page where you can stream, download the scene (if video is available) and the photos. There seems to be a point in March, 2008 when they started offering higher resolutions. Prior to that date the scenes were offered as WMVs in 640x480 and lower. I realize that a lot of these scenes weren’t filmed in good resolution so I can’t fault the site for this, but they are pretty poor quality. When higher resolutions were offered starting in 2008 they were first WMVs at 1280x720 at 4000 kb/s. A problem though, is that even though some of the scenes uploaded after 2008 are labelled “HD” on the thumbnail, they still only come in at 640x480. With file data not provided the best gauge for guessing resolution is file size. The last two years saw another change with the file type switching to MP4. For the past two years the files are offered as an “MP4 High” and an “MP4 Medium.” The “High” are 1920x1080 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look good, but not as crisp as on some other sites. The “Medium” are 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 29fps. I know this will sound really fussy on my part, but I do wish they offered 1280x720 to bridge the gap. While there are photos offered (and singles or zips) there are only a few low-res photos offered with each scene, and some of those are screencaps. The site supports download managers and I had no trouble with links timing out. Download speeds were good. I experienced a problem the first few days of my membership with the site crashing and giving me an “internal server error” message. Usually going back to the site and logging in resolved it. It hasn’t happened in the past few days so it may have been a temporary glitch. I found that I had downloaded several scenes where the video and audio were not in sync. It may have been that with bad luck I stumbled on the few like that, but it is more likely that this occurs in other scenes too. The bottom line is that this is a site that could have been great but isn’t. RLD makes some great porn but the cons really outweigh the pros here. Add to this that the site may be dying and I am certain that I won’t be back. The only people I’d recommend the site to would be a person who is just starting to buy and collect online porn and doesn’t already have many RLD titles. 01-03-14  06:46am Replies (6) Review 162 Backroom Casting Couch (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Excellent site in a relative under-served niche - 165 scenes - Updating regularly - Many good looking models - Most models are ‘amateur’ - ome porn stars early in their careers - Now uploading in 1280p - Packaged with another excellent amateur site - Male talent who never tries to upstage the models - Excellent camerawork and editing - Innovative use of split screen and picture-in-picture - Supports download managers - Bills through CCBill Cons: - Only the most recent updates are HD. Older scenes can be low resolution Bottom Line: Lately I’ve developed an interest in ‘casting’ videos and this is one of the better sites in that niche. A membership here includes a membership to two other sites: Exploited College Girls and Net Video Girls. ECG is a great site and makes a membership here better. NVG isn’t terrible, but, in my opinion, it is the weakest site of the three. I should point out that the TBP review doesn’t say anything about the additional sites but I’ve joined twice now and both times that was the deal. I just checked again and it is still being offered. The site’s premise is that a guy passes himself off as a porn agent and has women come by to talk about getting into the business. The setting is an office and the scene is recorded using two cameras on tripods and a handheld POV camera. The ‘agent’ explains the business to the model and then she is encouraged to make a demo tape that the agent will then use to get work for her. The demo consists of the model getting naked, masturbating, performing oral on the agent and then getting fucked. Many of the scenes have some anal sex but it is usually short. Even if you aren’t as big a fan of anal as I am, the anal isn’t obtrusive. Some may criticize the site as being too formulaic. It is that, but in my opinion, the formula works so why fix what isn’t broken? Most of the models are unknown to me, though there are a few who went on to porn careers. Tanner Mayes (as Evangeline), Kacey Jordan, Shawna Lenee (as Kara), Amia Miley and Chastity Lynn are here, early in their careers. While there is no way that the premise could be real (given the paperwork involved to do porn), the models play the role well and really add to the feel of the scene. There is some variety in models with different body types, though the majority are Caucasian and petite. Most of the models are very good looking. There are a few videos with pregnant models if you’re into that. There have been negative comments about the male ‘agent.’ I don’t share those opinions because I find that he knows that members aren’t joining to see him so he is unobtrusive. Using two stationary cameras and a POV camera could be the site’s weak point, but it isn’t. The camera work and editing are great and really work well for the atmosphere. One feature that I really like is the use of split screen or picture-in-picture. For example, the model may be bent over the desk in a standing doggy position and one half of the screen is a camera pointing at her face while the other half is the POV camera held above the model’s ass. There are currently about 165 videos on the site with most being about 30 minutes long. The site does update regularly, but since my membership expired four days ago I can’t confirm the update schedule but my recollection is that it is at least one new scene per week. The scenes are only available in one file type, WMV, but they are available as clips or as the full scene. There are usually two resolutions available (labelled as high and low). I only downloaded the highest resolution full scenes so I can’t comment on the lower resolution or clips. Speaking of resolution, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that the site appears to have undergone a re-work and at the same time it looks like the last 12-15 uploads are available in 1280x720 at 3500kb/s and 29 fps. These look great. File sizes are between 500-800MB, though there are a few that hit a gigabyte. The bad news is that before the site started uploading HD the resolutions were lower. With a lot of the older scenes on the site that can be pretty low. Most are 768x432 (which still look good), some are 576x324, some are 640x360 and some 480x360. Obviously the smaller resolution files were uploaded a long time ago and don’t look good by today’s standards. The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out. I didn’t encounter any speed reductions or download limits. The site bills through CCBill. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site if you like this niche. It’s packaged with another excellent site (and a mediocre one too). The models are good looking and the scenes are fun to watch. The production values are good with good camerawork and editing. While the site has started uploading HD videos that was only recently so most of the videos are of lower resolution. Not only do I highly recommend this site but it is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin to download new scenes. 12-30-13  10:24am Replies (14) Review 163 Babes Network.com (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site with 460+ videos available - Ability to sort videos - Updates daily with one scene per day being added - Videos available in streaming and downloads - Videos available in multiple resolutions - Photos available (singles and zips) - Beautiful models - Good mix of American and European models - TBP/PU discount Cons: - Some ads and upsells - Photo resolutions seems a bit low - Only one video type (MP4) - No anal (which many will consider a plus) Bottom Line: This review isn’t technically a review of Babes network but is of the identical clone, Babes.com. I really can’t imagine why a company would have two identical sites, but they do. This site is another in the ‘artcore’ niche with hardcore porn done with a softer edge. If you’re looking for slapping, throat fucking and lots of anal pounding, then you’ll want to look elsewhere. There is none of that here. What you will find here are lots of scenes with beautiful women in solo, lesbian and b/g scenes. The site has offers the ability to sort by scene type, which is an excellent feature for getting to what you prefer. My preference is for b/g, so selecting for ‘couples’ removes the solo and lesbian from what I can see. The hardcore b/g scenes all follow a familiar format with kissing, foreplay (for both partners), vaginal sex and the money shot. As is the norm with these kinds of sites, the scene lengths are approximately 20 minutes each, in keeping with the natural feel that the site is trying to create. The production values are high with good lighting and editing in the scenes. The lesbian and solo scenes offer what you’d expect with scenes in those niches. The models are a mix of American and Europeans. Some are well-known porn stars while others are lesser known. They are all relatively young (18-25) and most are petite. One advantage to sites like this that have more sensual scenes and also offer solo and lesbian is that they seem to attract newer models who may only do solo or g/g for now. It’s a great opportunity to see some new models (like Emily Grey. Please, please, please, Ms. Grey, make the leap to hardcore!) The site is fairly large with 189 couples videos, 95 lesbian videos and 179 solo girl videos available. The videos are all available as streaming or downloads. Streaming is available as RTMP or HTTP (I have no idea what that means…) in 720, 480 or 320 resolutions. Downloads are available in 1080, 720, 480 and mobile resolutions. MP4 is the only file type offered. I found the 720p videos to be a good compromise between video quality and file size. The 720p videos come in at 1280x720, 4000kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively, they look great with no pixilation that some sites still have at higher resolutions. The site supports download managers and I had no problems with the links timing out. The download speeds were what I get with other sites so they don’t try to limit speeds, even at peak times. Updates are made daily with one scene per day being added. The site offers lots of photos too. Currently there are 122 ‘couples’ photosets, 95 lesbian and 179 solo sets. The photos are available as either zips or singles. The few photosets I downloaded all had a little over 100 photos. Photo resolutions seem a bit low at 1663x2494. There are no obvious negatives to the site. There are ads and upsells, but those happen at other sites too and they aren’t obtrusive or distracting. I did find it a bit annoying that when sorting scenes you had the option to see what scenes are available on other company sites like Brazzers, Mofos and Twisty’s. I think the trade-off is that if you really like a model it gives you access to trailers and you may want to join another site if you like what you see. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site with some great sensual porn available. The models are beautiful and the sex is hot. At the discounted price available through TBP/PU this site is a great value if you’re looking for porn with a softer edge. 12-24-13  11:35am Replies (2) Review 164 Erotica X (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 20 videos - Updates with one video added per week - High production values - A-list models - Sensual more than just sexual - Run by Open Life - TBP / PU discount Cons: - Small site (but growing) - No tour pages Bottom Line: EroticaX is a new site created by the people who run the Open Life network. It’s a stand-alone site and not part of the Open Life network. The site offers a TBP discount at $15 and TBP also reports a full trial. I joined for a month so I can’t independently confirm the trial is full. For a buyer who prefers harder-edged porn I’m always surprised at how much I like sites like this. This site is the latest in a crop of relatively new ‘artcore’ sites with an emphasis on high production values and a focus more on sensuality rather than raw sexuality. Each of the scenes starts slowly with some lingering shots of the model and then moves into some passionate sex. Not to create confusion – this is still a hardcore site with everything that you’d expect from that. These are not hotel-grade softcore videos. The videos are also a more natural length with each running about 25 minutes. It seems that aiming for a more sensual scene by not including gagging, throat fucking, gaping and spitting really brings the length down to something closer to the time it takes for real people to have sex Many of the scenes also use some interesting locations. While there are some beaches and other outdoor locations, they also use some pretty swanky apartments or condos. The models in the scenes are mostly from the current A-list in the adult industry. Unfortunately the site doesn’t offer much information to the prospective buyer so there appears to be no way to see what’s available before you join. But if you’re interested, models such as Allie Haze, Casey Calvert, Dillion Harper, Lia Lor, Maddy O’Reilly and Teal Conrad all have scenes here. (One thing to note: I also have a membership to the main Open Life network and found one scene was on both sites. That may be an issue for some.) As this is a new site it is still quite small with only 20 scenes being available as of this writing. A new scene is added weekly so the site will continue to grow. Depending on your interest and internet connection, a member may want to consider the trial for now until the site grows. One feature that I like is that you can select a tab that will show you what scenes will be uploaded in the coming month. The downside to that is that you may see that there is a pending scene you want to see but it’s just past when your membership will expire. The site is created by Open Life, a company that’s been recently created but was formed by another company that had been around for a while and had a good reputation. I’m not 100% sure, but damn close to that sure, that the site (and other Open Life sites) has to be affiliated with Fame Digital because their user interface and range of download options is the same. Speaking of which, there are a lot of options for downloads. WMVs are available in 160p, 240p, 360p and 480p. MP4s are available in those resolutions too and are also available in 540p, 720p and 1080p. I’ve dropped my practice of downloading the 1080p scenes because I watch most of my porn on a 24” monitor and the extra space on my hard drives can’t be justified. The 720p files I downloaded came in at 1280x720, a bitrate of just below 5000kb/s and 29fps. The technical side is definitely well done. Photos are available – as singles or zips – but this is definitely not a photo site. The pics are 1280x1920. There are a few things that are a bit subjective, but they bear mentioning in case anyone else is wondering too. Likely owing to the ‘artcore’ niche of the site, some things wouldn’t fit and you don’t see them. Anal sex is one. One scene is tagged as anal but there is no anal in it. I think the site got a little ambitious because on the scene tagged as anal the male model accidently bumps up against Jenna Ross’s anus while in the spoons position. The other missing element is the facial. Body shots are the norm here. I don’t consider these cons, I’m just mentioning them in case someone expects ‘sensual’ ass-poundings and facials. The other semi-complaint that I have (that is also subjective and not factored into the score) is the editing and transitions. It appears that the site is trying to convey a more natural and passionate sex than typical gonzo, but the editors too often choose to cut out transitions between positions. I realize that there is probably a lot of forage left on the cutting room floor – figuratively, of course – but I think showing more transitions to different positions would convey more passion and, in my opinion, turn the heat up a notch. The bottom line is that if you like high-production-value porn with some of the hottest models in the business today and you like to season your porn collection with some sensual and passionate artcore you’d do well to give this site a try. Yes, the site is small now, but the discount makes it a reasonable value that will only improve as the site grows. 12-15-13  05:31pm Replies (4) Review 165 Perfect Gonzo (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Collection of 10 sites - Large collection (1600+ scenes) - HD available on many scenes - Good use of niche tags - Supports download managers - Updates by adding one scene to the network every three or four days - Screenshots and photos available Cons: - Scenes can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: Perfect Gonzo is a collection of ten sites grouped around the main page. While it may be considered a true network because each of the sites serves a clear and distinct niche, all of the scenes are available through the main page too so that means that the sites themselves can act as high-level niche tags to quickly sort in or out preferences or dislikes. The sites available (with some basic details) are: All Internal: 322 scenes, featuring vaginal and anal creampies Ass Traffic: 314 scenes, featuring anal sex Cum for Cover: 82 scenes, featuring blowbangs with facials Fist Flush 68 scenes with fisting (for those with an interest, all of the scenes are g/g only, with some g/g/g and only about 10% of the scenes have any anal fisting) Give me Pink: 259 scenes, featuring solo masturbation MILF Thing: 59 scenes, with MILFs obviously Prime Cups: 158 scenes for large-breast fans Pure POV: 70 POV scenes Sperm Swap: 189 cum-swapping scenes Tamed Teens: 127 scenes with 18 and 19 year old models Each scene is accessible through a medium-sized thumbnail showing the model’s face. That thumbnail opens into a separate page that has tabs for the full scene, screenshots, photos and a trailer. There is a short description of the scene, a hyperlink to other scenes by that model and a series of (hyperlinked) tags for niches in the scene. Members have an opportunity to leave comments and some of those may be useful in deciding if you want to see the scene. Screenshots and photos are available as singles and zips. For video, HD is offered on approximately 70% of the scenes. Where HD is offered there are four choices for downloads, all of which are in mp4 format: 1920x1080 (12Mbit), 1280x720 (5Mbit), 960x540 (2.5Mbit) and 480x270 (1Mbit). File sizes are given before you download so you can decide on which version you want with all the information you need. File sizes for the highest resolution can be a bit daunting, but I appreciate that the site makes them available. I downloaded the 1280x720 resolution and subjectively they look great. Where no HD is available, only the two lower res files are offered. One important point is that the site only began putting the upload date on scenes in July 2013. That makes gathering a lot of stats difficult. What that does reveal is that several of the sites haven’t updated since the dates began being added. These include Cum for Cover, MILF Thing, Pure POV, Sperm Swap and Tamed Teens. What that also means is that when I say 70% of the scenes on the network are available in HD that doesn’t mean that 70% on the sites that are no longer updating are HD. All of the scenes have high production values with the lighting, filming, editing, etc. all being top quality. All of the models are European with many being well known in the adult business. The network is updated every three to four days with one scene being added to the network, not to each updating site. The site supports the use of download managers and if the links time out they do so reasonably because I had no problems with that. One thing prospective members should be aware of is that there’s a lot of anal sex here. For me, that’s no problem. In fact, it’s why I joined. Ass Traffic is all anal, but there are a lot of other anal scenes throughout the rest of the sites. I realize that this next point is subjective, but I found the scenes to be a bit repetitive and sometimes a bit boring. I know this is gonzo, and I know that this means a particular style, but I found that many of the scenes lacked heat. My opinion is that heat is most often formed by sexual tension, and that tension is best built at the beginning of the scene. Most of the scenes here are shot with little interaction between the models before they get down to business. Gonzo can have great set-ups that build tension and heat; just ask John Stagliano. It may be that since many of the models have little English that lessens the ability to create sexual tension. And this is not to take away from the scenes because they are great. (And in fairness, I find directors like Mike Adriano and Jay Sin to be repetitive too, but I still buy and download anything I can that they produce.) The bottom line for me is a bit of a mix. I can definitely recommend that anyone with an interest in the network join. The network has the three things that I think differentiate a great site from a merely good one: they have great porn (hot models and high production values), they have a well-laid-out website and the porn is easy to stream or download. The network offers over 1,600 scenes, many in HD, for a fair price. The volume of high quality porn for a reasonable price makes this a great value. The difference for me is that while I recommend that people join, I likely won’t be back myself, but the reasons for that are purely subjective and shouldn’t be taken into account unless your preferences are like mine. 11-26-13  03:35pm Replies (7) Review 166 Private.com (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 660 Private titles - Likely the most lavish productions of any current large studio - Stunning models - Some HD available - Supports download managers - Lots of anal (might be a con for some) - Updates with two scenes (not full DVDs) added per day Cons: - Not a true network of sites as indicated - Download speeds can vary - Sorting functions are limited - A few minor issues with separate links leading to the same scene and wrong star names Bottom Line: This is one of the better studio sites where I’ve had a membership, but since I find most studio sites lacking in some key areas that isn’t necessarily praise. This is a good site that offers solid value though. You’ll note that I refer to this as a site while others consider it a network. The TBP review notes that a membership to the main site comes with ten sites in total. That’s sort of true, because those other ‘sites’ exist, but it is also misleading. The additional sites contain nothing different from what is on the main site. The additional sites are more like niche tags. If you sort by DVD and then open a DVD you’ll see that some of the scenes in the DVD are tagged with the watermarks of those bonus sites. While this may be useful for sorting a niche you like, no one should join expecting access to both Private and bonus sites offering additional and unique content. Currently the site has 660 DVDs available. Unlike so many other studio sites it appears that Private hasn’t neglected to upload some scenes in DVDs. For those who know Private’s videos they don’t need an introduction, but for those not familiar with them, Private is a European studio (likely the oldest in the industry) known for high quality productions. The studio uses only the best looking models (mostly European but a few American A-listers too), has incredibly high production values and often shoots in exotic (and expensive) locations. Like so much of European porn, anal sex is frequent which may deter some members. If the site has a weak point, it isn’t the quality of the porn. The site’s main weak point, as seems to be common with studio sites, is in the website execution. The site itself is simple, which in many cases is an advantage, but in this case more detail and options should be made available. For example, when sorting by DVD (my preference) the only option is to sort by popularity or title. There is no option to sort by upload date or HD versus SD content. I’ll confess that I’ve become a bit of a ‘size queen’ in recent months: life is too short for low res porn. The result is that unless there is a specific scene that I really want, I won’t download anything less than 720p. On this site, that meant leaving a lot of porn on the table. (I can’t really say how much HD is available because there is no way that I can find to sort for it, but I estimate that maybe 40% is available as HD.) Given that some of the DVDs available here were filmed prior to HD I can’t fault the studio for this and I assume that all newly shot and uploaded DVDs will be available in HD. Where only SD is available there is usually only one option of 720x480, though some come in at 720x540. The only file type offered is mp4. Many scenes also offer a lower-res version for mobile devices. The HD scenes still only offer mp4 but there are more options for resolutions. Those are 480p, 720p, 1080p and mobile. I downloaded the 1080p and those came in at 1920x1080 at 4,100kb/s and 25fps. Interestingly (for a non-tech guy) the file sizes are much smaller than I’m used to seeing for scenes of this resolution. I don’t understand how they’re encoded, but the site really has struck a great balance between how the scenes look (they look great – clear and crisp) and the file size. I certainly appreciate their effort. Scenes are also available for streaming in the same resolutions offered for downloads. The site allows download managers and I had no issue with timeouts. I realize that some have reported being limited to five downloads at once, but since I only use a manager to queue up downloads for one-at-a-time download I had no issues. I was also able to continue navigating when downloading contrary to what some others have reported. Download speeds were up to normal standards but I did see speeds drop off on a few occasions. I usually saw 10+MB/s but it could drop as low as 3MB/s for short periods. A couple of minor issues popped up in that on more than one occasion I went to download a scene and my download manager said I already had downloaded it. It appears that some of the links may lead to the wrong scene. Another relatively minor quibble is that on maybe a dozen or so of the scenes I downloaded the female talent was incorrectly listed. As this is the studio that shot the video I’d like to think they could avoid this mistake. The bottom line for me is that this is a solid site that offers a lot of top-quality porn for a fair price. While the site could use more tags and search tools, and should continue to add HD content, even as it stands it offers great value for your porn dollars. 11-13-13  10:33am Replies (3) Review 167 Casting Couch X (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 74 scenes posted - All scenes in HD - Stunning models - Large majority of models are fresh and unknown - The male talent is rather ‘talented’ if you like big facials - Updates regularly - Screenshots and photos available - TBP / PU discount Cons: Major cons: - Links time out after approximately 10 minutes - Limited options for members with slower connections Nitpicky cons: - I had trouble with the MPG files (may just be me though) - Scenes may be repetitive - LOTS of ads - Meaningless file names - No tags or ability to sort by scene type Subjective cons: - 3 anal scenes?? Is that it?? - They’re affiliated with BangBros so watch out. Bottom Line: Lately I’ve had a thing for ‘casting’ sites and have been joining anything that looks decent. A week ago that led me to this site. And in case you’re wondering, yes, I know that these are staged, but they’re staged so well that a viewer can get lost in the fantasy. The site dates back to just over a year ago and not much has changed in the way the scenes are shot except for the location being much more upscale in newer scenes. The scenes follow a set formula and rarely deviate from that. Girl walks in, presents her ID, is interviewed, stands and undresses, girl poses nude and fingers herself a bit on the couch, guy standing/girl kneeling blowjob, occasionally becomes guy sitting on couch / girl kneeling blowjob (in some rare scenes with rimming), sex starts with girl standing bent over desk, girl on back on desk, guy laying on back on couch with girl riding, then switch back to girl on knees oral with a damn good facial. Most of the scenes stick pretty close to that formula. Some may find that repetitive, and it is, but it’s saved by the hot female models. You could argue that even the models are formulaic in that they are all in their late teens or early twenties, all are petite (but not skinny) and all but a few have B or C cup breasts. Given the age group, tattoos and piercings are common but not overwhelming. Most of the models are new to me, though I did recognize a few faces that I have seen before. To say that all the models are good looking is either an understatement or an exaggeration depending on your preference. I say the former, but if you prefer larger or older models, then this site may not be for you. The site has a very simple layout that is easy to use. On each page there are 12 scenes shown by a large thumbnail with the model’s name and the date of the upload. There are currently 74 scenes uploaded and it appears that a new scene is added every six days. Each scene is approximately 50 mins long. Opening that thumbnail brings you to a page to access the scene. I’m a big fan of HD material and always download it when it is available, so it may seem odd for me to complain that there aren’t many download options. The choice is HD in MPG or WMV and an MP4 in 750x422. File sizes for the HD files averages 3GB, so this might not work for members with slower internet speeds. I downloaded the WMV version and all of those came in at 1920x1280, 9000kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively, they aren’t bad, but they aren’t the best I’ve seen either. The MP4s look pretty good so they may be a good compromise for slower connections. Still, more choices are better. One problem I had that may be unique to me is that the MPG files stuttered badly. I tried multiple scenes on two computers and used two players and had the same result each time. This may not happen to you, but before you download a lot in MPG you should test them on your computer. Photos and screencaps are available too. The photos are 1500x1000 and the screencaps are 1920x1280. The big difference is that the screencaps aren’t available as zips. The site does support download managers, but the links time out after about 10 mins. Given the file sizes this means that lining up more than three scenes probably won’t work. Also, prepare to rename each file before you download it – they all use the same generic, meaningless name. One annoyance that I can live with is the number of ads on the site. I don’t mind ads if they help keep the site going, but I had one big problem here. Given that the site is affiliated with BangBros, and BB has a reputation for some pretty unethical subscription and billing practices, I avoided even going near the ads for sites I otherwise might be interested in for fear of getting burned with an unwanted subscription. I realize that not everyone will share my opinion on this, but I was disappointed to find only three anal scenes on the site. Many other ‘casting’ sites have a lot of anal because the genre lends itself to that sex act. “But honey, the big money is in anal…” This actually leads me to another problem that may not be a problem, and that’s that there are no tags or meaningful ways to sort the scenes. Why this really isn’t a problem is that with each scene closely following a formula tags are probably unnecessary: look at the model. Do you like her? If yes, you know exactly what she’ll be doing in the scene so download it. The pros far outweigh the cons here when you consider the merits of the site. You have access to over 60 hours of HD porn at a discounted price. The scenes all have some hot, young and fresh models. The production values are high and the scenes all look great. What more could you ask for? I definitely recommend this site. 10-24-13  06:13pm Replies (2) Review 168 Burning Angel (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Updates regularly - Good variation in body types - Variation in level of tattoos and piercings - Class-leading video quality in newer videos - Many download options - Streaming available (with options) - Supports download managers - Fans of Joanna Angel should definitely join – lots to see - TBP discount Cons: - No zips for pics Bottom Line: The first time I joined this site I surprised even myself as I’m not a big fan of tattoos and piercings. Or so I thought. The site seems to be quite a bit different now than the last time I reviewed it. Back in 2009 when dracken commented on it, and even as recently as a year ago when I reviewed it, the site had a ‘community’ feel to it, like it wasn’t necessarily a professional porn site but a site owned and run by people into this lifestyle. (That was and still is highlighted by the obvious connection that Joanna Angel has with this site. Any of her fans NEED to get a membership here.) The site still has that feel to it with the blogs, a forum, event listings and chats, but it is clearly more ‘professional’ now. The last time I reviewed the site it was broken down into several sub-sites. Those are listed in my previous review if you’re interested in seeing what those were. Those divisions seem to be gone now in favor of putting all the videos up on the main page and relying on a pull-down menu to sort by niche. This may be a personal thing, but I prefer the new way: all the scenes are right there and there are convenient ways to sort by star or niche. The site is part of the Fame Digital family of sites. In my opinion, Fame has the porn Midas touch in that they nail the Holy Trinity for porn sites: the porn is incredibly hot with high production values, the site is well organized, and the porn is easy to access for streaming or downloads. The only caveat with Fame is that you need to track which of their billing companies you paid through because you’ll need to know that when it comes time to cancel. Another way the site is different now is that they use a look more common to other Fame sites: the scene thumbnail opens into a page where all your options for streaming and downloads are in sub-menus. If you’re familiar with any of Fame’s sites you’ll realize that this is both intuitive and easy to use. Also like other Fame sites, this one offers some of the widest choices for streaming and downloads. Other porn companies need to copy this. The oldest videos on the site date from 2008 and are available for download in either WMV or MP4 in 160p, 240p, 360p and 480p. Obviously these aren’t great, but they look okay and they were great when they were uploaded. The really good news, however, is that like most Fame sites, this site jumped into HD early: videos uploaded as early as mid-2009 offer both 720p and 1080p in MP4 format. This was way ahead of the curve for most adult sites in 2009. The icing on the cake is that however fame encodes its scenes, in either 720 or 1080 they look amazing. Some sites offer 1080 that still looks pixilated. Please Fame, if you’re reading this please offer encoding lessons to other sites. Or just buy them out. I downloaded the 1080p versions and those come in at 1980x1280 and 6800kb/s bitrate. The site currently has 719 scenes of varying length. The scenes run the gamut from solo, POV, b/g, group, g/g, anal; in other words, just what you’d expect from an adult site. The models also have some variation so depending on the look you like you’re apt to find lots to satisfy you. The site updates frequently and regularly with several scenes being added weekly. If the site has one glaring fault it’s that pics are still not offered in zips. I know this is primarily a video site, but for those who like to collect photos of their favorite models it would be a good idea to offer zips. Download managers are supported and like other Fame sites this one has resolved the issue of short-duration time-outs. Links don’t last forever, but they will last about an hour and that is a huge improvement over what was offered even a year ago. So that leaves dealing with the 800lb gorilla in the room: that the models don’t sport a mainstream look. If that is an absolute deal-breaker for you, then there is no way you’d like this site. If, however, you have even a remote interest in this niche then I highly recommend checking this site out. The models are all really beautiful and but for the tattoos and piercings they look like the beautiful models that work in other parts of the porn industry. There are varying levels of body modifications too: not all the models are heavily tattooed and pierced; some are very light on both. Katie St. Ives, for example, is on this site and I doubt many would consider her a niche model. The bottom line is that just in the past year this site has made some changes that, while subtle, have made a great site even better. It’s a large and growing site that offers excellent quality (in production values and in how they look on your monitor or TV) at a discounted price and features unique-but-beautiful models. What’s not to like? I highly recommend joining. 10-08-13  04:17pm Replies (2) Review 169 Broke Amateurs (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Decent sized site (135 scenes) - Some attractive women - Supports download managers - Streaming available - Lots of rimming (yes, I consider this a pro) - Scenes are hard without being abusive - Updates Cons: - No HD - Highest resolution is barely industry standard - Seems to be using even lower resolution now - Many broken links - Some scenes are streaming only - No customer support - Some women not attractive Bottom Line: I recently discovered that I like ‘amateur’ porn. The qualifier for that is that I like porn that uses models that obviously have some interest in the adult industry and are now trying video, as opposed to a couple who record themselves and post it on the ‘net. The setup here is pretty much the same as used on similar sites like Exploited College Girls: the scene begins with an interview of the model, she gets naked, there is oral and then sex. I think this formula works so I don’t find it repetitive, but I can see that some might. Most of the sex is vaginal, but there are several scenes that feature anal too, but not enough that I’d consider this an anal site. One controversial sex act that does occur often is female on male rimming, which occurs in a majority of the scenes. I like watching that, so I find it a positive, but I understand that I’m probably in a minority. Most of the scenes are around 45-50 minutes long. While the female models are asked to do things they probably wouldn’t do in real life, the scenes are in no way abusive as can occur on other sites. There is no face fucking or other extreme acts like that. Most of the models are quite attractive and there is a decent variety among body types so that most members can say they found a lot of models that suit their tastes. As with ‘amateur’ sites though, there can be some models who are questionable. I swear that one of the models looks like a younger Geddy Lee. And as a Rush fan, it pains me to say that. It could have been worse though: the model could have looked like Neil Peart or Alex Lifeson. Unfortunately the bad outweighs the good on this site. The material itself is well shot (while there is a lot of POV it is well done), lighted and edited. Most of the women are attractive and most of the sex is fun to watch. The site is let down by the web design itself and what is actually made available to members. The site is simple and I have no problem with that. It is a small site with 135 scenes available so there is no need for a fancy layout and powerful search function. It would be nice to see some tags but I can live without those. Of the problems on the site, one of them is that the 135 scenes are only theoretically available. I didn’t count them, but there are many dead links for pages and more for downloads. Speaking of downloads, this is the biggest problem with the site: all of the older material is offered in only 320x240 resolution. (Only one download choice is offered per scene. Or, if you prefer, the only option is take it or leave it.) I can’t be convinced that they were anywhere near state-of-the-art even when they were uploaded. The site did improve that when they upgraded the downloads to 720x480. Those are passable and look pretty good on a 24” monitor, but get pretty grainy on a large TV. More options would be better, including an HD download choice. But wait! It gets worse! It appears that the site may have made a choice to actually revert back to the 320x240 size. I say this for three reasons: 1) the newest update is low resolution, 2) a blog update in late August reported that the site would be only using low resolution downloads to thwart theft, and 3) a couple of emails to the site to ask if my suspicions were true went unanswered. If it’s true that the site has reverted to low res for downloads, this alone will cause me to not recommend the site and not rejoin. I get that piracy is hurting porn, and probably hurting smaller sites more than big sites, but surely there is a better way to curb piracy than kicking your customers in the balls. I’m an active porn buyer and I frequently rejoin sites, but if this is what I get, I won’t be back. Two relatively minor issues too: 1) if you have an option for members to contact you, you should read your email and respond. If you don’t respond, then don’t make the option available, and 2) the third most recent update features a stunning young lass who puts on a great performance, but for some reason it is only offered in streaming. This really cheesed me off, and my reasonable question on future availability went unanswered. As for some technical stuff, the site updates with approximately one new scene being added weekly. It also supports download managers with no obvious timeouts or download limits. This is some decent amateur porn that is let down by a too-amateur site. I could live with that but if my suspicions are correct that they are making things even worse for members I can’t recommend the site. If the site responds to this review or to my email with some information on better downloads then I’ll reconsider my refusal to recommend and the score. 10-03-13  06:39pm Replies (10) Review 170 Immoral Live (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique and interesting site - Part of a larger network - Supports download managers - Good video quality - High production values - Lots of well-known models - Updates regularly - TBP / PU discount Cons: - Save your confirmation email so you know what website to use to cancel - Not much interaction between performers and viewers on the live shoots Bottom Line: This site is part of the My XXX Pass network but it is relatively unique and I figured worthy of a review. First, I should point out that even though the main claim of the site is that the posts are recorded live I didn’t actually watch any of them as they were being streamed. All of the shoots are available as part of the archive and are easily downloadable so that was what I opted for. Given that the shoots are recorded as they were happening I was a bit disappointed to see that there really isn’t much interaction between the performers and the viewing members. In the scenes where there was communication via chat that added to the heat of the scene. Regardless of this oversight, the shoots are still great to watch but for a live site they lack that extra element of interaction that usually comes with live shoots. The site is further broken down into ten categories, most of which have self-explanatory titles. These are (with the number of scenes currently on the site in brackets): • Boot Camp (7) • Cocksucking Challenge (48) • Fuck a Fan (2) • Immoral Live (22) • Immoral Orgies (60) • New Girl in Town (31) • Squirtamania (99) • Titterific (54) • Toss My Salad (19) • Wheel of Debauchery (76) This is, admittedly, very subjective, but I found the Wheel of Debauchery scenes to be the most fun to watch. The gimmick is a large wheel with various sex acts written around the edge so the model spins it and does what the wheel lands on. (The funny part is that there is, quite obviously, someone laying down outside the camera’s view stopping the wheel on specific acts. That makes sense, since a model who doesn’t do anal isn’t going to start just because the wheel stops on ‘anal.’) I also like the premise of Fuck a Fan and hope they shoot more of those. Most of the scenes feature some of the biggest names in porn so you know there will be a high level of professionalism. The professionalism applies to the production values too, with the camerawork and lighting being well done too. The site updates regularly with a new live scene being shot every several days. I don’t know how long it takes to upload a scene to the archive but it doesn’t appear to be too long. The site has a good sort feature so you can sort for just the scenes on Boot Camp, for example, if that’s your preference. You can also sort by star and there is a search function too but I found that the latter didn’t work well as any scene found that way linked back to the main page rather than the scene you wanted. Like other sites affiliated with Gamma, there are a lot of options for how you view or download the scenes. WMV downloads are offered in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. Mp4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. I downloaded the 720p and those came in at 1280x720 at 4000kb/s and 30fps. (Some of these options aren’t available for older videos.) I’d normally go for the highest resolution available but those aren’t for the faint of heart. Most of the scenes are well over an hour long, and some can last more than three hours, so a scene of that length at 1080p is close to 10GB. I figured that 720p was a good compromise. To their credit, the site has no obvious download limit so if you really wanted the best there is nothing stopping you from getting the best. The 720p look great on both a 24” monitor and a 32” TV. Also like other sites affiliated with Gamma Entertainment, you need to be careful with your membership information to ensure where you need to go to cancel. It appears that there are many sites that they use for billing (all owned by Gamma, I assume) and you need to save your confirmation email to get the site you’re billed through. Losing that information would probably cause some frustration. Even with that information, cancelling is a bit more involved than with CCBill, Epoch or the other big billers. Here you have to enter credit card information and a captcha which brings you to a further screen where you have to enter your membership name and email address and another captcha. It works, but until I learned to save all my membership information I got frustrated trying to cancel. Another advantage to the site is that joining through TBP / PU gets you a significant discount. That’s the good news. The bad news is that this discount won’t carry through past the first month so be careful to cancel if you don’t want to see the price double. (I should add that in many cases with Gamma sites you’re offered the first-month price when you start the cancellation procedure.) The bottom line is that this is a fun site to watch. It’s got some of the hottest models in the business. The production values are high, the site supports download managers and doesn’t have any download limits. On top of all of this you get it all for a great discount. 09-22-13  05:37pm Replies (5) Review 171 My XXX Pass (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site broken down into smaller sites - Lots of excellent quality HD - Affiliated with Gamma Entertainment - Supports download managers - Timeouts occur only after about two hours - Many well-known stars - High production values - Videos offered in multiple formats and wide array of resolutions - Streaming is available - Streaming doesn’t begin as soon as you load the scene page Cons: - No gradual transition from SD to HD - Need to take note of billing for cancellation purposes - A few navigation issues Bottom Line: My XXX Pass might try to act like a network, but it really isn’t. That’s not a bad thing though. It claims (and has) several ‘sites’ but all of that material is made available on this main site, so if all you visit is My XXX Pass then you’ll have had access to everything. There is no disadvantage to doing things this way (though some may say it is an attempt to make the site seem bigger than it is) and the advantage is it offers a quick way to sort by general theme. I’m not into MILF blowjobs, for example, so I can just avoid visiting the ‘site’ that caters to that niche. The ‘network’ contains almost 2500 scenes and these can be sorted by the various sites. The sites are: 1000 Facials, Immoral Live, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Throated. Most of what I write here applies to all the sites, though I do plan on writing a separate review of Immoral Live due to some unique offerings there. As you can tell from the list, the sites are mostly oral-themed. For those wondering (because I did) the scenes on Throated aren’t brutal like many other sites with similar names, and 1000 Facials isn’t a bukkake site (like I hoped it might be). There are some multi-shot scenes but they’re mostly one girl, one guy. (And also in case you’re wondering, there is very little anal on the network. There are 150 scenes listed as having anal but fewer than 10 are available in HD.) The ‘network’ updates regularly with at least one and as many as three scenes being added per day. These are spread across all the sites so don’t take this to mean that you’ll get a new scene added to any of the individual sites each day. In the most recent uploads there are a lot of options available. WMV downloads are offered in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. Mp4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. I downloaded the 1080p and those came in at 1920x1080, 6300 kb/s and 29fps. Average files sizes vary, but since most of the content is only oral they’re short and come in around 1GB. The scenes look great: they’re crisp and sharp and demonstrate some high production values. In less recent uploads, some of the options are narrowed, but the full 1080p is still there. When it comes to file resolutions, there is one point worth noting. The oldest scenes on the site date to 2005 so we can’t expect full HD in those, but the resolutions are quite low with only 160 and 360p being offered in both WMV and mp4. The other issue worth noting is that there wasn’t a gradual increase in resolutions where they added 540p and then a year later added 720p. It just appears that on a certain date (in summer 2009) they flipped a switch and started uploading HD video. There is a blend of HD and SD for a while, but it is disappointing to click on a scene uploaded in late 2009 to find that it is only offered in low res. I don’t want to leave a prospective member with the wrong impression though – this still means you get access to almost 1400 videos with full 1080p available. That’s a great value no matter how you look at it. I experienced a few minor navigations issues. Each page has 15 large thumbnails and the intention is that you can hover your mouse over those and see a brief slideshow of other thumbnails from the scene. It does work, but first a large box with the scene name will appear for a few seconds obscuring the thumbnails. The second issue that may just be an issue with Windows 8 is that hovering over a thumbnail causes it to go blank for a few seconds. I found that I had to wait for the thumb to come back and then wait for the box to disappear before I could see the thumbnails. The site gets the technical bits right: it is well laid out, easy to use, supports download managers (with reasonable timeouts of at least two hours) and has good download speeds. The scenes themselves are well done with good lighting and editing. The staff and male talent don’t fall into the trap of thinking that the scenes are about anything other than the female models. One caveat with any site managed through Gamma Entertainment, as this is: they’re a reputable company but pay attention to where you’re being billed from. They don’t use common billers and they seem to have a bunch of proprietary billing companies. Take note of the billing site name as that will be necessary when you want to cancel. The bottom line is that this ‘network’ has some great porn and they make it easily accessible. The production values are high and the HD videos look great. The content is mostly oral so if that’s something you like you can’t go wrong with a membership here. 09-07-13  07:01am Replies (18) Review 172 Hustler Mega Pass (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 1800 Hustler DVDs - Supports download managers - Many scenes are 1280x720 (bitrate varies) - Files offered as streaming or video - Files offered with some choice of type and resolution Cons: - Only the most recently uploaded scenes have good video quality (approximately 600 of the DVDs) - Not really a ‘network’ - Trial membership is now limited to streaming 5 scenes - Search function doesn’t work well - Sort function doesn’t work well - Scenes start streaming immediately – watch your speakers! - Lots of ads - Many DVDs have scenes missing Bottom Line: I’ll admit that this site probably hasn’t changed much since the last time I reviewed it, so the big difference in scoring and comments comes from how I’ve changed recently when it comes to collecting porn. I’ve recently deleted a lot of my collection because the quality was so poor and this site didn’t set a high bar for video quality. I think my approach to this site can be summed up by saying if you don’t care too much about quality and like lots of porn, get a membership here. If you prefer quality over quantity, the site is still worth a membership, but go into it with your eyes open as this is not a site that offers cutting-edge quality. If you’re like me and prefer quality over quantity, allow me to save you some time and frustration if you take a membership here. Any DVD or scene labeled as HD is fairly good quality, though it is not among the best on the ‘net. The resolution is 1280x720 and the bitrate is 3000kb/s. Scenes uploaded after 2010 (which is about one quarter of what’s available here) that are labeled as ‘Super’ quality also come in at 1280x720 and a 3000kb/s bitrate. These also look pretty good. (I don’t know why some are labeled HD even though the specs are the same as files not so labeled.) That’s the good news. The bad news is that the site must have changed codecs or made some amendments at some point in 2010 or 11 because even though the specs show 1280x720 and 3000 some of the scenes with those specs don’t look good. That’s bad because there is no obvious way to tell them apart other than watching each scene and deciding if the quality is good enough. The ugly news is that the majority of the videos uploaded are still 1280x720 (older videos are lower) but come in at lower bitrates of 1700 and lower. On a 24” monitor I found these scenes to be unwatchable. Dark colors showed lots of pixilation and even edges like arms looked blocky. Movement made them look worse, and let’s face it, sex (and therefore porn) without movement would be kind of pointless. I tried downloading both the mp4 and wmv versions but both were equally bad. The site does support download managers with long timeouts. There is no obvious download limit. The site does continue to update at what looks to be a scene per day. I can’t be certain because sorting the scenes or DVDs by latest added doesn’t work well. I did that and found newer scenes mixed in with scenes uploaded a week ago. At least the updates are dated so you can figure out what’s new. It also appears that as long as the scene was taped recently the quality will be good. If the upload is a ‘classic,’ the quality won’t be there. The site bills itself as a network, but it really isn’t in the true sense. The ‘sites’ are all listed on the main page but if you go to the main Hustler site you’ll get access to everything. One thing you’ll see lots of regardless of the site you’re on are ads. They aren’t obtrusive, and they aren’t pop-ups so I can live with them. If you’re thinking that you can join with the trial membership and get in, get what you want and get out, think again and read my comment on that. The search function works marginally well, but I found that it often returned results that weren’t even remotely related to my search. My final major beef with the site is that scenes are missing on many DVDs. In one example, Taylor Rain is on the box cover but her scene isn’t offered. This is frustrating if you’re hoping to find a specific scene. One quirk I found was that finding the member’s entrance was a real chore. The main page has links to join, but not for member’s to enter (that I could find anyway). The workaround was to go in through the back door using one of the ‘sites’ listed as being part of the network. This seems like an odd oversight. The bottom line is that this site can be a decent value for specific purposes. The site gives you access to Hustler’s best known series, Barely Legal, and if you like parodies Hustler shoots lots of them. The biggest problem is that while there are 1800 DVDs on the site, only about 600 of them have video quality that most collectors would find acceptable in 2013. That’s still a lot of porn though, so the value is still pretty good. If you do join, at least you can say you were warned. 09-02-13  05:03pm Replies (2) Review 173 Exploited College Girls (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Mostly unknown models - Models very good looking - Lots of opportunity to see the model’s personality - Includes two other sites - Supports download managers - No obvious time-outs - Scenes are available as a single download or as clips Cons: - Could offer more HD - Could offer niche tags Bottom Line: This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work I’ve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesn’t fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do – he doesn’t ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him. The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isn’t a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. I’m one of those people who like the site’s choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each model’s natural beauty rather than covering it. A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models I’ve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever they’re doing they should keep doing it because it works. The scenes all have a common theme: a ‘college girl’ is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girl’s youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure. Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, it’s dangerous, but it’s great to watch! Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process. The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch. The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldn’t be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the model’s age would be a good addition. One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. That’s good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well. I’m not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots aren’t edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. I’m glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other. The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if you’re only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs. Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes don’t look great by today’s standards, but they aren’t bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available. Photos are available as singles or zips. I didn’t download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788. The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly. 08-12-13  04:28pm Replies (2) Review 174 FTV Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge site with exclusive videos - Site well laid out - High production values - Beautiful models - Lots of public nudity - Lots of solo masturbation - Some girl/girl - Some (but not a lot) hardcore - A chance to see some A-listers before they were stars - Supports download managers - Excellent video quality - Downlaod options available - Early adopters of HD - High resolution photos available - Photos available in zips Cons: - If you don’t like the typical FTV model then you’ll likely not like the site Bottom Line: Some may disagree with me on this assessment, but I see FTV Girls as serving two completely different niches within one site. They focus on public nudity and on solo girl masturbation. There are other niches (some girl/girl and some rare hardcore) but the majority of the scenes contain the two main niches that the site serves. There is a limitation to my review in that while I’m a huge fan of public nudity I’m not a big fan of solo girl stuff, so most of what I downloaded was the public stuff. I think it’s reasonable to assume that if the public stuff is of such high quality that a prospective member who likes solo masturbation scenes would be equally happy with a membership. The site has been around for 10 years now and continues to offer high quality exclusive scenes. Right from day one this site had high production values with good lighting, camera work and editing. The site now has 839 scenes uploaded and updates with one (sometimes two) scenes being added per week. Some may say that the update rate isn’t enough, but when you consider the effort that goes into these scenes I think the once-a-week update is pretty impressive. The site itself is well laid out and simple to use. The scenes are laid out 30 per page and each scene opens into a separate page. On that scene’s page there are links for the videos (two or more) and the photos. Each of those opens into a separate page with the download options. On newer scenes there are obviously more options with the scenes being HD in both WMV and mp4, in SD in either format and in two formats for mobile devices. The file size is shown too. I downloaded the HD mp4 videos and they come in at 1920x1080, 12,000kb/s and 30fps. The older HD videos have the same specs except the bitrate is about 8,000kb/s. You can also sort by model and there is a search function and extensive use of tags. (One great advantage of the tags is that it allows the member to do some pre-sorting. I was here for public nudity and there was a tag for that.) The site was an early adopter of HD video bringing it in in December 2007. The SD videos offered before that come in at 720x480, 1,200kb/s and 25fps. One thing I liked about the layout was that when you opened the page for a specific video there are thumbnails of the photos on the same page which allows a bit of a preview to help you decide if you want the scene or not. Photos are available and look great. Obviously the photo size has grown over the years with the latest being offered as either 1600 or 4000 pixel downloads. Zips are available. An interesting facet of the site is that since it is so high quality and has been around so long it affords an opportunity to see A-list stars before they were stars, and in many cases under different names. Amia Miley appears as Ileana, for example. Christie Lee and Kelly Wells make early appearances. There are quite a few big models who appeared here early in their careers. Something that may be unique is the 2006 shoot of Brianna Love (as Brianna) when she is 8 months pregnant. I joined specifically for the public nudity. In my opinion, public nudity is either very good or very bad. When done wrong all the heat is removed. FTV does it right: the public parts of their shoots are really well done. I use Teasers VOD as the gold standard of public nudity due to its high risk and intense heat. FTV isn’t up to that standard but it is still excellent and any fan of the genre won’t be disappointed. I should also point out the flaw in comparing this site to Teasers: Teasers was so risky that the City of L.A. shut them down. I’ll accept the less in-your-face public scenes in FTV as a trade-off for more scenes being shot. Notwithstanding the above, this is NOT just a public nudity site. Most videos have some public nudity and that’s followed by an indoor scene with masturbation. While I normally prefer the option to download an entire video, the fact that the shoot is broken into segments really fits well here. I just want the public stuff and that’s in a stand-alone video. Same with the solo stuff. I liked that the scenes are not sterile. The model’s personality is allowed to shine through. Some may not like that the cameraman interacts with the model in the scene, but I think it adds to the heat. There is a lot of “BTS” material available too for those of us who like that. It’s located under the “Extras” tab. Download managers work on the site and I had no problem with using one. If there is a downside to FTV it is likely that some people who like variety in their models may not be satisfied. The models are almost exclusively Caucasian, 18-22 and slim. Don’t join looking for 30+ BBW black women. I like what they offer, and I’m a satisfied customer. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that does a great job of offering material for different interests. The material is great and it is easy to access. I recommend a membership. 08-03-13  07:32am Replies (2) Review 175 Dirt Pipe Divas (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of a small network (Jimmy Pass) - Updates regularly - All videos are available in HD (with one exception) - Video encoding keeps sizes reasonable but with better picture than many other sites - Some A-list porn stars in rare anal scenes - Supports download managers - Seems to have a loose affiliation with Philly Butt Sluts - Great customer service from the site owner / webmaster Cons: - Small site (but growing) Bottom Line: I bought a membership to this site to get access to one scene but I discovered that the rest of the scenes are also great so I ended up downloading just about everything. Unfortunately that wasn’t as big a job as it sounds because the site is relatively new, having started in April 2013. Currently there are only 16 scenes on the site but it is growing with a history of a new scene being added about every five days. Some may feel that spending $30 for a site that only offers 16 scenes isn’t a good value, but in my subjective opinion the scenes are worth every dime. One advantage to this site is that it offers at least two anal scenes from models who aren’t known for doing anal. Taylor Dare has done some (Let’s Try Anal), but this one and the LTA scene are the only ones I’m aware of. The site also has a very rare Kacey Jordan anal scene. To make things more interesting, this is her first. The bad news with the Kacey scene is that it was recorded a while ago and only recorded in SD. All other scenes are available in HD. The HD scenes come in at 1920x1080 at 6000kb/s and 30fps. I don’t know anything about how video gets encoded, but whatever they do at this site they do it right. The videos all look incredibly sharp with no pixilation at all. For videos this clear I was surprised to see that the file sizes aren’t as big as those on many other HD sites. The average file size for HD is around 1GB. The scenes themselves are all gonzo with no plot. The scenes open with the model sitting on a couch while she is interviewed and then the action starts. You can’t argue with simplicity. While there may not be high production values in the scene set up, the technical production values are definitely up to industry standards. Sound, lighting and camera work are all great. Another thing that I was pleased to see is that as can happen with so many sites that feature the same male talent in the scenes, that male talent can get confused and start to think that the site and scenes are about him. In these scenes the male talent never tries to upstage the female. He does what male talent should do and that is to make the female talent look good. Adding to the value of the membership is the fact that it is part of a small network. The other sites are Classic Jimmy, Ivy Bleu and Jimmy Hooligan. I realize this is subjective, but with Dirt Pipe Divas offering great scenes in HD I’d consider it the flagship of the network. Prior to joining the site I had a few questions and took a chance and emailed the webmaster. He replied quickly and gave me all the information that I wanted. One thing I did learn from him is that he is loosely affiliated with Philly Butt Sluts and some of those scenes will be uploaded here. This is good news because the Philly site only sells through Clips4Sale which can be very expensive. The bottom line is this: I’m glad I joined the site, I strongly recommend to anyone with a love of anal to check it out and consider joining, and this is now a site on my list of sites to rejoin a few times a year. I’m looking forward to re-subscribing to see more excellent porn as the site grows. 07-31-13  02:40pm Replies (2) Shown : 151-175 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.