Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 76-100 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 Exxxtra Small (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Site is part of a great network - Site is growing with at least two updates per month - Three streaming options - Five download options - Bills through Epoch - TBP / PU discount - Allows download managers - Provides porn in a rare niche Cons: - Slightly slower download speeds than with similar networks - Still small as of this writing Bottom Line: I’ll get this out of the way: no, the site isn’t named Exxxtra Small because it only has nine scenes posted so far. And no, I haven’t lost my mind in taking the time to write a review for such a small site. Yes, I know that having only nine scenes makes it a small site, but it is new, it is updating, it is part of a large network and, most important, it serves a niche where good porn is rare: very petite women. I know that at any given time there are usually any number of petite young women in porn, but sites that actually showcase them are fairly rare. This site is part of the Team Skeet network and is one of the newer (if not the newest) site on the network. It started on June 22, 2012 and has been updating regularly with two updates per month. I know that two updates per month doesn’t sound like a lot, but since the site is part of a large network new scenes are being added throughout the network regularly. Team Skeet is a great teen-themed network which is a must-visit site for anyone who likes their porn models fresh. The gang at Skeet must have a direct channel into the talent agencies to get so many of the newest faces in porn. Exxxtra Small is a great addition to the network and really fits in well with the overall teen themes they promote. The models on this site are all young (18-20) and all are exceptionally tiny. One good thing about a niche like super-petite models is that the directors aren’t locked in to just a few scene set-ups. This happens with a lot of massage sites where the massage set-up is so narrow that it can get stale pretty quickly. But the same can’t be said for the extra-petite niche: take any porn set-up you can think of and add in a tiny model and it still works. Boats, pools, living rooms, naughty students, perky temps… it all works. All the director needs to do is accentuate and promote the model’s tiny size. Since this site started recently it has the same new video download options that were rolled out on the network late last year. This saw a significant improvement in video quality being offered. All the scenes here are offered in streaming in high and low resolutions and in HD. I’m not into streaming so I can’t really say anything about these except to add that Team Skeet doesn’t follow what is becoming a more common model to have the streaming start automatically. Since this might be an unpleasant surprise to someone who forgets to turn their speakers off, and since it unnecessarily hogs bandwidth I think that the site made the right choice here. Downloads and streaming can be broken down into many different ways to satisfy just about anyone. You can view or download a preview, the full scene, the scene broken down into thirds or into one-minute blocks. They’ve really thought of ways to make the customer happy. The best thing about these broad choices, in my opinion, is that it is easy to set your preferences which then impact any scene you open. I set my preference for ‘full’ and that’s the link that came up each time. Downloads are available in two formats and multiple resolutions per format. A medium-grade WMV is available as is a file for mobile users. The big news for the network is that they now have mp4s available in three resolutions: “hi,” 720p and 1080p. I opted for the 720p in most files because it offered the best compromise between file size and video quality. Those files are 1280x720 at a 2400kb/s bitrate and 30fps. These look great on a 24” monitor and I suspect they’ll look good on a 50” TV too when I get around to trying that. If you have any doubts, the 1080p is also available. Photos and screencaps are also available (in singles or zips). The photos look great at 1053x702. The screencaps are a lower resolution and 720x405. The other good news is that the site (and network) bills through a reputable biller, allows download managers and has no download limits. They also offer a TBP/PU discount. The (semi) bad news is that I find the download speeds to be a little slower than I normally see with other similar networks. It isn’t bad – just a bit slower. (A subjective negative is that the entire network isn’t big on anal scenes. That’s their choice, but I wish there were more. There are no anal scenes on this site. But a guy can dream…) So am I going to say that a site with just nine scenes is a good value? No, but that doesn’t factor in that this is a new and growing site on an established network. And the niche is underserved so this is a welcome site. This is great porn at a great price and perhaps the best recommendation that I can give it is to say that because of this one new site I’ll be joining this network more frequently than I used to. 12-10-12  06:40pm Replies (9) Review 77 Pornstar Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 175 studios (some major, some niche) - 9000+ DVDs - Many individual scenes independent of DVDs - Some exclusive sites - Updates daily - Adds new studios - Supports download managers (IDM for me) - No obvious time-outs for files - TBP / PU special membership makes it really worthwhile Cons: - Not all sites update - Like other DVD mega-sites, there is a lot of crap to sort through while looking for the gems Bottom Line: I wrote a review of this site about a year ago after my first membership here and after re-reading that I can say that it all still applies. I know that I’m not the only PU member who regularly visits the same sites so my perspective in this second review is to give some thoughts about whether it is worth joining a second or later time. I’ll cut to the chase, the answer to that is certainly yes, but it isn’t as easy a decision to make as with some other sites. PSN suffers from a similar problem to other DVD sites, namely the availability of new material to keep updating the site. Like Videobox, PSN uploads five DVD titles per day. Unlike VB though, PSN doesn’t put the complete title up at once. You may see a DVD that you really want only to find that the scene you really want is due to be posted later. The good news is that you usually won’t have to wait more than a few days to get all the scenes in that DVD. The problem with that uploading schedule for both PSN and VB is that they have to upload a lot of crap to keep to it. The good news is that, in my opinion, PSN uploads less crap than VB. The site is large, with over 9000 DVDs already posted from 175 studios. The studios range from the biggest of the big names like Elegant Angel and Private to more niche oriented studios. In short, there is likely something here for everyone. It appears that PSN continues to add studios because, as I noted in a comment a few weeks ago, they are now the only site I’m aware of that has Max Hardcore DVDs available for download. Yes, Max is polarizing, but I still think it reflects well on PSN to licence and make available these titles, even if they are the edited American versions. The site continues to offer downloads in multiple formats, with AVI, H.264 and MPEG being the most common. The H.264 files come in at 720x540 and look decent so only true ‘size queens’ will miss higher definition scenes. I use Internet Download Manager and had no problems. The links didn’t time out in the time it took to download them and download speeds were as fast as I see with most porn sites. One problem that I perceived (and am open to being corrected on if I’m wrong) is that there is some overlap within the sites themselves. Take the site Sperm Cocktail which offers a lot of Brandon Iron’s material including his series “A Good Source of Iron.” Sorting the site by DVDs gives you all the DVDs obviously, which you can then click on and download the individual scenes from each. You can also sort by scene which appears to includes a lot that isn’t on the DVDs but that is mixed in with the same scenes that are on the DVDs which means that you will likely end up downloading some stuff twice. This is no big deal if you don’t care to associate a scene with the DVD it is from, but for those of us who like to organize by DVD it can be an issue. While this likely won’t happen if you join, I will point out that both times I did I had initial problems and I’ve read of others having similar problems. The first time I joined they had just started offering the full access to TBP/PU members and I got missed. This time after paying my fee I was given limited trial access. The good news is that on both occasions customer service was helpful and resolved the problems quickly. One advantage to a rejoin is that during your first time through you’ve likely downloaded all the material you wanted from the several sites that no longer update. Most of these are solo model sites where the model has left the business. This is an advantage on a rejoin because PSN still has a download limit of 100 files per 24 hour period and many of the files on the older sites are small so you can hit the limit. I’m no fan of limits but I have to admit that the one here is pretty reasonable. It would have to be a rainy, hung-over Sunday to hit the limit. One point that bears mentioning even though it is a repeat of what I said in my original review is that if you want to join this site it is very important to join through TBP / PU. Joining through TBP / PU makes what might be a decent membership and makes it a great one. The difference is that joining through here gets you access to the otherwise-optional Moviez material which is really the bulk of the good material on the site. In my opinion, PSN is definitely worth a re-join. They continue to expand and even add new studios. They offer a great collection of mainstream American porn along with a good mix of lesser known European material and even some niche stuff. I’ll definitely be back again too. 10-31-12  08:51am Replies (0) Review 78 VideoBox (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Still the undisputed champion of DVD sites - Huge selection - Wide variety of niches - Add-on ‘channels’ at reasonable prices - Channel prices are still pro-rated for your first month - New studios being added - Still adds five DVDs per day - Excellent value - Good download speeds - Supports download managers with no timeouts - Multiple viewing options - VB3 is still not mandatory - Prospective members can view the full site before joining - The best alternative to pirated porn on the ‘net Cons: - Over-reliance on compilations and low grade Euro movies - Won’t allow using the same username and password on rejoin Bottom Line: Before anyone gets mad at this, being my sixth review of VB, let me just say that I planned this as just a comment and then got carried away. There isn’t much more that one can say about VB that hasn’t already been said here, but I’ll try. The site offers a virtual porn mega-store with over 12,000 DVDs and the site continues to grow. What’s interesting is that the opinions and ratings here really run the full spectrum. My personal opinion on VB tends to run with those who are big fans. I join VB twice a year and probably will continue to do so as long as the site exists. I rank it high because what it does, it does well. The site has hundreds of studios on offer and as the site grows they appear to be attracting more. I wish that some of the bigger studios offered more of their titles to VB but a site this size can only continue to grow as it brings sales to studios that need them. Almost any interest can be satisfied here with the only limitation being that as VB relies on DVDs they don’t have some of the more extreme niches since those aren’t usually issued on DVDs. But if it happens to be available on DVD, VB probably has some titles in that genre. VB continues to offer the DVDs in a variety of ways. Streaming is available and downloads are available in both WMV and MP4 formats. The highest resolution available on most is only 640x480 which is low by today’s standards and those come in at 3300kb/s and 30fps. Only one DVD per day is offered with an HD option. One thing that I’ve always respected about VB is that they don’t just rely on a few flashy preview pages and then ask for your credit card number. VB lets prospective members see the entire site. I wish other porn sites would follow this model. VB still offers premium ‘channels’ at additional cost. These are great value if you like those studios and VB still offers a pro-rated price through your first month. If you join in week two of your VB membership you’ll only pay half the price until both sites renew. While I’m a big VB fan the site isn’t without its flaws. I’ve said this before, and I remain convinced of it: one of VB’s biggest selling points is also one of its biggest flaws, namely the addition of five titles per day. What person would argue against more porn, you might ask? One who prefers quality over quantity. With 12,000+ DVDs on the site no one would dispute that VB is the biggest player in downloadable porn DVDs. But to sustain that growth VB relies to heavily on compilations with re-hashed scenes and on low grade Euro porn. I’ll admit that there is an element of subjectivity in this opinion, but I think I’m also being objective when I say that having the same scene on the site in three or four different titled movies adds nothing. Thankfully VB members usually point out a repost so you can avoid it if you have it. As for the Euro stuff, while I’m not a huge Euro fan I can still recognize that there is a difference between good porn and bad porn. They do have good Euro porn here, but they add a lot of bad stuff too. My recommendation to VB is to drop the five-DVD schedule and concentrate on quality instead. One or two quality DVDs per day would be fine and judging from many of the comments on the VB site many other members would agree with me. (I understand that the compilation issue isn’t VB’s fault since the industry cranks them out, but while they make sense in DVD format, they don’t make sense as a download.) One minor gripe is that the site doesn’t let you use the same username and password when you rejoin. I’d prefer that when I join with the same email I’m given my usual name and password. The most polarizing aspect of VB seems to be the VB3 interface. My opinion of VB3 is that it appears to be something dreamed up by the marketing people to lure in new members who are attracted to bright shiny things. If that works, that’s great, because obviously VB needs members to continue to operate. It also appears that the technical people have some clout because the old site is still available and still fully functional. Whenever I go to VB the first link I click on is to go to the old site. I hope that option remains available, and I hope that if enough people also vote for the old site with a mouse click that the marketing exercise that is VB3 will be shelved. Recently, other PU members have reported having low download speeds and even having downloads stop. I experienced none of that and Free Download Manager downloaded everything at the highest supported speed and never once had a broken link or a failed download. It may be that whatever caused that is now fixed. The bottom line for me is that I’ll continue to both support and recommend VB. It has a few flaws, but those are far outweighed by its advantages. With sites like VB no one has an excuse to access pirated porn or tube sites. VB remains an incredible value and I hope they’re around for a long time. 07-14-12  07:17am Replies (20) Review 79 Nuru Massage (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - $14.95 TPB/PU discount - Supports download managers (see comment below) - Scenes have a decent amount of heat and eroticism - Beautiful models, most well-known porn stars - Appears to be exclusive content - Very high production values - Updates regularly - Seems to be affiliated with the Fame Digital Group - Can sort by tags and models Cons: - Limited resolutions available for WMV users - The theme may be repetitive for all but the most ardent massage aficionados - Lack of hardcore sex may be an issue for some - No independent biller (see comment) Bottom Line: This site doesn’t market itself as a network, and I’m not saying it is one, but membership to one site gets you membership to three other massage-themed sites so I’ll cover all four sites here. While there are subtle variations between the sites the basic elements are the same in all of them: a guy walks into the massage parlor to get a massage. The girl greets the guy, they undress and shower together, they usually start the massage in a large tub and then the massage continues on an air mattress or massage table. In Nuru Massage they use a thick, clear massage oil for which the type of massage and this site are named. In Soapy Massage they use soap bubbles as the medium, and the massage is a bit more traditional in Massage Parlor. In all cases there is a ‘happy ending’ and in 80% of scenes on all sites there is oral. There are a few sex scenes, but those are rare. All Girl Massage seems to follow a similar pattern, though I didn’t watch many of those. Some potential members might find the massage theme can get a little dull after a while. I agree that it can, but if you like massage as a niche this is definitely well done. The models play their roles well and they keep the heat and eroticism turned up. Some may not like the fact that there is very little sex (apart from oral), but I think that adds to the heat and realism. The details on each site are: • Nuru Massage – 166 videos, updates with one video per week • Massage Parlor - 220 videos, updates several times per week with the addition of one scene per update • Soapy Massage – 242 videos, updates irregularly and infrequently, but at least one scene per month is added • All Girl Massage – 106 videos, updates with one video per week The site is either affiliated with or uses the same web design as Fame Digital. I think it’s the former. This is a good thing, in my opinion, because the quality of these sites is very good. And like other Fame sites there is a TBP / PU discount. Unfortunately, like other Fame sites, they don’t use a biller though I’ve never had a membership issue with any Fame site before. TBP includes Nuru Massage as an Asian site, which seems appropriate considering the idea of Nuru massage is Japanese, but while there is a higher percentage of Asian models on the site than on many other porn sites, I don’t think I’d call this an Asian site. It may be that when TBP reviewed it originally the site had more Asian models, but now they aren’t even in the majority. When you consider all four sites as a group this is definitely not an Asian site. That could be good or bad, depending on your tastes. The models are all beautiful and most are well known porn stars. There are different body types to suit most tastes. Some have too many tattoos but that’s just part of the business these days. In his earlier review, GCode noted there were only 15 models on the site. This has improved significantly with 77 available now. The scenes all appear to be exclusive. I collect massage-themed stuff and I’ve never seen them elsewhere. Also, given that the set and set-up is essentially the same for all the scenes that supports that these are exclusive. The production values are great too: the lighting, sound, camerawork and editing are all top-notch. There is no search function on any of the sites but one isn’t needed either. You can sort the scenes using different tags and you can sort by model. This may sound too limiting, but given the single theme of the sites it works well. If you’re familiar with Fame sites the site design will look familiar. Each scene opens to a page where you can download or stream the video. Video downloads are available as WMVs in 240p or 480p resolutions. MP4s are available in 240, 480, 540, 720 and 1080p. I prefer WMV files and I downloaded the 480p ones which come in at 720x400 at 2200kb/s and 30fps. I can’t make any assessment of the MP4s. While I understand why a site would limit WMVs (due to the larger size, I suspect) I do wish that they offered more choice with that file type. In their defence, even though the numbers don’t look all that impressive, subjectively the videos look great. An issue I’ve had in the past with Fame sites is that they have a short time-out on the links which makes using a download manager difficult. I’ll admit that I have a faster connection from the last time I had a Fame membership, but the problem doesn’t seem to be nearly as bad here as I’ve experienced in the past. The bottom line is that I’d definitely recommend these sites. As usual, the caveat is that you have to like the set-up, but for the price it is even worth it to join just to get a few addition scenes with some favourite stars. The sites have excellent material to offer and they offer it through a website that’s easy to use and they sell it at a great price. The whole combination is an excellent value. 07-05-12  06:46pm Replies (0) Review 80 Evil Angel (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Now over 900 DVDs available - Very little overlap with the other Evil Angel website - TBP/PU Discount - Full trial - Good download speeds - Multiple video options - Updates regularly (possibly daily – hard to tell…) - Photos available (though this is primarily a video site) - Good mix of American and European models Cons: - Very short time-outs using download managers - No zips on the photos - No wmv HD - Still not a great selection of older videos - No search function - Newer scenes posted as streaming before downloads available Bottom Line: I recently posted a review of the other Evil Angel website under the listing of Milk Enema and a bit earlier under the site Mike Adriano. If you’re interested in any EA material you may want to check those reviews since most of what I wrote there applies here too. This site, however, is different from the others that I reviewed, even though they are all part of the EA company. This site isn’t a network like the other one (which is a collection of themed sites). Obviously Evil Angel material isn’t for everyone; they are among the hardest of the hardcore mainstream. If, like me, you’re an anal enthusiast then both Evil Angel sites are worth checking out. Many harder hardcore studios rely on European talent to do the heavy lifting, but here there is a great mix of American and European models. In some cases they appear in the same scene, which is rare in porn. The site has grown a lot since I was here last and they now have over 900 DVDs available. The site updates regularly, and while I can’t say for sure they seem to update daily. One negative is that some (maybe all) of the new scenes they post are first only available in streaming before they’re made available as a download. I don’t know how long the delay is before they become available as a download. If you join the site to download a recently added scene be aware that you might discover that you can only stream it. While there is no search function you can sort the videos by scene and by DVD. Once you’re at the scene level there are tags that are useful too. As with the other EA site there are two video options (wmv and mp4) and at least two resolutions available for each. Unfortunately they don’t post any HD material in wmv format so your only option is mp4 if you want HD. HD is widely available and is at 720p. I download wmvs and at the highest resolution they come in at 720x400 at 2100kb/s. Subjectively, they look great even running them through a 50” TV. Many Evil Angel scenes are quite long, sometimes nearly an hour, which is a good thing. The downside to that is that file sizes can be large if your ISP imposed a cap or if you have a slower connection. Pictures are available but those appear to be mostly screencaps or photos taken during the scene itself. Zips aren’t available. This is primarily a video site and I wouldn’t recommend it for anyone who is mostly interested in photos. That’s not a negative since Evil Angel is a video studio not a photo studio. What you get for your membership is access to one of the better studio sites on the internet. I’m not normally a fan of studio sites since studios don’t seem to put much effort into their sites, possibly to focus on the people who still buy DVDs. My biggest complaint about the site as a studio site is that they don’t offer a big selection of their older material. Evil Angel has been around for a long time and as a fan of older porn I’d really like to see more of the older stuff. This could be a positive or a negative, depending on your perspective, but there isn’t a lot of overlap between the material on this site and the on the other EA site. The good news is that you won’t feel like you’ve wasted your money when you buy access to two different sites, but the bad news is that to get better access to the EA catalogue you do need to buy access to two sites. But… both EA sites offer a TBP/PU discount and have an excellent $2.95 3-day trial. If you’re a fan of EA material and haven’t had a membership here before I’d strongly recommend that you avoid the trial because there is no way you could download everything you want here in three days. Another reason to consider the full membership is that EA has the shortest timeouts I’ve ever encountered on a website. While they support download managers actually using one is virtually impossible since the links you line up for downloading expire in about 15 minutes. If you like hard hardcore and especially if you like anal sex, then you really should consider a membership here. With the TBP/PU discount this is probably one of the best values for porn on the internet. 11-26-11  04:03pm Replies (2) Review 81 Milk Enema (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Small but unique site - Part of a larger collection of unique sites - Access to some of Jay Sinn’s movies - Good download speeds - Supports download managers - Multiple video options - Updates weekly (with the addition of one scene) - $2.95 three day full access - Photos available (though this is primarily a video site) - Good mix of American and European models - Some b/g/g hardcore - Great site for the anal enthusiast Cons: - Very short time-outs using download managers - Small site - Not full access to the Jay Sinn catalogue - The ‘network’ updates daily, but this site only adds one scene per week - No zips on the photos - No wmv HD Bottom Line: I’ve been a member of this site several times since it started and I’ve reviewed this small Evil Angel ‘network’ before. If you’re interested in joining this site and are looking for more information on the whole collection of sites you might find my review of Mike Adriano useful. That review was done recently and everything there is still relevant. I rejoined this site because I saw the review at TBP and because of the excellent value available for the $2.95 for a three day full access membership. I really can’t stress enough how great a value that is for some very unique hardcore material. The caveat to the above statement is that you obviously have to have an interest in the material on offer here. If you don’t, the low price will mean nothing. And I know a lot of PU members won’t be interested in this site because I once got a fairly negative reaction when I mentioned having an interest in girl/girl milk enemas on a thread about fetishes. I can understand, however, that in a world where liking a woman’s feet is a ‘fetish’ that seeing women spray milk out of their asses onto the faces and bodies of other women is seen as a bit weird. (Okay… a LOT weird…) Currently there are 50 scenes on this site (that’s not including the other 19 sites in the network). Most of the scenes are from Jay Sinn’s series for Evil Angel titled Milk Nymphos though there are a few scenes from Sinn’s series Pretty Sloppy. (For fans of Jay Sinn’s work, there are more scenes, such as Anal Acrobats, available on the network.) The videos are available in both wmv and mp4 format. Wmv files are available in 240p and 480p. I downloaded only the 480p and those come in at 720x400 at 2100kb/s. Subjectively, they look great. Because most of the scenes are two to three time longer in duration than the average cookie-cutter porn scene, file sizes are quite large. That isn’t a negative, but you should be aware of it. Mp4 files are usually available in a much wider range of resolutions: 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. I have a subjective dislike of the mp4 player so I don’t usually download those. I do wish there was a wmv HD option, though my understanding is that compression ratios make this more of a bandwidth hog. Pictures appear to be screencaps, but since they aren’t available as zips I didn’t download any apart from one to test. It came in at a pretty high resolution: 1280x1920. One advantage to this site (and to much of the network) is that although the material isn’t mainstream there is still a good mix of American and European models. Most comparable sites seem to feature only European models, presumably because a lot of American models won’t do much fetish work. While most of the scenes are g/g there are a few g/g/g. There are also a few solo scenes and a handful that start g/g and eventually bring in a guy for some anal sex. And in case you don’t get this from the title, this whole site has an anal theme. While the b/g/g scenes feature anal sex, the others use a lot of toys and interesting objects. I’m no doctor, but I can’t imagine sticking a billiard ball up your friend’s bum is a good idea. But I’m glad these ladies try because it sure is fun to watch. If I had to complain about the site one complaint would be nitpicking, namely that I wish there was more Jay Sinn material available here. He’s a pretty innovative director who produces nothing like I’ve seen elsewhere. Sure, you could say that about Max Hardcore when he first started, but that would be comparing apples and oranges. You might not like the actual scenes, but they aren’t abusive. They feature fetish models who appear to be having fun doing what they’re doing. I once saw an interview with Allison Pierce who described her Milk Nympho scene. She didn’t understand it as a fetish, but was fine with doing it. Another negative that is more substantive is that while the site allows download managers the time-outs imposed make them pretty much useless. My educated guess is that links will time-out around the 15 minute mark. That’s pretty short when you consider that the 480p wmv scenes average 1GB in size. You certainly can’t queue up a bunch of scenes and walk away. A final concern, though more about the network than this site in particular, is that some of the sites don’t appear to be updating any longer. I’d definitely recommend that anyone with an anal fetish give this site a try. Not only is it unique, but it is very well done too. If this is your first visit to the network you may want to consider the full membership because with the time-out issue getting all the material you want in three days might be impossible. But for regularly popping in to check for new scenes the low price on the trial makes this a site to return to regularly. 11-23-11  09:30am Replies (4) Review 82 Skinny Super Girl (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Incredibly beautiful model - Can include the site as part of a network - TBP discount - Pics and video available - Pics available as zips - Videos available in multiple resolutions - Some pics and video offered in HD - Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager) - Excellent customer support Cons: - Small site (but growing regularly) - Site name could be better – it isn’t really flattering - If purchased as a stand-alone site the value isn’t great - Some sharing of material with other company sites - All softcore Bottom Line: This site is a Diesel Access site dedicated to the model Gloria. Gloria started at Young Legal Porn and there is some of her material on that site too. The oldest material on the site is dated from June 2011 so the site is quite new. The downside to that is that it is also still quite small, but it is growing. Currently there 34 videos and 34 photo sets posted. The site appears to update every three days with the update alternating between a video and a photo set. The site can be purchased as a stand-alone site at $30 ($20 price with TBP/PU discount) or as part of the Diesel Access network at $40 ($30 price with TBP/PU discount). As a stand-alone site at full price it isn’t a very good value yet, but as the site grows that will obviously improve. My recommendation is to pay the extra $10 to get the network access. I did that but didn’t immediately get the full network access and customer support wasn’t all that helpful even after I sent them a screenshot of the TBP discount page. The webmaster stepped in and resolved the issue so there should be no problems now. And no other PU members reported the same problem. Video quality varies from good to excellent. About half of the videos posted are true HD at 1920x1080. Bitrates (which I don’t fully understand) are the highest I’ve ever seen with rates hitting over 15,000kbps on some videos. The other half of the videos are available at 1280x720 with bitrates around 10,000. All videos are offered in multiple sizes and two formats. Wmv files (codec 9) are offered at either the 1080p or 720p, and mp4 files are offered in multiple sizes ranging from HD to lower resolutions for mobile devices. Download speeds are slightly above the average that I usually see with porn sites. I use Free Download Manger and it worked well with the site: there were no timeout issues. The picture quality also ranges from good to excellent. Most sets are at 1000x556 but there are several that are 2666x4000. The quality of the lower resolution photos is good, but they pale in comparison to the higher res photos. The hi-res photos are amazing quality. The site certainly does the technical bits right, and they do the artistic things well too. The lighting is always good and the photographer and videographer are obviously professionals. There is definitely NOT an amateur effort. The site is pure softcore – mostly solo girl posing and some masturbation. There are a couple of girl/girl shoots but these are non-sexual. The girls may rub or touch each other a bit but there is very little contact. Kissing is even rare. There are no boy/girl shoots at all. The model, Gloria, also appears on the Young Legal Porn site where she has 8 videos and 12 photo sets. My preference would be to see all her stuff migrated to SSG just to have it all in one place, but that isn’t a deal breaker and not really even an issue if you have full network access. One issue that would be solved by having all Gloria’s material on one site is that there is some sharing of material between SSG and YLP. It isn’t sharing in the sense that the same videos or photos are on both sites, but the video of a shoot may be posted on YLP and the photos of the same shoot may be posted on SSG. Again, this isn’t that big a deal if you get network access. This is nitpicking, but I really don’t like the site name. To me, calling a girl skinny is a negative. It’s criticizing her. Yes, Gloria is petite, but she’s wonderfully proportioned and definitely not malnourished like models posted on sites that feature truly skinny, even anorexic, models. Gloria is definitely not malnourished or anorexic. But at least the ‘super’ part is accurate. From a technical viewpoint, the site is great. There is a search function, but none is needed while the site is small. You can sort by photos or videos, and each set has tags that can help sort further. The value of the site, then, really comes down to your subjective opinion of Gloria. I’m not normally given to hyperbole and flowery language, but my life as a porn user can now be marked in BG and AG. Up to September 30, 2011 is the “Before Gloria” era, and October 1, 2011 marks the “After Gloria” era. You may not share my opinion, but I now have a new #1 model. Gloria is absolutely stunning – a beautiful face with incredible eyes (that the professional staff show off well) and an incredible body. I don’t know why she started doing nude shoots, but I’m sure grateful that she did. I’ve scored the site high, which some may question considering that it might be relying too much on my subjective reaction to Gloria. But I think the score is warranted because the only flaw on the site is that it is new and needs to grow. It is updating so that flaw will fix itself. Otherwise, the site is really well done and has some great material. If you like Gloria’s look, I’d highly recommend getting a network membership. 10-08-11  12:46pm Replies (4) Review 83 Teasers VOD (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Popular adult stars doing public nudity - One of the best of a rare genre (American public nudity shoots) - Video and photos available - Video available in wmv (one resolution) and QT (two resolutions) - Pics available as zips - Download speeds up to normal standards - Free Download manager works without problems - Lots of Behind-the-scenes material - Just over 150 scenes as of the date of review - Excellent value - 2011 AVN “Best Alternative Release” winner - Definitely not a “VOD” site; membership gets you access to everything Cons: - Video and pictures are up to industry standards but they don’t push the limits in quality - No TBP/PU discounts - No trial - Could use more multiple-girl scenes - Should offer an option for a single scene download Bottom Line: This was an unusually difficult review for me to write. First, vaark’s review style and the things he looks for are almost exactly the same as how I look at and review sites so I had to work to differentiate my review to make it useful. Second, I’m taking a position that is pretty much opposite to what mbaya took in his review. To be fair to mbaya though, most of the things he lists as ‘cons’ are no longer an issue. If you like public nudity you’ll know that Teasers VOD is in a small class of sites, namely U.S. public nudity. Most good public nudity sites use European models and settings likely because that culture is less puritanical than we live in here in North America. This site is certainly among the best. Other sites have less daring public scenes, and one of the bigger sites (Nude in LA) has managed to remove all titillation from the genre. Teasers manages to make the scene daring and risky and makes the effort to show the girls are nervous about it. Subjectively, this nervousness is a big draw for me. Being a U.S. site many of the models are porn stars. Some of them are A-list models which is an added bonus. There are many lesser stars here too, and lots of girls who are on the porn periphery. The models are mostly Caucasian, all under 25 and with the typical pornstar body. There are some variations, but not much. Almost all of the shoots are solo-girl. There are only two with two models. These shoots are far more interesting because of the interaction between the models so I wish that the site would do more of these. Having said that though, the video and photo guys interact with the models during the photo shoot which helps create an atmosphere in the scenes. As of this date there are a bit over 150 scenes posted. Each scene follows a formula, but the formula does work. We see the model preparing for the scene, there’s some video in a café where there is some flashing, there is a bikini shoot in public and then there is some public flashing or even full nudity. Many models then go to a secluded but still public area for a masturbation scene. I’d normally fault a site for not offering a full-scene download, but in this case it makes sense to have the individual chapters available. They should consider a full-scene option though. Mbaya noted that there was too much masturbation. While there is masturbation, I didn’t find that it was the main focus. I’m not a fan of solo masturbation so I’d notice if it was over the top, and subjectively I don’t find that it gets in the way. What masturbation is there is still part of the public element of the scene. This contrasts with FTV Girls (which doesn’t market itself as a public nudity site so this isn’t a jab at them) where there is frequently some public flashing and then the girl goes indoors for the main event – masturbation. As an added bonus for some, one of the staff has a spanking fetish so there is often some light spanking in the scenes too. The videos are available in WMV (Codec 9) and QT. QT are available in high and low resolution. I can’t give data on the QT files because I don’t know how resolutions are measured in that format, but the high resolution doesn’t appear much better than the WMV files. The WMV files for older scenes is fairly low at 640x480 and 1700kbps. They improve to 720x480 @1700 and by mid-2009 they went to 960x540 @ 3000. That remains the standard resolution. Pictures are available, with zips being offered. The zips are broken down into ‘chapters’ too, so you’ll have multiple zips for the full scene. The pics come in at 1200x1800. They’re good, but not great. Maybe I’ve just been spoiled by the photos at ALS Scan… Both previous reviews noted that there were broken downloads. I didn’t experience that at all. Free Download Manager worked flawlessly with this site too. Download speeds were fast at 1800MB/sec (which I think is limited by my FDM settings) TBP and vaark note that there is a discount that kicks in on your second and subsequent months. I can’t confirm that because I’m not planning to stay for more than a month and my membership confirmation specifically says that it will rebill at the full price and not at the 50% discount. Updates seem to be more frequent than the last time the site was reviewed. The site now updates three times per week. Also, starting this month they seem to be doing something new called “Teasers Porn Valley” or “Real Girls of Porn Valley.” It’s marketed as a porn reality show though I can’t really see the difference between the new scenes and the old scenes. The same formula is followed, though there is less editing now. I like the new style with less editing. This is an excellent site in an under-served niche. If you like public nudity, this is site you need to visit. 08-20-11  12:14pm Replies (1) Review 84 Everything Butt (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 140 +/- scenes - Usually some extreme ass play - Some anal fisting - Some enemas - Very innovative - Videos available in several formats and resolutions - Pictures available - Regular updates - Good mix of solo, girl on girl(s) and girl(s) and guy(s) - Supports download managers Cons: - Seems to have lost some of its edge - Not many ‘fresh’ models Bottom Line: While there are countless sites dedicated to anal sex, there aren’t many dedicated to a wider appreciation of all things related to the female ass. This site is one of those rare ones, and without having seen many others I’d be surprised if this wasn’t the best of them. This site obviously isn’t for everyone, but the same can be said for most of the sites under the Kink umbrella. I last reviewed this site when it was fairly new and it has continued to grow. There are now approximately 140 scenes on the site, most of which are about an hour long. So even at full price, this is a great value. Even the oldest of the scenes (which only date back to 2009) are available in ways to suit all preferences. There is streaming (which I don’t use and can’t really speak to, though it looks good) and there are downloads. Downloads are available in mp4 HD, wmv HD, wmv SD and mp4 for portable devices. My experience is only with wmv HD which, while excellent quality, isn’t as crisp as some other sites that offer HD. The resolution is 1280x720 with a bitrate of about 7500kbps. Photos are also available (1200x800) individually or as zips. Frequently the zips are broken down into themes so if you want all the photos there may be a couple of zips to get. The scenes mostly have a common theme: extreme ass play. There is some variety in that there are solo scenes, all girl with two or more models, and some scenes with a mix of women and men. The latter aren’t as common as the others. The scenes involve anal penetrations of toys and other large items. Fisting does occur, but it (sadly) isn’t as common as one might hope for on such a site. Many of the earlier scenes involve a lot of enema play, but that seems to have mostly disappeared from the newer scenes. Since fisting and enemas aren’t common, that was always a big selling point for me, so I’m disappointed to see it dialed back. Another change I’ve noticed is that it isn’t as edgy as it once was. This is highly subjective, but it seems to me that a lot of the newer scenes are more mainstream, if you can call any of this ‘mainstream.’ The older scenes are amazing to watch, with a lot of enema action. Many of the newer scenes are styled more like an anal scene you’d expect from Evil Angel, for example. All the technical bits are the same, but the newer scenes just seem more tame. Many of the scenes have a BDSM undertone, and this could be a factor for a prospective subscriber. There isn’t a huge variety in models, which is a bit of a negative for me, but then again there probably aren’t that many models willing to do scenes like this. The fetish models you might expect to see are here: Dana DeArmond, Amy Brooke, Bobbi Starr and Amber Rayne all make multiple appearances, and they always give 110%. But it would be nice to see some fresh faces more often. This fetish isn’t for everyone, but if you have an ass play interest this site will certainly satisfy you. 06-09-11  01:11pm Replies (1) Review 85 Massage Creep (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of PornPros Network - Discount through TBP / PU - Multiple download options - Streaming available - No DRM - Watermark is small enough to be ignored - Pics available (both separate and screecaps) - Pics available as a zip - Supports download managers - 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date) - Site updates weekly Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review. I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much. But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is. The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session. While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite. This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great. One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene. If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites. 05-17-11  08:10am Replies (4) Review 86 Jurassic Cock (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of PornPros Network - Discount through TBP / PU - Multiple download options - Streaming available - No DRM - Watermark is small enough to be ignored - Pics available (both separate and screecaps) - Pics available as a zip - Supports download managers - 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date) - Site updates weekly Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD - Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.) Bottom Line: I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out. Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy. The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability. As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.) The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996). This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low. This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective. If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this. 05-14-11  09:09pm Replies (2) Review 87 Pornstar Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - When you join through TBP/PU you get full access to the entire site - Huge archive of material - Large volume of DVD porn - Large volume of semi-exclusive stuff - A lot less overlap with other DVD sites that you might expect - Wide range of genres covered - Decent collection of 1990s porn - Good download speeds (not extremely fast, but slightly better than average) - Excellent customer service - new scenes added daily Cons: - Navigation can be confusing - Search function doesn’t work well - Many DVD scenes are listed under a created title that can be confusing (instead of listing it as Taylor Rain in Taylor Rain Gets Fucked in the Ass Volume 74, the scene might be listed as “hot teen brunette fucked in the ass.) - Download limit of 100 files per day (which for most people isn’t too bad, but some of the older scenes are broken down into smaller files so that might cause more of a problem - No HD options on even the newer stuff - Some of the exclusive sites aren’t updating (I can’t and won’t fault PSN for this since the most likely cause is that the model has left the business) Bottom Line: In the past when I’ve had friends ask me how they can turf their collection of 1980s Hustler mags and join the new world of internet porn, I steered them to Videobox. I’ll still do that, but I’ll also tell them to get a membership at PornStar Network too. This is a great site with access to a great mix of DVD porn and some seemingly exclusive stuff too. Many of the best models from Quebec are here. (The site is run out of Quebec, so that makes sense.) The site also features access to over 130 porn studios, some major, some smaller. Some studios have almost 600 DVDs here. The smaller ones less. What surprised me was that there was not as much overlap with Videobox as I expected. Even in the studios that both have, there were titles here that I couldn’t get elsewhere. One factor that could have been a serious negative has been turned into a positive and is a reward for those of us who hang out at TBP/PU. The membership for those who stumble in from the open web is tiered: your basic membership excludes access to “MovieZ” files that make up about 50% of what is on the site. That sucks, unless you join through TBP/PU. Doing so gives you full access to the entire site, and there is a lot of material here. All the extra material that you get is accessed through PSN but it is all watermarked as VideosZ. I can’t say for sure that PSN gets you access to all of VideosZ stuff, but it must be close. If you’re considering a VideosZ membership this might be the better value. Many of the files have some options for download, though the premium stuff through MovieZ is only available as AVI files. Download speeds average about 650MB/sec, though that can get higher on occasion. One problem I encountered several times was that while download speeds remained the same, the navigation speed dropped off to the point where it was frustrating to use. That didn’t happen often, but it was annoying when it did. Pictures are available on most of the exclusive sites, but I don’t download those so I don’t have a lot of detail. Zips are available. Search and navigation functions aren’t up to standard, but once you figure it out you can muck about. Sometimes DVD scenes can be catalogued using a description that makes it harder to find if you’re looking for a star or a title. This probably isn’t relevant now, but when I joined they were in the process of giving PU members full access and I was missed somehow. The customer service was excellent and fast. (Two thumbs up to the TBP staff for their help with this too!) The bottom line is that not only will I recommend this site to porn buddies, I already have. The video quality and navigation are about industry standard, but the sheer volume of porn here makes this an excellent value whether you’re just starting out or whether (like me) you have enough titles to rival the best porn store in the country. To top it off, the material is a good mix of DVD and more exclusive. 01-31-11  03:03pm Replies (0) Review 88 Wired Pussy (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Kink.com network - Huge, huge collection of videos (close to 500 now) - Interesting fetish - Done to typical Kink (very high) standards - A good mix of recognizable stars and fresh faces - Not degrading - Good download speeds - Various formats and quality available - Pictures available - Can download the whole video as one file now – even older ones have been converted - Updates weekly - Very unique, very high production values Cons: - The only real ‘con’ is that like other Kink.com sites this can get a bit repetitive since the featured fetish is so narrow Bottom Line: Wired Pussy is part of the Kink.com network and for anyone who’s read my reviews of other sites from the network you’ll know that I consider Kink.com to be pretty much the best in the business. The premise of WP is simple and fits well with the general BDSM themes in other Kink sites. In WP women are subjected to a mixture of pleasure and pain using electrical instruments. In most of the scenes the women are bound or restrained in some way which really plays to the BDSM theme. The scenes include a fairly lengthy interview with the model where she discusses her limits and clearly gives her consent to what has or is about to happen to her. The scenes vary in length and range from 20 minutes to almost an hour. During that time the submissive woman will be subjected to a wide variety of things from a TENS machine, Violet Wand, cattle prod and various electrified insertables for both the pussy and ass. Like the other Kink sites, the directors make the whole BDSM thing work as a fantasy without degrading the models. At WP, as with all Kink sites that I’ve seen, it is abundantly clear that the models are really into and enjoying what’s happening to them. The production values are high, as is always the case with Kink sites. The look and feel of the set adds to the tension. The models are an interesting mix too. There are a lot of well-known porn stars who make an appearance. This includes some who are known for their BDSM work like Amber Rayne, Bobbi Star and Dana deArmond, and porn stars who aren’t normally seen in BDSM material like Aubrey Addams and Isabella Soprano. Many other models are unknown to me and may be true amateurs. WP is logically laid out and easy to use. There is a good search function if you’re looking for a specific model. Selecting a scene brings you to a separate page where you have a number of options. You can download pictures from each scene as a zip, or you can download the video in any of four formats. HD is available in both mp4 and wmv format for all of the newer scenes. The scenes can be downloaded as smaller clips or as a complete file. Kink clearly understands the value of making the product as user-friendly as possible. Download speeds are decent, being about average for the industry. Are there things I don’t like? Yes, but those are probably more personal preferences. The site is lesbian only which though I have no issue with girl-on-girl, I prefer BDSM to be m/f. That’s pretty minor, I know. The other thing that I don’t like about the site is that like some other Kink sites the niche is so narrow that there is only so much that can be done differently. Many of the scenes all have the same look and feel. There are some scenes that are very different, such as an outdoor shoot in New York, or the mix of water and electricity. The bottom line is simple: if this is an interest of yours, then I can’t imagine you’ll find a site that does it better. 07-25-10  08:44am Replies (0) Review 89 ALS Scan (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Stunning models - All models are young, petite and shaved - Some great scenes on location in Europe and the Caribbean - Pictures and video available - No DRM - HUGE volume of material available - Some public nudity - The public scenes are very well done - Simple, if somewhat dated, navigation Cons: - No search function apart from searching by model - Less public nudity than I expected since it was heavily promoted in the tour Bottom Line: The reason I joined ALS Scan was because the previews showed that there was some public nudity available, and as a big fan of that I joined for that reason alone. While I’m not a big fan of solo softcore sites, I have to admit to being really impressed with ALS Scan. This is an excellent site that offers some stunning women in both videos and pictures. All of the women are pretty much of the same body type – petite and small breasted. For a guy who thinks small-breasted petite women are the best, this makes the site even better. There is a decent mix of Eastern European models and American women. Some porn stars make an appearance too, like Courtney Simpson and Faye Reagan. Most of the models are also fairly young (18-25) and, as the site’s name says, all of the ladies are shaved. So if you like petite, young, shaved models, you should consider a membership on the strength of that alone. Many of the video/picture shoots take place on an indoor set, but there are a lot that are shot in the Caribbean. These are visually outstanding. Apart from solo girl action, there is some peeing, some toy and speculum use and some girl/girl stuff. All of it is well shot. The videos are classed into two broad categories: masturbation and photo shoot. The photo shoot scenes are pretty interesting as they give a behind-the-scenes perspective on what goes on. I joined because the site promised some public nudity. There is some of that, but not a lot. What is there is excellent though, and for a big fan of public stuff that alone was worth the price. All the public nudity is done in Europe with European models. For a site into solo girls, they really seem to understand public nudity. Unlike some other sites (Nude in LA) the public nudity isn’t matter-of-fact and sterile. It is really well done and the titillation and risk are well presented. They also do something that I’ve never seen before and hope to see more of – that is using body paint to paint a skimpy outfit on a nude model and then send her out to the streets. This is really innovative and a lot of fun to watch. I appreciate that the editors chose to film the painting too – this adds to the fun. But ALS Scan also has the technical side right too. They offer several different choices of resolution with the HD being visually stunning. Other reviewers have covered more of the technical stuff below. One drawback is that there is no search function. I had no way to easily find the public nudity even though each scene was categorized in that way. Likewise, there is no way to separate out the photo shoot scenes from that masturbation scenes. Some search function would be an improvement. I may not be a big fan of solo girl sites, but I’m now a big fan of ALS Scan. The people behind ALS present some stunning models in well-shot scenes and make it available through an easy-to-use and modern website. Overall, an excellent value. 05-04-10  04:44pm Replies (4) Review 90 Society SM (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Membership in 5 sites for the price of 1 - Huge amount of material - Download speeds (1MB/s and 1.5MB/s) as advertised - Many big-name porn stars - Many beautiful models - No over-emphasis on one body type – most people will find models they like - Pictures and video available - Pictures are available zipped - No download limits - One of the best BDSM sites available Cons: - Videos are broken up into segments (the segments mark a different part of the scene, but no full download is available) - Video links are hidden within picture galleries, not readily available - Can get repetitive – same settings, same equipment used frequently - Older videos are smaller and play in Quick Time Bottom Line: Society SM (SSM) is one of five sites available through a membership to any one of those five sites. (This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint.) This bundling seems to be new, and creates an amazing value for BDSM fans. This review will look at SSM specifically, though much of it will also be applicable for the other sites. SSM is a large site, having been in existence since about 2004. They have over 200 models, and many of those models have multiple scenes on the site. For quantity, this site is a great value. For quality, this site is also an excellent value. The video is available in two formats, though I only downloaded the .wmv format. Download speeds are advertised at 1MB/s and I achieved those speeds consistently. I’m not a technical guy so I can’t really translate the video into technical specs, but I can say that it is comparable to what is available on other sites. If SSM has one failing, it can be blamed on an embarrassment of riches. The site is so large that the number of models and scenes using the same settings, equipment and techniques actually starts to become a bit boring. The number of settings is limited, and the equipment used (even though it is innovative and creative) remains a constant throughout many of the scenes. For many scenes, the only variable is the model herself. Don’t read this as me saying “one negative aspect to this site is that it offers too much porn,” since that isn’t possible. But they could use different settings. The scene with Julie Night, for example, is shot outdoors and has a completely different feel to it. More outdoor work, or more in a setting other than the dungeon would be great. As for the models, they are top notch. Many popular porn stars seem to have passed through SSM’s dungeon. I’m a big BDSM fan and always appreciate seeing a mainstream porn star on a BDSM site to see their reactions. One important thing to note is that this isn’t a site that degrades women. There is nothing inherently degrading about being a sub, and these Doms know this. It is fun and interesting to watch some of these women explore a unique sexual interest. If you’re a fan of BDSM my recommendation is that you get a membership to SSM. You won’t be disappointed. Maybe a bit bored eventually, but not disappointed. 03-30-10  04:33pm Replies (5) Review 91 VideoBox (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - It’s Videobox, one of the largest sites on the internet - Huge collection of videos (7500+ DVDs) - No DRM - Different file sizes for different download capabilities - Five updates a day - Seem to listen to user comments and complaints - Adding more older (1990s) DVDs Cons: - Sometimes bigger isn’t always better - Quality of some of the videos is questionable - It’s fairly clear they push quantity over quality Bottom Line: Yes, I know Videobox has been reviewed here many times before so I won’t simply rehash everything that you can read below. I’ve said this before – if you’re new to collecting internet porn a membership at this site is essential. Most porn video stores wouldn’t have the volume that VB has. If you’re just starting out this will take you much more than a month to get through unless you have a really narrow niche you’re looking for. The other site a newbie needs to spend some time at is American Vice. I’m amazed that VB and AV don’t overlap much more than they do. The up-side to this is that you can download from one knowing that you probably won’t find it on the other. I first took out a VB membership in 2005 and maintained that without a break until late 2008. After that I switched to taking a monthly membership a few times a year. If you’re new to the site, expect to stay a while. There have been some subtle changes that I’ve noticed over the past little while. One is that they seem to have been listening to a lot of complaints by users that the DVDs were heavily skewed to anal themes. Some people took to calling the site “AnalBox.” In my current stay at VB I can report that there does appear to be a reduction in anal themed DVDs. I’ll leave it to you to decide if this is good or bad. (The Rearadmiral, though, thinks it’s bad.) In my opinion, the switch away from anal (which I never thought was out of proportion with the industry – anal is popular people!) means that VB doesn’t have some anal scenes from some of the hottest new girls in the biz. Stars like Aubrey Addams and Dakoda Brookes do anal, but there aren’t a lot of their anal scenes on VB. I suspect that this is partly a response to complaints. There are also a lot more European videos. Some of these are decent, many aren’t. When they promise five updates a day they have to have access to a lot of videos and they seem to have sourced a lot from Europe. I like European movies, but I prefer U.S. stuff because I find it easier to keep track of the stars I like. Anal or not, one issue is that they really seem to focus on quantity over quality. Some of the videos are really bad. I mean generally bad, not just “I don’t like this fetish’ bad. One thing I liked was that they are also adding some older (1990s) titles. Yes, I know this is a preference thing too, but it does add to the variety. Apart from adding a lot of European content they are obviously continuing to expand their American lines too. Since my last membership they’ve added J.M. Productions, for example. Overall, this site remains a must-have membership if you like porn DVDs. You can’t please everyone all the time, but this site tries and frequently succeeds. (Please note that nothing above is intended to apply to the two extra-cost bonus sites. I’ve not had a membership to either and can’t say anything about them.) 02-10-10  01:59pm Replies (5) Review 92 Pissing.com (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: • It’s a Kink.com site so it is backed a reputable company • Exclusive videos • Hardcore, but not misogynistic • Some very beautiful models and some interesting set-ups • Photos and videos, as well as a trailer for each shoot • Weekly updates (Tuesday) • Long videos – most are around 30 minutes • No DRM • Zips available for the pictures and videos • Fast downloads (I average 350+ kb/sec – that’s at least 100kb/sec faster than I get with Videobox) Cons: • Site is still small because it is new, but it updates weekly • No options for file sizes Bottom Line: Pissing.com is the latest offering from Kink.com. If you like fetish videos, then you probably already know Kink. Kink is probably the premier fetish site on the web today. (I say “probably” only because I don’t know of any company that does it better.) The set-ups are pretty much the same – the girl starts clothed, and in most cases she starts the peeing by doing it herself. Then one or more guys come in to add to the fun. Pissing.com is different from other sites that I know of that feature peeing. Max Hardcore does pissing as part of a rough sex scene, unlike Pissing.com which makes pissing the sole focus. The only other site where I’ve had a membership is Piss Mops, which is part of the Meat Members group. Like Max, Piss Mops is pretty misogynistic, and that would be a turn off for lot of fans who are just into watersports and not seeing women degraded. I know this sounds strange, but Pissing.com doesn’t degrade the women. The women seem to be willing and eager participants. Another benefit of pissing.com is that since pissing is the whole focus, the videos are long for this genre. The average video is probably 30 minutes long. This is good, but the trade-off is that the models don’t get a real hosing off. Most times the pisser takes his time. Since I labeled the pissers as male above, that raises an issue that some people may find fault with. The site is primarily male on female pissing. There is some female on female, but not much. I prefer male on female, but as the site grows, maybe those of you who like f-on-f will get more. File sizes for videos average 250MB and can be downloaded as a zip, though it still unzips into a number of smaller videos (usually 3 to 4). This is a great feature that is used throughout Kink sites. Photos are also available as a zip. There are no options for file sizes but the resolution is fairly good. The videos aren’t DVD quality, but they are still very good. The bit rate is 2140bps, with the screen resolution being 960x540. There is a small but unobtrusive watermark in the lower left corner. The site is new, so it isn’t too big right now, but the webmaster says that there will be weekly updates on Tuesdays. I have no doubt that this is the case as every other Kink site updates weekly. (To give full marks to Kink.com, when they stopped updating Water Bondage they informed everyone. Lesser sites would just stop and continue to collect money.) I know I might be accused of being a Kink.com shill, but apart from being a very satisfied customer I have no relationship with them. All of their sites are top quality – I’d go so far to say that they set the standard. If you like fetish stuff, check out Kink. I can report that they are also customer oriented too. I had a password problem (of my own making) with a membership to another Kink site and they responded to my email in less then 24 hours and they recommended and implemented a quick and easy solution. 11-28-08  04:33pm Replies (1) Review 93 Public Disgrace (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Kink hits another home run. - Very unique videos if you're into bondage and voyeurism together. - Videos, sound, locations, models are all up to Kink's usual standards (which is to say excellent) - Download speeds are decent. Cons: - Site is small as it just opened (as of the date I'm writing this). Given it's current size the price is a bit high. Bottom Line: Kink has knocked another one out of the park. Just for the benefit of those who don’t know Kink’s work, they are a BDSM-themed group with a number of sites. Because of the twists that they add to the BDSM theme the sites tend to be very innovative, like Fucking Machines or Water Bondage. The tone of the videos isn’t demeaning though like you get with Max Hardcore or some of the stuff from Sweet Entertainment Group. Kink goes out of its way to make it clear that this is all consensual, but they also do that in a way that doesn’t interfere with the overall fantasy of the scene. Public Disgrace is the newest addition to the Kink stable. The theme is public humiliation, public bondage and public sex. If that is something that you’re interested in, this site warrants a look. As of today (October 7, 2008) there are only nine videos posted. While that doesn’t seem like a lot you have to consider the production values of those nine scenes. Kink’s standards are second to none in the industry. Consider that Kink bought and uses a huge old armory in San Francisco. They take their business seriously. As it stands now with the nine available videos, they can be classed into two distinct types. There are the videos shot (apparently) in Eastern Europe using Eastern European models on public streets, buses, etc, and then there are the videos shot in Kink’s armory in San Francisco. Obviously the American authorities would be less likely to turn a blind eye to a bound girl walking naked down the street, so the ‘public’ element in the American videos means bringing in a bunch of guys to have their way with a bound woman. I know this sounds like just a gangbang, but adding bondage adds a whole new and unique element. (Check out Sarah Jane Ceylon’s video for proof of that) As for the Eastern European videos that are truly public, I find that there is a bit of a cringe factor. I have no idea how many of the people watching are warned, but I suspect that Kink does go to some effort to make sure that no minors are around and that no one who doesn’t want to be exposed to this is exposed. There is a bus scene with Valentina Blue that has to have the cooperation and consent of everyone on the bus. If Kink does get those permissions they keep them hidden so as not to spoil the public fantasy. Price will be an issue, and I agree with that. Right now the price seems high for only having nine videos available. (I’m assuming that Kink will follow its normal weekly update schedule.) I can’t argue with someone who says that the price is too high right now, but I can add this: if you like this kind of material, you will not find better on the ‘net. If you have only a passing interest in this, then the value may not be there. If, like me, you have an interest in this, the value is there even with only nine videos right now. Overall this is an excellent site that will undoubtedly get larger over time. 10-07-08  07:44am Replies (4) Review 94 The Training Of O (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: •Very unique – it’s more about the training than hardcore sex, though there is sex •Fast download speeds •It may not look like there is a lot of content, but the clips are long •Beautiful women Cons: • Updates are only once a week (but since this is entirely their own product I can forgive that) • Updates appear to be staggered (in other words they don’t upload one training day per girl in sequence – that means that if you like a particular girl you may need to hang around for a couple of months to get all her stuff) • There is a lack of continuity in the scenes which takes away from the realism. For example, the girl might have welts on her ass that are ‘gone’ right after that. Bottom Line: Excellent site and promises to get better as more material is added. I’ve never seen a site quite like this. I also plan to take out memberships on other sites on the Kink network based on my positive experiences with this site. Obviously if you have little or no interest in , or are offended by BDSM, D/s, stuff then you shouldn’t bother with a membership. If you do like this stuff I can’t imagine that there is a better site out there. The premise is pretty simple: take a willing woman and submit her to four days of training. At the end she’s a submissive slut. I highly recommend this site if you are into this kind of kink. 08-26-07  09:25am Replies (0) Review 95 Perv City (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 300 scenes - 30+ are exclusive to this site - Supports download managers (but links time out in 10-15 minutes) - High production values - Top models in the business - Not misogynistic, the models are obviously having fun - Tons of ass play and anal sex Cons: - Very large file sizes - Some may see his work as repetitive, formulaic - 90% of the scenes here aren't exclusive - Scene links time out (10-15 minutes) Bottom Line: Most readers here will know Mike Adriano’s work and those who do will either have a solidly pro or con opinion of it. He’s not polarizing because his work is like Max Hardcore, because it certainly isn’t, but his work isn't for everyone. For those who don’t know Adriano’s work, it’s fair to say that he has a signature look and feel to his scenes. Most of his scenes are shot in a combination of an outdoor setup and an indoor room. He only shoots the biggest stars in the business, and his scenes all have a definite ass theme to them. Even those rare Adriano scenes that don’t feature anal sex are still ass-focused. Other things you’ll see a lot of are sloppy blowjobs, lots of drool, ball-licking, male-on-female rimming, many scenes have female-on-male rimming and tons of anal sex. It’s important to note that while some sites could treat these sex acts in a way that was degrading to the female models that doesn’t happen here. There is no hint of D/s or misogyny here; the models really look to be having fun and Mike Adriano is truly an ass worshipper. Some may find fault that most of his scenes follow a formula but my thought is that since he found a formula that works there’s nothing wrong with sticking to it. The site is broken down into five ‘sites’ – Anal Overdose, Chocolate BJs, Oral Overdose, Banging Beauties, Up Her Asshole – but the main site has all the scenes. The sub-sites are great as filters but don’t go into this thinking you’re getting access to several distinct sites. There are currently about 300 scenes available but a prospective member needs to know that only about 30 of these are exclusive. Adriano is a prolific director and performer and is one of the leading directors at Evil Angel. He also shoots for Bang Bros. A member here will find a lot of the same EA scenes on this site too. The good news is that this lack of exclusivity is factored into the price. In my opinion the price of the membership is fair even if all you want are the exclusive scenes. Each scene opens into a separate page with only one option to stream and three download options, all of which are MP4: 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 704x480. I’m not sure how they’re encoded but the file sizes are a lot larger than I’m used to seeing for similar specs. The 720p files are all around 3GB each and the 1080p files can top out at more than 5GB. The file sizes may be an issue for some users but given the quality of the porn I didn’t find it an issue. The file sizes may also be a reflection of the fact that most of the scenes are near an hour long and many are over an hour long. The site supports download managers but the links do time out after 10 or 15 minutes. The download speeds varied from okay to great, but given the size of many of the files it wasn’t possible to queue up more than two or three 720p scenes at a time. The site updates with a new scene being added approximately every three days. An important point, however, is that only one exclusive scene is added per month. I didn’t look all that hard, but if there are photos on the site they aren't obvious. It’s fair to say that Adriano’s work is geared to video collectors anyway. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that is definitely worth joining. If you like high-quality videos of the top names in the business doing some nasty things and enjoying it, then this site is for you. If you’re already a Mike Adriano fan you just need to be aware that 90% of the scenes here are available elsewhere, mostly on Evil Angel. But if you are truly a Mike Adriano fan the membership fee is still worth it for the exclusive scenes. 05-23-15  09:32am Replies (4) Review 96 Roxy Raye (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Provides photos and videos in an under-served niche - Wide variety of anal-themed videos - 235 videos - 185 photo sets - Updates with a new video every three days or so - Has live cam shows regularly - All but a few videos are exclusive - Part of a small network - Supports DL managers - Active webmaster Cons: - 50GB daily download limit, but there is also a 10GB / hour limit. - Probably a bit too extreme for many porn viewers - Streaming begins on opening a scene link Bottom Line: I seem to start off a lot of reviews with this statement: this site is definitely NOT for everyone. A regional brewery near here used to have a tag line: “Those who like it, like it a lot.” The same might be said of this extreme anal play. Roxy Raye exists in a very narrow niche of extreme anal play. The only other site I know of that is similar is hotkinkyjo, the site featuring the Russian model with an expandable colon. The big difference is that with Roxy Raye you can download the scenes while with HKJ they are streaming only. I know that any reader who either has no interest in this niche or finds it abhorrent will wonder how I can describe this site as having a broad range of scenes within the extreme anal niche. But Roxy really does cover a broad range of activities, albeit with the common theme of something large going into her ass. There are sex scenes (b/g and g/g), there are IR scenes, there are the large toy insertions, there are pissing videos, there are speculum videos (vaginal and anal), there is fruit and vegetable insertion (hey, she’s looking after her health), there is fisting (vaginal and anal, by self, men and women), there are regular camshows (with downloads available shortly after broadcast), there is some public nudity and there are even rosebuds. And don’t ask what that last thing is. If you don’t know, do yourself a favor and don’t bother learning about it. The site currently has around 235 videos with a new video being uploaded about every three days. A vast majority of these are exclusive, though there are a few uploads of scenes that she’s done for Evil Angel. Approximately 30 of the scenes are downloadable files of the live camshows that she does regularly. I didn’t have an opportunity to take in a live show so I can’t comment on those. The only drawback to the live shows is that prior to mid-2012 they are very low resolution. I suspect that this is dictated partly due to file size because the newer ones aren’t great resolution (640x480 with some at 960x540) but are still as large as 1.5GB. Most scenes have some download options with files being offered as both WMV and MP4 formats. More than one resolution is usually offered too. Obviously the options and resolutions improved as the site kept up with evolving industry standards. The newer MP4s come in at 1920x1080, 3000kb/s and 29fps. That seems like a low bitrate, but the scenes look crisp. The other most common resolution for older, non-HD scenes is 960x540, 2500kb/s. These look fine on a 24” monitor. Photos are also offered, with most of the sets being taken as part of the video shoots. Resolutions vary here too, but most are decent at 1225x816. Photos are updated with a new set being added once every ten days or so. The site layout is relatively simple, and that’s not a bad thing. If you’re familiar with how Hustler looks, it is pretty much the same as that. I can’t find any link between Hustler and this site, but they look a lot alike. While there is no search function there are tags that help sort some things out. The site commits one sin that is too common these days. I may be the only person who dislikes it, but I dislike it a lot: when you open the link to a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish that sites would stop this. There is a download limit of 50GB per day, which is reasonable for a site with so much exclusive material. But there is another limit that is easier to hit. If at any time in a one hour period you exceed 10GB you’ll be shut down for a while. I don’t know how long, but it seems to be an hour or so. The site supports download managers for queuing up scenes and I had no obvious problems with links timing out. The membership includes access to ten sites in total. Normally I’d provide some information on the other sites but in this case most of them are MILF-oriented and therefore not something I have a lot of interest in, so I didn’t spend any time there. Of note too is that there is an active webmaster who responds to questions here and by email. That’s rare and appreciated. The bottom line (pun not intended) is that this is a very good site offering some videos and photos in a rare niche. The site is easy to navigate, the videos are available with some choices, streaming is offered, there are a lot of variations on the main theme and the price is right. The biggest caveat to anyone considering a membership is to make sure you have an interest in this niche. If your porn experience is glamcore then this isn’t the site to dabble in something new. This site is an excellent value and I’d recommend it for anyone interested in the niche. Maybe the whole site can be summed up in something that Roxy says during a scene. How often do you hear an attractive young lady say “I think this is the biggest apple I’ve ever put up my ass”? If you’ve ever heard those words spoken for real before, I need to hang out with you. 02-11-14  08:24am Replies (2) Review 97 Casting Couch X (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 74 scenes posted - All scenes in HD - Stunning models - Large majority of models are fresh and unknown - The male talent is rather ‘talented’ if you like big facials - Updates regularly - Screenshots and photos available - TBP / PU discount Cons: Major cons: - Links time out after approximately 10 minutes - Limited options for members with slower connections Nitpicky cons: - I had trouble with the MPG files (may just be me though) - Scenes may be repetitive - LOTS of ads - Meaningless file names - No tags or ability to sort by scene type Subjective cons: - 3 anal scenes?? Is that it?? - They’re affiliated with BangBros so watch out. Bottom Line: Lately I’ve had a thing for ‘casting’ sites and have been joining anything that looks decent. A week ago that led me to this site. And in case you’re wondering, yes, I know that these are staged, but they’re staged so well that a viewer can get lost in the fantasy. The site dates back to just over a year ago and not much has changed in the way the scenes are shot except for the location being much more upscale in newer scenes. The scenes follow a set formula and rarely deviate from that. Girl walks in, presents her ID, is interviewed, stands and undresses, girl poses nude and fingers herself a bit on the couch, guy standing/girl kneeling blowjob, occasionally becomes guy sitting on couch / girl kneeling blowjob (in some rare scenes with rimming), sex starts with girl standing bent over desk, girl on back on desk, guy laying on back on couch with girl riding, then switch back to girl on knees oral with a damn good facial. Most of the scenes stick pretty close to that formula. Some may find that repetitive, and it is, but it’s saved by the hot female models. You could argue that even the models are formulaic in that they are all in their late teens or early twenties, all are petite (but not skinny) and all but a few have B or C cup breasts. Given the age group, tattoos and piercings are common but not overwhelming. Most of the models are new to me, though I did recognize a few faces that I have seen before. To say that all the models are good looking is either an understatement or an exaggeration depending on your preference. I say the former, but if you prefer larger or older models, then this site may not be for you. The site has a very simple layout that is easy to use. On each page there are 12 scenes shown by a large thumbnail with the model’s name and the date of the upload. There are currently 74 scenes uploaded and it appears that a new scene is added every six days. Each scene is approximately 50 mins long. Opening that thumbnail brings you to a page to access the scene. I’m a big fan of HD material and always download it when it is available, so it may seem odd for me to complain that there aren’t many download options. The choice is HD in MPG or WMV and an MP4 in 750x422. File sizes for the HD files averages 3GB, so this might not work for members with slower internet speeds. I downloaded the WMV version and all of those came in at 1920x1280, 9000kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively, they aren’t bad, but they aren’t the best I’ve seen either. The MP4s look pretty good so they may be a good compromise for slower connections. Still, more choices are better. One problem I had that may be unique to me is that the MPG files stuttered badly. I tried multiple scenes on two computers and used two players and had the same result each time. This may not happen to you, but before you download a lot in MPG you should test them on your computer. Photos and screencaps are available too. The photos are 1500x1000 and the screencaps are 1920x1280. The big difference is that the screencaps aren’t available as zips. The site does support download managers, but the links time out after about 10 mins. Given the file sizes this means that lining up more than three scenes probably won’t work. Also, prepare to rename each file before you download it – they all use the same generic, meaningless name. One annoyance that I can live with is the number of ads on the site. I don’t mind ads if they help keep the site going, but I had one big problem here. Given that the site is affiliated with BangBros, and BB has a reputation for some pretty unethical subscription and billing practices, I avoided even going near the ads for sites I otherwise might be interested in for fear of getting burned with an unwanted subscription. I realize that not everyone will share my opinion on this, but I was disappointed to find only three anal scenes on the site. Many other ‘casting’ sites have a lot of anal because the genre lends itself to that sex act. “But honey, the big money is in anal…” This actually leads me to another problem that may not be a problem, and that’s that there are no tags or meaningful ways to sort the scenes. Why this really isn’t a problem is that with each scene closely following a formula tags are probably unnecessary: look at the model. Do you like her? If yes, you know exactly what she’ll be doing in the scene so download it. The pros far outweigh the cons here when you consider the merits of the site. You have access to over 60 hours of HD porn at a discounted price. The scenes all have some hot, young and fresh models. The production values are high and the scenes all look great. What more could you ask for? I definitely recommend this site. 10-24-13  06:13pm Replies (2) Review 98 My XXX Pass (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site broken down into smaller sites - Lots of excellent quality HD - Affiliated with Gamma Entertainment - Supports download managers - Timeouts occur only after about two hours - Many well-known stars - High production values - Videos offered in multiple formats and wide array of resolutions - Streaming is available - Streaming doesn’t begin as soon as you load the scene page Cons: - No gradual transition from SD to HD - Need to take note of billing for cancellation purposes - A few navigation issues Bottom Line: My XXX Pass might try to act like a network, but it really isn’t. That’s not a bad thing though. It claims (and has) several ‘sites’ but all of that material is made available on this main site, so if all you visit is My XXX Pass then you’ll have had access to everything. There is no disadvantage to doing things this way (though some may say it is an attempt to make the site seem bigger than it is) and the advantage is it offers a quick way to sort by general theme. I’m not into MILF blowjobs, for example, so I can just avoid visiting the ‘site’ that caters to that niche. The ‘network’ contains almost 2500 scenes and these can be sorted by the various sites. The sites are: 1000 Facials, Immoral Live, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Throated. Most of what I write here applies to all the sites, though I do plan on writing a separate review of Immoral Live due to some unique offerings there. As you can tell from the list, the sites are mostly oral-themed. For those wondering (because I did) the scenes on Throated aren’t brutal like many other sites with similar names, and 1000 Facials isn’t a bukkake site (like I hoped it might be). There are some multi-shot scenes but they’re mostly one girl, one guy. (And also in case you’re wondering, there is very little anal on the network. There are 150 scenes listed as having anal but fewer than 10 are available in HD.) The ‘network’ updates regularly with at least one and as many as three scenes being added per day. These are spread across all the sites so don’t take this to mean that you’ll get a new scene added to any of the individual sites each day. In the most recent uploads there are a lot of options available. WMV downloads are offered in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. Mp4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. I downloaded the 1080p and those came in at 1920x1080, 6300 kb/s and 29fps. Average files sizes vary, but since most of the content is only oral they’re short and come in around 1GB. The scenes look great: they’re crisp and sharp and demonstrate some high production values. In less recent uploads, some of the options are narrowed, but the full 1080p is still there. When it comes to file resolutions, there is one point worth noting. The oldest scenes on the site date to 2005 so we can’t expect full HD in those, but the resolutions are quite low with only 160 and 360p being offered in both WMV and mp4. The other issue worth noting is that there wasn’t a gradual increase in resolutions where they added 540p and then a year later added 720p. It just appears that on a certain date (in summer 2009) they flipped a switch and started uploading HD video. There is a blend of HD and SD for a while, but it is disappointing to click on a scene uploaded in late 2009 to find that it is only offered in low res. I don’t want to leave a prospective member with the wrong impression though – this still means you get access to almost 1400 videos with full 1080p available. That’s a great value no matter how you look at it. I experienced a few minor navigations issues. Each page has 15 large thumbnails and the intention is that you can hover your mouse over those and see a brief slideshow of other thumbnails from the scene. It does work, but first a large box with the scene name will appear for a few seconds obscuring the thumbnails. The second issue that may just be an issue with Windows 8 is that hovering over a thumbnail causes it to go blank for a few seconds. I found that I had to wait for the thumb to come back and then wait for the box to disappear before I could see the thumbnails. The site gets the technical bits right: it is well laid out, easy to use, supports download managers (with reasonable timeouts of at least two hours) and has good download speeds. The scenes themselves are well done with good lighting and editing. The staff and male talent don’t fall into the trap of thinking that the scenes are about anything other than the female models. One caveat with any site managed through Gamma Entertainment, as this is: they’re a reputable company but pay attention to where you’re being billed from. They don’t use common billers and they seem to have a bunch of proprietary billing companies. Take note of the billing site name as that will be necessary when you want to cancel. The bottom line is that this ‘network’ has some great porn and they make it easily accessible. The production values are high and the HD videos look great. The content is mostly oral so if that’s something you like you can’t go wrong with a membership here. 09-07-13  07:01am Replies (18) Review 99 Innocent High (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of a large teen-themed network - Close to 350 videos now uploaded - Updates regularly but not on any obvious schedule - Site now offers HD in mp4 format - Bills through Epoch - Supports download managers - Many new models just starting out in the adult business Cons: - Slower download speeds than with similar networks - The same male talent appears too often - Not much anal Bottom Line: I’m a huge fan of teen-themed sites with the young models (18-20ish) playing schoolgirls. I suspect that this is a common fetish for a lot of men. While this is a niche that is served fairly well, I’d never say no to a well-done site, and this is a pretty decent site. This is the second time I’ve been a member here and was enticed to join when the network (Team Skeet) offered a special discount on top of the discount they already offer us. I liked the site the first time I was a member there and they’ve made some improvements that made it worth a revisit. As I noted last time, the theme is schoolgirls and the setting is almost always a classroom. This obviously limits the kinds of scene setups that are available which can make the scenes a bit repetitive. There are only so many scenarios that can be done within these limits and they’ve done them all frequently. The good news, however, is that even though the scene set-ups can be repetitive the model’s appearance and ‘skills’ keep the scenes interesting. The site books some of the freshest new faces in porn so it is worth a membership just to see the latest crop of models. The site is quite large offering just shy of 350 scenes. It continues to update but the update schedule is fairly irregular. There is at least one update per month though there are many months with three or four updates. Keep in mind that this site is part of a network so the other sites are updating too. The biggest change that happened since I was last a member here 18 months ago is a significant improvement in video quality. When I was last a member here the only file format was WMV and while they advertised the scenes as being available in HD their definition of HD was pretty loose. Starting in October 2011 the site made a big move forward by offering true HD in mp4 format. A decent resolution WMV is still available but the scenes are now also offered in mp4 SD, 720p HD and 1080p HD. In the interests of balancing video quality with hard drive space I opted for the 720p. Those come in at 1280x720 at a 2400kb/s bitrate and 30fps. Subjectively they look great and I can safely assume that the 1080p would look even better. The negatives to this site are pretty minor, and some of them are also admittedly subjective. The one objective problem is that download speeds still tend to be lower than I expect at a quality site like this. I’m used to seeing near 7MB/s with Internet Download Manager and most of the time here I was getting no more than 4MB/s. (As an aside, TBP’s review notes that there may be a download limit and that there may be issues with download managers. I had no problems. The site’s TOS does say that they ‘may’ impose a limit but I purposely went looking to see if I’d get shut out and I called it quits at 30+GB in one day and had no limit imposed. Also, I had no issues using a download manager and the links didn’t time out.) The other negatives are, admittedly, subjective. The site uses the same male talent in a lot of their scenes and I find that makes the scenes even more repetitive. I think of the male talent in a straight porn scene as furniture, but I do wish these guys would change the furniture more frequently. The last (subjective) negative is that on a site with almost 350 scenes there are only three anal scenes. I realize that this is likely a reflection of the newness of many of the models, but guys, give the members some variety! The last time I reviewed this site I found it to be a great value because of the combination of some great teen-themed porn and a TBP discount. With more scenes available and being added regularly this site continues to be a great value and if this is your kind of porn then I’d highly recommend joining. (And if you act soon the extra discount may still be available.) 12-10-12  04:10am Replies (5) Review 100 Innocent High (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - TBP Discount ($17.95) - 291 Scenes (approx 30 mins each) - Appears to be all or mostly exclusive content on this site - Videos available in multiple ways - Pictures and screenshots available - Bills through CCBill - Good mix of well known and lesser known models - Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager and it works fine) - Part of a network (8 sites in total) Cons: - Definition of HD is pretty flexible - Download speeds below average - Updates aren’t dated - Hello??? Have the directors never heard of anal sex? Bottom Line: Innocent High is a site within a network that features young, though fully legal, models in various school-oriented scenes. All the standard clichés are here, the most common being teacher and student, or principal and student. I could complain that these are repetitive and overused, but I couldn’t come up with anything better. Regardless of the setup, the goal is the same in all the scenes: show off the youthful model in a well-lit, well-shot scene with good camera work and editing. If all porn sites did those basics this well the porn world would be a better place. As for the models, there is a great mix of well known models like Aubrey Addams (looking mind-numbingly beautiful in her pre-surgery days), Ashli Orion and Eden Adams. There are plenty of less recognizable models too, though they are all young and very good looking. Most are petite and small-breasted, though there are lots who are better endowed too. There are 291 scenes now on the site with 171 of these advertised as being HD. The problem with that claim is that the site’s definition of HD has varied a bit over time. Some are 1280x720 at 4500kbps while others are 960x540 at 1800kbps. They all look good on a monitor though I haven’t tried them on a TV yet. The site offers more options to view the videos than I’ve seen elsewhere, so there will be something for all tastes and connections. Streaming is available in various resolutions, though I can’t say anything more than it looks good. Downloads are available in different ways and resolutions. Your download options are to download the full video, download a ‘best of’ clip, download it in 3 segments or in 1-minute segments, or the trailer. Nobody can complain that they can’t get the scene how they want it. For downloads, the ‘full’ offers the most choices with WMV (in up to three resolutions), Quicktime, Mpg and IPod. “HD” is as listed above and the next lower resolutions come in at 640x480 or 640x360. I assume this depends on when the scene was shot and added. I can’t give a clear picture on when the uploads were because they aren’t dated. Also for that reason I can’t give an indication of the update schedule, though it certainly looks like it is updating. Pictures are also available, as are screenshots. The pics are available as zips and come in at 1050x700. They look good, but obviously not hi-res. There are no big negatives to this site. If I had to pick on one I’d point out that the download speeds are lower than I’ve seen at other big sites. Using Free Download Manager I get 1100KB/s, which is 700+ lower than with most sites. Also, TBP has a warning about download managers. They don’t specify what the issue is, but I had no problems. This site has the quality and quantity to make the TBP discounted price an excellent value – even without being part of a network. Couple it with the 7 other sites in the Team Skeet network and it becomes even better. 06-18-11  12:21pm Replies (2) Shown : 76-100 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.46 seconds.